NSF REUs and Participant Costs Amy Rollinger & Rachel Surber.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Renee L. Wallace Associate Vice President Academic Personnel Services August 9, 2013.
Advertisements

Office of Sponsored Projects Administration COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS.
Participant Support Costs August Participant Support Costs NSF Grant Policy Manual (GPM) “Participant support costs are the direct costs.
Salary and Wages Policy Other Support.  Limits salary compensation for senior personnel  Two (2) months of regular salary in any one year  All NSF.
Regulation Grant Brown Bag Session February 12, 2013.
Proposal Preparation 101 Office of Sponsored Programs and Research (OSPR) June 10, 2014 (updated March 31, 2015)
University of Massachusetts - Dartmouth February 17, 2011 EFFORT REPORTING.
Other Trainee Issues Sponsored Projects Administration (SPA)
Managing a Scientific Laboratory Financial Management and Budgeting.
“NSF’s Division of Undergraduate Education: Funding Opportunities for Community Colleges” CUR November 18, 2011 Eun-Woo Chang Montgomery College.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals: Fellowship Track Washington, DC January 9, 2014.
Alliance Meeting May 18, 2006 National Science Foundation Division of Grants and Agreements Al Wilson, Grants Management Specialist (703)
The IGERT Program Preliminary Proposals June 2008 Carol Van Hartesveldt IGERT Program Director IGERT Program Director.
CAREER Proposal Budgeting Workshop Sponsored Programs Office May 17, 2011.
The University of Texas at Arlington Office of Research and Office of Accounting and Business Services Brown Bag Training Session Three: The 1,2,3’s of.
Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG) Changes & Clarifications.
If the funder provides specific guidelines related to format or contents of your budget… FOLLOW THEM! Otherwise, your proposal may not make it out of.
HOW TO WRITE A BUDGET…. The Importance of Your Budget Preparation of the budget is an important part of the proposal preparation process. Pre-Award and.
Presented by the Office of Research Development & Services and Sponsored Programs Administration.
Fellowship Application Universe WPI Office of Sponsored Programs Elena Glatman Associate Director, Pre-award Services.
Grants Pre Award Workshop Barnard College “From A to F (Abstract to Funding)” Fall 2010.
National Science Foundation Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) Site Program.
9/7/2015Division of Undergraduate Education Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (S-STEM) Program Bert Holmes
Submitting a Proposal: Best Practices By: Anu Singh Science Assistant
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Integrating Diversity into.
“Grants Boot Camp” Workshop Series January 9, 2014 Creighton University Sponsored Programs Administration 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE  Phone:
General Provisions for Selected Items of Cost OMB A-21 Section J.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
Sponsored Project Training Program Cost Policy on Sponsored Agreements and Cost Transfers Involving Sponsored Agreements UOP Updates March 13, 2013 Sponsored.
Grant Financial Management U.S. Department of Commerce Officer of the Inspector General 1.
U N I V E R S I T Y OF F L O R I DA Building Realistic Budgets Judy Harris, Proposal Processing Division of Sponsored Research.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
Cost Policy Training Sponsored Project Training Program April 30, 2012 Beverly Blakeney & Jennifer Gagnon April 30, 2012Sponsored Project Training Program1.
BRIDGES TECHNICAL WORKSHOP GRANTS MANAGEMENT BRIDGES TECHNICAL WORKSHOP GRANTS MANAGEMENT Lori Burge Lori Burge Grants Management Specialist Grants Management.
1 QEM/BIO Workshop October 21, 2005 Award Administration.
Submitting to the NIH ERA Empowerment Series MAY 2014.
BRIDGES TECHNICAL WORKSHOP GRANTS MANAGEMENT BRIDGES TECHNICAL WORKSHOP GRANTS MANAGEMENT Lori Burge Lori Burge Grants Management Specialist Grants Management.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Broadening Participation.
NSF Early Career Award Submission Preparation March 21, 2014 Prepared by: Shelly Baczkowski
Good Information to Know about Hiring Students: No students are to begin employment without completion of the mandatory Federal I-9 process with their.
FEDERAL UPDATE Jeff Warner Senior Contract and Grant Officer Alisia Ford Contract and Grant Officer Spring QRAM - Tuesday, March 12, 2013.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
NSF STEM Scholarship Program. Outline NSF-STEM program information – One submission per year – Mission – Regulations What we learned last time – Strengths.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
Research Administration Forum Changes to NSF & NIH Proposal Submission and Award Documents December 8, 2015.
Cindy Collins ETEC 665 The Proposal Budget The ABCs of Constructing A Budget.
How to Obtain NSF Grants Review of Proposal Pieces A workshop providing information on the process of applying for external research awards. Sponsored.
Overview of Proposal and Award Process at UCLA A short “ How-to-Do ”
Pre-Submission Proposal Preparation Proposal Processing & Review.
Cost Analysis Guidance for Information Requested from Financial Officer.
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
Office of Sponsored Projects Federal Updates/Reminders ROUNDTABLE FEBRUARY 9, 2016 CAMPUS.
Subaward, Procurement, or Consulting? Herbert B. Chermside, CRA Prepared for Virginia Commonwealth University Grants Administration Training Series © 2003.
Department of Microbiology, Immunology, & Molecular Genetics Faculty Meeting June 10, 2016 Susan Stark Manager, COM SRAS Mary Gay Whitmer Pre-Award Manager,
2016 SPaRC Retreat Afternoon Concurrent Session #2 Ask HR!
REUs: Technical Issues and Funding Sources
HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER
Budget Development “SPEAR” Workshop.
Congratulations - You Have a Grant! Now What?!
Post-Doctoral Trainee Senior Professional Research Staff Staff
New Facilities and Administrative (F&A) Rates
Session Two – Participant Support Costs (PSCs) May 24, 2018
Participant Support Costs
DGCA Breakfast Briefing:
NSF Tribal College Workshop
Office of Sponsored Projects
Research Community Meeting
Research Community Meeting
Building a Successful Cost Proposal
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
Presentation transcript:

NSF REUs and Participant Costs Amy Rollinger & Rachel Surber

Guidance on the Inclusion of Undergrads in NSF projects Three Options to consider when preparing a proposal with undergraduate students: 1. Participant Support 2. REU Supplement 3. Foreign Undergrads or Undergrads with a UMN employment appointment

Option #1 Participant Support. If the role of the undergraduate students meets the NSF definition of participant support costs in the current GPG, they may be included in the budget as participants.

NSF Definition of Participant Support This budget category refers to costs of transportation, per diem, stipends and other related costs for participants or trainees (but not employees) in connection with NSF-sponsored conferences, meetings, symposia, training activities and workshops. For some educational projects conducted at local school districts, however, the participants being trained are employees. In such cases, the costs must be classified as participant support if payment is made through a stipend or training allowance method. The school district must have an accounting mechanism in place (i.e., sub-account code) to differentiate between regular salary and stipend payments. The number of participants to be supported must be entered in the parentheses on the proposal budget. These costs also must be justified in the budget justification section of the proposal. Some program solicitations may have special instructions for treatment of participant support.

Participant Support Considerations: –The undergraduate students would not be considered participants if they are performing research. –NSF imposes a restriction on UMN employees in this category and the undergraduate students may not be paid a stipend as a participant if they hold a University appointment.

Participant Support Considerations (cont’d) –If a student is employed by the UMN in an area that is clearly separate from their area of study, they may be approved on a case by case basis. –The student’s employment may not provide a benefit to their degree program

Option #2 REU (Research Experiences for Undergraduates) Supplement If the role of the undergraduate students meets the NSF definition of an REU supplement in the current GPG, they may be included in the budget as participant costs.

NSF REU Guidance The Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) program supports active research participation by undergraduate students in any of the areas of research funded by the National Science Foundation. REU projects involve students in meaningful ways in ongoing research programs or in research projects specifically designed for the REU program. (1) REU Sites are based on independent proposals to initiate and conduct projects that engage a number of students in research. REU Sites may be based in a single discipline or academic department or may offer interdisciplinary or multi-department research opportunities with a coherent intellectual theme. (2) REU Supplements may be included as a component of proposals for new or renewal NSF grants or cooperative agreements or may be requested for ongoing NSF-funded research projects. Undergraduate student participants in either REU Sites or REU Supplements must be U.S. citizens, U.S. nationals, or permanent residents of the United States.

NSF REU Guidance The stipend that is paid to REU student participants is not a salary or wage for work performed. It is a traineeship, a form of student aid (like a scholarship or fellowship) provided to support a student's education/training in a STEM field. In this case, the student's training consists of closely mentored independent research.

REU Supplements Considerations –An REU Supplement typically provides support for one or two undergraduate students to participate in research as part of a new or ongoing NSF-funded research project. –The budget justification should include language stating that the participant support is for an REU supplement

REU Supplements Considerations (cont’d) NSF imposes a restriction on undergraduate student participants in either REU Sites or REU Supplements. They must be U.S. citizens, U.S. nationals, or permanent residents of the United States. If they are performing research and are restricted because of citizenship status, option 3 should be used

Option #3 Undergraduate Students with a UMN employment appointment and Foreign Undergraduates –If the undergraduate student does not meet the participant support criteria because they hold a UMN employment appointment, they should be included in the personnel section of the budget with salary and fringe requested. –If a foreign undergraduate student does not meet the REU qualifications, they may be given a UMN employment appointment and the department should request funding in the personnel section of the budget with salary and fringe requested.

F&A The REU solicitation (13-542)has been revised to clarify the treatment of indirect costs in proposals for REU Sites and requests for REU Supplements. –“Indirect costs (F&A) are not allowed on Participant Support Costs in REU Site or REU Supplement budgets. Note that the REU solicitation's longstanding "administrative allowance" of 25% of the participant support stipend amount in lieu of indirect costs has been discontinued.”

Guidance Notes The guidelines of the GPG at the time of proposal should be followed and the options may be subject to change as the NSF updates to the GPG are implemented. A separate REU supplement request is also an option when a need to incorporate undergraduates is identified after the award is established.

Isolate Participant Costs Set up funds in a child project

Documentation REU grant file should include 1)Nature of student’s involvement with the project 2)Nature of the mentoring the student will receive 3)Selection Criteria 4)Expectations of participant 5)Confirmation of participants completion

Marry Programmatic & Financial Document what successful participation in the REU includes and issue payments on meeting participation bench marks.

Summary The intention of an REU is to “train” not “pay” REU projects are to involve students in meaningful ways in ongoing research programs or in research specifically designed for the REU program Supplements are not intended to provide additional salary support for meeting the objectives of the awarded project Supplements should explicitly state training objective

References NSF GPG 13-1: e/nsf13001/gpg_index.jsp e/nsf13001/gpg_index.jsp NSF REU Solicitation : htm htm