Learning culture and vocabulary from reading texts Do input-processing directions make a difference? Lies Sercu & Lieve De Wachter K.U. Leuven.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Content Side of the ACPS Professional Learning Plan (PLP)
Advertisements

Assessment types and activities
SBA to GLE: The Road Les Morse, Director Assessment & Accountability Alaska Department of Education & Early Development No Child Left Behind Winter Conference.
Users reactions to innovative computerised feedback – the case of DIALANG Ari Huhta Centre for Applied Language Studies University of Jyväskylä Finland.
1 The influence of the questionnaire design on the magnitude of change scores Sandra Nolte 1, Gerald Elsworth 2, Richard Osborne 2 1 Association of Dermatological.
U24103 – INTRODUCTION TO RESEARCH METHODS & STATISTICS FOR PSYCHOLOGY WEEK 4 How to write a lab report.
ELA Common Core – What We Know So Far….
Writing a Method Section
Participation in Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills.
The relation between teacher input and the SLA of immigrant children aged 2,5 Machteld Verhelst, TBLT 2005, Leuven.
Boost Student Engagement and Motivation In Your Classroom.
Cross Cultural Research
Dutch++: Varieties in Dutch as pluricentric language – year 3 ZEDDE ZOT? BEN JE GEK? 1.
Trilingual Education in Friesland: Challenges & Developments
Automated user-centered task selection and input modification Rintse van der Werf Geke Hootsen Anne Vermeer MASLA project Tilburg University.
Chapter 1 What is listening?
Japanese University Students’ Attitudes toward the Teacher’s English Use Koji Uenishi Hiroshima University.
Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.
Listening Task Purpose of the test:
Anne Van Marsenille – EdD student – Open University Anne Van Marsenille - Open University - Edinburgh, July 2012.
Speaking Of all the four skills (speaking , listening, reading, and writing) speaking seems intuitively the most important. Most foreign language learners.
Advisor: Dr. Raung-fu Chung Graduate: Ju-chuan Chen.
Classroom action research
Modular 15 Ch 10.1 to 10.2 Part I. Ch 10.1 The Language of Hypothesis Testing Objective A : Set up a Hypothesis Testing Objective B : Type I or Type II.
1 DEVELOPING ASSESSMENT TOOLS FOR ESL Liz Davidson & Nadia Casarotto CMM General Studies and Further Education.
Bank of Performance Assessment Tasks in English
TBLT 2005 LEUVEN Elke Peters Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Word relevance and task instruction. Do they make a difference for word retention?
Chapter 21 Preparing a Research Report Gay, Mills, and Airasian
IN THE NAME OF GOD. Islamic Republic of Iran Islamic Azad University Khodabandeh Branch May,2011.
General Tips:  Carefully read the instructions on the cover of the test booklet.  Read the directions for each test carefully.  Read each question.
 The candidate uses student data (gathered by following the assessment plan) to profile and document student growth that occurred as a result of the.
Student Use of CALL Software and its Effect on Learners Alan Bessette Poole Gakuin University GloCALL
ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES THE FOUR PART MODEL Presented by Daya Chetty 20 APRIL 2013.
Chap. 2 Principles of Language Assessment
 METHODOLOGY 1. Subjects 2. Instruments 3. Procedures 4. Data Analysis 4. Data Analysis The Questionnaire The Oral Production Testing Material The Written.
Information about and Tips for Responding to Open-Ended Questions.
 There must be a coherent set of links between techniques and principles.  The actions are the techniques and the thoughts are the principles.
Assessment. Workshop Outline Testing and assessment Why assess? Types of tests Types of assessment Some assessment task types Backwash Qualities of a.
Experimental Research Methods in Language Learning Chapter 5 Validity in Experimental Research.
Warm-up November 13 What is the purpose of using a bulleted list in an informational text? Please respond in paragraph form, using complete sentences.
TEFL METHODOLOGY I COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING.
English Literature Course Cho Yu-kyung Kim Hye-Rin
EVALUATION AND SELFASSESSMENT SYSTEMS FOR THE VIRTUAL TEACHING: MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONNAIRES Claudio Cameselle, Susana Gouveia Departamento de Enxeñería.
Judit Kormos and Kata Csizér
Flossing Analysis. Introduction Sampling Methods Descriptive Statistics Checking Requirements Inferential Statistics Conclusion Flossing Analysis.
PREPARATION OF QUESTIONNAIRES PREPARATION OF QUESTIONNAIRES Chapter - 4 Dr. BALAMURUGAN MUTHURAMAN
COURSE AND SYLLABUS DESIGN
Monitoring and Assessment Presented by: Wedad Al –Blwi Supervised by: Prof. Antar Abdellah.
 Rubrics for Literacy Learning.  What is your current view of rubrics? What do you know about them and what experiences have you had using them ? Self.
+ Blogging for Struggling Writers Jackie Misiak Integrating & Implementing Technology Fall 2012.
AUTHOR: NADIRAN TANYELI PRESENTER: SAMANTHA INSTRUCTOR: KATE CHEN DATE: MARCH 10, 2010 The Efficiency of Online English Language Instruction on Students’
Learner Characteristics
1 Vocabulary acquisition from extensive reading: A case study Maria Pigada and Norbert Schmitt ( 2006)
So You Think You’ve Made a Change? Developing Indicators and Selecting Measurement Tools Chad Higgins, Ph.D. Allison Nichols, Ed.D.
Lecture 12 Teaching L2 Reading Luo Ling
Theories of Language Acquisition
An –Najah National University Submitted to : Dr. Suzan Arafat
What is it all about? 2016 onwards
Ma Rui Tianjin Normal University
Qualitative and Quantitative Data
Differences in comprehension strategies for discourse understanding by native Chinese and Korean speakers learning Japanese Katsuo Tamaoka Graduate.
Learning About Language Assessment. Albany: Heinle & Heinle
GRAMMAR TASK INFORMATION
jot down your thoughts re:
jot down your thoughts re:
Why do we assess?.
Teaching a receptive lesson
Presentation transcript:

Learning culture and vocabulary from reading texts Do input-processing directions make a difference? Lies Sercu & Lieve De Wachter K.U. Leuven

TBLT Leuven Sept Research goal Better results?Worse results? Dual learning task Single learning task

TBLT Leuven Sept …more specifically Group 1 = condition 1: reading text ‘cultural’ contents Group 2 = condition 2: reading text ‘cultural’ contents reading text ‘cultural’ contents + vocabulary Group 3 = condition 3: reading text vocabulary reading text vocabulary

TBLT Leuven Sept Do dual learning tasks (culture + vocabulary) lead to better or worse learning effects than single learning tasks ?

TBLT Leuven Sept Hypotheses Learners with dual task => less good in answering cultural questions than learners with single task cultureLearners with dual task => less good in answering cultural questions than learners with single task culture Learners with single task vocabulary => better in vocabulary test than learners in other conditionsLearners with single task vocabulary => better in vocabulary test than learners in other conditions Learners with single task vocabulary => less good in cultural test than learners in other conditionsLearners with single task vocabulary => less good in cultural test than learners in other conditions

TBLT Leuven Sept Research design CALL-environment in Question Mark Perception 1. General questionnaire: Personal elementsPersonal elements Learning stylesLearning styles Motivation to learn the language + cultureMotivation to learn the language + culture IntegrationIntegration … 2. Pretest vocabulary + pretest culture 3. Posttest vocabulary + posttest culture

TBLT Leuven Sept Pre-test culture (open) 1 april Manneke Pis Justine Henin Prins Laurent Dutroux 11 november

TBLT Leuven Sept Pre-test culture (closed) Multiple choice questions on ‘cultural’ aspects Multiple choice questions on ‘cultural’ aspects E.g. would you say it is common for men to urinate in public? To kiss each other on the street? … E.g. would you say it is common for men to urinate in public? To kiss each other on the street? …

TBLT Leuven Sept Pre-test vocabulary On basis of frequency list for Dutch as a foreign language On basis of frequency list for Dutch as a foreign language 20 target words + 30 distractor words of same frequency band 20 target words + 30 distractor words of same frequency band Goals: Goals: Check respondents’ overall level of proficiency in foreign languageCheck respondents’ overall level of proficiency in foreign language Check whether respondents knew target words before experimentCheck whether respondents knew target words before experiment

TBLT Leuven Sept Pre-test vocabulary 1. de spanning (a) Ik heb dit woord nog nooit ontmoet (b) Ik heb dit woord al ontmoet, maar weet niet meer wat het betekent (c) Ik weet wat dit woord betekent (1) ik kan dit woord gebruiken in een zin waaruit de betekenis van het woord duidelijk wordt. De zin die ik wil voorstellen is (vul hieronder aan) OF (2) ik kan een synoniem geven, namelijk (doe dat hieronder) OF (3) ik kan een omschrijving (definitie, parafrase) geven (doe dat hieronder) 2. zoenen (werkwoord) (a) Ik heb dit woord nog nooit ontmoet (b) Ik heb dit woord al ontmoet, maar weet niet meer wat het betekent (c) Ik weet wat dit woord betekent (1) ik kan dit woord gebruiken in een zin waaruit de betekenis van het woord duidelijk wordt. De zin die ik wil voorstellen is (vul hieronder aan) OF (2) ik kan een synoniem geven, namelijk (doe dat hieronder) OF (3) ik kan een omschrijving (definitie, parafrase) geven (doe dat hieronder)

TBLT Leuven Sept Participants Students of Dutch as a Foreign Language of university language centre (ILT) – K.U. Leuven Students of Dutch as a Foreign Language of university language centre (ILT) – K.U. Leuven Students have degree of higher secondary education – most of them university degree Students have degree of higher secondary education – most of them university degree Level B1 of CEF Level B1 of CEF

TBLT Leuven Sept Materials Text: ‘Kussen’ from Niet Vanzelfsprekend (Van Loo & Schoenaerts) Text: ‘Kussen’ from Niet Vanzelfsprekend (Van Loo & Schoenaerts) Kissing habits in Belgium / The Netherlands (1, 2 or 3 kisses / men- women kissing, evolution in kissing traditions) Kissing habits in Belgium / The Netherlands (1, 2 or 3 kisses / men- women kissing, evolution in kissing traditions) 809 words (among them 20 target words) 809 words (among them 20 target words) Authentic text about culturally ‘relevant’ topic => incites learner’s reflection on culture (ICC) Authentic text about culturally ‘relevant’ topic => incites learner’s reflection on culture (ICC)

TBLT Leuven Sept Post-test vocabulary Two parts: 1. Receptive test: recognizing target words’ meaning + formal characteristics - 40 sentences (2 per target word) - some contained mistakes (semantic, morphological, grammatical) 2. Productive test: - gap filling - first letter given

TBLT Leuven Sept Post-test culture 12 questions on cultural information provided in the text 12 questions on cultural information provided in the text Multiple choice test Multiple choice test

TBLT Leuven Sept Data collection procedure 2 occasions: 2 occasions: General questionnaire + pre-tests culture and vocabularyGeneral questionnaire + pre-tests culture and vocabulary Reading authentic text + posttests culture and vocabularyReading authentic text + posttests culture and vocabulary

TBLT Leuven Sept No time limit No time limit Text reading: twice at their own pace Text reading: twice at their own pace Text input: on paper (words in margin explained + use of dictionary + asking teacher) Text input: on paper (words in margin explained + use of dictionary + asking teacher)

TBLT Leuven Sept Sample Number of ‘valid’ tests: 81 Number of ‘valid’ tests: 81 condition 1: focus on culture: 23condition 1: focus on culture: 23 condition 2: focus on culture + voc.: 38condition 2: focus on culture + voc.: 38 condition 3: focus on voc.: 20condition 3: focus on voc.: 20 Variables: Variables: gendergender ageage nationalitynationality mother tonguemother tongue degreedegree number of months / years in Belgiumnumber of months / years in Belgium

TBLT Leuven Sept Significant differences between conditions? No significant differences between conditions in numbers between No significant differences between conditions in numbers between Men – womenMen – women Older people – younger peopleOlder people – younger people Belgians – other nationalitiesBelgians – other nationalities …

TBLT Leuven Sept

Overall results Learning effect vocabulary (= voc. posttests): Learning effect vocabulary (= voc. posttests): no significant difference between conditions 1, 2 and 3 -> students who were instructed to concentrate on vocabulary reacted statistically similar to students who did not get this instruction

TBLT Leuven Sept Learning effect culture (= cult. posttests): Learning effect culture (= cult. posttests): Significant difference between condition 3 and conditions 1 and 2 -> students who were instructed to concentrate on vocabulary (!) had better scores on the posttest culture than students in other conditions

TBLT Leuven Sept Input processing directions do not have expected results Input processing directions do not have expected results Differences on pre-test level? no significant differences there for culture or for vocabulary Differences on pre-test level? no significant differences there for culture or for vocabulary Task too easy for culture? Task too easy for culture? Students in condition 3 intrinsically better? Students in condition 3 intrinsically better? => seems to be reinforced by general results during Summer Course Students in condition 2 intrinsically weaker? Students in condition 2 intrinsically weaker? => seems to be reinforced by general results during course of June

TBLT Leuven Sept Dual or single tasking? no conclusive evidence no conclusive evidence probably due to sampling issues probably due to sampling issues simply giving directions on how to process materials may not be enough to change input-processing behaviour simply giving directions on how to process materials may not be enough to change input-processing behaviour