© Fraunhofer FIRST Dr. Stephan Weißleder Research Manager Testing Department Quality of Embedded Systems (QUEST) Fraunhofer-Institute FIRST Relation of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

1 TITLE OF THE ARTICLE Author (Institution) Co-Author (Institution) .
Reporting on I&C status and recommendations to IAEA
1 Verification by Model Checking. 2 Part 1 : Motivation.
Safety Update This presentation covers Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC
Thursday, November 1, 2001(c) 2001 Ibrahim K. El-Far. All rights reserved.1 Enjoying the Perks of Model-based Testing Ibrahim K. El-Far Florida Institute.
§ 1.10 Properties of the Real Number System. Angel, Elementary Algebra, 7ed 2 Commutative Property Commutative Property of Addition If a and b represent.
1 Grafcet point de vue système. 2 Cliquez pour mise en route 0P 0Z 1V 2V 2V 1 1V 1 1V 2 1Z BPR 0Z 3 0V 1A.
Slide 1 Insert your own content. Slide 2 Insert your own content.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 3.1 Chapter 3.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
Quest ion 1? A.) answer B.) answer C.) correct answerD.) answer L C.) correct answer F.
2017 OHANA We are “FAMILY”.
Railways Systems: Applications HSI beyond DoD Dr. Jen Narkevicius Jenius LLC Dr. Jen Narkevicius Jenius LLC Human Systems Integration.
1 BALLAST WATER STANDARDIZATION COLLABORATIVE INITIATIVES December 9, 2009 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION – MARITIME ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENT.
Module N° 1 Module N° 1 – Introduction to SSP Familiarization course.
Presented to: COSCAP SA By: Aaron E. Wilkins III / Ajay Kumar Date: April 2011 FAAs Presence in South Asia An Overview of Technical Assistance Provided.
Combining Like Terms. Only combine terms that are exactly the same!! Whats the same mean? –If numbers have a variable, then you can combine only ones.
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
International Organization
ENQA seminar: Programme oriented and institutional oriented approaches to quality assurance - New developments and mixed approaches Berlin, 13/14 June.
17 November 2005Industry Meeting1 Fees & Charges Regulation Ralf Erckmann Certification Manager.
0 - 0.
2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt Time Money AdditionSubtraction.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Teacher Name Class / Subject Date A:B: Write an answer here #1 Write your question Here C:D: Write an answer here.
Addition Facts
Dependability analysis and evolutionary design optimisation with HiP-HOPS Dr Yiannis Papadopoulos Department of Computer Science University of Hull, U.K.
©G Dear 2010 – Not to be sold/Free to use
May 2012 All-in-one Permit for Physical Aspects Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment November 3rd 2010.
© 2013 Copyright Southwest Research Institute ® Southwest Research Institute Embedded Systems Security for Automotive October 3, 2013.
Software in Legacy Systems
Karl-Heinz Kühnlein Conquest 2009: Experiences with model centric Testing in Standard-based Medical IT Environments Test Management Aspects.
I-Secure Product Overview © 2010 ECC International. All Rights Reserved 1 ECC International PHILIPPINES :: MALAYSIA :: VIETNAM © 2010.
Session Overview Office of Postsecondary Coordination and Alignment (OPCA): Mission and Goals Defining Dual Enrollment and Dual Credit Knowing the Key.
AS9102 First Article Inspection Report
Kelly Weyrauch
Building better students by building better college procedures: How community colleges could better convey incentives for school effort Prof. James E.
(c) 2007 Mauro Pezzè & Michal Young Ch 17, slide 1 Test Execution.
1. 2 August Recommendation 9.1 of the Strategic Information Technology Advisory Committee (SITAC) report initiated the effort to create an Administrative.
Mafijul Islam, PhD Software Systems, Electrical and Embedded Systems Advanced Technology & Research Research Issues in Computing Systems: An Automotive.
O X Click on Number next to person for a question.
© S Haughton more than 3?
5.9 + = 10 a)3.6 b)4.1 c)5.3 Question 1: Good Answer!! Well Done!! = 10 Question 1:
Difference, Product and Quotient Functions
1 Developing Tests for Departmental Assessment Deborah Moore, Assessment Specialist Institutional Research, Planning, & Effectiveness University of Kentucky.
1 HSE KPI Data Collection Tool Briefings. 2 Contents Why is Network Rail introducing this system Data Input Levels System and Navigation Help Setting.
Past Tense Probe. Past Tense Probe Past Tense Probe – Practice 1.
Factoring ax2+bx +c ax2+bx +c
E-Transcripts – Electronic procedure for the exchange of curriculum data of exchange students.
Addition 1’s to 20.
3 ( x + 2 ) = 3 x ( 3 x - 5 ) = 6x - 10 xxx - 5 M May.
25 seconds left…...
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Click your mouse to move the card ahead! Work with a buddy using two Abacuses. First click and follow along using your abacus. After each click talk about.
11 = This is the fact family. You say: 8+3=11 and 3+8=11
Week 1.
Safety Critical Systems and Certification Issues DO-178B Airborne Standard
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Chapter 12 Integrating the Organization from End to End – Enterprise Resource Planning.
Bottoms Up Factoring. Start with the X-box 3-9 Product Sum
O X Click on Number next to person for a question.
Fourth Quarter Oklahoma Data (October-December 2011)
Massachusetts Digital Government Summit October 19, 2009 IT Management Frameworks An Overview of ISO 27001:2005.
X-box Factoring. X- Box 3-9 Product Sum Factor the x-box way Example: Factor 3x 2 -13x (3)(-10)= x 2x 3x 2 x-5 3x +2.
Capabilities.

ASP-1 Results from Break-Out Session 1. ARTEMISIA Association Title Presentation ideas  6 clusters  Safe transport technologies (1)  Safety.
Sector specific standards
Presentation transcript:

© Fraunhofer FIRST Dr. Stephan Weißleder Research Manager Testing Department Quality of Embedded Systems (QUEST) Fraunhofer-Institute FIRST Relation of Model-Based Testing and Safety-Relevant Standards

© Fraunhofer FIRST Page 2 Fraunhofer-Institute FIRST – Department QUEST Review and AssessmentTestingVerification IEC DO-178B ISO IEC EN IEC DO-178B ISO IEC EN certified

© Fraunhofer FIRST Page 3 Model-Based Testing

© Fraunhofer FIRST Page 4 –Early testing –Low costs –Support for certification –Early testing –Low costs –Support for certification –Better test management –Early testing –Low costs –Support for certification –Better test management –High degree of automation –Better test coverage Model-Based Testing Requirements Model Implementation Unit test System test Acceptance test Validation and traceability of requirements Generation of test design & test oracle Early acceptance test by model simulation Design Test management, Variant management

© Fraunhofer FIRST Page 5 How Does MBT Support Safety-Relevant Standards?

© Fraunhofer FIRST Page 6 How Does MBT Support Safety-Relevant Standards? Requirements Tests ? Higher Efficiency, Automatic Traceability Validation of requirements, Better Traceability? Measure/Achieve code coverage, More detailed coverage information for system tests? Relation of model coverage and requirements coverage? TraceabilityCoverage

© Fraunhofer FIRST Page 7 How do Safety-Relevant Standards Support MBT?

© Fraunhofer FIRST Page 8 Standards The good things about standards is there are so many to choose from. VDE 0801 IEC ISO ISO RTCA DO-178B ARINC 653 EN EN EN IEC EN ISO ISO TR General purpose Automotive Aviation Railway Machinery

© Fraunhofer FIRST Page 9 ISO (under publication) "Testing activities are also treated differently since models can be used as a useful source of information for the testing process (model-based testing)."

© Fraunhofer FIRST Page 10 RTCA DO-178B – 1992 DAL EDAL DDAL CDAL BDAL A No effectMinorMajorHazardousCatastrophic (Source: John Joseph Chilenski) (Source: DO-178B Standard)

© Fraunhofer FIRST Page 11 RTCA DO-178B – 1992 ObjectiveDAL ABCD Test coverage of high-level requirements is achieved. XXXX Test coverage of low-level requirements is achieved. XXX Test coverage of software structure is achieved. (MC/DC) X Test coverage of software structure is achieved. (Decision Coverage) XX Test coverage of software structure is achieved. (Statement Coverage) XXX Test coverage of software structure is achieved. (Data coupling / control coupling) XXX No support for model-based testing. Things are getting better in DO-178C ?

© Fraunhofer FIRST Page 12 IEC – 2010 !!!

© Fraunhofer FIRST Page 13 IEC – 2010

© Fraunhofer FIRST Page 14 IEC – 2010 Advantages: -Early requirements validation -Automatic test case generation -Combination of test case generation and code coverage measurement Model-based testing is (highly!) recommended. Model-based testing is (highly!) recommended.

© Fraunhofer FIRST Page 15 Dr. Stephan Weißleder +49 (0) Our mission is to bring model- based testing to industrial practice.