World Heritage Committee, Thirtieth Session, Vilnius, Lithuania Tracking Management Effectiveness in Multiple Sites Sue Stolton, Equilibrium, UK.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EU Presidency Conference Effective policies for the development of competencies of youth in Europe Warsaw, November 2011 Improving basic skills in.
Advertisements

Requirements Engineering Processes – 2
Alabama Primary Health Care Association
international strategic management
Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
Feichter_DPG-SYKL03_Bild-01. Feichter_DPG-SYKL03_Bild-02.
Chapter 1 The Study of Body Function Image PowerPoint
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Appendix 01.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
Science Subject Leader Training
Overview of Performance Measurement. Learning Objectives By the end of the module, you will be able to: Describe what performance measurement is, and.
2 Session Objectives Increase participant understanding of effective financial monitoring based upon risk assessments of sub-grantees Increase participant.
International Organization International Organization
ASYCUDA Overview … a summary of the objectives of ASYCUDA implementation projects and features of the software for the Customs computer system.
Designing and Building a Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation System: A Tool for Public Sector Management.
Aviation Security Training Module 4 Design and Conduct Exercise II 1.
ActionDescription 1Decisions about planning and managing the coast are governed by general legal instruments. 2Sectoral stakeholders meet on an ad hoc.
EU-Regional Policy Structural actions 1 GROWING EVALUATION CAPACITY THE MID TERM EVALUATION IN OBJECTIVE 1 AND 2 REGIONS 8 OCTOBER 2004.
California Preschool Learning Foundations
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Exit a Customer Chapter 8. Exit a Customer 8-2 Objectives Perform exit summary process consisting of the following steps: Review service records Close.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Year 6 mental test 5 second questions
Year 6 mental test 10 second questions
1 Implementing Internet Web Sites in Counseling and Career Development James P. Sampson, Jr. Florida State University Copyright 2003 by James P. Sampson,
Privacy Impact Assessment Future Directions TRICARE Management Activity HEALTH AFFAIRS 2009 Data Protection Seminar TMA Privacy Office.
1 SESSION 5- RECORDING AND REPORTING IN GRADES R-12 Computer Applications Technology Information Technology.
Second Meeting of the Reflection Year on World Heritage Periodic Reporting: 2-3 March 2006 Linking management effectiveness evaluation and periodic reporting:
Management Plans: A Roadmap to Successful Implementation
Vision: A strong and capable civil society, cooperating and responsive to Cambodias development challenges 1.
Effectively applying ISO9001:2000 clauses 6 and 7.
Effective Contract Management Planning
Evaluating administrative and institutional capacity building
1 Capacity Training New Mexico Strategic Prevention Framework.
1 Undirected Breadth First Search F A BCG DE H 2 F A BCG DE H Queue: A get Undiscovered Fringe Finished Active 0 distance from A visit(A)
VOORBLAD.
15. Oktober Oktober Oktober 2012.
Checking & Corrective Action
IS-700.A: National Incident Management System, An Introduction
1 Independent Evaluation in IFC Presentation to Staff of Islamic Development Bank May 3, 2009 Marvin Taylor-Dormond.
Promoting Rational Drug Use in the Community Monitoring and evaluation.
Factor P 16 8(8-5ab) 4(d² + 4) 3rs(2r – s) 15cd(1 + 2cd) 8(4a² + 3b²)
Strategic Financial Management 9 February 2012
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Understanding Generalist Practice, 5e, Kirst-Ashman/Hull
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
How creating a course on the e-lastic platform 1.
25 seconds left…...
H to shape fully developed personality to shape fully developed personality for successful application in life for successful.
Januar MDMDFSSMDMDFSSS
Protecting Heritage Places 10 steps to help protect the natural and cultural significance of places.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
Module 12 WSP quality assurance tool 1. Module 12 WSP quality assurance tool Session structure Introduction About the tool Using the tool Supporting materials.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
PSSA Preparation.
1 Literacy PERKS Standard 1: Aligned Curriculum. 2 PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1. Aligned Curriculum 2. Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction.
Educator Evaluation: A Protocol for Developing S.M.A.R.T. Goal Statements.
MIS (Management Information System)
General Analysis of the (European) Questionnaire Jorun Poettering Consultant WHC.
2nd meeting WH Periodic Reporting Reflection Year Monitoring Indicators for Cultural World Heritage sites ICOMOS Discussion points.
Management Effectiveness Training Seminar: Europarc 2008 Management effectiveness assessments – a tool for maintaining high standards in protected area.
Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool. 902 METT assessments included in the global study A major data source.
WORLD BANK / WWF ALLIANCE FOR FOREST CONSERVATION AND SUSTAINABLE USE Reporting Progress in Protected Areas - a Tracking Tool Leonardo Lacerda, WWF International.
~MPA Scorecard ~ Assessing and Reporting on MPA Management Effectiveness Marco V. Cerezo (FUNDAECO) Barbara Reveles (SEMARNAT) Wil Mehia (TIDE) Marea E.
Assessment Form for Periodic Reporting
Presentation transcript:

World Heritage Committee, Thirtieth Session, Vilnius, Lithuania Tracking Management Effectiveness in Multiple Sites Sue Stolton, Equilibrium, UK

World Heritage Committee, Thirtieth Session, Vilnius, Lithuania This presentation is about a simple methodology – known as the Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool - that has been developed to track portfolios of sites In 15 minutes it has to be a simple presentation But creating simple things can be complex I won’t be telling you about the years it took to develop, test, review and revise Or give substantive detail of the results of analysis using the tool

World Heritage Committee, Thirtieth Session, Vilnius, Lithuania I will be giving a brief description of the Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool Say a little about how it has been used Give a short analysis comparing the Tracking Tool with the Periodic Reporting Section II Some suggestion about how it could be adapted for WH use

World Heritage Committee, Thirtieth Session, Vilnius, Lithuania The Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool is ‘fit for purpose’ Developed to assess agreed and clearly articulated objectives

World Heritage Committee, Thirtieth Session, Vilnius, Lithuania Original incentive for developing the Tracking Tool World Bank/WWF Alliance for Forest Conservation and Sustainable Use Target: 75 million hectares of existing forest protected areas under improved management to achieve conservation and development outcomes by 2010

World Heritage Committee, Thirtieth Session, Vilnius, Lithuania Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool Objectives Tracking improvements in management to achieve conservation and development outcomes Harmonised reporting for multiple sites Relatively quick and easy to complete Based on expert knowledge available at site Easily understood by non-specialists Consistent with existing reporting systems Provides useful information for site managers

World Heritage Committee, Thirtieth Session, Vilnius, Lithuania How has it been used? WWF’s portfolio of 200 forest protected areas World Bank’s portfolio of protected areas All Global Environment Facility protected areas projects Adapted for marine and freshwater biomes Adapted for use in all protected areas in China Used in all Indian Tiger Reserves Used to improve management in private reserves in South Africa and Namibia

World Heritage Committee, Thirtieth Session, Vilnius, Lithuania What is the Tracking Tool? 1.Datasheet: contextual information including objectives and threats 2.Questionnaire: 4 alternative text answers to 30 question and an associated score to summarise progress 3.Associated text fields with each question: recording justification for assessment, sources used and steps to be taken to improve the management issue

World Heritage Committee, Thirtieth Session, Vilnius, Lithuania Based on the management cycle of a site WCPA Framework for assessing management effectiveness

World Heritage Committee, Thirtieth Session, Vilnius, Lithuania Section II: Period ReportingManagement Effectiveness Tracking Tool (2) Justification for InscriptionProtected area objectives (4) (3) Boundary and buffer zoneProtected area boundary demarcation (6) (4) Authenticity and Integrity of the siteProtected area design (5) (5) ManagementResource management (11) (6) ProtectionLegal status (1); Protected area regulations(2); Law enforcement (3) (7) Management plansManagement plan (7); Regular work plan (8) (8) Financial resourcesCurrent budget (15); Security of budget (16); Management of budget (17); Fees (26) (9) Staffing levels (human resources)Staff numbers (12); Personnel management (13) (10) Expertise and Training in Conservation and Management Staff training (14) (11) VisitorsVisitor facilities (24); Commercial tourism (25) (12) Scientific studiesResource inventory (9); Research (10) (13) Education, Information and AwarenessEducation and awareness programme (20) (14) Factors Affecting the Property (SoC)Condition assessment (27); Access assessment (28) (15) MonitoringMonitoring and evaluation (30) Specific World Heritage questions (16, 17, 18, 19) Equipment (18); Maintenance of equipment (19); State and commercial neighbours (21); Indigenous people (22); Local communities (23); Economic benefit assessment (29)

World Heritage Committee, Thirtieth Session, Vilnius, Lithuania Two Tools: Shared Needs IssueCriteriaScoreCommentsNext steps 30. Monitoring and evaluation Are management activities monitored against performance? There is no monitoring and evaluation in the protected area 0 There is some ad hoc monitoring and evaluation, but no overall strategy and/or no regular collection of results 1 There is an agreed and implemented monitoring and evaluation system but results are not systematically used for management 2 A good monitoring and evaluation system exists, is well implemented and used in adaptive management Is there a formal monitoring program for the site? If yes, please describe it, indicating what factors or variables are being monitored and by what process. YesNo

World Heritage Committee, Thirtieth Session, Vilnius, Lithuania Please briefly describe the visitor facilities at the site Are these facilities adequate? If no, what facilities is the site in need of? YesNo IssueCriteriaScoreCommentsNext steps 24. Visitor facilities Are visitor facilities (for tourists, pilgrims etc) good enough? Outputs There are no visitor facilities and services0 Visitor facilities and services are inappropriate for current levels of visitation or are under construction 1 Visitor facilities and services are adequate for current levels of visitation but could be improved 2 Visitor facilities and services are excellent for current levels of visitation 3

World Heritage Committee, Thirtieth Session, Vilnius, Lithuania Similarities WH: assess conservation status; focus on future activities; strengthen co-operation TT: track/monitor progress of conservation targets; plan portfolio interventions WH/TT: Overlap of questionnaire topics

World Heritage Committee, Thirtieth Session, Vilnius, Lithuania Differences TT: based on internationally recognised structure for reporting protected area management effectiveness (WCPA Framework) TT: 30 questions plus data sheet WH: Natural and cultural site WH: 140 questions (nearly 500 over all regions)

World Heritage Committee, Thirtieth Session, Vilnius, Lithuania Tracking Tool: Strengths Multiple choice allows for more consistent analysis of answers over time Next steps section provides some guidance for adaptive management Questions are specifically linked to achievement of objectives Short and relatively quick to complete Standardised language thus easy to translate

World Heritage Committee, Thirtieth Session, Vilnius, Lithuania Tracking Tool: Limitations Not an independent assessment Questions are not weighted Limited evaluation of outputs and outcomes However good management is, if values continue to decline, the objectives are not being met. Therefore the question on condition assessment has disproportionate importance.

World Heritage Committee, Thirtieth Session, Vilnius, Lithuania Tracking Tool: Achievements Has grown from measuring one project’s targets to many adaptations and global uptake Largest global data set of protected area effectiveness information using one system Improving effectiveness from site to global level

World Heritage Committee, Thirtieth Session, Vilnius, Lithuania Can the Tracking Tool be adapted to fit the needs of WH reporting? Step 1: Clear objectives about what Periodic Reporting can and cannot achieve Step 2: Adapt Tracking Tool to reflect WH requirements and in particular cultural sites Step 3: Test revised Tracking Tool in key cultural, natural and mixed sites

World Heritage Committee, Thirtieth Session, Vilnius, Lithuania Cultural Challenges Challenge 1: sites are not managed by one single management unit Challenge 2: sites fragmented sometimes over large areas

Second Meeting of the Reflection Year on World Heritage Periodic Reporting: 2-3 March 2006 The Tracking Tool is available in English, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Chinese, Russian, Bahasa Indonesia, Lao, Khmer, Vietnamese and Mongolian Download several language version from: