Development of Standards for Transit Priority Paul R. Olson, P.E. PTOE FHWA Western Resource Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Metro Transit INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS)
Advertisements

Bus Priority in Portland - Lessons Learned
School Management Tracking Solutions
The Downtown Seattle Bus Monitoring System Collecting and Analyzing Transit Travel Time Data Owen Kehoe, PE, PTOE King County Metro Transit : Seattle,
Transit Signal Prioritization (TSP) Considerations within RTS Corridors Rapid Transit System Steering Committee Technical Memorandum 2 Existing Conditions.
Overview What is the National ITS Architecture? User Services
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA) Caltrans Traffic Signal Management and Surveillance System (CTNET) Presented by Metro.
FTA’s Small Starts Program Charlotte, North Carolina October 11, 2007.
Transit Signal Priority Applications New Technologies, New Opportunities Peter Koonce, PE APTA BRT Conference – Seattle, WA Wednesday, May 5, 2009 Technology.
WMATA Bus ITS Project Update Transit Signal Priority Briefing to the Traffic Signals and Operations Working Group April 21, 2005.
Presented by: SAGE KAMIYA, P.E., PTOE
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) Metro’s Countywide Signal Priority Program T3 Webinar January 22, 2008.
Transit Signal Priority Work Group Report 7/30/13
Electronic Fare Collection CEE582. Vehicle-Based Systems (Fixed-Route) Exterior Route and Destination Announcements Electronic Destination Sign Vehicle.
Advanced Public Transit Systems (APTS) Transit ITS CEE582.
TSP Must Fit Within An Overall Agency ITS Plan. Transit Priority Data Needs Vehicle Location –Speed Door & Lift Status –Predictions Passenger Counting.
APTS – Fourth Day Miscellaneous Topics. Fleet Management Fixed Route versus Paratransit Operations versus Maintenance.
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the Access for All Advisory Committee April.
Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida Technology Session: 21 st Annual Transportation Disadvantaged Best Practices and.
Transit Priority Systems (TPS) Chun Wong, P.E. City of Los Angeles, Department of Transportation T3 Webinar.
1Prepared by AC Transit Service Development Transit Signal Priority For the San Pablo Rapid Bus.
IST Work Programme 2001 RATP contribution n These research views are not committing RATP to the European Commission and the IST Work Programme 2001 n They.
Evolving TSP to meet the needs of the ITS community 1.
Civitas Elan – Ljubljana ITS measures. Treviso May 18, testing innovative measures in urban transport - focus on mobilising citizens - 37 partners.
Lead the Way APTA Transit Standards Development “BUS RAPID TRANSIT”
“IF YOU CAN MANAGE IT, YOU CAN MEASURE IT” Robert Hudson, Performance Analyst Dept. Planning/Office of Research & Analysis.
Role of the Highway-Rail Intersection in the National ITS Architecture IEEE WG14 June 20, 2000 Bruce Eisenhart Lockheed Martin Architecture Development.
National ITS Architecture Update Research and Innovative Technology Administration ITS Joint Program Office Professional Capacity Building Program Talking.
WVDOT/MPO/FHWA Transportation Planning Conference WVDOT Traffic Data Collection, Processing and Analysis Handbook Presented to September 16, 2015 Presented.
Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Project Update TAC - July 21, 2015 Nick Perfili, FCDOT Department of Transportation.
RITIS Standards Evaluation & Usage Presented at the NCR REGIONAL ITS ARCHITECTURE WORKING GROUP By Jason Ellison November 3, 2007.
Optimization of DATA Transmission for Transport Sector User case, TMB David Lumbreras Project Area Manager.
Transit Priority Strategies for Multiple Routes under Headway-based Operations Shandong University, China & University of Maryland at College Park, USA.
NESTS Transit Planning Project Facilities and Technology Briefing with CAST of Cornell University and Creighton Manning Engineering, LLP.
May 1, 2014 East Gude Drive Pedestrian Road Safety Audit Stakeholder Pedestrian Safety Meeting.
U.S. DOT T3 Webinar Mobile Device Technology TCRP Synthesis 91 April 10, 2012 Case Study LeeTran – Lee County, FL Mike Horsting, AICP 1.
Transportation Checklist
1 Item 12: Report on Draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for the National Capital Region Michael Farrell TPB Staff Presentation to the Transportation Planning.
Agenda  Message Class Update  SAIG Transmission Header Changes  School Testing  Software Developer Feedback.
September 25, 2013 Greg Davis FHWA Office of Safety Research, Development and Test Overview of V2I Safety Applications.
1 Challenge the future Feed forward mechanisms in public transport Data driven optimisation dr. ir. N. van Oort Assistant professor public transport EMTA.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Overcoming Multi-Jurisdictional Challenges Lessons Learned Implementing Bus Signal Priority.
Transit Signal Priority (TSP). Problem: Transit vehicles are slow Problem: Transit vehicles are effected even more than cars by traffic lights –The number.
Transit Signal Priority (TSP): Deployment Issues and R&D Needs as Identified by Practitioners Hallie Smith Brendon Hemily.
The Promotion of Active Safety Measures in Japan - collision damage mitigation brake - February 2007 Road Transport Bureau Road Transport Bureau MLIT Japan.
PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING RFTA Solicitation No Automated Vehicle Locator (AVL) & Computer-Aided Dispatch (CAD) System and Related Services.
Shreya Gadepalli Regional Director (India) August 2015 The BRT Standard Bus Rapid Transit Best Practices.
ITSA Phoenix1 Traveler Information & Related Standards Past, Present, & Future Information Forum Showcase ITS America Annual Meeting May 3, 2005 Joel Markowitz,
Line 22 BRT: Summary Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority May 2003.
Intelligent Transportation Systems Data Dictionaries and Data Registry Thomas M. Kurihara IEEE ITS Program Manager Standards Activities 17 February 1999.
Seamless Public Transportation Through ITS Louis F. Sanders Director, Technical Services American Public Transportation Association.
Transit Signal Priority: Managing Expectations Kevin N. Balke, Ph.D., P.E TransLink ® Research Center Director Texas Transportation Institute Transportation.
Chapter 12 The Network Development Life Cycle
Overview of King County Transit Signal Priority Program T3 Webinar January 22, 2008.
Presentation to TransPort
Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data David T. Crout Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (TriMet) Presented at Transportation.
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the National Capital Region Transportation.
January 26, 2001 Self Assesmsnts of Operations and Management 1 Self-Assessment Process for Roadway Operations Prepared for TexITE Meeting San Antonio,
Chapter 12 Software Support and Maintenance. Product released! Software Released! Now what?
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
Arlington County’s Transit ITS Program Needs Assessment and Planning Study Presented to ITS Virginia | July 17, 2015.
TCIP Fare Collection Rob Ayers Prepared for Talking Technology and Transportation (T3) State-of-the-State Update on U.S. Fare Collection Standards December.
Overview of SCP WG By: Paul R. Olson, P.E. PTOE FHWA Western Resource Center.
About Blacksburg Transit Started in 1983 Grown from 8 buses to 46 Grown from 3 routes to 12 Operator staff has increased from 26 part-time operators to.
NE Pasco (The Hills) Multimodal Safety Action Plan Pasco County, FL
An ACSLite Case Study Riva Road in Annapolis, MD
Product released! Software Released! Now what?.
Chapter 12: Software Support and Maintenance
Presentation transcript:

Development of Standards for Transit Priority Paul R. Olson, P.E. PTOE FHWA Western Resource Center

Quick Quotes The only reason God was able to create the Universe in six days was because He didnt have to worry about the installed base. - Enzo Torresi The nice thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from. - Andrew Tanenbaum

Reminder These ARE Communications Standards They ARE NOT Hardware Standards

Why? Cross-boundary operations Many systems involved Multiple agencies Different points of view Evolving systems Open systems

What Systems

Common Understanding Two different points of view Many different goals Two different sets of terms Many potential pieces to standardize

Legacy Issues Incompatibilities in current systems Glacial change Market forces Vendor politics Standards Development Organizations Who is in charge?

Transit Priority Data Needs Vehicle Location Speed Door & Lift Status Predictions Passenger Counting Stop Location Near side Far side Vehicle Routing Stopping Turning Schedule Adherence Vehicle Identification

Transit Management Center Location Monitoring Schedule Information Desired Headway Ridership Monitoring Other

Traffic Signal Systems Monitoring Services request for priority Resolve conflicting priority requests Recovery from priority request

Traffic Management Center Signal System Management Signal Coordination Signal Timing Feedback

SCP Logical System Model

Scenario 1

Scenario 1 Examples Los Angeles, CA Buses use loop detectors to communicate to the transit management center Transit management center determines whether to grant priority Central system sends messages to the local controllers and adjusts timing accordingly

Scenario 2

Scenario 2 Examples Montgomery County, MD AVL System communicates to a central traffic signal system Central system sends messages to the local controllers and adjusts timing accordingly

Scenario 3

Scenario 3 Example

Scenario 4

Scenario 4 Example Portland, OR AVL System on bus determines whether to provide priority (based on criteria) Bus sends signal directly to traffic signal to request priority

Who Is The Development Team? Subject matter experts Infrastructure owners & users Transportation professionals Communications experts Equipment manufacturers Automobile manufacturers Information service providers Public Safety Officials

What and Who?

ITE, NEMA, AASHTO NTCIP Standards Actuated Signal Controllers NTCIP 1202 Signal Control Priority NTCIP 1211

Transit PRG

APTA Formerly NTCIP 14xx Suite Now TCIP V 2.4 New group for Signal Control Prioritization is TCIP Technical Working Group #10 Standards for a Priority Request Generator

Status NTCIP 1211 User Comment Draft released Revisions now at Version 33 To final Ballot CY 2004 APTA TCIP Start from old NTCIP 14xx documents Now at Version 2.4 Final Version will be 3.0 Due out 2005

Questions