Faik Orucov, MD, Sinan Goker,MD, Abraham Solomon, MD, Joseph Frucht- Pery, MD Comparison of Tecnolas and Allegretto laser in situ keratomileusis.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Long-term Outcomes of Photorefractive Keratectomy for Anisometropic Amblyopia in Children Evelyn A. Paysse, MD, David K. Coats, MD, Mohamed A. W. Hussein,

Advertisements

Advanced Surface Ablation Insert name/ Practice name/ Logo here if desired.

Laser Eye Surgery Technology LASIK. Anatomy of the eye.

1 Comparison of bitoric with monotoric laser in situ keratomileusis for the correction of myopic astigmatism with the Nidek EC-5000 Laser. By Mohamed Abdul-Rahman.

LASIK Surgery Camellia Gardens Eye Center. What is LASIK? Procedure uses computer controlled laser to reshape cornea Surgical procedure to correct –Myopia.

LASIK Surgery Magnolia Gardens Eye Center. What is LASIK? Procedure uses excimer laser to reshape cornea Surgical procedure to correct myopia, hyperopia,

29/01/05www.drmathys.be BSCRS 2005 P R K in 2005 Bernard Mathys, MD Brussels.

Monovision for Presbyopia Insert name/ Practice name/ Logo here if desired.

Steve Schallhorn MD Myth Busters in Patient Selection for LASIK Steve Schallhorn MD.

Bandage Soft Contact Lenses Role in Pain Control After LASEK: Does Lens Type Make a Difference? Darrel K. Carlton, MD Lieutenant Colonel, Medical Corps.

Topographically-guided photo-refractive keratectomy (TG-PRK) for complications of refractive surgery David TC Lin, MD, FRCSC Simon Holland, MD, FRCSC,

Tarek Abdel-Wahab, MD Clear Vision Center Cairo,Egypt Clinical Consultant of Schwind and technolase.

Wavefront-Guided Laser Surgery. 2 How the eye works Light rays enter the eye through the clear cornea, pupil and lens. These light rays are focused directly.

By Kelsey Matthews. History  LASIK stands for laser in situ keratomileusis  Developed in 1991 by a greek doctor Ioannis Pallikaris  Purpose to correct.

Phakic IOL. 2 How the eye works Light rays enter the eye through the clear cornea, pupil and lens. These light rays are focused directly onto the retina,

INTRAOPERATIVE FLAP COMPLICATIONS IN LASIK SURGERY PERFORMED BY OPHTHALMOLOGY RESIDENTS IN TRAINING Arturo Gómez-Bastar MD Arturo Ramirez-MirandaMD Lorena.

Laser Vision Correction for Myopia, Myopic Astigmatism, Hyperopia and Hyperopic Astigmatism with CustomVis Solid State Laser (213nm) THE ROYAL AUSTRALIAN.

Refractive Lens Exchange. 2 How the eye works Light rays enter the eye through the clear cornea, pupil and lens. These light rays are focused directly.

Bilateral phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation for bilateral corneal ectasia after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) Department.

Refractive Errors & methods of correction M. F. Al Fayez, MD, FRCS.

LASIK What are the Limits ?

PRK Enhancement with Mitomycin - C after LASIK - a case series

©DZ Reinstein 2009 One and two-year clinical outcomes of LASIK for high hyperopia Dan Z Reinstein MD MA(Cantab) FRCSC 1,2,3,4.

Comparison of Orbscan and Ultrasound Pachymetry Measurements Faik Orucov, MD, Abraham Solomon, MD,Ziv Caspi, David Landau, MD, Eyal Strassman, MD, and.

Effects of IOP Lowering Agents on Myopic Regression after Refractive Surgery Lim, Taehyung M.D., Hong, So Jin M.D., Cho, Beom Jin M.D., Ph.D. Chung Kyu-Hyung.

Mike P. Holzer, MD Annett Mannsfeld, MSc Angela Ehmer, MSc Gerd U. Auffarth, MD International Vision Correction.

Femto-Lasik after corneal transplantation

Phacoemulsification in eyes with previous anterior chamber phakic IOL surgery Walton Nosé, MD, PhD 1,2 Adriana dos Santos Forseto, MD 1 Mariana Ávila,

Neeti Parikh, MD Fuxiang Zhang, MD Department of Ophthalmology Henry Ford Hospital A Comparison Of Patient Satisfaction With Modified Monovision Versus.

Professor Ioannis Pallikaris MD, PhD.  Different mediums (Nd:YAG Crystals vs ArF Gas)  Less optics for the shaping of the pulse  No use of toxic gasses.

Evaluation of Safety and Effectiveness of Multizone Laser Vision Correction in Presbyopic Patients ASCRS 2010 Paul Van Saarloos PhD – CustomVis, employee.

