Historical Changes in Stay-at-Home Mothers: 1969 to 2009 American Sociological Association Annual Meeting Atlanta, GA August 14-17, 2010 Rose M. Kreider,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
You have been given a mission and a code. Use the code to complete the mission and you will save the world from obliteration…
Advertisements

1 The Foreign-Born Population in the United States: 2003.
In-Home Pantry Inventory Updated: November Background and Methodology Background In 1996 a National Eating Trends (NET) pantry survey found that.
1 Inducements–Call Blocking. Aware of the Service?
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 16 Unemployment: Search and Efficiency Wages.
Copyright © 2002 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1.
Citizenship Acquisition in the United States of America Ather H. Akbari (Saint Marys University & Atlantic Metropolis Centre)
Union Members in 2009 Jim Walker Economist Bureau of Labor Statistics January 29, 2010.
1 Changing Profile of Household Sector Credit and Deposits in Indian Banking System -Deepak Mathur November 30, 2010.
Gender and Statistics in Liberia Honorable Assistant Minister Jerolinmek Piah Ministry of Gender and Development, Government of Liberia January 26, 2009.
Stuart Kerachsky Acting Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics October 14, 2009 EMBARGOED until October 14, :00 a.m. E.D.T.
© 2006 POPULATION REFERENCE BUREAU Marlene A. Lee Senior Policy Analyst Domestic Programs 300 MILLION AND COUNTING Education and Workforce: The Critical.
1 The Academic Profession and the Managerial University: An International Comparative Study from Japan Akira Arimoto Research Institute for Higher Education.
1 Learning for employment vocational education and training policy in Europe in Europe Greece.
Statistical Significance and Population Controls Presented to the New Jersey SDC Annual Network Meeting June 6, 2007 Tony Tersine, U.S. Census Bureau.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Undergraduates in Minnesota: Who are they and how do they finance their education? Tricia Grimes Shefali Mehta Minnesota Office of Higher Education November.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
An in-the-ballpark estimate based on hypothetical situations and their potential effects on earnings and tax revenue for the State of Nebraska. Presented.
Year 6 mental test 5 second questions
Chapter 7 Sampling and Sampling Distributions
Understanding Multiyear Estimates from the American Community Survey Updated February 2013.
The Year Old Population
1 Understanding Multiyear Estimates from the American Community Survey.
1 The Social Survey ICBS Nurit Dobrin December 2010.
ABC Technology Project
401(k) Participant Behavior in a Volatile Economy Prepared for the 14 th Annual RRC Conference, August 2, 2012 by Barbara Butrica and Karen Smith 1.
…A NEW FORCE IN HISPANIC (NETWORK) TV -Kevin Downey, MEDIALIFE March 20, 2009.
March 2010 Teaching with Contingency Tables 1. Welcome! Introduction Session I – How to teach with contingency tables – DataCounts! tutorial – Interactive.
American Community Survey Data Products Updated February 2013.
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR PROJECTIONS SYSTEM Industry Projections Occupational Projections Population Projections Labor Force Projections Labor Force.
Name of presenter(s) or subtitle Canadian Netizens February 2004.
© 2013 E 3 Alliance 2013 CENTRAL TEXAS EDUCATION PROFILE Made possible through the investment of the.
Who is Poor in America Today? Learning About an Epidemic.
1 Opting-Out: An Exploration of Labor Force Participation of New Mothers By Jennifer Cheeseman Day and Barbara Downs Presented at the Population Association.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Week 1.
United Nations Population Division, Demographic dynamics of youth POPULATION DIVISION DESA.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
Gender, Race, and Ethnicity in the Labor Market
PSSA Preparation.
Estimating Net Child Care Price Elasticity Of Partnered Women With Preschool Children Using Discrete Structural Labour Supply-child Care Model Xiaodong.
Unpaid care activities among the Indigenous population: Analysis of the 2011 Census Mandy Yap and Dr. Nicholas Biddle This work is funded by the Commonwealth.
What the quarterly Labour Force Survey can tell us about the economic circumstances of people with sight loss Sue Keil RNIB.
1 Case Study 2: Choosing between ACS 1-, 3-, and 5-Year Estimates 2009 Population Association of America ACS Workshop April 29, 2009.
Children’s Religious Attendance and Child Well-Being Findings from the 2004 SIPP Jane Lawler Dye, U.S. Census Bureau For presentation at the American Sociological.
The Net Undercount of Children in the Decennial Census Based on Demographic Analysis by Dr. William P. O’Hare O’Hare Data and Demographic Services, LLC.
1 Where the Boys Aren’t: Recent Trends in U.S. College Enrollment Patterns Patricia M. Anderson Department of Economics Dartmouth College And NBER.
1 Avalaura L. Gaither and Eric C. Newburger Population Division U.S. Census Bureau Washington, D.C. June 2000 Population Division Working Paper No. 44.
1 Health Status and The Retirement Decision Among the Early-Retirement-Age Population Shailesh Bhandari Economist Labor Force Statistics Branch Housing.
The Gender Gap in Educational Attainment: Variation by Age, Race, Ethnicity, and Nativity in the United States Sarah R. Crissey, U.S. Census Bureau Nicole.
The Perfect Storm Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa - October 2007.
Changing Demographic Trends & Families in the U.S. Lecture 3 Introduction to Family Studies.
Father Involvement and Child Well-Being: 2006 Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) Child Well-Being Topical Module 1 By Jane Lawler Dye Fertility.
Determining Wages: The Changing Role of Education Professor David L. Schaffer and Jacob P. Raleigh, Economics Department We gratefully acknowledge generous.
Roomers and Boarders: Melissa Scopilliti, University of Maryland, Maryland Population Research Center; Population Division, U.S. Census Bureau.
Changing Demographic Trends & Families in the U.S. Lecture 3 Family Sociology.
Recent Trends in Worker Quality: A Midwest Perspective Daniel Aaronson and Daniel Sullivan Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago November 2002.
+ Women and Paid Work Family Sociology. + Paid Work, Gender & Families After rising for several decades, the labor force participation rate for women.
Changing Demographic Trends & Families in the U.S. Lecture 2 Family Sociology.
Changing Demographic Trends & Families in the U.S. Lecture 2 Introduction to Family Studies.
Changing Demographic Trends & Families in the U.S. Lecture 2 Introduction to Family Studies.
Age at First Marriage in Palestine Niveen ME Abu-Rmeileh, MPH, PhD Institute of Community and Public Health-Birzeit University Ulla Larsen, PhD University.
Hispanic Trends Project The Nation’s Changing Demographics Mark Hugo Lopez Director of Hispanic Research October 2014.
+ Women and Paid Work Introduction to Family Studies.
U.S. Hispanic Population: Population Size and Composition.
Presentation transcript:

