Recent Developments In New Oral Anticoagulants

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Advanced Practice of Pharmacy Experience: Journal Club Mai Nguyen Mercer University COPHS Doctor of Pharmacy Candidate 2012 Preceptor: Dr. Ali Rahimi.
Advertisements

The RE-LY Study: Randomized Evaluation of Long-term anticoagulant therapY Dabigatran Compared to Warfarin in 18,113 Patients with Atrial Fibrillation at.
Year 6 mental test 15 second questions Numbers and number system Numbers and the number system, Measures and Shape.
Supported by ESRC Large Grant. What difference does a decade make? Satisfaction with the NHS in Northern Ireland in 1996 and 2006.
Atrial Fibrillation Cardiovascular ISCEE 26th October 2010.
Dose Escalating Safety Study of a New Oral Direct Thrombin Inhibitor, Dabigatran Etexilate, in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement: BISTRO I Eriksson.
The Home INR Study (THINRS): Home INR Monitoring as Effective as Clinic-Based Care AK Jacobson, MD American Heart Association 2008 Scientific Sessions:
THE NATIONAL ANTICOAGULATION INITIATIVE
Educational Event 23rd & 24th January 2013
Managing anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation Dr Katy Rice June 2011.
NOAC but NICE Conference 16th July 2013.
1 GRASP-AF Audit - Intro 8 th July 2010 Mark Gregory.
Educational Event 23rd & 24th January 2013
ATRIAL FIBRILLATION.
Atrial Fibrillation Service
ROCKET-AF Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial.
Presentation title: 32pt Arial Regular, black Recommended maximum length: 1 line International efforts to improve quality, reduce costs and increase transparency.
STROKE UPDATE Carlos S. Kase, M.D. Department of Neurology Boston Medical Center Medicine Grand Rounds New England Baptist Hospital March 17, 2011.
Atrial Fibrillation – TIMI 48
Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk.
Patient Survey Results 2013 Nicki Mott. Patient Survey 2013 Patient Survey conducted by IPOS Mori by posting questionnaires to random patients in the.
JOURNAL REVIEW Newer Antithrombotics in AF 1 Dr Ranjith MP Senior Resident Department of Cardiology Government Medical college Kozhikode.
What a Bloody Mess! A/Professor Kent Robinson Senior Staff Specialist, Liverpool & Campbelltown Hospitals.
1 Novel Oral Anticoagulants: Benefits and risks Matthew Moles, MD December 4, 2012 University of Colorado.
Apixaban versus Aspirin in Atrial Fibrillation Patients ≥ 75 years old: An Analysis from the AVERROES Trial Kuan H Ng, Olga O Shestakovska, John W. Eikelboom,
New Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation Dr Dipti.
CLINICAL CASES.
Prophylaxis of Venous Thromboembolism
Study by: Granger et al. NEJM, September 2011,Vol No. 11 Presented by: Amelia Crawford PA-S2 Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.
Cross-Canada Collaboration to Promote Evidence-Based Use of Anticoagulants CADTH SYMPOSIUM APRIL 14, 2015.
AF and NOACs An UPDATE JULY 2014
Manufacturer: Daiichi Sankyo FDA Approval Date: 01/08/2015
The EINSTEIN PE Study 'Xarelto' for the Acute and Continued Treatment of Symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism.
The EINSTEIN DVT Study 'Xarelto' for the Acute and Continued Treatment of Symptomatic Deep Vein Thrombosis.
Jim Hoehns, Pharm.D.. Edoxaban Oral factor Xa inhibitor Bioavailability: 62% Tmax: 1-2 hrs Elimination: 50% renal Half-life: 9-11 hours.
Randomized Evaluation of Long- term anticoagulant therapY Dabigatran Compared to Warfarin in 18,113 Patients with Atrial Fibrillation at Risk of Stroke.
DR ABUL AZIM CONSULTANT IN ELDERLY MEDICINE & STROKE STROKE AND ATRIAL FIBRILLATION AND THE ROLE OF THE NOAC.
Atrial Fibrillation Warfarin and its newer alternatives
  Warfarin Dabigatran Rivaroxaban Apixaban Edoxaban Target
The Long Term Multi-Center Extension of Dabigatran Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (RELY-ABLE) study To reviewers and moderators: These.
Atrial Fibrillation and Anticoagulation
Adam M. Levine, DO, FACC Clinical Assistant Professor of Medicine Rowan University September 12 th, 2015.
Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism N Engl J Med Apr ;348(15) : PREVENT (Warfarin) Trial.
ALI R. RAHIMI, BOBBY WRIGHTS, MD, HOSSEIN AKHONDI, MD & CHRISTIAN M. RICHARD, MSC Clinical Correlation Between Effective Anticoagulants & Risk of Stroke:
ARISTOTLE Objectives Primary: test for noninferiority of apixaban, a novel oral direct factor Xa inhibitor, versus warfarin Secondary: test for superiority.
A Randomized Trial of Dabigatran versus Warfarin in the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism Schulman S et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 205.
Presented by Renato D. Lopes, MD, PhD, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, USA for the ARISTOTLE investigators. Efficacy and Safety of Apixaban.
The Case for Rate Control: In the Management of Atrial Fibrillation Charles W. Clogston, M.D. Cardiologist CHI St. Vincent Heart Clinic Arkansas April.
Stoke On Trent CCG – Atrial Fibrillation Service AF Nurse in GP Practice Interfacing Primary and Secondary Care for AF Stroke Prevention Jodie Williams.
ResultsIntroduction Atrial Fibrillation (AF) affects 1.2% 1 of the population and 10% of those over the age of 75 2 It is the commonest arrhythmia in primary.
Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation Dalia Hawwass PGY2 June 2015.
N Engl J Med 2009;361: Stuart J. Connolly, M.D., Michael D. Ezekowitz, M.B., Ch.B., D.Phil., Salim Yusuf, F.R.C.P.C., D.Phil., John Eikelboom,
The Management of AF Warfarin New anticoagulants 16 Sept 2011.
Manesh R. Patel, M.D., Kenneth W. Mahaffey, M.D., Jyotsna Garg, M.S., Guohua Pan, Ph.D., Daniel E. Singer, M.D., Werner Hacke, M.D., Ph.D., Gunter Breithardt,
ANTICOAGULATION The objectives of this section are: To be able to write prescriptions according to local anticoagulation guidelines To know how to prescribe.
The Efficacy of Dabigatran versus Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Systematic Review Karim Bouferrache Pacific University.
Uttam M Chouhan Pharmacist Glan Clwyd Hospital, BCUHB September 2017
You can never be too Thin…. An Update on NOACs
A Comparison of RE-LY and ROCKET AF Trial Designs and Outcomes
Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation
Randomized Evaluation of Long-term anticoagulant therapY
Click here for title Click here for subtitle
Educational Event 23rd & 24th January 2013
Up to Date on Which NOAC for Which Patient
Dabigatran in myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery
Selecting NOACs for High-Risk Patients
NOACS: Emerging data in ACS/IHD
Dabigatran in myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery
Which NOAC and When for Stroke Prevention in AF?
Dabigatran in myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery
Presentation transcript:

Recent Developments In New Oral Anticoagulants Eric Watts Basildon Hospital

Eric Watts, Basildon Hospital

Eric Watts, Basildon Hospital

Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation-Related Stroke

Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation-Related Stroke

Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation-Related Stroke

Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation-Related Stroke

Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation-Related Stroke

Background - AF Warfarin is effective, 2/3 risk reduction for CVA Better than maximal antiplatelet therapy Cumbersome to use Discontinuation rates high Many patients have inadequate control Several drug interactions

Dabigatran etexilate Oral prodrug –rapidly converted to Dabigatran Predictable bioavailbility 80% renal excretion ½ life 12-17 hrs “does not require regular monitoring”

Patient Baseline Characteristics 3 groups “well balanced” Mean age 71 63% male Mean CHADS score 2.1 CCF Hypertension Age Diabetes

Mortality Warfarin …………………….4.13% pa Dabigatran 110mg ……...…3.75% pa .ns Dabigatran 150mg …………3.64% pa .ns

Myocardial Infarction Warfarin ……………….0.53 % Dabigatran 110mg ...…0.72 % p= 0.07 Dabigatran 150mg ……0.74% p= 0.048 Is the antithrombin effect cardioprotective?

Major Bleeding Warfarin…………….3.36 % Dabigatran 110 ……2.71 %, p=0.003 Dabigatran 150 ……3.11% n.s. Life threatening, intracranial Minor bleeding higher with warfarin More major GI bleeding with 150 Dabigatran

Haemorrhagic Stroke Warfarin …………................. 0.38% Dabigatran 110mg ………... 0.12% Dabigatran 150mg ……….… 0.10% NNT = 370 “significant”

GI bleeding & discomfort Discontinuation Warfarin ……………….……. 10.2%pa Dabigatran 110mg ……...…..14.5% pa Dabigatran 150mg …………..15.5% pa

Can we Rely on RE-LY Fairly good INR control -64% (Rosendal) for warfarin to be equally effective – 74% No hepatic toxicity Does have some interactions –P-glycoprotein inhibitors verapamil, amioderone & quinidine Lower dose for renal patients ? Risk stratification for GI pathologies

Can we Rely on RE-LY Is selective antithrombin activity a mixed blessing? “Because of Dabigatran’s twice daily dosing & greater risk of non haemorrhagic side effects patients already taking warfarin with excellent INR control have little to gain by switching” “in contrast, many other patients who have atrial fibrillation and at least one additional risk factor for stroke could benefit from Dabigatran”

Efficacy Outcomes Apixaban Enoxaparin Intended treatment period no. / total no. (%) no. /total no. (%) All VTE and death from any cause 104 / 1157 (9.0) 100 / 1130 (8.8) Major VTE and death from any cause 26 / 1269 (2.0) 20 / 1216 (1.6) Symptomatic VTE and VTE-related death 19 / 1599 (1.2) 13 / 1596 (0.8)

From Xarelto’s Website

From Xarelto’s Website Post to: Delicious   Digg   Reddit   Facebook   StumbleUpon  

2011 & beyond ????? New drugs licensed Costs will need to be competitive NICE recommendation clinical & cost effectiveness Warfarin wobblers & patients on interacting drugs may be changed over No INR monitoring More complex patients e.g. VR may stay on warfarin for the benefit of monitoring

The future of anticoagulant services ? There will still be a need for clinicians with specialist knowledge & experience Diagnosing & initiating treatment for DVT has been developed by many anticoagulant nurses where this service works well it will probably be maintained Some old drugs are still in use despite the introduction of modern alternatives (UFH)

From the Health Service Journal ‘Clunky’ GP contracts raise questions on quality 8 October 2009 | By Sally Gainsbury There are huge variations in what different PCTs pay for the same services, yet there is no detectable correlation between cost and quality or patient satisfaction. Sally Gainsbury looks at why commissioning has not yet addressed these stark contrasts If you have ever attended a conference on making NHS commissioning “world class” the dominant theme will have been primary care trusts getting to grips with their hospitals. You hear less, if anything, about what PCTs are doing to improve the value for money of their primary care contracts with GPs. There are huge variations in what different PCTs payfor the same services, yet there is no detectable correlation between cost and quality nor patient satisfaction. Sally Gainsbury asks why has commissioning not yet addressed these stark contrasts ?

From the Health Service Journal ‘Clunky’ GP contracts raise questions on quality 8 October 2009 | By Sally Gainsbury Ms Helen Northall says the absence of a value for money focus in primary care is evident in the results of Primary Care Commissioning’s latest benchmarking survey, which found huge and persistent variations in what PCTs pay for ostensibly the same thing.

Discussion Points A “tighter” control with Dabigatran gives fewer bleeds ? The bleeds only need supportive treatment?

Basildon Costs Pradaxa - both 75mg and 110mg are £48.30 for 60 – 80p each Xarelto is £47.40 for 30 tablets …….. £1.59 each