Development of Methylation Specific High Resolution Melt analysis for detection of 11p15 methylation abnormalities and comparison to MS-MLPA. Cath Willoughby.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
High Resolution studies
Advertisements

Números.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
Fill in missing numbers or operations
EuroCondens SGB E.
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley.
Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley
Properties Use, share, or modify this drill on mathematic properties. There is too much material for a single class, so you’ll have to select for your.
Multiplication X 1 1 x 1 = 1 2 x 1 = 2 3 x 1 = 3 4 x 1 = 4 5 x 1 = 5 6 x 1 = 6 7 x 1 = 7 8 x 1 = 8 9 x 1 = 9 10 x 1 = x 1 = x 1 = 12 X 2 1.
Division ÷ 1 1 ÷ 1 = 1 2 ÷ 1 = 2 3 ÷ 1 = 3 4 ÷ 1 = 4 5 ÷ 1 = 5 6 ÷ 1 = 6 7 ÷ 1 = 7 8 ÷ 1 = 8 9 ÷ 1 = 9 10 ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = 12 ÷ 2 2 ÷ 2 =
Objectives: Generate and describe sequences. Vocabulary:
UNITED NATIONS Shipment Details Report – January 2006.
/4/2010 Box and Whisker Plots Objective: Learn how to read and draw box and whisker plots Starter: Order these numbers.
Add Governors Discretionary (1G) Grants Chapter 6.
CALENDAR.
0 - 0.
1 1  1 =.
1  1 =.
2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt Time Money AdditionSubtraction.
FACTORING Think Distributive property backwards Work down, Show all steps ax + ay = a(x + y)
Addition Facts
Around the World AdditionSubtraction MultiplicationDivision AdditionSubtraction MultiplicationDivision.
C1 Sequences and series. Write down the first 4 terms of the sequence u n+1 =u n +6, u 1 =6 6, 12, 18, 24.
ZMQS ZMQS
The 5S numbers game..
Box and Whiskers with Outliers. Outlier…… An extremely high or an extremely low value in the data set when compared with the rest of the values. The IQR.
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
The basics for simulations
Look at This PowerPoint for help on you times tables
The challenge ahead: Ocean Predictions in the Arctic Region Lars Petter Røed * Presented at the OPNet Workshop May 2008, Geilo, Norway * Also affiliated.
Effects on UK of Eustatic sea Level rise GIS is used to evaluate flood risk. Insurance companies use GIS models to assess likely impact and consequently.
Progressive Aerobic Cardiovascular Endurance Run
Familial Hypercholesterolaemia
Sequence Quickies 1  ORB Education. Visit for the other resources in this pack.
Lecture 3 Validity of screening and diagnostic tests
Clinical background: Patient RM, YoB 1966 Her family were originally referred because of a history of breast and ovarian cancer. BRCA testing found a missense.
LO: Count up to 100 objects by grouping them and counting in 5s 10s and 2s. Mrs Criddle: Westfield Middle School.
2011 WINNISQUAM COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=1021.
Hereditary GI Cancer Syndromes: Keys to identify high risk patients
Before Between After.
2011 FRANKLIN COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=332.
Chromosome abnormalities
Addition 1’s to 20.
Model and Relationships 6 M 1 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
25 seconds left…...
2.10% more children born Die 0.2 years sooner Spend 95.53% less money on health care No class divide 60.84% less electricity 84.40% less oil.
MRC-Holland b.v. Microdeletion in IC Copy no. Results 50% Microdeletion deleting exons 1-4 SNRPN Methylation Results 1.
Suggestions for PMS2 best practice Jenny Simmonds
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Non-invasive diagnosis of fetal sex using free fetal DNA: our experiences so far For my trainee project I was involved in setting up and validating fetal.
Analyzing Genes and Genomes
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
Partial Products. Category 1 1 x 3-digit problems.
PSSA Preparation.
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Validation of BRCA2 mutation scanning using the LightScanner system for high resolution melt analysis Lewis Darnell Nottingham Regional Molecular Genetics.
1 Cervical Screening Programme, England, : Graphs.
Select a time to count down from the clock above
Schutzvermerk nach DIN 34 beachten 05/04/15 Seite 1 Training EPAM and CANopen Basic Solution: Password * * Level 1 Level 2 * Level 3 Password2 IP-Adr.
Chris Campbell West Midlands Regional Genetics laboratory
Development of a Diagnostic Service for Pseudohypoparathyroidism type 1b Jennifer Greatwood.
Wilhelm Engström Professor of General Pathology Uppsala
CTCF and Imprinting Disorder Preeti Misra Sang-Gook Han.
P57: Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome Presented By: Jameeka Carrington.
11p15 familial duplication causing Silver-Russell syndrome in the daughter and Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome in the mother R. Teek 1, T. Kahre 1,2, K. Muru.
Addition of H19 ‘Loss of Methylation Testing’ for Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome (BWS) Increases the Diagnostic Yield  Jochen K. Lennerz, Robert J. Timmerman,
Figure 3 Mutations and epimutations of the imprinted
Figure 2 Flowchart for investigation and diagnosis of Beckwith– Wiedemann syndrome Figure 2 | Flowchart for investigation and diagnosis of Beckwith– Wiedemann.
Hypomethylation of the H19 Gene Causes Not Only Silver-Russell Syndrome (SRS) but Also Isolated Asymmetry or an SRS-Like Phenotype  Jet Bliek, Paulien.
Presentation transcript:

Development of Methylation Specific High Resolution Melt analysis for detection of 11p15 methylation abnormalities and comparison to MS-MLPA. Cath Willoughby SW Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory - St George’s

IGF2 H19 CDKN1C H19 Imprinted domain 1 Imprinted domain 2 KCNQ1 Ex1-10 KCNQ1OT1 KCNQ1 Ex11-16 IGF2 H19 CDKN1C H19 KCNQ1 Ex1-10 KCNQ1OT1 KCNQ1 Ex11-16 KvDMR Pat Mat CH 3 11p15 region KvDMR

11p15 abnormalities – Opposite syndromes Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) Macrosomia (Overgrowth) Macroglossia (Large tongue) Exomphalos (Abdominal contents develop outside body wall) Hemihypertrophy (Body asymmetry) Increased risk of Wilms’ Tumour

11p15 abnormalities – Opposite syndromes Silver-Russell syndrome (SRS) Undergrowth (Intrauterine growth retardation and poor postnatal growth) Classical facial features including a triangular shaped face, prominent forehead and pointy chin Hemihypertrophy (Body asymmetry) Clinodactyly (Finger deflections)

11p15 abnormalities BWS Sporadic Loss of methylation of KvDMR – 50-60% Sporadic Gain of methylation of H19 – 2-7% Paternal UPD - ~20% CDNK1C mutations + other rare causes IGF2 H19 CDKN1C H19 KCNQ1 Ex1-10 KCNQ1OT1 KCNQ1 Ex11-16 IGF2 H19 CDKN1C H19 KCNQ1 Ex1-10 KCNQ1OT1 KCNQ1 Ex11-16 KvDMR Pat Mat CH 3 KvDMR

11p15 abnormalities Sporadic Loss of methylation of H19 – Majority of cases Maternal duplications -~4% Maternal UPD – 1 reported case SRS IGF2 H19 CDKN1C H19 KCNQ1 Ex1-10 KCNQ1OT1 KCNQ1 Ex11-16 IGF2 H19 CDKN1C H19 KCNQ1 Ex1-10 KCNQ1OT1 KCNQ1 Ex11-16 KvDMR Pat Mat CH 3 KvDMR

Techniques for diagnosis of BWS and SRS - Methylation-specific High Resolution Melt Analysis (MS-HRM) Alders et al.,2008 Eur J Hum Genet. Advance online publication Oct Bisulphite modification of genomic DNA C G T A Pat Mat C G C G CH 3 C C G C G G T A T A C G C G C G Pat Mat PCR across each imprinting centre (H19 and KvDMR) A T C G ************************************ A T A T C G C G

