Influence of the neutron-pair transfer on fusion V. V. Sargsyan*, G. G. Adamian, N. V. Antonenko In collaboration with W. Scheid, H. Q. Zhang, D. Lacroix,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nuclear Binding Energy
Advertisements

CoulEx. W. Udo Schröder, 2012 Shell Models 2 Systematic Changes in Nuclear Shapes Møller, Nix, Myers, Swiatecki, Report LBL 1993: Calculations fit to.
The Kinetic Theory of Gases
Coulomb excitation with radioactive ion beams
Reaction dynamics of light nuclei around the Coulomb barrier Alessia Di Pietro INFN-Laboratori Nazionali del Sud ARIS 2014Alessia Di Pietro,INFN-LNS.
Single Neutron Stripping Reactions for Structural Study of 23 O Ravinder Kumar Department of Physics Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra Kurukshetra -
Emission of Scission Neutrons: Testing the Sudden Approximation N. Carjan Centre d'Etudes Nucléaires de Bordeaux-Gradignan,CNRS/IN2P3 – Université Bordeaux.
Microscopic time-dependent analysis of neutrons transfers at low-energy nuclear reactions with spherical and deformed nuclei V.V. Samarin.
The Collective Model Aard Keimpema.
W. Udo Schröder, 2007 Spontaneous Fission 1. W. Udo Schröder, 2007 Spontaneous Fission 2 Liquid-Drop Oscillations Bohr&Mottelson II, Ch. 6 Surface & Coulomb.
The Dynamical Deformation in Heavy Ion Collisions Junqing Li Institute of Modern Physics, CAS School of Nuclear Science and Technology, Lanzhou University.
RFSS: Lecture 9 Nuclear Reactions
Single Particle Energies

Higher Order Multipole Transition Effects in the Coulomb Dissociation Reactions of Halo Nuclei Dr. Rajesh Kharab Department of Physics, Kurukshetra University,
1 Role of the nuclear shell structure and orientation angles of deformed reactants in complete fusion Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Flerov Laboratory.
EURISOL User Group, Florence, Jan Spin-Dependent Pre-Equilibrium Exciton Model Calculations for Heavy Ions E. Běták Institute of Physics SAS,
25 9. Direct reactions - for example direct capture: Direct transition from initial state |a+A> to final state B +  geometrical.
Lecture 10 Energy production. Summary We have now established three important equations: Hydrostatic equilibrium: Mass conservation: Equation of state:
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
W. Udo Schröder, 2007 Semi-Classical Reaction Theory 1.
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, 1 st Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Nuclear Binding Energy B tot (A,Z) = [ Zm H + Nm n - m(A,Z) ] c 2 B  m.
Structure of Be hyper-isotopes Masahiro ISAKA (RIKEN) Collaborators: H. Homma and M. Kimura (Hokkaido University)
Quantum Monte-Carlo for Non-Markovian Dynamics Collaborator : Denis Lacroix Guillaume Hupin GANIL, Caen FRANCE  Exact  TCL2 (perturbation)  TCL4  NZ2.
Coupled-Channel Computation of Direct Neutron Capture and (d,p) reactions on Non- Spherical Nuclei Goran Arbanas (ORNL) Ian J. Thompson (LLNL) with Filomena.
Cross section for potential scattering
NUCLEAR MODELS.
Effects of self-consistence violations in HF based RPA calculations for giant resonances Shalom Shlomo Texas A&M University.
Neutron transfer reactions at large internuclear distances studied with the PRISMA spectrometer and the AGATA demonstrator.
Collective Model. Nuclei Z N Character j Q obs. Q sp. Qobs/Qsp 17 O 8 9 doubly magic+1n 5/ K doubly magic -1p 3/
Nuclear Reactions AP Physics B Montwood High School R. Casao.
Cross Sections One of the most important quantities we measure in nuclear physics is the cross section. Cross sections always have units of area and in.
Realistic Calculations of Neutrino-Nucleus Reaction Cross sections T.S. Kosmas Realistic Calculations of Neutrino-Nucleus Reaction Cross sections T.S.
Nuclear deformation in deep inelastic collisions of U + U.
1 Reaction Mechanisms with low energy RIBs: limits and perspectives Alessia Di Pietro INFN-Laboratori Nazionali del Sud.
Isotope dependence of the superheavy nucleus formation cross section LIU Zu-hua( 刘祖华) (China Institute of Atomic Energy)
Wolfram KORTEN 1 Euroschool Leuven – September 2009 Coulomb excitation with radioactive ion beams Motivation and introduction Theoretical aspects of Coulomb.
Fusion, transfer and breakup of light weakly-bound and halo nuclei at near barrier energies. J. Lubian Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Niteroi,
POPULATION OF GROUND-STATE ROTATIONAL BANDS OF SUPERHEAVY NUCLEI PRODUCED IN COMPLETE FUSION REACTIONS A.S. Zubov, V.V. Sargsyan, G.G. Adamian, N.V.Antonenko.
Breakup effects of weakly bound nuclei on the fusion reactions C.J. Lin, H.Q. Zhang, F. Yang, Z.H. Liu, X.K. Wu, P. Zhou, C.L. Zhang, G.L. Zhang, G.P.
Coupling of (deformed) core and weakly bound neutron M. Kimura (Hokkaido Univ.)
Some aspects of reaction mechanism study in collisions induced by Radioactive Beams Alessia Di Pietro.
ChE 452 Lecture 25 Non-linear Collisions 1. Background: Collision Theory Key equation Method Use molecular dynamics to simulate the collisions Integrate.
Application of correlated states of interacting particles in nonstationary and modulated LENR systems Vladimir I.Vysotskii Kiev National Shevchenko University,
Lecture 23: Applications of the Shell Model 27/11/ Generic pattern of single particle states solved in a Woods-Saxon (rounded square well)
Nucleon DIffusion in Heavy-Ion Collisions
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Extreme independent particle model!!! Does the core really remain inert?
Study on ν-A Reaction Cross Sections within CRPA Jeong-Yeon LEE and Yeong-Duk KIM Sejong University, KOREA.
Reaction studies with low-energy weakly-bound beams Alessia Di Pietro INFN-Laboratori Nazionali del Sud NN 2015Alessia Di Pietro,INFN-LNS.
Collective model Vibrational States Average shape Instantaneous shape
1 Synthesis of superheavy elements with Z = in hot fusion reactions Wang Nan College of Physics, SZU Collaborators: S G Zhou, J Q Li, E G Zhao,
Fusion, transfer and breakup of light weakly bound nuclei at near barrier energies. Paulo R. S. Gomes Univ. Fed. Fluminense (UFF), Niteroi, Brazil Eurisol.
Fusion of light halo nuclei
Faddeev Calculation for Neutron-Rich Nuclei Eizo Uzu (Tokyo Univ. of Science) Collaborators Masahiro Yamaguchi (RCNP) Hiroyuki Kamada (Kyusyu Inst. Tech.)
Time dependent GCM+GOA method applied to the fission process ESNT janvier / 316 H. Goutte, J.-F. Berger, D. Gogny CEA/DAM Ile de France.
Why the complete fusion of weakly bound nuclei is enhanced at sub- barrier energies and suppressed above the barrier. Paulo R. S. Gomes Univ. Fed. Fluminense.
Dynamical Model of Surrogate Reaction Y. Aritomo, S. Chiba, and K. Nishio Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokai, Japan 1. Introduction Surrogate reactions.
1 Z.Q. Feng( 冯兆庆 ) 1 G.M. Jin( 靳根明 ) 2 F.S. Zhang ( 张丰收 ) 1 Institute of Modern Physics, CAS 2 Institute of Low Energy Nuclear Physics Beijing NormalUniversity.
Production mechanism of neutron-rich nuclei in 238 U+ 238 U at near-barrier energy Kai Zhao (China Institute of Atomic Energy) Collaborators: Zhuxia Li,
Lecture 4 1.The role of orientation angles of the colliding nuclei relative to the beam energy in fusion-fission and quasifission reactions. 2.The effect.
Pairing Evidence for pairing, what is pairing, why pairing exists, consequences of pairing – pairing gap, quasi-particles, etc. For now, until we see what.
Determining Reduced Transition Probabilities for 152 ≤ A ≤ 248 Nuclei using Interacting Boson Approximation (IBA-1) Model By Dr. Sardool Singh Ghumman.
Shape parameterization
Peripheral collisions Hans-Jürgen Wollersheim
Satoshi Adachi Research Center for Nuclear Physics (RCNP),
Nuclear Chemistry CHEM 396 Chapter 4, Part B Dr. Ahmad Hamaed
Parametrisation of Binding Energies
Fusion and neutron transfer reactions with weakly bound nuclei within time-dependent and coupled channel approaches VIACHESLAV SAMARIN Flerov Laboratory.
Breakup of weakly bound nuclei and its influence on fusion
V.V. Sargsyan, G.G. Adamian, N.V.Antonenko
Presentation transcript:

Influence of the neutron-pair transfer on fusion V. V. Sargsyan*, G. G. Adamian, N. V. Antonenko In collaboration with W. Scheid, H. Q. Zhang, D. Lacroix, G. Scamps ECT*, Trento, Italy *Joint Institute For Nuclear Research

Outline I.Quantum Diffusion Approach: Formalism II.Role of deformations of colliding nuclei III.Role of neutron pair transfer IV.Summary

The assumptions of the QD approach The quantum diffusion approach based on the following assumptions: 1.The capture (fusion) can be treated in term of a single collective variable: the relative distance R between the colliding nuclei. 2.The internal excitations (for example low-lying collective modes such as dynamical quadropole and octupole excitations of the target and projectile, one particle excitations etc. ) can be presented as an environment. 3.Collective motion is effectively coupled with internal excitations through the environment.

The formalism of quantum-diffusion approach The full Hamiltonian of the system:

The formalism of quantum-diffusion approach The full Hamiltonian of the system:  The collective subsystem (inverted harmonic oscillator)

The formalism of quantum-diffusion approach The full Hamiltonian of the system:  The collective subsystem (inverted harmonic oscillator)  The internal subsystem (set of harmonic oscillators)

The formalism of quantum-diffusion approach The full Hamiltonian of the system:  The collective subsystem (inverted harmonic oscillator)  The internal subsystem (set of harmonic oscillators)  Coupling between the subsystems (linearity is assumed) Adamian et al., PRE71,016121(2005) Sargsyan et al., PRC77,024607(2008)

The random force and dissipative kern  The equation for the collective momentum contains dissipative kern and random force: --- Random force --- Dissipative Kern

The random force and dissipative kern  The equation for the collective momentum contains dissipative kern and random force: One can assumes some spectra for the environment and replace the summation over the integral: --- Random force --- Dissipative Kern --- relaxation time for the internal subsystem

The analytical expressions for the first and second moments in case of linear coupling Functions determine the dynamic of the first and second moments --- are the roots of the following equation

Nucleus-nucleus interaction potential: Double-folding formalism used for nuclear part: Nucleus-nucleus potential: 1.density - dependent effective nucleon-nucleon interaction 2.Woods-Saxon parameterization for nucleus density Adamian et al., Int. J. Mod. Phys E 5, 191 (1996).

Approximation: realistic nucleus-nucleus potential  inverted oscillator The frequency of oscillator is found from the condition of equality of classical action  The real interaction between nuclei can be approximated by the inverted oscillator.

The capture cross section The capture cross-section is a sum of partial capture cross-sections G (R 0,P 0 ) t=0 (R, P) The partial capture probability obtained by integrating the propagator G from the initial state (R 0,P 0 ) at time t=0 to the finale state (R, P) at time t: --- the reduced de Broglie wavelength --- the partial capture probability at fixed energy and angular momenta

Propagator for the inverted oscillator  For the inverted oscillator the propagator has the form:  The expression for the capture probability --- the mean value of the collective coordinate and momentum --- the variances and Dadonov, Man’ko, Tr. Fiz. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR 167, 7 (1986).

Initial conditions for two regimes of interaction r ex r in R int E c.m. > U(R int ) -- relative motion is coupled with other degrees of freedom E c.m. < U(R int ) -- almost free motion Nuclear forces start to act at R int =R b +1.1 fm, where the nucleon density of colliding nuclei reaches 10% of saturation density.

16 O+ 208 Pb reaction Reactions with spherical nuclear are good test for the verification of the approach. Using these reaction we fixed the parameters used in calculation. The change of the slope of the excitation function means, that at sub-barrier energies the diffusion becomes a dominant component.

Reactions with spherical nuclei  Reactions with the spherical nuclei more clearly shows the behavior of the excitation function.

The features of quantum diffusion approach 1.The coupling with respect to the relative coordinate results in a random force and a dissipation kernel. t 2.The integral term in the equations of motion means that the system is non-Markovian and has a “memory” of the motion over the trajectory preceding the instant t. 3.Predictive power. Sargsyan et. al., EPJ A45, 125 (2010) Sargsyan et. al., PRA 83, (2011) Sargsyan et. al., PRA 84, (2011) Our approach takes into account the fluctuation and dissipation effects in the collisions of heavy ions which model the coupling with various channels.

Role of deformation of nuclei in capture process  At fixed bombarding energy the capture occurs above or below the Coulomb barrier depending on mutual orientations of colliding nuclei ! The lowest Coulomb barrier The highest Coulomb barrier

Reactions with deformed nuclei  The effect depends on the charges and deformations of the colliding nuclei.  The used averaging procedure seems to work correct. Sargsyan et. al., PRC 85, (2012)

Role of neutron transfer  Neutrons are insensitive to the Coulomb barrier and, therefore, their transfer starts at larger separations before the projectile is captured by the target nucleus.  It is generally thought that the sub-barrier capture (fusion) cross section increases because of the neutron transfer.  The present experimental data (for example 60 Ni Mo system, Scarlassara et. al, EPJ Web Of Conf. 17, (2011) ) specify in complexity of the role of neutron transfer in the capture (fusion) process and provide a useful benchmark for theoretical models. Why the influence of the neutron transfer is strong in some reactions, but is weak in others ?

 Large enhancement of the excitation function for the 40 Ca+ 96 Zr reaction with respect to the 40 Ca+ 90 Zr reaction!

The model assumptions  Sub-barrier capture depends on two-neutron transfer with positive Q-value.  Before the crossing of Coulomb barrier, 2-neutron transfer occurs and lead to population of first 2+ state in recipient nucleus (donor nucleus remains in ground state).  Because after two-neutron transfer, the mass numbers, the deformation parameters of interacting nuclei, and, respectively, the height and shape of the Coulomb barrier are changed.

Sargsyan et. al., PRC 84, (2011) Sargsyan et. al., PRC 85, (2012)

Sargsyan et. al., PRC 84, (2011) Sargsyan et. al., PRC 85, (2012)

Reactions with two neutron transfer

Pair transfer ?  Reactions with Q 1n 0  Good agreement between calculations and experimental data is an argument of pair transfer  By describing sub- barrier capture, we demonstrate indirectly strong spatial 2-neutron correlation and nuclear surface enhancement of neutron pairing  Indication for Surface character of pairing interaction ?

Enhancement or suppression ?  2n-transfer can also suppress capture  If deformation of the system decreases due to neutron transfer, capture cross section becomes smaller

Summary  The quantum diffusion approach is applied to study the capture process in the reactions with spherical and deformed nuclei at sub-barrier energies. The available experimental data at energies above and below the Coulomb barrier are well described.  Change of capture cross section after neutron transfer occurs due to change of deformations of nuclei. The neutron transfer is indirect effect of quadrupole deformation.  Neutron transfer can enhance or suppress or weakly influence the capture cross section.

Reactions with weakly bound projectiles  There are no systematic trends of breakup in reactions studied!  For some system with larger (smaller) Z T breakup is smaller (larger).? The break-up probability:

Reactions with weakly bound projectiles  There are no systematic trends of breakup in reactions studied!  For some system with larger (smaller) Z T breakup is smaller (larger).? The break-up probability:

Friction depending on the relative distance of colliding nuclei  Frictions is a result of the overlapping of the nuclear densities.  For the light systems, the coupling parameter should depend on the relative distance between the colliding nuclei and, as a result the friction becomes coordinate-dependent.  Comparing the results, obtained with the analytic expressions (constant friction) for the equations of motions with the numerical one (coordinate- dependent), one can assume that the linear coupling limit is suitable for the heavy systems and not very deep sub-barrier energies.

Calculations with constant and R- dependent friction