A 10 GeV, 4 MW, FFAG, Proton Driver at 50 Hz G H Rees, RAL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EcoTherm Plus WGB-K 20 E 4,5 – 20 kW.
Advertisements

David Burdett May 11, 2004 Package Binding for WS CDL.
CALENDAR.
CHAPTER 18 The Ankle and Lower Leg
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
The Emittance Growth Scaling Laws in Resonance Crossing X. Pang, F. Wang, X. Wang, S.Y. Lee IUCF, Indiana University K.Y. Ng Fermilab 1.
Adding Up In Chunks.
1 Project X Proton Driver David Neuffer September 2011.
MaK_Full ahead loaded 1 Alarm Page Directory (F11)
When you see… Find the zeros You think….
Before Between After.
25 seconds left…...
Subtraction: Adding UP
Clock will move after 1 minute
PSSA Preparation.
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Insertions for an Isochronous, 8-16 turn, 8-20 GeV, Muon FFAG G H Rees, RAL.
Isochronous, FFAG Rings with Insertions for Rapid Muon or Electron Acceleration G H Rees, RAL.
Select a time to count down from the clock above
Proton / Muon Bunch Numbers, Repetition Rate, RF and Kicker Systems and Inductive Wall Fields for the Rings of a Neutrino Factory G H Rees, RAL.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, MW AGS proton driver (M.J. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas,
Options for a 50Hz, 10 MW, Short Pulse Spallation Neutron Source G H Rees, ASTeC, CCLRC, RAL, UK.
(ISS) Topics Studied at RAL G H Rees, RAL, UK. ISS Work Areas 1. Bunch train patterns for the acceleration and storage of μ ± beams. 2. A 50Hz, 1.2 MW,
FFAG Concepts and Studies David Neuffer Fermilab.
100 MeV- 1 GeV Proton Synchrotron for Indian Spallation Neutron Source Gurnam Singh Beam Dynamics Section CAT, Indore CAT-KEK-Sokendai School on Spallation.
Neutrino Factory,  ± Decay Rings C Johnstone, FNAL, F Meot, CEA, & G H Rees, RAL.
Storage Ring : Status, Issues and Plans C Johnstone, FNAL and G H Rees, RAL.
S.J. Brooks RAL, Chilton, OX11 0QX, UK Options for a Multi-GeV Ring Ramping field synchrotron provides fixed tunes and small.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Proton Driver Status ISIS Accelerator Division John Thomason.
Source Group Bethan Dorman Paul Morris Laura Carroll Anthony Green Miriam Dowle Christopher Beach Sazlin Abdul Ghani Nicholas Torr.
Y. Mori Kyoto/KEK FFAG C. OH FFAG: Fixed Field Alternating Gradient Strong focusing(AG focusing, phase focusing) Like synchrotron, but fixed field Moving.
A 3 Pass, Dog-bone Cooling Channel G H Rees, ASTeC, RAL.
Related poster [1] TPAG022: Slow Wave Electrode Structures for the ESS 2.5 MeV Chopper – Michael A. Clarke-Gayther Status Funding bids have been prepared.
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
EDM2001 Workshop May 14-15, 2001 AGS Intensity Upgrade (J.M. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S.Y. Zhang) Proton.
Advanced Accelerator Design/Development Proton Accelerator Research and Development at RAL Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 24 March 2011.
Neutrino Factory,  ± Decay Rings C Johnstone, FNAL, F Meot, CNRS, & G H Rees, RAL.
Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.
Synchronization Andrew Hutton Slava Derbenev Yuhong Zhang.
Acceleration System Comparisons S. Machida ASTeC/RAL September, 2005, ISS meeting at CERN.
Electron Model for a 3-10 GeV, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
WG3 Summary (Achievements in 2005) 28 Talks & 5 focus sessions 17 talks &2 focus sessions in this talk 12 taks & 3 focus sessions by H. Kirk.
NUFACT’05 24-June-2005 H. Schönauer CERN The typical approaches to Muon acceleration at higher energies: Recirculating linacs Scaling FFAG’s : constant.
FFAG Studies at RAL G H Rees. FFAG Designs at RAL Hz, 4 MW, 3-10 GeV, Proton Driver (NFFAGI) Hz,1 MW, GeV, ISIS Upgrade (NFFAG) 3.
WG2 (Proton FFAG) Summary G.H. Rees. Proton Driver Working Group  Participants: M. Yashimoto, S. Ohnuma, C.R. Prior, G.H. Rees, A.G. Ruggiero  Topics:
New Gantry Idea for H + /C 6+ Therapy G H Rees, ASTeC, RAL 4 th September, 2008.
4 MW, 50 Hz, 10 GeV, 1 ns (rms), FFAG Proton Driver Study G H Rees, RAL.
3 GeV, 1.2 MW, RCS Booster and 10 GeV, 4.0 MW, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, ASTeC, RAL.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
ISS Muon Bunch Structure Convenors: S Berg, BNL, and G H Rees, RAL.
FFAG’ J. Pasternak, IC London/RAL Proton acceleration using FFAGs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
NuFACT06 Muon Source at Fermilab David Neuffer Fermilab.
RCS design Valeri Lebedev AAC Meeting November 16-17, 2009.
1 Tracking study of muon acceleration with FFAGs S. Machida RAL/ASTeC 6 December, ffag/machida_ ppt.
Presenter : Yang Wu McMaster University Work conducted at IHEP.
FFAG Studies at BNL Alessandro G. Ruggiero Brookhaven National Laboratory FFAG’06 - KURRI, Osaka, Japan - November 6-10, 2006.
Towards a Common Proton Driver for a Neutrino Factory
J-PARC main ring lattice An overview
Alternative/complementary Possibilities
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Isochronous, FFAG Rings with Insertions for Rapid Muon or Electron Acceleration G H Rees, RAL.
FFAG Accelerator Proton Driver for Neutrino Factory
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

A 10 GeV, 4 MW, FFAG, Proton Driver at 50 Hz G H Rees, RAL

Non-scaling, Non-linear FFAGs Categories for FFAG Lattice Cells of Five Magnets: 1. IFFAG: isochronous, no Q v =n and 2Q v =n crossing 2. IFFAGI: IFFAG with combined function insertions 3. NFFAG: non-isochronous, high/imag  -t, no Q var’n 4. NFFAGI: NFFAG with insertions, some Q h variation 1 and 2: rapid acceleration of muons or electrons 3 and 4 : high power proton drivers or medical rings

4 MW Proton Driver Arrangement Muon yields optimal for GeV (S Brooks, RAL) Choose: 10 GeV, 50 Hz to reduce target shock 3 GeV booster for 3 – 10 GeV NFFAGI 2, 25 Hz or 1, 25 Hz booster (R =2.2 R b ) 0.18 GeV H ‾ linac for low bunch areas 5 bunches at h = 5 for RCS booster(s) Transfer: 5 (10 13 protons/bunch) to the NFFAGI Bunch to: 1 ns (rms) adiabatically (h = 33 & 198)

Longitudinal bunch area The longitudinal bunch area (in eV sec) is: A = (8Rα/(ch)) ((2 V(I-  sc )E o  ) / (h  )) ½ For a small longitudinal bunch area, choose a low value of injection energy and ring radius Choose E o (  - 1) = 0.18 GeV and R b  50.0 m Choose the bunch & harmonic number (h) = 5 Compressed bunch area needed  0.66 eV sec

4 MW, Proton Driver Layout 0.18 GeV H ‾ Achromat 0.18 GeV H ‾ Linac 10 GeV, 50 Hz, N = 5, NFFAGI with protons per bunch 3 GeV, 50 Hz, h =5, RCS (1 at 50 Hz, or 2 at 25 Hz)

NFFAGI Design Criteria For compression of the 5 bunches at 10 GeV: Design for a gamma-t value at 10 GeV  20 Design for longitudinal bunch areas  0.66 eV s Adiabatic acceleration & comp. with h = 33, 198 Design the NFFAG ring with lattice insertions, to ease injection, ejection & beam loss collection Use two insertions to allow most flexibility, eg: 21 normal and 13 insertion cells per insertion

Acceleration and Compression Systems Driver-booster circumference ratio: 2.2 to 1 Booster rf range (h=5): to MHz Driver rf range (h=33): to MHz Compression frequency (h=198): MHz Peak accelerating voltage per turn: 1.0 MV Peak compression voltage per turn: 2.56 MV

Lattice Cell Options Normal cell Insertion cell Magnet types Doublet D D1 + T0 + D Triplet T T1 + T2 + T Pumplet P1 P Easiest solution is to match P1 and P2 pumplet cells:  P1 has a smaller β-range than either D or T  The insertion has only one type of cell, P2  P2 has the smallest closed orbit “lever arm” No 2  dispersion suppressors, as too many are needed

10 GeV, Normal & Insertion Cell Layouts bd(-) BF(±) BD (+) BF(±) bd(-) O O Normal cell (5.294º, m) Insertion cell (5.294º, m) 2.2 There are two superperiods of 21 normal & 13 insertion cells At 10 GeV: Q v = 13.72, Q h = 19.36,  -t = 20.4, R = m

NFFAGI Lattice Design Use equal bend, normal and insertion, pumplet cells Arrange ~ matching for a normal and insertion cell Arrange integer, insertion tunes eg Q h = 4 & Q v = 3 The normal cells in an insertion are then matched Seek unchanged closed orbits on adding insertions by varying the normal cell field gradients and tunes Then, dispersion match is almost exact for insertions Small ripple remains in β h and β v (max) in insertions

Non-Linearity Compensation Crossing of the 3rd order resonance: 3Q h = 58  Insertion and arc 3(Q h ) values: 3Q h = 3(4, 5⅔ )  Hence, no 3rd order excitation for: 3Q h = 58 Crossing of 4th order resonance: 2Q h + 2Q v = 66  Insertion and arc values for: 2(Q h + Q v ) = 2(7, 9½ )  So, no 4th order excitation for: 2Q h + 2Q v = 66 Crossing of the 4th order resonance: 4Q h = 77  Insertion and arc 4(Q h ) values: 4Q h = 4(4, 5⅝ )  Some small 4th order excitation for: 4Q h = 77

NFFAGI Lattice Results Satisfactory matching at the 24 reference energies: 10.0…..6.8, 6.5…..5.0, 4.75…..4.0, 3.8…..3.0 GeV. Q v =13.72 throughout the 3 to 10 GeV energy range. Dispersion match is found by varying K(bd) and  h : T =10.0……6.8, 6.5…. 5.0, , 3.8…3.0 GeV Q h =19.36, 19.31, 19.3, 19.29, 19.2, 19.2, 19.2, 19.2 Gamma-t becomes imaginary for the low energies

Combined Function Magnet Fields (T) Magnets Insertion Normal cell bd to to BF 1.75 to to BD 0.54 to to 1.59 T max bending ratios; bd : BF : BD ~ : 1.0 : 0.23 (Ratios in muon ring; bd : BF : BD ~ : 1.0 : 1.0)

Beam Loss Collimators Vertical:  Locate in 4, adjacent, long, insertion straights  Use 1, primary and 3, secondary, 5 kW collimators  Use tapered units for lower, high energy acceptance Horizontal:  Locate in the first three, vertical, collimator straights  Use 1, primary and 3, secondary, 5 kW collimators  Use angled units for collimation at 3 and 10 GeV

10 GeV NFFAGI versus RCS Pros: Allows acceleration over more of the cycle, No need for ac magnet p/s or ceramic chamber, Gives more flexibility for the holding of bunches, Required is one NFFAGI ring, but two RCS(s), Allows operation at 50 Hz instead of at 25 Hz, with ppp at target, instead of ppp. Thus, there is half the target shock per pulse. Cons: needs a larger (~ 0.33 m) radial aperture