Problem- Based Learning in STEM Disciplines Saturday, November 10, 2007 JHU/MSU STEM Initiative.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School John D. Bransford, Ann L. Brown, and Rodney R. Cocking, editors.
Stephanie Burba, Noyce Graduate Tyler Ghee, Noyce Scholar Shelby Overstreet, Noyce Scholar Kathryn Crawford, Noyce Graduate Hope Marchionda, PhD Using.
K-6 Science and Technology Consistent teaching – Assessing K-6 Science and Technology © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
Learning Outcomes Participants will be able to analyze assessments
Thinking ‘Behind’ the Steps Engaging Students in Thinking ‘Behind’ the Steps.
1. Principles Learning Assessment Technology 3 Teaching Assessment Technology Principles The principles describe particular features of high-quality.
NCTM’s Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making.
Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Mathematics and Science Education PROM/SE Ohio Spring Mathematics Associate Institute April 27, 2005.
Making Proficiency in Math Soar to Greater Heights November 2, 2006 Claudia Ahlstrom.
Thinking, reasoning and working mathematically
Science PCK Workshop March 24, 2013 Dr. Martina Nieswandt UMass Amherst
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
1 New York State Mathematics Core Curriculum 2005.
Big Ideas and Problem Solving in Junior Math Instruction
Lesson Design: An Overview of Key Tools for Flexible Math Instruction Think about Ms. Christiansen—the teacher in the video. What helps a teacher plan.
Developing Effective Questioning In Teaching Games For Understanding (TGfU) Pearson & Webb, 2008.
INTEGRATED LEARNING: STAGE 4 (SECONDARY COGS) Principles and process.
Literacy in the Mathematics Classroom District Learning Day August 5, 2015.
Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics High School Session 2: Matching Clusters of Standards to Critical Areas in one.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) at Sojourner Douglass College Faculty and Staff Session One Saturday, November 9, 2013.
NCTM Overview The Principles and Standards for Teaching Mathematics.
Engaging Learners and Realizing the Development of Mathematical Practices ALM Conference July 15, 2015 Trena L. Wilkerson Professor, Mathematics Education.
Illinois MSP Program Goals  To increase the content expertise of mathematics and science teachers; 4 To increase teaching skills through access to the.
Institute for Collaborative Research in Education, Assessment, and Teaching Environments for STEM NGSS Resources by CREATE for STEM Institute MSU licensed.
Standards-Based Science Instruction. Ohio’s Science Cognitive Demands Science is more than a body of knowledge. It must not be misperceived as lists of.
Math rigor facilitating student understanding through process goals
The Areas of Interaction are…
1. Principles Equity Curriculum Teaching 3 Assessment Technology Principles The principles describe particular features of high-quality mathematics programs.
© 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. Planning for Developmentally Appropriate Curriculum Chapter 3.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Advantages of Using Children’s Literature provides a motivating introduction to complex curriculum topics mathematical vocabulary can be reinforced and.
Authentic Learning and Assessment Erin Gibbons Five Standards of Authentic Instruction  Higher-Order Thinking  Depth of Knowledge  Connectedness to.
ationmenu/nets/forteachers/2008s tandards/nets_for_teachers_2008.h tm Click on the above circles to see each standard.
Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms Ready, Set, SCIENCE.
PRINCIPAL SESSION 2012 EEA Day 1. Agenda Session TimesEvents 1:00 – 4:00 (1- 45 min. Session or as often as needed) Elementary STEM Power Point Presentation.
Chapter 1 Defining Social Studies. Chapter 1: Defining Social Studies Thinking Ahead What do you associate with or think of when you hear the words social.
PROCESS STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICS. PROBLEM SOLVING The Purpose of the Problem Solving Approach The problem solving approach fosters the development of.
Pedagogy versus Andragogy Debate. Presented by Lynette Favors April 7, 2008.
Teaching to the Standard in Science Education By: Jennifer Grzelak & Bonnie Middleton.
Understanding Problem-Based Learning. How can I get my students to think? Asked by Barbara Duch This is a question asked by many faculty, regardless of.
Educator Effectiveness Academy Day 2, Session 1. Find Someone Who…. The purpose of this activity is to review concepts presented during day 1.
Constructivism A learning theory for today’s classroom.
Christine Yang March 17, As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of technology teacher standards. ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.
LEARNER CENTERED APPROACH
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
Introduction to STEM Integrating Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math.
The Learning Cycle as a Model for Science Teaching Reading Assignment Chapter 5 in Teaching Science to Every Child: Using Culture as a Starting Point.
M= Math in STEM College and Career Ready- Conference Summer, 2015.
Connecting the Characteristics Margaret Heritage UCLA/ CRESST Attributes of Other Characteristics of Effective Instruction and Assessment for Learning.
National Science Education Standards. Outline what students need to know, understand, and be able to do to be scientifically literate at different grade.
Christchurch New Zealand October 2009 Integrating new technologies to empower learning and transform leadership.
Dr. Leslie David Burns, Associate Professor Department of Curriculum and Instruction UK College of Education
Inquiry Primer Version 1.0 Part 4: Scientific Inquiry.
Five Tools & Processes for NGSS Tool 3: Using the 5E instructional model to develop a conceptual flow.
Rich Tasks.
THE BSCS 5E INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL: CREATING TEACHABLE MOMENTS
Interdisciplinary learning (primary version)
DPI 10 Teaching Standards
Using Cognitive Science To Inform Instructional Design
TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS FOR EDUCATORS BONNIE SMITH MAY 2, 2011
OSEP Leadership Conference July 28, 2015 Margaret Heritage, WestEd
“Because of the children”
Western Teaching of Mathematics
Assist. Prof.Dr. Seden Eraldemir Tuyan
Teaching All Children: Planning and Assessment
The whole is greater than the sum of the parts. –Aristotle
Welcome to the overview session for the Iowa Core Curriculum
Presentation transcript:

Problem- Based Learning in STEM Disciplines Saturday, November 10, 2007 JHU/MSU STEM Initiative

Session Goals To provide an overview of PBL in the STEM disciples To provide a rationale for incorporating PBL in STEM disciplines To provide an overview of the benefits of PBL to student learning outcomes To raise awareness about issues related to implementing PBL in STEM disciplines

Activity 1: KWL Jot down what they already know about problem based learning in STEM disciplines, what they want to learn about problem-based learning and at the end of the session, record what you have learned about PBL in then STEM disciplines as a result of the session

Activity 2: Sorting Through Each group has been given a set of problems taken from various STEM disciplines Categorize these problems into groups based on the nature of the problems Categories and sorting strategies should be developed by the groups Present your rationale for categorizing problems to the whole group

Categorization, Revisited Now, use the following categories to sort problems based on the following categories: Exercises Traditional Word Problems Discipline Specific Inquiry Problems Interdisciplinary STEM Inquiry Problems

Discussion Questions What are the fundamental differences between problems in a specific content area (such as mathematics) and problems that reflect an integrated STEM PBL approach with respect to: Student learning outcomes? Subject matter content coverage? Instructional strategies required to implement the task?

Guiding Principles of PBL Identification of the "big" or key science, technology, engineering and mathematical (STEM) ideas around which the curriculum and subsequent learning tasks are being built. Classroom instruction focuses on inquiry and investigation of STEM ideas embedded in rich problem situations.

Guiding Principles of PBL cont Ideas are explored through rich tasks that allow students to make sense of STEM ideas and make connections among these ideas. The curriculum helps students grow in their ability to reason effectively with information represented in graphic, numeric, symbolic, and verbal forms and to move flexibly among these representations.

Rationale for a Problem- Centered Curriculum Students' perceptions about a discipline come from the tasks or problems with which they are asked to engage. Authentic multi-disciplinary problems allow students to think and problem solve as scientists or mathematicians Long term and meaningful learning occurs (Wheatley, 1990; Stephien & Shelagh, 1993)

Lessons from Cognitive Science Students can make sense of mathematics and science if the concepts and skills are embedded within a rich context or problem (Savery & Duffy, 1996; Rebello,et. al 2007) Students must explore interesting and integrated situations that require them to use STEM concepts in an integrated way, reflecting on solution methods, examining why the methods work, comparing methods, and relating methods to those used in previous situations (Ogot & Okudan, 2007)

Lessons from Cognitive Science Students are likely to build more robust understanding of STEM concepts and related procedures in problem-based learning environments. A problem-centered instructional approach helps students to make sense of the mathematics and science and helps them to process the mathematics and science content in a retrievable way (Kilpatrick, Swafford, & Findel, 2001).

Characteristics of Good Problems Contribute to students' conceptual development of important STEM ideas. Promote skillful use of mathematics and science and opportunities to practice important skills. Create opportunities for teachers to assess what students are learning Engage students and encourage classroom discourse.

Characteristics of Good Problems Cont Allow various solution strategies require higher-level thinking and problem solving Connect to other important mathematical and scientific ideas Relevant to students experience

Characteristics of PBL Activity Examine the discipline specific inquiry problems and the STEM interdisciplinary problems Use the Characteristics of PBL grid to decide which features of good problems are represented in each of the problems sorted earlier Discuss your grids with your group members

Teaching using a PBL requires: A deep knowledge of mathematics and science A broad and coherent view of the subject matter An understanding of effective ways to conduct a class based on inquiry Effective classroom management Patience, Flexibility and Reflectivity !!

Problem-based Learning in Student Learning Outcomes Students learn to systematically approach a problem or question Students are encouraged to take control of the learning process, their awareness and control over learning is heightened (student-centered fostering independent learners) Deep understanding of content knowledge, there are studies that indicated longer retention and better transfer of knowledge (Duffy and Cunningham, 1996; Sternberg, 1998) Learning through experience cognitive benefits of students participating in authentic learning activities Increased motivation due to authentic tasks that arouse natural curiosity and use an appropriate level of challenge

Objections to Problem Based Learning Lack of Sequencing of Learning Outcomes Teacher and Student resistance Assessing Student Outcomes Classroom management, particularly for novice teachers Some scholars suggests that PBL is less effective and less efficient than direct instruction models (Kirschner, Sweller & Clark, 2006)

What did you learn? Return to your KWL grid and record what you have learned as a result of this session Thank you for your time and engagement! Questions????