Historical Changes in Stay-at-Home Mothers: 1969 to 2009 American Sociological Association Annual Meeting Atlanta, GA August 14-17, 2010 Rose M. Kreider, U.S. Census Bureau Diana B. Elliott, U.S. Census Bureau 1

Background The stay-at-home mother is relatively new concept: -- Post WW II prosperity provided jobs to married men and wages adequate to support a family -- Cultural values focused on family, coupled with stratified and gendered spheres of work and family -- Over the last 40 years, employment of married women with young children has been on the rise 2

Background The opt-out debate: -- Media outlets proclaimed a growing trend of high achieving married, working women “choosing” to leave the labor force to raise children -- Probably not a choice, but a result of the struggles to balance work and family -- Recent data show stay-at-home mothers are not primarily high achieving professionals, but are often foreign-born, Hispanic, and younger women with less education 3

Research needs The cultural and historical changes over the last 40 years suggest that in addition to the decline in the proportion of married mothers who stay at home, who they are has also changed – it’s a more selective group now. There is a need for a historical understanding of who stay-at-home mothers were and who they are now, relative to other married women with children who are in the labor force. 4

Research questions How has the proportion of married mothers who stay at home changed since 1969? With a lower proportion of married women with children staying home in recent years, how do they differ from their non-stay-at-home counterparts? How has the composition of this group changed over the last 40 years? 5

Data and Methods Data: March supplement of the Current Population Survey (CPS), also known as the Annual Social and Economic Supplement--ASEC (1969, 1979, 1989, 1999, 2009) Sample: Married couples (that include the householder) with own children under 15 in the household 6

Data and Methods Definition of stay-at-home mothers (DV): Those wives who report being out of the labor force all last year while their husbands report being in the labor force all last year (50 or more weeks) 7

Data and Methods Independent variables: Wife’s characteristics: Age, Education, Race, Hispanic origin, Nativity Couple characteristics: which spouse has more education Household characteristics: Female adult relative present, number of children under 5 present 8

Data and Methods Analysis: Descriptive table shows stay-at-home mothers’ characteristics compared to other mothers for each decade Logistic models predict the likelihood of being a stay-at-home mother over time with main effects and interactions by year of survey. 9

Source: Current Population Survey, Annual Social and Economic Supplement, 1969, 1979, 1989, 1999, 2009 Percent of married couple households with stay- at-home mothers: 1969 to

Percent of stay-at-home and other mothers who are age 15 to 24: 1969 to 2009 Source: Current Population Survey, Annual Social and Economic Supplement, 1969, 1979, 1989, 1999,

Percent of stay-at-home and other mothers who have less than a high school degree: 1969 to 2009 Source: Current Population Survey, Annual Social and Economic Supplement, 1969, 1979, 1989, 1999,

Percent of stay-at-home and other mothers who have a bachelor’s degree or more: 1969 to 2009 Source: Current Population Survey, Annual Social and Economic Supplement, 1969, 1979, 1989, 1999,

Percent of stay-at-home and other mothers who were Hispanic: 1979 to 2009 Source: Current Population Survey, Annual Social and Economic Supplement, 1979, 1989, 1999,

Percent of stay-at-home and other mothers who were foreign born: 1999 and 2009 Source: Current Population Survey, Annual Social and Economic Supplement, 1999,

Percent of stay-at-home and other mothers who were Hispanic and foreign born: 1999 and 2009 Source: Current Population Survey, Annual Social and Economic Supplement, 1999,

Predicting whether married mothers stay at home: Main effects model Source: Current Population Survey, Annual Social and Economic Supplement, 1969, 1979, 1989, 1999, Smaller proportion of stay-at-home mothers in later years (but odds ratios in 2009 are not as low as 1989 and 1999) More likely to be a stay-at-home mother: -Woman has less than a HS education – 1.3x more likely to stay home than those with a HS degree - Husband has more education – 1.2x more likely to stay home than those who have same education -- Two or more children under 5 – 2.8x more likely to stay home 17

Predicting whether married mothers stay at home: Main effects model Less likely to be a stay-at-home mother: - Under 35 years old (.57 age 15-24;.81 age 25-34) - Bachelors or higher – less likely (.77) than those with HS degree - Black women – less likely (.48) than White women -- Wife has more education – less likely (.72) than couples with the same level of education - Female adult relative present – less likely (.91) to stay home Source: Current Population Survey, Annual Social and Economic Supplement, 1969, 1979, 1989, 1999,

Predicting whether married mothers stay at home: Main effects model Results for the model are similar to those for the model. - Hispanic women – 1.4x more likely to stay home than White non-Hispanic women Source: Current Population Survey, Annual Social and Economic Supplement, 1979, 1989, 1999,

Predicting whether married mothers stay at home: Interaction effects model (1969 to 2009) Source: Current Population Survey, Annual Social and Economic Supplement, 1969, 1979, 1989, 1999, 2009 Three findings of note: Age: in 1989, 1999, 2009, younger mothers (age 15-24) more likely to stay home than younger mothers in 1969 and 1979 Education: for 1979 and later, women with less than a high school degree were more likely to stay at home than those with less than HS in Hispanic: Relative to White non-Hispanic women, Hispanic women more likely to stay at home in later decades than in

Predicting whether married mothers stay at home: Interaction effects model (1969 to 2009) Source: Current Population Survey, Annual Social and Economic Supplement, 1969, 1979, 1989, 1999, 2009 Couple/Household characteristics: One or more children under 5: Regardless of the survey year, women with young children were more likely to stay at home ( model). Interaction terms don’t change the story. Spousal education differentials: In the model that controls for Hispanic, in 1999 and 2009, mothers with more education than their husbands were less likely to stay home than similar mothers in

22

Conclusion Source: Current Population Survey, Annual Social and Economic Supplement, 1969, 1979, 1989, 1999, 2009 While the proportion of married mothers who were stay-at- home moms declined significantly from 44 percent in 1969 to 26 percent in 2009, the relationship between stay-at-home mothers and particular demographic, socioeconomic, and family compositional variables changed over this time period so that the following women now have higher odds of being a stay-at-home mothers now than earlier in the 20 th century: -- younger; -- less educated; and -- Hispanic. 23

Contact Information Rose M. Kreider Fertility and Family Statistics Branch U.S. Census Bureau Diana B. Elliott Fertility and Family Statistics Branch U.S. Census Bureau NOTE: The estimates in this paper are based on responses from a sample of the population and may differ from actual values because of sampling variability or other factors. As a result, apparent differences between the estimates for two or more groups may not be statistically significant. All comparative statements have undergone statistical testing and are significant at the 90-percent confidence level unless otherwise noted. Further information about the source and accuracy of the estimates is available at: 24