Changes in  15 N of nitrate and particulate nitrogen during a mesoscale iron fertilization experiment in the Southern Ocean David Timothy, Mark Altabet,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessing the efficiency of iron fertilization on atmospheric CO2 using an intermediate complexity ecosystem model of the global ocean Olivier Aumont 1.
Advertisements

The Ecology of Iron Enhanced Ocean Productivity Michael R. Landry Integrative Oceanography Division Scripps Institution of Oceanography University of California,
Prospects for ocean sequestration of carbon dioxide Andrew Watson School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
North Patch South Patch SAMPLE COLLECTION & ANALYSIS We deployed the Multiple Unit Large Volume in-situ Filtration System (MULVFS) during the.
Open Ocean Iron Fertilization Experiments From IronEx-I Through SOFEX: What We Know and What We Still Need to Understand Johnson, K S Chase, Z Elrod, V.
Particulate organic matter and ballast fluxes measured using Time-Series and Settling Velocity sediment traps in the northwestern Mediterranean Sea lead.
Marine Ecosystems and Food Webs. Carbon Cycle Marine Biota Export Production.
Biological pump Low latitude versus high latitudes.
Earth Science: 15.3 Oceanic Productivity
1 Nitrogen Cycle Most of Nitrogen is in the atmosphere. 14 N = 99.6% 15 N = 0.4% Air is standard for  15 N Range is –20 to +20 ‰
Changes in POC Concentration and  13 C during Mesoscale Iron Fertilization in the Southern Ocean 1 Mark A. Altabet, David Timothy, Matt McIlvin, and Peng.
UK GEOTRACES: Characterizing nitrate isotopes in South Atlantic water masses (40°S). UK GEOTRACES: Characterizing nitrate isotopes in South Atlantic water.
OXYGEN ISOTOPES B.C. Schreiber U. Washington Dept. Earth & Space Science To be used only for scholarly purposes, consistent with “fair use” as prescribed.
15 N in marine plants Modified by Angela Quiros. (Montoya 2007) There is lots of variation in the 15 N values in the world’s oceans.
Nutrient dynamics in the deep blue sea – David M. Karl
OCN520 Fall 2009 Mid-Term #2 Review Since Mid-Term #1 Ocean Carbonate Distributions Ocean Acidification Stable Isotopes Radioactive Isotopes Nutrients.
Freshwater Algae Growth Associated with Iron Fertilization Yang Zhang.
15 N in marine plants Alison Collins. Major Inputs of Nitrogen in the Ocean 1. Deep Water Nitrate 2.Atmospheric deposition Largest in areas near continental.
Iron fertilization: the biogeochemical basis for carbon sequestration Ken Johnson MBARI.
Climate through Earth history
OC211(OA211) Phytoplankton & Primary Production Dr Purdie SOC (566/18) LECTURE 6 Week 6 (i) Photosynthesis & Light (ii) Critical.
The Anthropogenic Ocean Carbon Sink Alan Cohn March 29, 2006
Cycling of Ocean Micronutrients: What do we Know and What do we Need to Know? Ed Boyle Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute.
Paper Number OS 26A-06 At both sites, the majority of the vertical flux attenuation of components such as carbon occurred with the mesopelagic “Twilight.
Lesson 4: The Biogeochemical Cycle Chemical Oceanography.
Lecture 13 Export Production Lecture 12 summary: Primary Productivity is limited mostly by nutrients. In low latitudes (< 45 o ), the limiting nutrient.
How does the Eastern Mediterranean photosynthetic community work CYCLOPS Addition experiment and resulting model.
Lecture 19 HNLC and Fe fertilization experiments
The Nitrogen Isotopic Record From the Peru-Chile Suboxic Zone; Distinguishing Internal and External Signals Across the Last Deglaciation M. A. Altabet.
Climate, Oceans and Phytoplankton: That Sinking Feeling* *With apologies to Bill Forsyth and Jorge Sarmiento (Nature 2000) Conservation Biology Oct 22,
Biogeochemical Controls and Feedbacks on the Ocean Primary Production.
RA-228 AND RA-226 FROFILES FROM THE NORTHERN SOUTH CHINA SEA Hsiu-Chuan Lin, Yu-Chia Chung and Chi-Ju Lin Institute of Marine Geology and Chemistry, National.
Melting ice, primary production, and particle export in the Southern Ocean- what’s the connection? Ken O. Buesseler Much of today's talk taken from: “The.
Iron and Biogeochemical Cycles
Introduction The environmental factors such as light, temperature and nutrients interact with each other in the marine environment and play a major role.
Does Iron Fertilization Enhance Carbon Export in the Southern Ocean? Matthew A. Charette and Ken O. Buesseler Department of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry,
NCAR ECSA Workshop on Coastal ZonesJune 2004 Importance of study of coastal zones in the carbon cycle has been explicated by two major carbon science steering.
Georgia Tech Biological Oceanography Inputs of “New” Nitrogen to the Planktonic Food Web in the North Atlantic: How Far Does the Nitrogen Go? Jason Landrum.
Nutrient Determination in the Belgian Coastal Waters of the North Sea By Sheku Sei and Enyue Xue 1 st Year Ecomama.
Among the biogeochemical cycles in the oceans carbon is one of the most significant. