The Supreme Court Nullification Enter John Calhoun

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
McCulloch v Maryland (1819)
Advertisements

Strengthening the Judicial Branch SOL: VUS.5e.  Born in Midland, Virginia  Veteran of the Revolutionary War.  He endured the harsh winter at.
The Marshal Court How was the Federalist party able to stay relevant despite not winning any presidential elections since the John Adam’s administration?
The Marshall Court Mr. Johnson AP US History.
Judicial Interpretation of the Constitution The Constitution is not clear about the power of the Supreme Court.
John Marshall and the United States Supreme Court
Court Cases that Changed America
The Marshall Court. Marshall was born in the foothills of the Virginia's Blue Ridge Mountains in 1755, far from the wealthy tobacco and slave Tidewater.

John Marshall, Chief Justice
SUPREME COURT CASES. THE CASE William Marbury, one of Adam’s “midnight appointments” was denied his job as a judge.
Federalism and the Supreme Court McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
Judicial Review Power of the Courts. Judiciary Act of 1789 George Washington George Washington Created the Federal Court System and outlined the powers.
Marbury v. Madison (1803) Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) McCulloch v. Maryland (1824)
7.2 Nationalism at Center Stage Mr. Manelski CPUSH.
The Supreme Court (The Judicial Branch) What’s the big deal?
JOHN MARSHALL’S GREATEST HITS Marbury v. Madison1803 Fletcher v. Peck1810 McCulloch v. Maryland1819 Gibbons v. Ogden1824.
Chapter 8, Section 3 The Supreme Court. 1. How are Supreme Court justices selected? The president appoints the justices, with the consent of the Senate.
DO NOW: “We are under a Constitution. But the Constitution is only what the Supreme Court says it is. It is these judges that safeguard our liberty, protect.
Courts The point of the courts is to provide a place where we can argue about matters relating to the law. The point of lawyers is to help people argue.
Supreme court cases: constitution is the supreme law of the land Analyze court cases that illustrate that the US Constitution is the supreme law of the.
John Marshall, Chief Justice  Nominated to Supreme Court by John Adams in1801  Marshall agreed, and upheld Hamilton’s doctrine of “implied powers” 
Served as an officer with General Washington during the Revolution Attended College of William and Mary and became a practicing attorney. 2 nd cousin of.
Marshall Court I.Chief Justice John Marshall A. Dominates Supreme Court B. Strengthened federal govt. at the expense of state governments.
Supreme Court Cases Overview. Marbury v. Madison Marbury sued Sec of State Madison for his appointment to be a judge (midnight judges – Adams administration)
MARBURY V. MADISON.  Federalists controlled the Judicial Branch  Adam’s created and filled 16 new judge positions at midnight on his last day in office.
© 2004 Plano ISD, Plano, TX 1.What branch of government interprets the laws? 2.The _____________ of 1789 created the federal court system. 3.What is a.
The History of the Supreme Court HUSH Unit Three.
NATIONALISM & THE MARSHALL COURT Mr. Sandford AP United States History.
Thomas Jefferson Election of 1800 In a presidential election you are really voting for electors who meet in what is known as the electoral college.
Unit 4: GROWTH OF THE YOUNG NATION Topic 3: The Marshall Court (Judicial Nationalism)
Judicial Interpretation of the Constitution The strength and path of the court were found with Chief Justice John Marshall 4 th Chief Justice 1801 – 1835.
The Marshall Courts. Purpose of the Judicial Branch  Interpret the Law –Set Legal Precedents –Determine if laws passed by Congress or Presidential Actions.
Andrew Jackson and The Nullification Issue The Nullification Issue The Webster and Hayes Debate The Force Bill.
Terms Review III The United States Government. This gives Congress the power to pass legislation that is “necessary and proper” for doing its job.
Review for Test Constitutional Convention New Jersey vs. Virginia Plan Great Compromise 3/5 Compromise Preamble of Constitution Article 1- Legislative.
The United States Supreme Court Article 3 of the US Constitution The U.S.S.C. interprets the Constitution and the Law How did the Supreme Court under.
© 2004 Plano ISD, Plano, TX Landmark Supreme Court cases that outlined the powers of the Judicial Branch.
Judicial Review Power of the Courts.
Implied Powers of the National Government
Supreme Court Cases Landmark Supreme Court cases that outlined the powers of the Judicial Branch.
NATIONALISM & THE MARSHALL COURT
Congress President Supreme Court.
Establishing Judicial Review
VUS5e John Marshall How did Chief Justice John Marshall, a Virginian, contribute to the growth of the U.S. Supreme Court’s importance in relation to the.
McCulloch v Maryland (1819)
This, and what you learned from your DBQ are what you need to know...
John Marshall and the United States Supreme Court
Expanding the powers of the Judicial Branch
The Marshall Court.
The United States Supreme Court Article 3 of the US Constitution
Judicial decisions Colin Bouchard.
The United States Supreme Court Article 3 of the US Constitution
The Marshall Court 6.3.
Unit 4: GROWTH OF THE YOUNG NATION
Reviewing Marshall Court Decisions
NATIONALISM & THE MARSHALL COURT
Growth of the Supreme Court
Do Now: What is the main job of the Judicial Branch?
Establishing Judicial Review
Defining the Powers of the National Government
Do Now: What is the main job of the Judicial Branch?
Supreme Court Cases of the early Republic
The United States Supreme Court Article 3 of the US Constitution
(Warm-Up 12-6) Which Supreme Court case set up the principle of judicial review? Gibbons v Ogden Marbury v Madison McCulloch v Maryland Engel v Vitale.
Do Now (Background Essay)
Marshall Court AIM: Did the Supreme Court under John Marshall Give Too Much Power to the Federal Government at the Expense of the State Governments?
How is power distributed in Federalism?
The Marshall Court.
Presentation transcript:

The Supreme Court Nullification Enter John Calhoun Judicial Nationalism The Supreme Court Nullification Enter John Calhoun

John Marshall and the Supreme Court of the United States Chief Justice, 1801-1835 His court decisions greatly expanded the implied powers clause of the constitution The principle of federalism greatly expanded under his tenure

Marbury v. Madison (1803) William Marybury was nominated by Adams to be a judge, but Jefferson becomes president and does not honor Marybury’s appointment Marybury sues because he wants the job Marshall ruled courts have “judicial review”, the right to declare laws unconstitutional and decide to hear cases if they choose to do so

Fletcher v. Peck (1810) Ruled that the Supreme Court has the power to review the constitutionally of a state law and hear contract cases

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) State banks argue that the United States does not have the power to create and run a national bank because it is not addressed in the Constitution Court ruled that it was allowed under the “necessary and proper clause” “Necessary and proper clause” allows government to do what it feels is necessary for the best interest of the nation

Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) A New York law gave a steamboat company a monopoly on the ferry service on the New Jersey to New York Marshall rejected the law and ruled that the United States had the power to regulate interstate commerce not states

John C. Calhoun Born in South Carolina, Yale educated lawyer, served in South Carolina legislature and supported War of 1812 as a “War Hawk” Served as vice-president under John Quincy Adams and Andrew Jackson He has taken the mantle of defender of the “Southern way of life” John C Calhoun

The Nullification Crisis South Carolina is suffering from an economic depression that hurts cotton planters South Carolina is also paying what it believes are high tariffs for imported goods In 1828, Congress will raise the tariff rates higher. South Carolinians name it the “Tariff of Abominations”

Calhoun’s Theory of Nullification Calhoun argued that states had the right to to nullify any federal law that exceeded the powers granted in the Constitution Nullify means that a state can refuse to obey--an act of Congress it believes is unconstitutional If Congress attempted to pass the law again then states had the right to secede from the union.