Incorporation by Reference

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supplementary International Search (SIS) (PCT Rule 45bis)
Advertisements

1 Practical Impact of Recent PCT Changes on US Practice Maria Eliseeva Houston Eliseeva LLP American Intellectual Property Law Association October 15,
Key Decision Points in the PCT System
PCT Supplementary International Search Service (PCT Rule 45bis applicable from January 1, 2009)
WIPO Patent Information Services
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
35 U.S.C. § 112, First Paragraph By: Sheetal S. Patel.
Disclaimer: The information provided by the USPTO is meant as an educational resource only and should not be construed as legal advice or written law.
AIA Final Rules Submission of Certified Foreign Priority Documents and Translations Under the AIA March 20, 2013.
Disclaimer: The information provided by the USPTO is meant as an educational resource only and should not be construed as legal advice or written law.
DRAFTING A BILL OF LAW Resource: Maritza Torres-Rivera Francisco J. Domenech, Esq. Director.
The Procedure for Amending the Application under § Presented by Margaret W. Stevens, Head Supervisory Legal Instruments Examiner ;
1 Pre-Appeal Brief Conference (with Demo) By: Bennett Celsa Jean Witz Kathleen Bragdon TC1600 Quality Assurance Specialists.
The Examination Process
1 Information Disclosure Statements Julie Burke TC1600 Quality Assurance Specialist
Michael D. Stein Principal Stein IP LLC 1400 Eye Street, NW Suite 300 Washington, DC (202) Patent Prosecution.
William Boshnick Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.
1 NEW PRE-APPEAL BRIEF CONFERENCE PRACTICE OVERVIEW & TIPS FOR PRACTICE November Off. Gaz. Pat. Office, Vol. 2 (July 12, 2005)
By David W. Hill AIPLA Immediate Past President Partner Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP Overview of the America Invents Act.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Week 1.
Revision of WIPO Standard ST.14 Committee on WIPO Standards, third session Geneva 15 – 19 April 2013 Anna Graschenkova Standards Section.
AIA Final Rules AIA Transition Applications March 20, 2013.
Michael Neas Supervisor Office of PCT Legal Administration
Implementing First-Inventor-to-File Provisions of the AIA By: Scott D. Malpede, Seth Boeshore and Chitra Kalyanaraman USPTO Rules Effective March 16, 2013.
Filing for a United States Patent “Helpful Hints” U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Utility and Written Description Steve Kunin Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy Esther Kepplinger Deputy Commissioner for Patent Operations.
1 35 USC 112, 1 st paragraph enablement Enablement Practice in TC 1600 Deborah Reynolds, SPE
The America Invents Act (AIA) - Rules and Implications of First to File, Prior Art, and Non-obviousness -
September 14, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December.
Filing Compliant Reexam Requests Andy Kashnikow SPE, Central Reexamination Unit Andy Kashnikow SPE, Central Reexamination Unit June, 2010.
Memorandum - 35 U.S.C. 112, Second and Sixth Paragraphs Robert Clarke Director, Office of Patent Legal Administration United States Patent and Trademark.
1 Implementation of the American Inventors Protection Act of 1999 (Public Law ) and the Patent Business Goals Hiram H. Bernstein Senior Legal Advisor.
Patent Processing – Examination Issues Patent, Trademark, and Copyright - Law and Policy 5-8 November 2007 Amman, Jordan Global Intellectual Property Academy.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School February 25, 2008 Patent - Utility.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School February 27, 2008 Patent - Enablement.
by Eugene Li Summary of Part 3 – Chapters 8, 9, and 10
Patent Overview by Jeff Woller. Why have Patents? Patents make some people rich – but, does that seem like something the government should protect? Do.
Appeal Practice Refresher Office of Patent Training.
1 35 U.S.C. § 102(e): The Legislative Fix (S.320) and Serial Abandonment of Provisional Applications Stephen G. Kunin Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination.
The America Invents Act: Eighteen Months Post-Enactment Janet Gongola Patent Reform Coordinator March 27, 2013.
Information Disclosure Statements
December 8, Changes to Patent Fees Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (H.R. 4818)(upon enactment) and 35 U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by.
Julie Burke TC1600 QAS/PM New Matter, Incorporation By Reference, Restriction and Claim Language for Nucleic Acid Molecules.
Contents of US Patent Applications & Filing Requirements
Notice of Proposed Rule Making Affecting Claims That Recite Alternatives 1 Robert Clarke, Director Office of Patent Legal Administration (571)
1 John Calvert Supervisory Patent Examiner
The Patent Document II Class Notes: January 23, 2003 Law 677 | Patent Law | Spring 2003 Professor Wagner.
Corrections/Amendments and Priority/Benefit Claims in International and National Stage Applications
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Update regarding PCT and PPH at the USPTO Yuichi Watanabe Joint Meeting of AIPLA and.
July 18, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December 10,
1 Rules of Practice Before the BPAI in Ex Parte Appeals 73 Fed. Reg (June 10, 2008) Effective December 10, Fed. Reg (June 10, 2008)
1 Written Description Analysis and Capon v. Eshhar Jeffrey Siew Supervisory Patent Examiner AU 1645 USPTO (571)
Claims and Continuations Final Rule Overview Briefing for Examiners 1.
New Sections 102 & 103 (b) Conditions for Patentability- (1) IN GENERAL- Section 102 of title 35, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: -`Sec.
3 rd Party Participation Bennett Celsa TC 1600 QAS.
Claims and Continuations Final Rule 1 Joni Y. Chang Senior Legal Advisor Office of Patent Legal Administration (571) ,
Vector Claims in Gene Therapy Applications: In vivo vs. In vitro Utilities Deborah Reynolds SPE GAU
James Toupin – General Counsel February 1, Summary of Proposed Rule Changes to Continuations, Double Patenting, and Claims.
Derivation Proceedings Gene Quinn Patent Attorney IPWatchdog.com March 27 th, 2012.
January 25, Notice of Proposed Rule Making Proposed Changes to Practice for Continuing Applications, Requests for Continued Examination Practice,
Double Patenting Deborah Reynolds SPE Art Unit 1632 Detailee, TC1600 Practice Specialist
The Impact of Patent Reform on Independent Inventors and Start-up Companies Mark Nowotarski (Patent Agent)
PATENT OFFICE PROSECUTION
Preparing a Patent Application
Claims and Continuations Final Rule
PATENT LAW TREATY Gena Jones Senior Legal Advisor
Preparing a Patent Application
Presentation transcript:

Incorporation by Reference Deborah Reynolds, TQAS TC1600 571-272-0734 Deborah.Reynolds@uspto.gov

Incorporation by Reference New Rule 37 CFR 1.57 69 FR 56482 (Sept. 21, 2004); 1287 OG 67 (Oct. 12, 2004) for 1.57(a), contact Eugenia Jones, OPLA  for 1.57(b)-(f), contact Michael Lewis, OPLA    OPLA's number is (571) 272-7701 Sequence Disclosure and Examples

37 CFR 1.57 (a) (a) Subject to the conditions and requirements of this paragraph, if all or a portion of the specification or drawing(s) is inadvertently omitted from an application, but the application contains a claim under § 1.55 for priority of a prior-filed foreign application, or a claim under § 1.78 for the benefit of a prior-filed provisional, nonprovisional, or international application,that was present on the filing date of the application, and the inadvertently omitted portion of the specification or drawing(s) is completely contained in the prior-filed application, the claim under § 1.55 or § 1.78 shall also be considered an incorporation by reference of the prior-filed application as to the inadvertently omitted portion of the specification or drawing(s). A priority claim will now be considered an incorporation by reference as long as it is present on the filing date.

37 CFR 1.57 (part a cont.) The application must be amended to include the inadvertently omitted portion of the specification or drawing(s) within any time period set by the Office, but in no case later than the close of prosecution as defined by § 1.114 (b), or abandonment of the application, whichever occurs earlier. The applicant is also required to: (i) Supply a copy of the prior-filed application, except where the prior-filed application is an application filed under 35 U.S.C. 111; (ii) Supply an English language translation of any prior-filed application that is in a language other than English; and (iii) Identify where the inadvertently omitted portion of the specification or drawings can be found in the prior-filed application. Will hide this so that it just appears in handouts.

37 CFR 1.57 (part a cont.) (2) Any amendment to an international application pursuant to this paragraph shall be effective only as to the United States, and shall have no effect on the international filing date of the application. In addition, no request to add the inadvertently omitted portion of the specification or drawings in an international application designating the United States will be acted upon by the Office prior to the entry and commencement of the national stage (§ 1.491) or the filing of an application under 35 U.S.C. 111 (a) which claims benefit of the international application. (3) If an application is not otherwise entitled to a filing date under § 1.53(b), the amendment must be by way of a petition pursuant to this paragraph accompanied by the fee set forth in § 1.17(f). Hide this slide.

37 CFR 1.57 (b) (b) Except as provided in paragraph (a) of this section, an incorporation by reference must be set forth in the specification and must: (1) Express a clear intent to incorporate by reference by using the root words “incorporat(e)” and “reference” (e.g., “incorporate by reference”); and (2) Clearly identify the referenced patent,application, or publication. Other than a priority claim, a proper incorporation by reference must use those specific words incorporate and reference.

37 CFR 1.57 (c) (c) “Essential material” may be incorporated by reference, but only by way of an incorporation by reference to a U.S. patent or U.S. patent application publication, which patent or patent application publication does not itself incorporate such essential material by reference. “Essential material” is material that is necessary to: If material incorporated by refernce is deemed essential, than it may only refer to a US patent or US patent application publication.

37 CFR 1.57 (part c cont.) (1) Provide a written description of the claimed invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out the invention as required by the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112; Essential material is material required to meet the limitations of 35 USC 112.

37 CFR 1.57 (part c cont.) (2) Describe the claimed invention in terms that particularly point out and distinctly claim the invention as required by the second paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112; or (3) Describe the structure, material, or acts that correspond to a claimed means or step for performing a specified function as required by the sixth paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112. Applies not just for 1st paragraph of 112, but 2nd and 6th as well.

37 CFR 1.57 (d) (d) Other material (“Nonessential material”) may be incorporated by reference to U.S. patents, U.S. patent application publications, foreign patents, foreign published applications, prior and concurrently filed commonly owned U.S. applications, or nonpatent publications. An incorporation by reference by hyperlink or other form of browser executable code is not permitted. Incorporations by reference are permitted in most situations if the material is considered nonessential.

37 CFR 1.57 (e) (e) The examiner may require the applicant to supply a copy of the material incorporated by reference. If the Office requires the applicant to supply a copy of material incorporated by reference, the material must be accompanied by a statement that the copy supplied consists of the same material incorporated by reference in the referencing application. If the examiner requires a copy, applicants must also supply a statement that it is the same material that was incorporated by reference.

37 CFR 1.57 (f) (f) Any insertion of material incorporated by reference into the specification or drawings of an application must be by way of an amendment to the specification or drawings. Such an amendment must be accompanied by a statement that the material being inserted is the material previously incorporated by reference and that the amendment contains no new matter. If incorporated material is inserted into the spec of drawings there must be an accompanying statement that the inserted material contains no new matter.

37 CFR 1.57 (g) (g) An incorporation of material by reference that does not comply with paragraphs (b), (c), or (d) of this section is not effective to incorporate such material unless corrected within any time period set by the Office, but in no case later than the close of prosecution as defined by § 1.114(b), or abandonment of the application, whichever occurs earlier. In addition: An improper incorporation by reference can be corrected under the following conditions:

37 CFR 1.57 (part g cont.) (1) A correction to comply with paragraph (b)(1) of this section is permitted only if the application as filed clearly conveys an intent to incorporate the material by reference. A mere reference to material does not convey an intent to incorporate the material by reference. (2) A correction to comply with paragraph (b)(2) of this section is only permitted for material that was sufficiently described to uniquely identify the document. There must have been a clear intent that the material was to be incorporated by reference. The document must have been uniquely identified.

Mechanisms for Disclosing Sequences Full disclosure of each sequence in full compliance with rules 37 CFR 1.821-1.825 (recommended). Caution: Full disclosure of each sequence at the time of filing may be necessary when filing abroad. Explicit incorporation by reference of copending U.S. patent application, prior art document or database accession number that discloses sequence(s) intended to be part of the specification. Citation of, or reference to, a copending U.S. patent application, prior art document or database accession number that discloses sequence(s). Depending on the context, this may or may not evidence a clear intent to incorporate the sequence(s) by reference. New rule 57 applies to all referenced material. TC1600 has been faced with a specific type of reference regarding sequences.

Sequence Disclosure A rejection under 35 USC 112, 1st para (and/or 2nd para as appropriate) will be advanced if the examiner determines that a sequence not explicitly disclosed in the specification is essential material and is not incorporated by reference in compliance with 37 CFR 1.57.

Ineffective Incorporation by Reference Incorporation by reference ineffective if it Does not use proper words (“incorporate”and “reference”) or uniquely identify referenced document or Incorporates essential material by reference to other than a U.S. patent or U.S. patent application publication, which patent or patent application publication does not itself incorporate such essential material by reference or Incorporates nonessential material by reference to a hyperlink or other form of browser-executable code. A correction can be made pursuant to 37 CFR 1.57(g) provided that the correction is timely made, there was clear intent to incorporate, and the publication is uniquely identified. Material incorporated by reference may be added to the specification pursuant to 37 CFR 1.57(f), i.e., accompanied by a statement that the material being inserted is the material previously incorporated and that the amendment contains no new matter. A caution regarding the uniquely identified clause-Sequences are often amended after disclosure to a database, and they can be amended by anyone. Therefore, a mere reference with a database accession number may not be a unique identifier.

Possible Options for Overcoming 35 USC 112 Rejection Provide arguments/evidence showing that the material (sequence) is not essential. Amend the specification in compliance with 37 CFR 1.57(g) to correct an ineffective incorporation by reference of a U.S. patent or U.S. patent application publication. Amend the specification in compliance with 37 CFR 1.57 (f) to insert essential material incorporated by reference.

Possible Options for Overcoming 35 USC 112 Rejection If the application as originally filed incorporates the sequence by reference in compliance with 37 CFR 1.57(b)(i.e., uses proper terms and clearly identifies document), or EVIDENCES A CLEAR INTENT to incorporate the sequence by reference, applicants may overcome the rejection by amending the specification to incorporate the essential material. Such an amendment must comply with 37 CFR 1.57(f), i.e., accompanied by a statement that the material being inserted is the material previously incorporated by reference and that the amendment contains no new matter. An amendment inserting a version of the sequence that was added to a data source after the filing date of the incorporating application (e.g., a corrected sequence) would not comply with 1.57(f) and may trigger a new matter rejection.

What is Clear Intent? The examiner has the task of determining whether applicants clearly intended to incorporate material by reference. This must be determined upon a case-by-case basis. A claim that identifies a sequence by database accession number will usually be accepted as clear intent to incorporate the sequence by reference. This claim must be an original claim that is present as of the filing date.

What is Clear Intent? In making the determination of clear intent the examiner will consider language used in referencing the sequence the context in which it is disclosed any additional arguments/evidence presented by applicants. Language identifying a source only in passing as other prior work of no identified relevance is unlikely to be incorporated by reference.

What is Clear Intent? If the examiner determines there was no clear intent to incorporate the sequence, the examiner will maintain the 35 USC 112 rejection(s). Final Rule “Discussion” indicates that “[i]f a reference to a document does not clearly indicate an intended incorporation by reference, examination will proceed as if no incorporation by reference statement has been made and the Office will not expend resources trying to determine if an incorporation by reference was intended.” [69 FR at 56500; 1287 OG at 82]

Questions? Deborah Reynolds, TQAS TC1600 571-272-0734 Deborah.Reynolds@uspto.gov