nab-Paclitaxel Sviluppi Futuri nel Carcinoma Mammario

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Miles DW et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 41.
Advertisements

Miles D et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposia Authors: Dr. Sunil Verma Date posted: January 6 th, 2008.
Breast Cancer Patient Issues in Family Practice: An Interactive Session.
Management of HER2 Over-Expressed Breast Cancer in the Adjuvant, Neoadjuvant, and Metastatic settings Christy A Russell, MD Keck School of Medicine University.
ACRIN Abdominal Committee ACRIN Gynecologic Committee Fall Meeting 2010.
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
First Efficacy Results of a Randomized, Open- Label, Phase III Study of Adjuvant Doxorubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide, Followed by Docetaxel with or without.
Integration of Taxanes in the Management of Breast Cancer
Xeloda X-panding options in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer
516 (32723) Phase III trial comparing AC (x4)taxane (x4) with taxane (x8) as adjuvant therapy for node-positive breast cancer: Results of N-SAS-BC02.
Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee
Extending life for women with HER2-positive MBC
Gynecologic Oncology Group Gynecologic Oncology Group Uterine Corpus Trials: GCIG David Scott Miller, M.D., F.A.C.O.G., F.A.C.S. Director and Dallas Foundation.
Integration of Capecitabine into Anthracycline- and Taxane-Based Adjuvant Therapy for Triple Negative Early Breast Cancer: Final Subgroup Analysis of the.
William J. Gradishar MD, FACP Betsy Bramsen Professor of Breast Oncology Director, Maggie Daley Center For Women's Cancer Care Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive.
Updates from the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2013 HER2+ Breast Cancer Julie R. Gralow, M.D. Director and Jill Bennett Professor of Breast Medical.
Open Clinical Trials: What’s Out There Now Paula D. Ryan, MD, PhD
Herceptin® (trastuzumab) in combination with chemotherapy: pivotal metastatic breast cancer survival data 1.
Fabio Puglisi Dipartimento di Oncologia Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Udine Antiangiogenic Treatment Mediterranean School of Oncology.
A Meta Analysis of Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Treated with Anti Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Ca Breast CY Choi UCH.
Drug Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer
EN.8 - A PHASE III STUDY OF STANDARD THERAPY VERSUS RIDAFOROLIMUS IN WOMEN WITH RECURRENT OR METASTATIC ENDOMETRIAL CANCER WHO HAVE PREVIOUS HAD CHEMOTHERAPY.
Taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC): investigational agents TTP = median time to disease progression OS = median overall survival.
Van Cutsem E et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract LBA4509. (Oral Presentation)
The Carry-Over Effect of Adjuvant Zoledronic Acid: Comparison of 48- and 62-Month Analyses of ABCSG-12 Suggests the Benefits of Combining Zoledronic Acid.
Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro Genoa – Italy
1Bachelot T et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S1-6.
BASED ON PROTOCOL VERSION 1 SEPTEMBER 2012 A new study evaluating an investigational drug to treat patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastroesophageal.
E2100 A Randomized Phase III Trial of Paclitaxel versus Paclitaxel plus Bevacizumab as First- Line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.
Pritchard KI et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
Lapatinib versus Trastuzumab in Combination with Neoadjuvant Anthracycline-Taxane-Based Chemotherapy: Primary Efficacy Endpoint Analysis of the GEPARQUINTO.
Baselga J et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S3-3.
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 8-12, 2015
Impact of Bevacizumab (Bev) on Efficacy of Second-Line Chemotherapy (CT) for Triple- Negative Breast Cancer: Analysis of RIBBON-2 Brufsky A et al. Proc.
Low Dose Decitabine Versus Best Supportive Care in Elderly Patients with Intermediate or High Risk MDS Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Final Results.
S1207: Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Use of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy +/- One Year of Everolimus in Patients.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
Agency Review of sNDA SE-006 DOXIL for Ovarian Cancer Division of Oncology Drug Products Office of Drug Evaluation 1 Center for Drug Evaluation.
Journal Club Dr. Eyad Al-Saeed Radiation Oncology 12 January, 2008.
A Phase III, Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter Study of Eribulin Mesylate versus Capecitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast.
MITO 25 A randomized phase II trial of Carboplatin-Paclitaxel- Bevacizumab vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Bevacizumab- Rucaparib vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Rucaparib.
Response-Guided Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Gunter von Minckwitz, Jens Uwe Blohmer, Serban Dan Costa, Carsten Denkert, Holger Eidtmann Journal.
Results of a Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Eribulin Mesylate as First-Line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast.
Single-agent nab-Paclitaxel Given Weekly (3/4) as First-line Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer (An International Oncology Network Study, #I )
RANDOMIZED PHASE II STUDY OF NABPACLITAXEL, IN RECURRENT ADVANCED OR METASTATIC CERVICAL CANCER MITO CER-NAB Enrica Mazzoni, MD Medical Oncology & Breast.
EFFECT: A randomized phase II study to evaluate the EFficacy and impact on Function of two different doses of nab-paclitaxEl in elderly patients with advanCed.
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico Modena
A Single-Arm Phase IIIb Study of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab with a Taxane as First-Line Therapy for Patients with HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer.
Gajria D et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
CREATE-X: Adjuvant Capecitabine in HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
ASCO 2002 Advances in the Adjuvant Chemotherapy of Breast Cancer
Vahdat L et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
S1207: Phase III randomized, placebo-controlled trial adding 1 year of everolimus to adjuvant endocrine therapy for patients with high-risk, HR+, HER2-
Abraxane-Pembro nei carcinomi uroteliali avanzati
Intervista a Lucio Crinò
Lo sviluppo clinico di nab-paclitaxel Discussant: Fabio Puglisi
Ospedale Misericordia, Grosseto
Her2-positive breast cancer: updating current best practice
Barrios C et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 46.
Krop I et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 5090.
Bergh J et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 23.
Untch M et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
Baselga J et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 45.
Efficacy of BSI-201, a PARP Inhibitor, in Combination with Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (GC) in Triple Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer (mTNBC): Results.
Presentation transcript:

nab-Paclitaxel Sviluppi Futuri nel Carcinoma Mammario

nab-Paclitaxel Studi Europei Ongoing Trial Description Country Phase A multicenter phase II trial of nab-paclitaxel and Capecitabine as first line treatment in HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer ITALY II A phase II, open-label, non-randomized study of nab-paclitaxel for patients with stage II and III luminal breast cancer as neo-adjuvant treatment SPAIN A Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing Nanoparticle-based Paclitaxel With Solvent-based Paclitaxel as Part of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients With Early Breast Cancer (Gepar Septo) GERMANY III Adjuvant phase III trial to compare intense dose-dense treatment with EnPC to dose-dense, tailored therapy with dtEC-dtD for patients with high-risk primary breast cancer

nab-Paclitaxel Studi “Ready to start” Trial Description Country Phase Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with nab-paclitaxel in women with HER2-negative high-risk breast cancer ETNA ITALY III A randomized phase II study evaluating three different schedules of nab-paclitaxel as first line chemoterapy in metastatic breast cancer SNAP II A randomized phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and impact on function of two different doses of nab-paclitaxel in elderly patients with advanced breast cancer EFFECT

Studio GOIM A multicenter phase II trial of nab-paclitaxel and Capecitabine as first line treatment in HER2 negative Metastatic Breast Cancer Primary endpoint: The efficacy of combination in terms of response rate (RR) according to RECIST criteria The progression free survival (PFS) Secondary endpoints: Overall survival (OS) Tolerability and safety of the combination regimen according to CTC criteria

Studio GOIM Disegno dello Studio Nab-paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 IV in 30 min GG 1-8 q3w Capecitabina 825 mg/m2 Orale bid GG 1-14 q3w + N = fino a 94 Pazienti con ECOG PS 0-1, HER2-, inclusi TN, adeguata funzionalità d’organo 6 cicli (+ 2 a discrezione del clinico) bid, twice daily; IV, intravenous; MBC, metastatic breast cancer; q3w, every 3 weeks.

Studio GEICAM A phase II, open-label, non-randomized study of nab-paclitaxel for patients with stage II and III luminal breast cancer as neo-adjuvant treatment Study GEICAM is a multicenter, open label, non-randomized phase 2 trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nab-Paclitaxel in the neoadjuvant treatment of ER positive HER2 negative patients amenable to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy Primary endpoint: Determine percentage of patients with poor response in contrast to good response (residual cancer burden) Secondary endpoints: pCRR after surgery, Clinical response (RECIST), Invasive disease-free survival, Correlation of Ki67, gp-60, caveolin-1, SPARC and PAM50 gene expression assay with efficacy, Tolerability

Studio GEICAM Disegno dello studio 52 5 MA 1219 00004762 2007 04 26 - 03:46:51 PM ESA 1256 2007 10 01 - 12:05:26 PM 69 5 7

Studio GeparSepto A randomized phase III trial comparing nanoparticle-based paclitaxel with solvent-based paclitaxel as part of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with early breast cancer Primary endpoint: To compare pCR rates of neo-adjuvant treatment with nab-paclitaxel with solvent-based paclitaxel Secondary endpoints: Assess the pCR rates for stratified subgroups, Assess various pCR rates, Determine response rates of breast tumor and axillary nodes, Clinical remission rate by taxane use, Rate of breast conservative surgery, Toxicity and compliance, Determine pCR and LRFS in patients with a cCR and a negative core biopsy before surgery

GeparSepto Disegno dello Studio Core biopsy Core biopsy Core biopsy Surgery if HER2-positive: Trastuzumab if HR-positive: Tamoxifen, Aromatase-Inhibitor According to AGO recommendation N = 1.200 R 12 weeks 12 weeks Stratification: - Subgroup HER2/HR - Ki67 - SPARC If HER2-positive: Trastuzumab 8 mg/kg (loading dose) followed by 6 mg/kg Pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) followed by 420 mg Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly nab-Paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 weekly Epirubicin 90 mg/m2 Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2

Studio GeparSepto Disegno dello studio

Studio GAIN II Adjuvant phase III trial to compare intense dose-dense treatment with EnPC to dose-dense, tailored therapy with dtEC-dtD for patients with high-risk primary breast cancer Primary endpoint: Invasive disease free survival (IDFS) Secondary endpoints: DDFS and OS, Brain metastasis free survival (in the subgroups of TNBC and HER2+ breast cancer patients), Compliance and safety, Quality of life

GAIN II Disegno dello Studio nP nP nP C C C Pegfilgrastim q2w, Epoetin (Darbepoetin-α, Epoetin-β) N=2.886 ® Epirubicin 150mg/m2 q2w nab-Paclitaxel q2w Cyclophosphamide 2g /m2 q2w (Definition of dose by run-in Phase) R E E E E +1 week break D D D D C C C C Pegfilgrastim q2w, Epoetin (Darbepoetin-α, Epoetin-β) EC 90/600 mg/m², q2w x 4 Docetaxel 75 mg/m², q2w x 4 tailored tailored

Studio ETNA Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with nab-paclitaxel in women with HER2-negative high-risk breast cancer Adapted from STRATEGIES for SELECTING THERAPY in HERNEGATIVE BREAST CANCER, ESMO Vienna 2012, prIME Oncology activity Satellite Symposium

Studio ETNA Adapted from STRATEGIES for SELECTING THERAPY in HERNEGATIVE BREAST CANCER, ESMO Vienna 2012, prIME Oncology activity Satellite Symposium

ETNA Disegno dello Studio Adapted from STRATEGIES for SELECTING THERAPY in HERNEGATIVE BREAST CANCER, ESMO Vienna 2012, prIME Oncology activity Satellite Symposium

Studio SNAP A randomized phase II study evaluating three different schedules of nab-paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer Primary endpoint: Progression Free Survival (PFS) Secondary endpoints: Adverse events according to CTCAE v4 Feasibility: completing treatment according to the protocol for at least 24 weeks Disease control: stable disease for ≥24 weeks or confirmed overall partial response or complete response Overall survival: time from randomization to death from any cause

SNAP Disegno dello Studio nab-pac- 75 mg/m2 days 1,8,15,22 C Randomization allocation 1:1:1 (A:B:C) Note that the schedules of 150 mg/m2 differ in induction (days 1,8,15) and maintenance arm B (days 1,15) nab-paclitaxel administered in 28 day cycles Continue treatment until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity

Studio EFFECT A randomized phase II study to evaluate the EFficacy and impact on Function of two different doses of nab-paclitaxEl in elderly patients with advanCed breasT cancer Primary endpoint: Event-free survival (EFS) where an event is either disease progression or death or decline in functional status Secondary endpoints: Objective response rate (ORR) Clinical benefit rate (CBR) Progression free survival (PFS) Overall survival (OS) Incidence of Adverse events (defined by CTCAE v4.0)

EFFECT Disegno dello Studio Age ≥ 65 Locally recurrent or metastatic HER2-neg breast cancer or HER2- positive but considered not eligible for anti-HER2 therapy No prior CT for advanced breast cancer Measurable or evaluable disease N=156 nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 day 1, 8, 15 q 28 nab-paclitaxel 100mg/m2 R till disease progression or toxicity Stratification factors: age 65-74 vs ≥ 75 yrs diabetes yes, no   G3-4 CIRS yes, no IADL deficient yes, no