Fred Hills Richard Leslie McLennan Community College.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SDSUs Tech T-UNU-P Web-Based Solutions Technology in the Classroom Technology in Distance Education.
Advertisements

Eli Collins-Brown, Ed.D. Illinois State University July 12, 2006 Aspects of Online Courses That Are More Effective and Successful than Traditional, Face-to-Face.
Making Technology Work for the Rural Student Raymond Griffith and Heather Woodson South Piedmont Community College.
Teachers, administrators and staff continuously seek and share learning and then act on what they learn. The goal of their actions is to enhance their.
Supplemental Instruction in Precalculus
Troy University eTROY Colloquium April 17-18, 2012.
What is it? What is it? Quality Matters (QM) is a nationally recognized, faculty- centered, peer review process designed to certify the quality of online.
A Quality Matters “Quickie”
Instructional Design & Online Learning Greg Kearsley.
Engaging Students in Online Discussion
September 2007 PM Writing Linking reading to writing.
Kathy Lein, MS ~ Instructional Specialist Community College of Denver ADEIL Conference October 21, 2011 Grand Junction, CO.
Control-theory and models at runtime Pierre-Alain Muller 1, Olivier Barais 2, Franck Fleurey 2 1 Université de Haute-Alsace Mulhouse, France 2 IRISA /
Rena M. Palloff, Ph.D. Fielding Graduate University and Crossroads West December 12, 2013 Sponsored by.
DESIGN AND ONLINE DELIVERY OF A COASTAL SCIENCE MODULE USING A CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACH. RAMESSUR R.T. 1 and SANTALLY M.I. 2 1.Faculty of Science, University.
Facilitating Online Discussions Jason D. Baker. Topics Discussion Value Discussion Tools Discussion Tips.
Designing Instructionally Sound Courses Kristina Leonardo, Senior Consultant Blackboard, Inc. April 14, 2005.
E-Learning Center Deanship of Academic Development.
IN SUPPORT OF STUDENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE COURSE TRANSFORMATION PROGRAM Senate Resolution 1012.
What are the necessary ingredients?. Necessary Ingredients Design Considerations Design Considerations –Planning the media depends on lifestyle, lifestyle,
Clara Fowler University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
1 Feng-Qi Lai Project Peer Evaluation: Assessment and Collaborative Learning Feng-Qi Lai Department of Curriculum, Instruction, and Media Technology Bayh.
How to Teach a Science Course Online. Y Generation (1982–2001) Is Our Educational System Designed For Them? ➔ View lectures as boring and uninteresting.
Blackboard 201 Communication Workshop Barbara Cooper. OCC Faculty Online Coordinator.
The Student Experience Project Overview for Kosovo Higher Education visit Mark Wilkinson October 2014.
STRATEGIES FOR ONLINE LEARNING IN A GLOBAL NETWORK UNIVERSITY INTED 2013 Annette Smith, Kristopher Moore, Erica Osher Reifer New York University.
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
Franklin University Dr. Lewis Chongwony, Instructional Designer
Recommendations for Best Practice. Best Practice This section will present an analysis of the literature in the following categories: Organization of.
Colorado Online Learning Spring 2003 Student Survey Data.
CA12 Assessing Online Courses Howard University November 2013.
Matrix on Virtual Teaching: a Competency-based Model for Faculty Development Mary Rose Grant, Ph.D. Saint Louis University MERLOT Conference 2008.
MA course on language teaching and testing February 2015.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE 2014.
The Mechanics of Putting Your Courses Online Summer Institute 2003 Lesley Blicker, Office of Instructional Technology
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities. Component 4a: Reflecting on Teaching ElementUnsatisfactoryBasicProficientDistinguished AccuracyTeacher does not.
Learners’ Attitudes and Perceptions of Online Instruction Presented by: Dr. Karen S. Ivers Dr. JoAnn Carter-Wells Dr. Joyce Lee California State University.
GSU Online Degree and Certificate Programs Preparation for North Central Association Accreditation Visit.
Review of Course Approach and Assignment on Class Discussions These slides from session 1 of the class and can be found on the class website.
What Works: Research-Based Best Practices in Developmental Education A Presentation by Ruth Dalrymple and Marilyn Mays based on Hunter R. Boylan’s work.
IVC Interactive Video Classroom Faculty Training Summer 1999.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
CA12 Assessing Online Courses Howard University Spring 2015.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Can one online teacher education course really help teachers help LESLLA learners? LESLLA 2010 Koln, Germany Nancy Faux.
LEARN NC Creating Your Own Professional Development Plan with E-Learning for Educators Ross White Associate Director LEARN NC – School.
Best Practices for Higher Education and K-12 Distance Education Programs Aubrey D. Crook, M.Ed. © 2006.
Increasing Success Rates in Online Learning Kathy Coleman, Chattahoochee Technical College.
BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.
INACOL Standard D: CLEAR EXPECTATIONS PROMPT RESPONSES REGULAR FEEDBACK.
Instructional Strategies Teacher Knowledge, Understanding, and Abilities The online teacher knows and understands the techniques and applications of online.
4Faculty.org Online Professional Development Resources.
Learning Through Online Delivery What the Experts Say Dr. Margo Burns Dr. Helen Prosser.
Maximize Course Development with External Content Using the National Repository of Online Courses (NROC) Mary Schlegelmilch, Omaha Public Schools Dr. Roni.
The Review Process: Where Do We Begin? Jennifer L. Bishoff June 7, 2001.
Matthew Mansour  Introduce yourself to 1 person sitting close to you and tell them….  Who you are  Your Expertise & Background  Why you are.
Smartxt Universal Learning Project Presented by Stacey Kayden Stacey has been a High Tech Learning Specialist at Laney College in Oakland California since.
The Assessment of Blended Courses: Gathering and Using Faculty and Student Feedback to Maximize Program Effectiveness Orly Calderon, PsyD, Long Island.
Applying Laurillard’s Conversational Framework to Blended Learning Blogging and Collaborative Activity Design R Papworth, R Walker & W Britcliffe E-Learning.
Assessment Online. Student Assessment Design learner-centered assessment that include self-reflection Design grading rubrics to assess discussions, assignments,
1 Howard University Name: Effective Use of Technology in Teaching and Learning (ETTL) Person responsible: Dr. Folahan Ayorinde, Professor and Chair of.
E VALUATION PLAN FOR COURSE DESIGN Embedding Literacy and Numeracy Module.
Summative Evaluation Shasta Davis. Dimension: Preparation (Score- 4) Plans for instructional strategies that encourage the development of critical thinking,
Starfish Training Minot State University
Harvesting the Benefits of QM Culture for Institutional Accreditation
Seven Principles of Good Teaching
Presentation transcript:

Fred Hills Richard Leslie McLennan Community College

 Background ◦ Online courses fastest growing sector on campus ◦ Student attrition rates high in online classes (35%+) ◦ Growing interest in student learning outcomes (SLO) ◦ Most research focuses on positive, little on the negative factors and their impact on SLOs  Why the topic? ◦ What are the negative aspects of online instructions ◦ What are the differences in faculty and students on these factors ◦ What impact do these have on student learning Leslie/Hills for CIT Nov 072

 How many teach online?  How many taken online courses?  What is your worst online course experience as a student?  What is your best online course experience as a student?  What impact did either have on your online teaching experience? Leslie/Hills for CIT Nov 073

Action Research using Qualitative Methodology:  Typological study of Student Feedback ◦ Student feedback on seven semesters of Student Evaluations of Online courses (1060+ comments)  Survey of Online Faculty (25% Response) ◦ How many courses taken online ◦ How many course taught online ◦ Negative and positive experiences online ◦ Impact on their instruction  Panel Discussion with Faculty ◦ Experiences from learning and teaching online ◦ Impact of negative experiences on online course development Leslie/Hills for CIT Nov 074

 6 major themes emerged ◦ Instructor Feedback ◦ Course Organization ◦ Instruction/Guidance ◦ Addressing Learning Styles ◦ Interpersonal Communication in the Course ◦ Technology Leslie/Hills for CIT Nov 075

6

 Few or no replies to questions  Lack of communications on assignments  Little or no feedback on grading  Little or no instructor presence in online forums Leslie/Hills for CIT Nov 077

 Confusing or conflicting due dates ◦ Where do I start? ◦ Calendar? ◦ Timeline?  Confusing Course Navigation ◦ Non functional links ◦ Blocked links ◦ Wrong links  Confusing or no structure  Lack of logic in the layout of the course  Wrong textbook and/or materials  Outdated textbook and/or materials Leslie/Hills for CIT Nov 078

 Non communicated course expectations  Lack of clarity  Lack of direction  Lack of thoroughness  Concerns with testing ◦ Testing did not match objectives ◦ Too many assessments ◦ Timing of assessments Leslie/Hills for CIT Nov 079

 Correspondence course – did not engage different learning styles  Tried to force Teacher Centric in a Learner Centric environment  Passive text based course – only mode of delivery  Limited or no use of video/voice medias  Lack of variety in course work/projects/assignments Leslie/Hills for CIT Nov 0710

 Student did not connect with the class  Incorrect or misunderstood tone  Mismatched teams/groups  No discussion forums or student ties  Rude communication “…the instructor showed 'disdain' by the wording of replies to s. If I someone - I am going to take a few seconds extra to be courteous online” Leslie/Hills for CIT Nov 0711

 Inaccessible technology  Skill level required to high for student  CMS failings/limitations  Non functional Chats/Discussion Boards/Tools  Multimedia for multimedia sake Leslie/Hills for CIT Nov 0712

 Student overwhelmed or underwhelmed ◦ Student gives up and drops out ◦ Student fails to engage the material ◦ Student loses interest in the topic ◦ Student loses interest in education Leslie/Hills for CIT Nov 0713

 Integrate feedback loops  Establish expectations on communications ◦ Frequency ◦ Means ◦ Response time  Ensure quick feedback and turn around on assignments and grading  Give step-by-step instructions for assignments  Provide examples or models of the finished assignments  Keep courses up-to-date  Ensure consistency and ease of navigation Leslie/Hills for CIT Nov 0714

 Provide student the flexibility and access to work ahead  Include variety of learning techniques  Embed extra point opportunities in the notes and reading assignments.  Put effort into designing learning around student learning styles  Use collaborative assignments  Take into consideration those who use dial up  Focus on pedagogy before technology ◦ Use newest inventions only if they contribute to learning ◦ Deploy media appropriately in the course – in support of learning objectives Leslie/Hills for CIT Nov 0715

 Seek student feedback throughout the course and adjust accordingly  Recognize technology is a means and not an end  Better select and prepare instructors for online teaching  Provide online experience to online instructors  Do not “rest on your laurels”: regularly reassess your own delivery  NEXT STEP: Quantify impact of negative factors on student retention Leslie/Hills for CIT Nov 0716

Leslie/Hills for CIT Nov 0717 Fred Hills Program Director CIS & Multimedia Richard Leslie Instructional Designer Center for Instructional Design