 1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) New Mexico (Bartlett) UCFA Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Circle Theorems Bingo!. Use any 9 of these numbers 105 o 240 o 55 o 14 o 65 o 50 o 90 o 45 o 60 o 40 o 110 o 155 o 15 o 74 o 120 o 12 o.

Advertisements

3 hr 5 hr 8 hr Hours worked Charge

Chapter 7 EM Math Probability.

Alternative Algorithms

Artrelle Fragher & Robert walker. 1 you look for the median 1 you look for the median 2 then you look for the min and max 2 then you look for the min.

Name: Date: Read temperatures on a thermometer Independent / Some adult support / A lot of adult support

Ozone Level ppb (parts per billion)

Master Budget and Responsibility Accounting

By D. Fisher. 1. a. The Soccer team is raising $800 for equipment. It is 50% of the way to the goal. How much money has been raised? 0 % 100% 50% 25%

Math Expressions How does it all work together…?.

Level 4/5 Booster Lesson 9B Area and Perimeter.

Objectives: Calculate percentages using non-calculator methods. Calculate percentages less than 10% and values other than multiples of 10. Vocabulary:

Chapter 3: Utilization and Volume. 26 Chartbook 2000 Community hospital acute care admissions declined 15 percent between 1980 and 1994 and then began.

Trends in international telecom traffic, costs and prices

50 Where are we listening? Could we detect Earth? Is there a Solution?

Science Jeopardy >>>> Topic 1 Topic 2 Topic 4 Topic Topic 5.

2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt ShapesPatterns Counting Number.

5 th - Number Sense. 1. Which is the same as 13? A B. 10 × 3 C D. 1 × 3.

Year 6 mental test 15 second questions Numbers and number system Numbers and the number system, Measures and Shape.

1 More Standard Costing & Variance Analysis Week 10.

Team 1 Team Guidelines Slide 1 – Numbers are hyperlinked to slides, you can edit the information on each slide – to include.

Answer these on your whiteboards:

Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?

Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?

Can you explain the ideas

I can interpret intervals on partially numbered scales and record readings accurately ? 15 ? 45 ? 25 ? 37 ? 53 ? 64 Each little mark.

£1 Million £500,000 £250,000 £125,000 £64,000 £32,000 £16,000 £8,000 £4,000 £2,000 £1,000 £500 £300 £200 £100 Welcome.

1 s Share 2 s Share 3 s Share settles with 1 for $200,000 (the limit of 1 s insurance policy) settles with 1 for $700,000 Fault allocation: =0%, 1 =50%,

Problem1; Admission Flow

COST-VOLUME-PROFIT (CVP) ANALYSIS

INVENTORY AND OVERHEAD

Work, Power, & Energy Chapter 12 and 13.

Independent consultant Available for consulting In-house workshops Cost-Based Optimizer Performance By Design Performance Troubleshooting Oracle ACE Director.

$100 $200 $300 $400 $100 $200 $300 $400 $100 $200 $300 $400 $100 $200 $300 $400 $100 $200 $300 $400.

Sl No Top-up Amount No Of Affiliate Ads Payment Per Day By Affiliate Ad Total Affiliate Ad Income 1.5,000/- Daily 2 ad for 100 days 100/- Affiliate.

Chocolate Fudge Swiss Roll To make enough Swiss Roll for 8 people you would need… 50 g cocoa powder 3 large eggs 80g muscovado sugar 100g dark chocolate.

Writing Improper Fractions

Crops Choice Info sheets. Peas Cost of seed: £500 Expected selling price: £ Selling price will increase by 20% if product is farmed organically.

What is Inflation? Inflation is rising general level of prices

Managing Capacity.

Why Nations Trade Chapter 18 1.

Remember that of means multiply in mathematics. of = x.

Area of triangles.

Slide 1 Notebook Friday, 22 August 2014Registration Respect yourself - Respect each other - Respect the environment Starter How many words can you find.

 60 is a composite number which means it has more than two factors.  Factors of 60 are: 1,2,3,4,5,6,10,12,15,20,30 and 60 which are numbers that divide.

Making Landmark or Friendly Numbers (Multiplication)

Comparison of X-ray diffraction patterns of La 2 CuO 4+   from different crystals at room temperature Pia Jensen.

Using the properties and formula of Aritmetica series and Geometri series.

3 Ds cause injury to P. D 1 settles for $200,000 in exchange for P releasing D 1 from further liability. P sues D 2 and D 3, and the jury, in a jurisdiction.

We can multiply bigger numbers using an algorithm!

Lesson Menu Five-Minute Check (over Lesson 5–7) Main Idea and Vocabulary Key Concept: Percent of Change Example 1:Real-World Example: Find Percent of Change.

Planning for Profit and Cost Control

Elasticity and its Application

Making Numbers Two-digit numbers Three-digit numbers Click on the HOME button to return to this page at any time.

Roger died intestate survived by his wife, Ann, and by their one child, Mark. The value of the probate estate available for distribution is $240,000. How.

Look at these sequences. What is happening? 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, , 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800,

Beat the Computer Drill Divide 10s Becky Afghani, LBUSD Math Curriculum Office, 2004 Vertical Format.

Fractions Simplify: 36/48 = 36/48 = ¾ 125/225 = 125/225 = 25/45 = 5/9

Jeopardy Start Final Jeopardy Question Category 1Category 2Category 3Category 4Category

Kyle bought a bike from his friend. His friend gave him a 20% discount. He paid $40 for it. How much was the original price of the bike?

Chapter 8 Jeopardy DIVISION. Finding Quotients Mentally Word Problems Dividing without Regrouping Dividing.

TRAVEL MATHS D T S SPEED DISTANCE TRAVELLED JOURNEY TIME.

Powerpoint Jeopardy Category 1Category 2Category 3Category 4Category

+ Homework 0.45(800) = % 50% = 45% a b a 0.50b 360

Doubling and Halving. CATEGORY 1 Doubling and Halving with basic facts.

DIVIDEND CAPTURING. 1… Announcement date 2… Ex-date 3… Date of record 4… Payout date.

Multiplying By Multiples of 10 © 2012 Elizabeth Hill.

Presentation transcript:

 1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) New Mexico (Bartlett) UCFA Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

 1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) $480,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) $480,000 UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

 1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $480,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) $480,000 UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

 1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $480,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) $480,000 UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

 1 (10%) +  3 (30%) =40% total remaining  s’ fault

 1 ’s share of that remainder is 1/4=.25

 1 (10%) +  3 (30%) =40% total remaining  s’ fault  1 ’s share of that remainder is 1/4= $480,000 = $120,000

 1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) $480,000 UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

 1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + New Mexico (Bartlett) $480,000 UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

 1 (10%) +  3 (30%) =40% total remaining  s’ fault

 3 ’s share of that remainder is 3/4=.75

 1 (10%) +  3 (30%) =40% total remaining  s’ fault  3 ’s share of that remainder is 3/4= $480,000 = $360,000

 1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) $480,000 UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

 1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) $480,000 UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

 1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $480,000 UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

 1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $120,000 $480,000 UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

 1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $120,000 $480,000 $360,000 UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

 1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $120,000 $480,000 $360,000$240,000 + UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

 1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $120,000 $480,000 $360,000$240,000 + $480,000 = $720,000 UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

 1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $120,000 $480,000 $360,000$240,000 + $480,000 = $720,000 UCFA : uncollectable shares allocated among all remaining parties $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

 1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $120,000 $480,000 $360,000$240,000 + $480,000 = $720,000 UCFA: uncollectable shares allocated among all remaining parties $120,000 + $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

 1 (10%) +  3 (30%) +  (20%) = 60% total remaining parties’ fault

 1 ’s share of that remainder is 10/60=1/6

 1 (10%) +  3 (30%) +  (20%) = 60% total remaining parties’ fault  1 ’s share of that remainder is 10/60=1/6 1/6 * $480,000 = $80,000

 1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $120,000 $480,000 $360,000$240,000 + $480,000 = $720,000 UCFA: uncollectable shares allocated among all remaining parties $120,000 + $80,000 = $200,000 $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

 1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $120,000 $480,000 $360,000$240,000 + $480,000 = $720,000 UCFA: uncollectable shares allocated among all remaining parties $120,000 + $80,000 = $200,000 $480,000 $360,000 + Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

 1 (10%) +  3 (30%) +  (20%) = 60% total remaining parties’ fault

 3 ’s share of that remainder is 30/60=1/2

 1 (10%) +  3 (30%) +  (20%) = 60% total remaining parties’ fault  3 ’s share of that remainder is 30/60= ½ ½ * $480,000 = $240,000

 1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $120,000 $480,000 $360,000$240,000 + $480,000 = $720,000 UCFA: uncollectable shares allocated among all remaining parties $120,000 + $80,000 = $200,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $240,000 = $600,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

 1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $120,000 $480,000 $360,000$240,000 + $480,000 = $720,000 UCFA: uncollectable shares allocated among all remaining parties $120,000 + $80,000 = $200,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $240,000 = $600,000 $240,000 + Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

 1 (10%) +  3 (30%) +  (20%) = 60% total remaining parties’ fault

 ’s share of that remainder is 20/60=1/3

 1 (10%) +  3 (30%) +  (20%) = 60% total remaining parties’ fault  ’s share of that remainder is 20/60=1/3 1/3 * $480,000 = $160,000

 1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 =$240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $120,000 $480,000 $360,000$240,000 + $480,000 = $720,000 UCFA: uncollectable shares allocated among all remaining parties $120,000 + $80,000 = $200,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $240,000 = $600,000 $240,000 + $160,000 = $400,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent