Biostatistics Dr. Larry Rubinstein, National Cancer Institute.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cedars Sinai Medical Center
Advertisements

Intro to Statistics Part2 Arier Lee University of Auckland.
Sampling techniques & sample size
Survival Analysis In many medical studies, the primary endpoint is time until an event occurs (e.g. death, remission) Data are typically subject to censoring.
Study Size Planning for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Lecture 3 Validity of screening and diagnostic tests
Inhibition of Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase (PARP) by ABT-888 in Patients With Advanced Malignancies: Results of a Phase 0 Trial Shivaani Kummar, MD National.
Clinical Trials What Are They and When Are They Right For You? Maura N. Dickler Assistant Attending Physician Breast Cancer Medicine Service Memorial Sloan-Kettering.
T. A. LouisTrialNet Workshop March 7, The POPPI 1 Example: Statistical Comments Thomas A. Louis, PhD Department of Biostatistics Johns Hopkins Bloomberg.
AbstractSchema Conclusion Pharmacokinetic profile of the base-excision repair inhibitor Methoxyamine-HCl (TRC102; MX) given as an one-hour intravenous.
Brown JR et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 523.
LSU-HSC School of Public Health Biostatistics 1 Statistical Core Didactic Introduction to Biostatistics Donald E. Mercante, PhD.
Clinical Trial Design, Biostatistics, Ethics, and Recruitment Clinical Trial Design  Anthony J. Murgo, MD.,MS; NCI/DCTD Biostatistics  Larry Rubinstein,
Advanced NSCLC Objective response rate -Well defined & widely accepted -Does not correlate well with OS -May be more useful if SD included -Higher RR correlates.
Clinical Trial Design Considerations for Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines Richard Simon, D.Sc. Chief, Biometric Research Branch, NCI
Controversies in Adjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer Parag Sanghvi M.D. Tasha McDonald M.D. Department of Radiation Medicine OHSU.
Inhibition of Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase (PARP) by ABT-888 in Patients With Advanced Malignancies: Results of a Phase 0 Trial Shivaani Kummar, MD National.
Title, in bold style Subtitle, in regular Max 3 lines of text totally NB! The graphic outside the slide will not show in “Slide Show” or on print WntResearch.
Large Phase 1 Studies with Expansion Cohorts: Clinical, Ethical, Regulatory and Patient Perspectives Accelerating Anticancer Agent Development and Validation.
Sample Size Determination
Re-Examination of the Design of Early Clinical Trials for Molecularly Targeted Drugs Richard Simon, D.Sc. National Cancer Institute linus.nci.nih.gov/brb.
Power and Non-Inferiority Richard L. Amdur, Ph.D. Chief, Biostatistics & Data Management Core, DC VAMC Assistant Professor, Depts. of Psychiatry & Surgery.
Efficacy of Denileukin Diftitox Retreatment in Patients with Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed After Initial Response 1 Identification of an Active,
Surrogate Endpoints and Correlative Outcomes Hem/Onc Journal Club January 9, 2009.
Statistics for Health Care Biostatistics. Phases of a Full Clinical Trial Phase I – the trial takes place after the development of a therapy and is designed.
EDRN Approaches to Biomarker Validation DMCC Statisticians Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Margaret Pepe Ziding Feng, Mark Thornquist, Yingye Zheng,
Challenges of Non-Inferiority Trial Designs R. Sridhara, Ph.D.
EBCP. Random vs Systemic error Random error: errors in measurement that lead to measured values being inconsistent when repeated measures are taken. Ie:
1Bachelot T et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S1-6.
1 Statistics in Drug Development Mark Rothmann, Ph. D.* Division of Biometrics I Food and Drug Administration * The views expressed here are those of the.
Response rate using conventional criteria is a poor surrogate for clinical benefit on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in metastatic colorectal.
Survival Analysis, Type I and Type II Error, Sample Size and Positive Predictive Value Larry Rubinstein, PhD Biometric Research Branch, NCI International.
Gemcitabine + Cisplatin +/- Bevacizumab as 1st-line Treatment of Advanced NSCLC: AVAiL Study Manegold PASCO 25:#7514, 2007/Ann.
Federal Study of Adherence to Medications (FAME) Trial Presented at The American Heart Association Annual Scientific Session 2006 Presented by Dr. Allen.
EARLY PROGRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH-RISK SOFT TISSUE SARCOMAS AN ANALYSIS FROM A PHASE III RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE TRIAL (EORTC 62961/ESHO) OF NEOADJUVANT.
Biostatistics in Practice Peter D. Christenson Biostatistician Session 6: Case Study.
Using Predictive Classifiers in the Design of Phase III Clinical Trials Richard Simon, D.Sc. Chief, Biometric Research Branch National Cancer Institute.
A prospective randomized trial
FREEDOM FROM PROGRESSION FOR PATIENTS RECEIVING I 125 VERSUS Pd 103 FOR PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY Jane Cho, Carol Morgenstern, Barbara Napolitano, Lee Richstone,
Inferential Statistics Significance Testing Chapter 4.
1 BLA Sipuleucel-T (APC-8015) FDA Statistical Review and Findings Bo-Guang Zhen, PhD Statistical Reviewer, OBE, CBER March 29, 2007 Cellular, Tissue.
Course: Research in Biomedicine and Health III Seminar 5: Critical assessment of evidence.
Cabozantinib (XL184) in metastatic castration- resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Results from a phase II randomized discontinuation.
Response, PFS or OS – what is the best endpoint in advanced colorectal cancer? Marc Buyse IDDI, Louvain-la-Neuve & Hasselt University
Erlotinib plus Gemcitabine Compared with Gemcitabine Alone in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute.
Presented By Shin Fujita at 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting
Phase III Clinical Trial of FOLFOX with or without Cetuximab in Resected Stage 3 Colon Cancer: Cooperative Group Trial N0147 (NCCTG*,
 Adaptive Enrichment Designs for Confirmatory Clinical Trials Specifying the Intended Use Population and Estimating the Treatment Effect Richard Simon,
Summary Author: Dr. C. Tom Kouroukis, MD MSc FRCPC
How many study subjects are required ? (Estimation of Sample size) By Dr.Shaik Shaffi Ahamed Associate Professor Dept. of Family & Community Medicine.
Statistical Core Didactic
Overview of Standard Phase II Design Issues
TBCRC (the translational breast cancer research consortium) 005 Prospective study
Presented By Luca Malorni at 2017 ASCO Annual Meeting
S1207: Phase III randomized, placebo-controlled trial adding 1 year of everolimus to adjuvant endocrine therapy for patients with high-risk, HR+, HER2-
Supplementary Figure S2
Intervista a Lucio Crinò
The Safety and Efficacy of Full vs
Presented By Johanna Bendell at 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting
Longitudinal Analysis Beyond effect size
Current RTOG Soft Tissue Sarcoma Trials
Supplemental Figure 1A Pt Pt Pre-treatment
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
MITO 26 PHASE II TRIAL ON TRABECTEDIN IN THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED UTERINE AND OVARIAN CARCINOSARCOMA (CS)
Phase III study of irinotecan/5FU/LV (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5FU/LV (FOLFOX) +/- cetuximab for patients with untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the.
Clinical IIT Pancreatic Studies.
Supplementary Fig S1, Zembutsu H et al.
T. -F. Lin, Y. -C. Yeh, F. -S. Lin, Y. -P. Wang, C. -J. Lin, W. -Z
Immunohistochemical staining for FOXO3a of breast cancer tumor tissues
STK11/LKB1 comutations are associated with inferior objective response rate with PD-1 blockade in KRAS-mutant LUAC. A, Objective response rate (RECISTv1.1)
Presentation transcript:

