“ Take time to smell the roses ”.  1. Better understanding of student learning outcomes assessment ◦ at the program level – at the end of program  2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SCHOOL LEADERS: THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL INDUCTION
Advertisements

Session Learning Target You will gain a better understanding of identifying quality evidence to justify a performance rating for each standard and each.
Developing Our Leaders – Creating a Foundation for Success
Standards Definition of standards Types of standards Purposes of standards Characteristics of standards How to write a standard Alexandria University Faculty.
A Practical Guide. The Handbook Part I BCCC Vision of Assessment Guiding Principles of Assessment Part II The Assessment Model Part III A guide on how.
STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT. Cycle of Assessment Course Goals/ Intended Outcomes Means Of Assessment And Criteria For Success Summary of Data.
Student Learning Outcomes Curriculum Change Request Academic Council Presentation Gary Howard Rosemary Hays-Thomas October 22, 2004.
21 st Century Assessment Peg Henson and Laura Snow SD Department of Education
An Outcomes-based Assessment Model for General Education Amy Driscoll WASC EDUCATIONAL SEMINAR February 1, 2008.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Pace University Assessment Plan. Outline I. What is assessment? II. How does it apply to Pace? III. Who’s involved? IV. How will assessment be implemented.
Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
1 How LRW Faculty can Contribute to Their Law School’s Assessment Plan David Thomson (University of Denver) Sophie Sparrow (University of New Hampshire)
What should be the basis of
Catherine Wehlburg, Ph.D. Office for Assessment & Quality Enhancement.
Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division.
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Assessment Assessment Planning Assessment Improvements Assessment Data Dialogue & Reflection.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
The Role of Assessment in the EdD – The USC Approach.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
Jeanne M. Clerc, Ed.D. Western Illinois University (WIU) October 14, 2011.
1 Ohio’s Entry Year Teacher Program Review Ohio Confederation of Teacher Education Organizations Fall Conference: October 23, 2008 Presenter: Lori Lofton.
David Steer Department of Geosciences The University of Akron Learning objectives and assessments Oct 2013.
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
Academic Assessment at UTB Steve Wilson Director of Academic Assessment.
August 3,  Review “Guiding Principles for SLO Assessment” (ASCCC, 2010)  Review Assessment Pulse Roundtable results  Discuss and formulate our.
Writing Student Learning Outcomes Consider the course you teach.
PARENT COORDINATOR INFORMATION SESSION PARENT ACCOUNTABILITY Wednesday, July 20, 2011 Madelene Chan, Supt. D24 Danielle DiMango, Supt. D25.
The College of Saint Rose School of Education Department of Literacy and Special Education Teacher Candidate Assessment.
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
Assessing General Education Workshop for College of the Redwoods Fred Trapp August 18, 2008.
Understanding Meaning and Importance of Competency Based Assessment
Collaborative Programmes Annual and Periodic Quality Assurance Arrangements Rebecca Broome Quality Management Division November 2007.
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
On SLOA (SLO Assessment). (after Munch) Will Lecture die? No…
AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF ARMENIA Developing Course-Based Student Learning Outcomes July 8, 2014.
Writing Narratives Based on ACGME Competencies. Narratives What Are They?  Written Evaluation of Student Performance Formative  Mid-Course Evaluation.
Session Objectives At the end of the session you should be able to:- Explain how learning theories such as Kolb and Blooms impact teaching practice Identify.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.
THE SLO PROCESS #1 create/update SLO’s, rubrics, & assessment methods #2 assess all students in all sections of all courses #3 maintain SLO assessment.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
An Integral Part of Professional Learning Communities.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Using Groups in Academic Advising Dr. Nancy S. King Kennesaw State University.
Presented to GETSI by Ellen Iverson, SERC, Carleton College Developed as InTeGrate talk by David Steer Department of Geosciences The University of Akron.
The School Effectiveness Framework
New Faculty Orientation August 2015 Assessment: Challenges and Opportunities.
21 st Century Learning and Instruction Session 2: Balanced Assessment.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
30/10/2006 University Leaders Meeting 1 Student Assessment: A Mandatory Requirement For Accreditation Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chair-Person National Quality.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
+ Priory Curriculum & Instruction Faculty Inservice, August 2014.
1 IT/Cybersecurity - ICRDCE Conference Day Aligning Program, Course, and Class Objectives / Outcomes.
Your Teaching Narrative
D2L Refresher Upload content into the Content section in a D2L course
Program Learning Outcomes
Starting with the End in Sight…
Teaching and Learning with Technology
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Curriculum Coordinator: Marela Fiacco Date : February 29, 2015
Presentation transcript:

“ Take time to smell the roses ”

 1. Better understanding of student learning outcomes assessment ◦ at the program level – at the end of program  2. Value the faculty role in student learning outcomes assessment at the program level

 A student learning outcome is a specific statement that describes what the student is to learn, understand, or to be able to do as a results of a lesson or a series of lessons.

 Student learning outcomes assessment is an ongoing process aimed at understanding and improving student learning.

 Create an environment that promotes educational excellence through evidence- based dialogue about student learning and academic programs.

1… not an end in itself. 2.…most effective when it reflects the complexity of learning. 3. …outcome-oriented. 4. … a process. 5. …depends on faculty commitment. 6. …to improve.

◦ What do we want our students to learn? ◦ Are they learning it? How do we know? ◦ Why or why not?

CHARACTERISTICS:  Describe broad and comprehensive student learning outcomes of the program  Understandable to students  Arrived at collaboratively  Measurable  Employ active verbs usually taken from higher levels of Bloom’s taxonomy

Creating/Evaluating 3 Analyzing/Applying 2 Understanding/Remembering 1

◦ Servant Leadership Program Outcome : Develop pharmacists committed to the service of their profession and communities and in possession of the leadership skills required to provide service regardless of the pharmacist’s position or title. Blooms Level (3) ◦ Communication Program Outcome : Develop pharmacists who, as individuals and in collaboration with others, utilize effective verbal, non-verbal, and written communication skills to promote evidence-based, safe, and appropriate medication use to achieve optimal patient care. Blooms Level (3)

◦ Servant Leadership Program Outcome: Develop pharmacists committed to the service of their profession and communities and in possession of the leadership skills required to provide service regardless of the pharmacist’s position or title. Blooms Level (3)  Student Learning Outcomes for Servant Leadership  SL1: The student will articulate the roles, responsibilities, and characteristics of leaders who are engaged in service to their organizations, communities, and profession. Blooms Level (1)  SL2: The student will possess and articulate awareness of self as a leader through the discovery of their strengths and values. Blooms Level (1)  SL3: The student will demonstrate a service orientation toward others by utilizing their talents, knowledge and skills to achieve the common good. Blooms Level (2)  SL4: The student will demonstrate the ability to work in teams by utilizing the principles of combining individual strengths, team dynamics, and emotional intelligence. Blooms Level (2)  SL5: The student will participate in leading change, within groups and organizations, aimed at accomplishing goals for the common good. Blooms Level (3)

 Align and link SLOs to courses  Course syllabi include SLOs relevant to that course  Align and link course learning objectives with SLOs in courses

CourseSL1SL 2SL 3SL 4SL5 Phar 372XX Phar 382XXXX Phar 480XX Phar 482XX Phar 572X

 Assessment data based on actual student work: ◦ Embedded Assessments – existing tests, exams, or rubric based skills tools, portfolios

Exams and Exam Items o Align/link exams with student learning outcomes. Which exam items are measuring which outcomes? o Test manager software

Rubrics ◦ Align/link rubrics with student learning outcomes. Which rubric components are measuring which outcomes? ◦ Recorded in data base system

 Extract, aggregate, and analyze student performance results by outcome: ◦ From coded exam bank ◦ From coded rubric system

 Aligned/linked SLOs to courses  Course syllabi include SLOs relevant to that course  Aligned/linked course learning objectives with SLOs in courses

 Formative: On-going; Monitor cohorts of students to provide feedback to faculty who teach, department leaders, deans, assessment committees etc..;  Summative: At the end of program; Analyze how well cohorts of students achieved program level student learning outcomes

 Isn’t Assessment the Same Thing as Grading? NO Grading = Evaluative process Outcomes Assessment = Ameliorative process

 Why Should We Do Assessment? ◦ The Primary Purpose For Doing Assessment Is…. To Improve Student Learning

 QUESTIONS ????