Evaluation of Zonal Equivalent Keratometry Readings After LASIK Timmy Kovoor, MD Orkun Muftuoglu, MD V.Vinod Mootha, MD Steven Verity, MD R. Wayne Bowman,

Authors: Col. Assoc.Prof. Jiri Pasta, MD, PhD. Katerina Buusova Smeckova, MD, MBA Jaroslav Madunicky, MD Eva Vyplasilova, MD Department of Ophthalmology.

March 2011 Bascom Palmer Eye Institute University of Miami Elaine Wu, M.D. Ana Paula Canto, M.D. William Culbertson, M.D. Sonia Yoo, M.D. Financial disclosure:

Endothelial Dystrophy Association with Hyperopia Glenn W. Thompson, M.D. Timothy P. Page, M.D. Authors have no financial interest.

Young Joo Shin, 1 Sang Mok Lee, 2 Jin Choi, 3 Eun Ryung Han, 4 Dong Hae Kim 4 1 H ally m University Gangnam Sacred Heart Hospital 2 3The Armed Forces Medical.

LADARVision4000 Vs VISX CustomVue LADARVision4000 Vs VISX CustomVue CustomCornea CustomCornea A Comparison of Wavefront Guided Refractive Surgery outcomes.

Refractive Accuracy of LASIK Using the IntraLase and Zyoptix BACKGROUND Wavefront guided customized lasik procedures are designed to correct both lower.

«ASTANA VISION», ASTANA city, Republic of KAZAKHSTAN Igor Remesnikov, Vladimir Kim Refractive and visual outcomes after Femto-SubBowman’s Keratomileusis.

Myoung Joon Kim, MD / Sara Yoon, MD Tracy Purcell, PhD / David J Schanzlin, MD L aser In Situ Keratomileusis versus Photorefractive Keratectomy for the.

LASIK Surgery Student Name. What Is LASIK? Surgical procedure to correct myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism. LASIK is acronym for laser assisted in situ.

Laser subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) retreatment surgery Colm McAlinden, 1,2 Jonathan Moore, 2,3 1 School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster,

Comparison of LASIK and Mitomycin-C Assisted LASEK for Correction of Refractive Errors After Cataract Surgery Dr. Nitin Balakrishnan, Crystal Vision Laser.

Faik Orucov*, MD, Sinan Goker*,MD, Abraham Solomon**, MD, Joseph Frucht-Pery**, MD *Refractive Surgery Department, ISTANBUL SURGERY HOSPITAL Istanbul,

10 year follow up of LASIK surgery for low to high levels of myopia Qasim Qasem FRCS, Caitriona Kirwan MRCOpth, Michael O’Keefe FRCS. Institutional Affiliations:

Abdulrahman Al-Muammar, MD, FRCSC

Sherman W. Reeves, MD, MPH 1,3,4 ; Jacob A. Kozisek, OD 1,2 ; Noumia Cloutier-Gill, OD 1,2 ; David R. Hardten, MD 1,2,3,4 Accuracy of Scheimpflug Imaging.

Visual and IOP Outcomes after PRK in Pigment Dispersion Syndrome [Poster Number: P190] Kraig S. Bower, Denise A. Sediq, Charles D. Coe, Keith Wroblewski,

Wavefront-guided Ablation Retreatment in Myopic Eyes Engy M Mohamed MD, Orkun Muftuoglu MD, R.Wayne Bowman MD, V. Vinod Mootha MD, H. Dwight Cavanagh MD,PhD,

Outcome of Flap Complications Following LASIK Surgery

Comparing laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy in different eyes of the same patient. Joseph Frucht-Pery, MD, Faik Orucov, MD*,

Faik Orucov*, MD, Joseph Frucht-Pery, MD, David Landau, MD, Eyal Strassman, MD, Abraham Solomon, MD Clinical outcome of thin corneas after laser in situ.

Custom Topographic Neutralizing Technique (TNT) with Topographically-Guided (TG) laser to correct complications David T.C Lin Simon Holland ASCRS 2010.

Presbyopia CT Zyoptix Hyperopia Advanced (Rochester) Nomogram Scott MacRae MD Professor of Ophthalmology Professor of Visual Science University of Rochester.

THE EBK PROCEDURE FOR CORRECTION OF REFRACTIVE ERRORS

Comparison of Varying the Ablation Diameter in LASIK and LASEK:The Effects on Anterior Chamber Depth (ACD) and Regression at 3 months Minoru Tomita, MD,

Section first # represents how far away from the chart the person can stand and still be able to read a particular line second # is how far away.

Laser in Situ Keratomileusis Decentration With and Without Active Eye-Tracking System Mark Edmund Johnston MD FRCSC P 167: The author.

Camellia Gardens Eye Center

Eun Chul Kim, M.D. , Man Soo Kim,M.D.