Biostatistics Dr. Larry Rubinstein, National Cancer Institute

Phase 0 Trial Statistics for PD Assay  Endpoints are PD assay, baseline (ideally, just before Tx) vs. post-Tx, in tumor tissue and in blood  Baseline measures: 1 pre-treatment tumor biopsy measurement and at least 3 pre-treatment blood measurements (ideally, taken over the baseline to post-Tx time span) per patient  1 post-Tx measurement used as primary endpoint for tumor and blood (at same time post-Tx)  Declare significant Tx-related change, for an individual patient, for observed 2-fold change combined with 90% statistical confidence of a true difference (10% false positive rate) ¬For blood this is 1.8 x intra-pt pre-Tx SD ¬For tumor tissue this is 1.8 x inter-pt pre-Tx SD

Minimal Phase 0 Trial Design  Accrue 3 patients to each of the dose levels  For either endpoint, tumor or blood, significant Tx-related response for a dose is defined as significant change for at least 2 patients out of the 3  For a dose, if there is 80% likelihood of observing change at the patient level, there is 90% power to detect significant response for the dose level  There is an overall 6% false positive rate, for both endpoints combined, for a dose level with no biologic effect (because of the 10% false positive observed change at the patient level)

Enhanced Phase 0 Trial Design  There may be a need to detect a lower rate of response per dose level—use a 2-stage design  Accrue 3-5 patients per dose level, allowing for the expansion of a cohort to 5 patients if the results are not definitive for the initial 3  Declare significant change, for an individual patient, for an observed 2-fold change combined with 95% statistical confidence of a true difference ¬For tumor tissue this is 2.3 x inter-patient pre-Tx SD ¬For blood this is 2.3 x intra-pt pre-Tx SD

Enhanced Phase 0 Trial Design Details  Accrue 3 patients to each dose level ¬If a significant change is observed for exactly 1 patient, for either endpoint, expand the dose to 5 patients ¬For either endpoint, significant Tx-related response for a dose, for cohort size 3 or 5, is defined as significant change for at least 2 pts  For a dose, if there is 60% likelihood of observing change at the patient level, there is 89% power to detect significant response for the dose level  There is an overall 4% false-positive rate, for both endpoints combined, for a dose level with no biologic effect (because of the 5% false- positive observed change at the patient level)

The Next Speaker is: Dr. Holly Taylor