Key Points in Writing Case Studies

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Business Ethics for Real Estate: A. Glean
Advertisements

Exam Layout.
Analogies: Reasoning from Case to Case
Ethics for the Information Age
Internet Etiquette or Netiquette. Ten Rules Of Netiquette There are Ten rules of Netiquette that everyone who goes online should follow. You should remember.
Ethics Theory and Business Practice 3.1 Kantian Theory – Part One Kant’s Moral Philosophy.
Secular Responses Use of the Embryo. Utilitarianism Based on the idea of the greatest happiness for the greatest number or majority Also based on hedonism.
EQs: What must we understand and do to succeed in our history class
Writing the report.
At the end of this lesson you will be able to:
Ethics and Morality Theory Part 2 11 September 2006.
Ethical Decision Making Process. How to Resolve Ethical Dilemmas in Business Identify relevant facts Identify relevant issue(s) Identify primary stakeholders.
HRM-755 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
Ethical Theories: Deontology and Teleology
ESSAY WRITING Can be fun.
Assignment 2 Case Study. Criteria Weightage - 60 % Due Date – 11 th October 2012 Length of Analysis – 2500 words Leverage % including appendices,
 Letters involving business (personal or corporate) should be concise, factual, and focused.  Try to never exceed one page or you will be in risk of.
Business Ethics BY: Joshua m. Standifer.
What is Ethics. Morality is your sense of right and wrong What is Ethics Ethics is putting morality to practical use in decision making.
AS Philosophy & Ethics Mrs Sudds What are your expectations?
Ethical Theory and Business Chapter Two
Ethics Last Update Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D
Tips for writing good essays. The Essay Structure The essay needs a basic structure to build up your ideas. There are certain ‘ingredients’ needed for.
WRITING CONTENT TO RECOGNIZE AND INCLUDE IN YOUR OWN WRITING ANALYZING AN ESSAY.
How to write your special study Step by step guide.
Modern studies higher Question Stems.
Tentative Unit 1 Schedule Week 2 1/19- MLK Day-No Class 1/21-Using library databases (bring computer to class) 1/23- Intro to Exploratory Narrative & Source.
Ethics - 1 Key Definitions  Moral: “relating to principles of right and wrong”  Ethics: “the discipline of dealing with what is good and bad and with.
Several FACTS or REASONS are discussed rather than only one being REPEATED.
Personal Statement: How to write a personal statements for scholarships.
Ethical Theories Unit 9 Ethical Awareness. What Are Ethical Theories? - Explain what makes an action right or wrong - Have an overview of major ethical.
Scientific Communication
MORAL REASONING A methodology to help people deal with moral dilemmas The Key to doing well on paper 3.
PAPER 3 REMINDERS. THREE SECTIONS Critical Thinking Moral Reasoning Tentative solution.
Much Ado About Nothing.  This powerpoint will give you information and instructions about how to write your compare/contrast essay  Make sure you read.
Evaluation Proposal Defense Observations and Suggestions Yibeltal Kiflie August 2009.
Cornell System of Note-Taking The Cornell Method of note making is a 3 part system of making notes. Making notes, as distinguished from taking notes, is.
1 Technical Communication A Reader-Centred Approach First Canadian Edition Paul V. Anderson Kerry Surman
Moral Reasoning Part II 3/8/2012. Learning Objectives Use knowledge and analyses of social problems to evaluate public policy, and to suggest policy alternatives,
Ethical Decision Making , Ethical Theories
The Moral Philosophy of Immanuel Kant The Ethics of Duty and Reason
Basic Business Communications Nick Mercuro, Austin Moore, John Skinner.
Morality in the Modern World
Christopher Jay Department of Philosophy University of York.
Utilitarian Theory of Ethics Utilitarian theory is a consequentialist approach to judging moral behavior. Consequentialist hold that –consequences count.
CSE 1111 Week 3 Ethical Relativism Basically asserts that there are no standards or rules of behavior that can reasonably be applied at all times and in.
Lecture Notes © 2008 McGraw Hill Higher Education1 Critical Thinking Chapter 13 Writing Argumentative Essays.
1 Technical Communication A Reader-Centred Approach First Canadian Edition Paul V. Anderson Kerry Surman
Appendix © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or.
Chapter 1 What is Biology? 1.1 Science and the Natural World.
Int 2 Critical Essays. Purpose of the Critical Essay A DISCURSIVE essay on a text Presenting an ARGUMENT – clear line of thought which is linked throughout.
Bioethics. How to identify a dilemma  Dilemma: exists when there is no “right” course of action in a certain situation but, instead, several options,
AP STATISTICS LESSON (DAY 1) MAKING SENSE OF SATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE.
Lesson Objective Key Words Lesson outcomes Hypothetical Categorical Imperatives Freedom To evaluate the differences between the Hypothetical and Categorical.
Seminar Three.  1. Review of Work Due  2. Course Content  Virtue Ethics  Abortion  Universal Health Insurance.
DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS (CH. 2.0) © Wanda Teays. All rights reserved.
Writing a Personal Narrative
Deontological Approaches Consequences of decisions are not always the most important elements as suggested by the consequentialist approach. The way you.
Ethical Decision Making. Daniels College Mission.
-what you should include for the different questions. Section A- there is NO choice of question in this section- it will focus on either Vietnam or the.
Consumer choice and ethics Why do we need to think about what we buy? Who?What?Why? Where? When?
Ethics and Values for Professionals Chapter 2: Ethical Relativism
Unit 4: Introduction to Canada
Ethical Dilemmas in Leadership
THE QUESTIONS—SKILLS ANALYSE EVALUATE INFER UNDERSTAND SUMMARISE
Principles of Health Care Ethics
Writing a Personal Narrative
Moral Decision-Making
10th Literature October 31st
Steps for Ethical Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Key Points in Writing Case Studies Here are some key points to keep in mind when writing the required case study analyses. These key points do not take the place of the on- line lectures. Be certain to read over those carefully. There is also a sample case study analysis. Read over that as well.

Point 1 Statements of Facts Number all your statements of facts. Statements of facts must be complete, grammatically proper sentences. Unless there is very good reason to do otherwise, the order of the statements of facts should reflect the order of the information given in the case. Be complete – do not simply repeat in toto what is in the case, but give a complete (full) summary of the relevant information.

Point 2 Ethical Issues In Step 1(B) requires you pick out the ethical issues raised by the statements of facts. Include ONLY statements of facts that raise ethical issues. Only 1 statement of fact per row. For each statement of fact you use in Step 1(B) you need BOTH a explanation of WHY the statement of fact raises an ethical issue and WHAT the potential or resulting harms are.

Point 2 Ethical Issues Explaining WHY the statement of fact raises an ethical issue requires more than simply repeating the statement of fact. You need to explain clearly what the ethical issue is and why it is an ethical issue. For example, stating that a violation of privacy occurs is not an explanation for why this is an ethical issue. Include all of the potential and resulting harms. For example, if there is a violation of privacy, what are the resulting and potential harms of that violation? Be specific and be certain to mention the stakeholders who are affected.

Point 3 Stakeholders Include all of the important stakeholders. Typically (though not always) if someone (something thing, some group of people) is mentioned by name, that is an important stakeholder. Typically (though not always) you should include families together as a single stakeholder. Often only one member of the family is the principal stakeholder. Identify the PRINCIPAL stakeholders – those most directly and significantly affected.

Point 4 Ethical Dilemma The ethical dilemma is your Step II. The ethical dilemma is ALWAYS a single sentence in the form of a question. If you have more than a single sentence for your Step II, then you have an error. The question always looks forward to something that can happen, NOT BACKWARDS to what has already happened? The general form that your ethical dilemma should take is: “Should X do Y?” where X is a stakeholder and Y is some action that has not occurred but which X can choose.

Step IV Ethical Analyses Point 5 Step IV Ethical Analyses The Step III analyses constitute the greatest part of your case study analysis. In each of Step III (A – F) you always need to refer to at least three separate stakeholders. These stakeholders MUST be mentioned in your Step I(C). If they are not mentioned there, you may not use them in Step III. Step III (A – F) constitute the consequentialist (utilitarian) analyses. You need to be specific in terms of the harms and benefits. For example, writing that someone’s privacy has been violated is NOT specific enough. What is the real or potential harm of the violation of the privacy? Be specific and complete in your answers.

Point 5 Step III(G) concerns rights and duties. Rights and duties ALWAYS come in pairs. Thus, each line of your answer under Step III(G) should be made up of a pair of rights and duties. The rights and duties should be specific to the case – e.g., Unless you believe that you can make a strong case of a generic right to happiness and that right is relevant to the case, do not use such a general right. Be as specific as possible – e.g., if you refer to a right to privacy, clearly delineate the scope of that right. Remember that rights and duties may be applicable for employers, employees, the society in the which the organization operates, and the various stakeholders with which the business organization operates.

Point 5 Step III(H – M) concern the Kantian (deontological) analyses of the case. Step III(H – J) deal with disrespect. This is disrespect in the technical Kantian sense, NOT disrespect in the ordinary English language sense. Kantian disrespect has the general form: “Stakeholder A disrespects B if A intends to treat B as only a means to an end”. This means that you MUST clearly identify the stakeholder that is acting with disrespect and the stakeholder that is being treated with disrespect. When doing the Kantian analyses you must focus on the intent of stakeholders, NOT on the consequences of their actions.

Point 5 Step III(K – M) deal with “unlike treatment”. This is NOT unlike treatment in the ordinary English language sense of the expression, but is instead the technical, Kantian sense. The general form your answers should take is: “Stakeholder A treats stakeholder B unlike others if A would not, as a rational and reflective agent, agree that B directing the same treatment to A is fair and equitable.” For example, suppose Tom is sexually harassing Sally. This is unlike treatment since Tom, as a rational reflective agent, would not agree that Sally sexually harassing him is fair and equitable.

Point 6 Step IV (A) requires that you answer your ethical dilemma (from Step II) and justify that answer referring to the relevant parts of your analyses from Step III. First, answer the ethical dilemma. If the ethical dilemma had the form “Should S do Y?”, then your answer should have the form “S should do Y”. (If you believe that S should not do Y, then it will have the form “S should not do Y”.) You must justify your decision. That requires you refer to EACH and EVERY part of Step III that supports your decision and EXPLAIN why that part of Step III supports your decision.

Point 6 Step IV(B) requires that you put your ethical decision into practice. How would you implement your ethical decision? What are the steps needed to implement your ethical decision? Be as specific as possible in terms of the implementation. Step IV(C) asks you to go back to your stakeholders (Step I(C)) and explain HOW your ethical decision will affect your stakeholders. Be as specific as possible.

General Points Answers should always (even if you use bullet lists) be in the form of grammatically proper, complete sentences (that means, amongst other things, ending with a period). Always check spelling and grammar. Use the “spell checker” and “grammar checker” that comes with your word-processing software. Do NOT include a cover sheet. Just begin on the first page with Step 1. Your name and other relevant information should occur in the upper left-hand corner of the first page. Number your pages. Be complete in your answers. Both the descriptive and analytic parts of your case studies must be fully completed. Refer to the online lectures for doing the case studies for additional information.