Wavefront Optimized Retreatment after Prior Wavefront

Topographically-guided photo-refractive keratectomy (TG-PRK) for complications of refractive surgery David TC Lin, MD, FRCSC Simon Holland, MD, FRCSC,

Clinical outcome of thin corneas after laser in situ keratomileusis

LASIK Application in High Myopic Eyes; 10 Years Survey

Is Photorefractive Keratectomy the Laser Vision Correction of Choice?

Comparison of topography-guided (TGL) to standard LASIK (SL) for hyperopia. How important is adjustment for angle kappa? ASCRS 08 A. John Kanellopoulos,

The authors have no financial interest to disclosure

Lasik decentration with the VISX ActiveTrak™ System

Mohamed Abdelrahman Awadalla,FRCS Magrabi Eye Hospital Cairo - Egypt

PERRY S. BINDER, MS MD* San Diego, California

Presentation transcript:

Faik Orucov*, MD, Sinan Goker*,MD, Abraham Solomon**, MD, Joseph Frucht- Pery**, MD Comparison of Tecnolas and Allegretto laser in situ keratomileusis outcomes in hyperopia *Refractive Surgery Department, ISTANBUL SURGERY HOSPITAL Istanbul, Turkey ** Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel

Hyperopia Hyperopia 2D 6% of population Low Hyperopia good vision in young poor vision in adults Hyperopia affects both distance and near vision and is compounded by presbyopia

Hyperopic Correction Thermokeratoplasty Hexogonal keratotomy Keratophakia Keratomileusıs Holmium laser CK H-PRK H-LASIK Phakic IOLs RLE

PROBLEMS IN HYPEROPIA Pts age > 40 - Dry eyes - BMD - More epithelial defects Flap size 9.5 mm - Small eyes and pannus (limbal bleeding)

PROBLEMS IN HYPEROPIA Large area of treatment (Flap size 9.5 mm) Long ablation time Centration is critical

PROBLEMS IN HYPEROPIA Initial overcorrection (myopia) Slow regression [1 y. in high hyperopia] Enhancement is complicated Final K-reading < 50 [D]

Hyperopic correction is significantly more likely to regress regress regression greater than myopic correction. The possibility of regression; hyperplastic healing response of the cornea to fill in this ablated step between the treated and untreated zones, thereby not only resulting in loss of effect over time but also inducing an astigmatic error in case of uneven fill-ins.

PURPOSE To compare visual outcome measurements in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for hyperopia using the Technolas 217 and Allegretto excimer laser. Authors have no financial interests in any of the mentioned products or companies

Two-center retrospective study H-LASIK by the Technolas 217; 50 eyes (Hadassah Medical Organization, Jeruasalem, (2003 and 2005)) H-LASIK by Allegretto excimer laser ; 42 eyes (Istanbul Surgery Hospital, Istanbul, (2004 and 2005)) Mean follow-up 23.1±13.7 months with Technolas 19.3±8.8 months with Allegretto. Inclusion criteria; - SE up to 4.00 diopters (D) of sycloplegic hyperopia, - Minimum F/U 12 months Exclusion criteria; - Incomplete documentation METODS

SE Technolase Allegretto P SE (Mean) Preoperative +2.51±0.78 (D) +2.37±0.81 (D) Postoperative ± ± Technolase Allegretto P Optical zone (Mean) 6.0±0.1mm 6.8±0.25 <0.001 Ablation depth (Mean) 68.1±21.2μ 49.8±18.3μ <0.001 Optical zone & Ablation depth

Higher Myopic overcorrection on the next day Greater regression observed during first month Regression (month 1 to last visit) : Technolase D Allegretto D (P=0.247) Stability

UCVA The postoperative UCVA was significantly lower in eyes treated with Tecnolas on postoperative month 1 (P=.037). At 3, 6,12 months and at last visit postoperatively, no significant differences were noted in UCVA between the two lasers (P=.065 to.473). Technolase Allegretto P UCVA 1 Month 0,69 ± 0,25 0,81 ± 0,26 0, Months 0,80 ± 0,18 0,85 ± 0,18 0,473 Last visit 0,80 ± 0,22 0,86 ±0,17 0,126

PREOPERATIVE LAST VISIT 0.92± ± ± ±0.10 P= P= BCVA

Postoperative (last visit) Technolas Allegretto UCVA 20/ % 69.0% ±0.50 D 69.0% 78.7%, BSCVA loss of 1 lines 11.4% 4.8% gain of 1 lines 19.2% 16.7%. Efficacy & Safety Technolas Allegretto P Safety 1.03± ± Efficacy 0.87± ± Predictability

CONCLUSION Ablation depth was greater with Technolas laser. Visual and refractive results were similar between the Technolas and Allegretto laser systems after 3 months of the procedure.