LightScanner Techniques for diagnosis of BWS and SRS - Methylation-specific High Resolution Melt Analysis

Aims of the project Develop and validate Methylation-specific High Resolution Melt Analysis (MS-HRM) of H19 and KvDMR for diagnostic testing of BWS and SRS referrals Complete validation of Methylation-specific MLPA (MS-MLPA) (Scott et al.,2008 J Med Genet 45;106-13) Compare MS-HRM and MS-MLPA by testing a cohort of patients

Methylation Specific - High Resolution Melt Analysis (MS-HRM) Validation at KvDMR 100% methylated control DNA 14 normal samples 6 Loss of methylation samples (BWS) Normal methylation index = 0.5 Level of plateau in abnormal samples corresponds to previously determined methylation indices Therefore this technique not only identifies loss of methylation but also indicates its degree 100% methylation control Normal controls

Methylation Specific - High Resolution Melt Analysis (MS-HRM) Validation at H19 100% methylated control DNA 13 normal samples 4 hypermethylated samples (BWS) 5 Loss of methylation samples (SRS) 100% methylation control Normal controls

Cohort study - samples Referral reason Total per referral type BWS33 Exomphalos3 Wilms Tumour 5 Hemihypertrophy6 SRS35 Total samples tested 82

Cohort study – Summary of results Total samples tested 82 Concordant between MS-MLPA and MS- HRM 78 (99%) Concordant between MS-MLPA, MS-HRM and a previous report 31 Non-concordant between MS-MLPA and MS-HRM 1 Fail3

Cohort study – non concordant result JS Pat UPD H19 LOM KvDMR LOM Original MS-HRM analysis Repeat MS-HRM analysis Significantly below 0.5 => loss of methylation Significantly above 0.5 => hypermethylation

Cohort study - results Referral reason ResultTotalExpectedMechanism Total per mechanism Expected Positive12/33(36%)>85% Pat UPD 2(16%)20% BWSNormal21/33 KvDMR hypomethylation 10(84%)>50% Fail0/33 H19 hypermethylation 02-11% Positive0/3(0%)10-20% Pat UPD 0 ExomphalosNormal3/3 KvDMR hypomethylation 0 Fail0/3 H19 hypermethylation 0 Positive0/5(0%)3% Pat UPD 0 Wilms Tumour Normal3/5 KvDMR hypomethylation 0 Fail2/5 H19 hypermethylation 0 Positive4/6(66%)25% Pat UPD 3(75%)60% HemihypertrophyNormal2/6 KvDMR hypomethylation 1(25%)22% Fail0 H19 hypermethylation 011% Positive3/35(8.5%)20-65% Mat UPD 0Rare SRSNormal31/35 H19 hypomethylation 3(100%)~99% Fail1/35

Cohort study - Further testing Microsatellite analysis confirmed 3 cases of Paternal UPD D11S1984 D11S1997 (D11S4957) p15.4 D11S922D11S2362D11S1997 Imprinted region D11S2071

Cohort study - Further testing CDKN1C sequencing in 12 BWS 11p15 normal patients identified from the cohort - 1 previously identified probable mutation (c.956+1G>A)

Summary Developed MS-HRM for confirmation of MS-MLPA results Sensitive technique for detection of methylation abnormalities at 11p15 99% concordance between MS-MLPA and MS-HRM Offering testing of 11p15 for BWS, SRS and isolated features of disease using MS-MLPA as a 1 st screen, supported by MS-HRM, microsatellite analysis and sequencing of CDKN1C.

Acknowledgments Marielle Alders – Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam Rohan Taylor, Liz Ormshaw, Alice Johnson-Marshall, Sally Cottrell, Nadiya Mahmud and the rest of the DNA laboratory at St George’s Kate Tatton-Brown – St George’s Naz Rahman,Richard Scott and Linda Baskcomb – The Institute of Cancer Research: Royal Cancer Hospital, Sutton