Inquiry Base Learning in the Enabling Sciences ASELL: Advancing Science by Enhancing Laboratory Learning ADAM BRIDGEMAN | ASSOCIATE DEAN FACULTY OF SCIENCE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teaching Scientist Volunteers about K-12 Science Education, Pedagogy, and Partnership University of California San Francisco Science & Health Education.
Advertisements

Qualifications are changing Curriculum Update Event – Stirling Management Centre Friday 9 December Mathematics and Numeracy.
Qualifications Update: Sciences Qualifications Update: Sciences.
School/Centre: Reflecting on the effectiveness of Self-Evaluation Resource The levels on the board are as in How Good Is Our school? Above the board, type.
Reciprocal Teaching: Session 2. Aims of Session Opportunities to share experiences of RT so far – identify benefits & problems What are metacognitive.
Managing the Statutory Requirements for Assessment April 2011.
The goal of continuum development
Stephanie Burba, Noyce Graduate Tyler Ghee, Noyce Scholar Shelby Overstreet, Noyce Scholar Kathryn Crawford, Noyce Graduate Hope Marchionda, PhD Using.
Principles of Assessment and Feedback for Learning CHEP Strategic Work-stream Assessment and Feedback for Learning Dr Alan Masson.
Integrating Academic Skills Development in a First Semester Chemistry Unit Technology Enhanced Curriculum | Sydney Teaching Colloquium | 2012 ASSOCIATE.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework October 2011.
K-6 Science and Technology Consistent teaching – Assessing K-6 Science and Technology © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
… not a just a day but an adventure in learning!.
Consistent teaching – K-6 Science and Technology
TEA Science Workshop #7 October 25, 2012 Kim Lott Utah State University.
Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority
RTI 101 Mia Hyde Tennessee Department of Education Coordinator of Reading Content & Resources.
Office of the DVC (S&E) Students as Change Agents Dr Cassandra Saunders Student Evaluation, Review and Reporting Unit (SERRU) Students Matter Forum 2013.
Strengthening the Problem-Solving Abilities of Our Students Emma Carberry, School of Mathematics and Statistics.
Revisiting Information Literacy at AGGS
MYP planning: the unit planner
College and Career Readiness in Science and Technology/Engineering STE Readiness Centers October 2013.
Western Hemisphere Membership Development Strategy.
1 © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training English K-6 Syllabus Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment.
PGCE FP/IP Research Conference 28 th October 2014 Debbie Stott.
Virginia Bourdeau, Professor Oregon 4-H Science Rich Inquiry Activity.
1 Strengthening Teaching and Learning: Educational Leadership and Professional Standards SABES Directors’ Institute July 2011.
September 2013 Current Reforms to Teacher Education in Scotland National Implementation Board.
1 Literacy PERKS Standard 1: Aligned Curriculum. 2 PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1. Aligned Curriculum 2. Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction.
Developing consistency of teacher judgment Module 2.
Teaching Inquiry The BSCS 5E Model. What is Inquiry? Inquiry is a general term for the processes by which scientific knowledge is developed. Scientific.
Why Inquiry? Inquiry is a process which naturally integrates cross-curricular competencies and the subject areas. Engages learners by making connections.
PYP Exhibition 2015 Beacon Hill School
PROM/SE Science Associates Welcome Back! Please sit at tables by grade bands K-2, 3-5, 6-8, 9-12.
Scientific Inquiry 13 February, Scientific Inquiry What is it? - Your definition - NSTA Position Statement - Other internet resources.
Thinking, reasoning and working mathematically
Science PCK Workshop March 24, 2013 Dr. Martina Nieswandt UMass Amherst
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
A Whole School Approach to Assessing Personal and Interdisciplinary Learning Let’s Get Essential Conference School Library Association of Victoria Jennifer.
Scientific Inquiry: Learning Science by Doing Science
Inquiry Based Learning Donna Barrett Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics and Computing.
Scaffolding Student Research Workshop presented at the QHTA Conference: June 2005 Sue Burvill-Shaw.
Enhancing problem-based learning designs with a single e-learning scaffolding tool:Two case studies using challenge FRAP Advisor : Min-Puu Chen Presenter.
1 Issues in Assessment in Higher Education: Science Higher Education Forum on Scientific Competencies Medellin-Colombia Nov 2-4, 2005 Dr Hans Wagemaker.
Middle School CIA Dec 13, Announcements  STEM District Committee  Programs, Curriculum  Need help to know about programs and events, newsletter.
Scientific Inquiry by:. Icebreaker “Scientific Inquiry refers to the diverse ways in which scientists study the natural world and propose explanations.
Teacher Professional Development When Using the SWH as Student-Oriented Teaching Approach Murat Gunel, Sozan Omar, Recai Akkus Center for Excellence in.
SLAV Conference Jennifer Hall BSSC Library Coordinator 17 March 2005.
Video Analysis Inquiry-based Teaching. Math & Science Collaborative, Science Teacher Leader Academy, Year 1, Goals Understand that inquiry teaching.
How People Learn – Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 1999) Three core principles 1: If their (students) initial understanding.
Inquiry: The Heart and Soul of Science Education Michael Padilla Clemson University
National Curriculum: Science. Questions for tomorrow … Associate Professor Manjula Sharma Sydney University Physics Education Research Group (SUPER) Institute.
Lynne H. Hehr Arkansas GLOBE partnership Center for Math and Science Education Arkansas NASA Educator Resource Center University of Arkansas Elementary.
Qualities of an Aligned Lesson Aligning Content and Process.
From Activity to Inquiry Reading Assignment Chapter 7 in Teaching Science to Every Child: Using Culture as a Starting Point.
GENERAL METHODS AND TECHNIQUES OF TEACHING
Video Analysis Inquiry-based Teaching. Math & Science Collaborative, Science Teacher Leader Academy, Year 1, Essential Features of Classroom.
What was your question and where did you get it?.
 TEACH USING THE INQUIRY APPROACH  Common Core Math Practices  Next Generation Science  Hands-On, Minds-On, Real World!
Inquiry Primer Version 1.0 Part 4: Scientific Inquiry.
Observation System Kidderminster College January 2012.
Inquiry Primer Version 1.0 Part 2: Ohio Core and the Implications for Science Education.
1 Science Grades “People have different beliefs about what is important for students to learn in the here and now.” Educational Leadership:
Manjula Sharma Tom Gordon Owen Brasier The University of Sydney National Project HQ/NT, NSW,
Using Scientific Inquiry to Drive Engineering Design
EarthComm Inquiry: Preparing Students to be Critical Thinkers and Science Literate Citizens Key Points: Today’s talk is about a high school Earth science.
Using Scientific Inquiry to Drive Engineering Design
Teaching Science for Understanding
Presentation transcript:

Inquiry Base Learning in the Enabling Sciences ASELL: Advancing Science by Enhancing Laboratory Learning ADAM BRIDGEMAN | ASSOCIATE DEAN FACULTY OF SCIENCE

The problem with modern education. “The object of education is not only to produce a [student] who knows, but one who does; who makes [their] mark in the struggle of life, and succeeds well in all [s/he] undertakes; who can solve the problems of nature and humanity as they arise; and who, when [they] know [they] are right can convince the world of that fact… There is no doubt in my mind that this is the point in which much of our modern education fails. Why is it? I answer that memory alone is trained, and that reason and judgment are used merely to refer matters to some authority who is considered final…. To produce [students] of action, they must be trained in action… If they study the sciences, they must enter the laboratory, … H.A. Rowland, “The Physical Laboratory in Modern Education”, Science

The problem with modern education. “The object of education is not only to produce a [student] who knows, but one who does; who makes [their] mark in the struggle of life, and succeeds well in all [s/he] undertakes; who can solve the problems of nature and humanity as they arise; and who, when [they] know [they] are right can convince the world of that fact… There is no doubt in my mind that this is the point in which much of our modern education fails. Why is it? I answer that memory alone is trained, and that reason and judgment are used merely to refer matters to some authority who is considered final…. To produce [students] of action, they must be trained in action… If they study the sciences, they must enter the laboratory, … H.A. Rowland, “The Physical Laboratory in Modern Education”, Science, 1886

The problem with modern education. “The object of education is not only to produce a [student] who knows, but one who does; who makes [their] mark in the struggle of life, and succeeds well in all [s/he] undertakes; who can solve the problems of nature and humanity as they arise; and who, when [they] know [they] are right can convince the world of that fact… There is no doubt in my mind that this is the point in which much of our modern education fails. Why is it? I answer that memory alone is trained, and that reason and judgment are used merely to refer matters to some authority who is considered final…. To produce [students] of action, they must be trained in action… If they study the sciences, they must enter the laboratory, …” H.A. Rowland, “The Physical Laboratory in Modern Education”, Science (Emphasis is mine) Active learning Problem solving Communication Skills Not rote learning

TOOLS,TECHNIQUES APCELL, ACELL, ASELL Universities 1999 – ongoing ▫ Focus on educational and pedagogical aspects for science academics ▫ Uptake internationally from 2007 ▫ Funded by OLT predecessors, ACDS ASELL Schools, ongoing ▫ Focus on inquiry … ▫ Support on science from universities ▫ Support on pedagogy from schools ▫ Successful funding of $2M Schools and Universities

July, 2000 (Canberra) Feb, 2001 (Sydney)* Feb, 2002 (Christchurch) Nov, 2002 (Melbourne)* Feb, 2004 (Hobart)* July, 2005 (Sydney) Feb, 2006 (Sydney)* Jan, 2007 (Adelaide)* July, 2007 (Auckland) Nov, 2007 (Sydney, physics)* Apr, 2008 (Adelaide, biology)* July, 2009 (Sydney)* April, 2010 (Adelaide, Science)* June, 2011 (Sydney, Science)* July, 2011 (Brisbane, Biology)* July, 2011 (Melbourne, Biology)* April, 2013 (Sydney, Science)* July, 2014 (Perth, Bio/chem)* * Experiential workshop UNIVERSITY SCHOOLS June, 2012 (Sydney, High School Science)* July, 2012 (Adelaide, High School Science)* May, 2013 (Sydney, High School Science)* July, 2013 (Melbourne, High School Science)* Nov, 2013 (Melbourne, High School Science)* April, 2014 (Melbourne, High School Science)* July 2014 (Perth, ECU) * Conference workshops July, 2013 (Melbourne, CONASTA)* Nov, 2013 (Melbourne, CONASTA)* July, 2014 (Adelaide, CONASTA)* Similarities and differences

ASELL University Workshop

ASELL Schools workshop

Wide range of learning experiences Q14: Overall, as a learning experience, I would rate this experiment as: score = ABCDEABCDE score = ABCDEABCDE Excellent Very Poor

1. Learner engages in scientifically oriented questions. 2. Learner gives priority to data/evidence in responding to questions. 3. Learner analyses data 4. Learner formulates explanations based on analysis. 5. Learner connects explanations to scientific knowledge. 6. Learner communicates and justifies explanations. (National Research Council, 2000 modified in Towns et al, 2009) The 6 Essential Features of Inquiry

Levels of scaffolding to support learning Elements Confirmation Structured Inquiry Guided Inquiry Open Inquiry Authentic Inquiry Question No questionGiven by teacher Sharped by student Selected by student Posed by student EvidenceNo evidenceGiven evidenceGiven possible evidence Guided to collect evidence Determines what to collect Analyses data No analysisTold how to analyse Given possible ways of analysing Guided to analyse Determines how to analyse Formulates explanation No explanationTeacher provides explanation Given possible explanations Guided in process of explanation Formulates explanation Connects explanation to scientific knowledge No connection to knowledge Teacher provides connection Given possible connections/ theories Directed to sources of knowledge Independently explores knowledge Communicates & justifies findings No communication Told how to communicate Provided with guidelines for communication Coached in methods of communication Chooses how to communicate

Sliding toward Inquiry…

Variations of Inquiry…

16 Stage 1 Physics class. Students were given the task of designing a method for determining the mass of an unknown object(rock). Students were not given access to balances, scales etc and had to devise a method and make calculations of the unknown object. A variety of methods were adopted and students used methods to effect a solution with variable results. Students had to use previously learned principles and some had to learn a new method using moments of a force. This provided good learning opportunities for all members of the class who worked in teams of 2 to find the answers to their problem. Some methods devised were Comparison with known quantity of water - pulley system. Acceleration of rock on a trolley with a known force and using moments of a force. School – teacher # 84

Points to note There are some differences in opinion. Not all experiments/investigations need to be inquiry. One can map a program using this template.

18 Teaching approach I teach Science from an inquiry perspective and continually look for hands on experiences in order to enthuse my students. I see Science as a method of inquiry and encourage my students to seek answers using the Scientific Method. As Head of Science at my school I encourage other teachers to adopt a similar approach to their teaching. School – teacher # 84

19 Household Chemistry for standard to low ability Y9 girls. Students began by researching their favourite makeup. We then investigated colloids, gels, wetting, soaps and hard and soft water in a series of experiments in which they found out what wetting really meant and how water could be made wetter.... As the students progressed through the 8 practicals the information was continuously related back to them and their environment. They found the effect of soap on skin of particular interest. School – teacher # 21

20 … They had to document an account of each prac and were given less and less guidance as they progressed. Practical 1 was basically a copying exercise from the white board but by number 8 they had to do and write up the practical completely on their own. I have done this activity many times and while it takes several weeks to complete I feel it is excellent science. … School – teacher # 21

Question Data Analysis Explain Connect Communicate Confirmation Structured Inquiry Guided Inquiry Open Inquiry Authentic Inquiry No communication

Question Data Analysis Explain Connect Communicate Confirmation Structured Inquiry Guided Inquiry Open Inquiry Authentic Inquiry Learner told steps for communication

Question Data Analysis Explain Connect Communicate Confirmation Structured Inquiry Guided Inquiry Open Inquiry Authentic Inquiry Teacher provides question

Question Data Analysis Explain Connect Communicate Confirmation Structured Inquiry Guided Inquiry Open Inquiry Authentic Inquiry Learner selects question

… inquiry

ASELL Schools: Next steps Contact us if you are interested in: Developing an experiment with university people. Being a member of the “Teacher Advisory Group”. Running an ASELL Schools workshop Seeking partnerships with teachers who are interested in being a member of the teacher advisory group and being part of ASELL Schools

Acknowledgements Staff and student delegates Deans for support & leadership HREC at the University of Sydney Funding Agencies AMSPP Universities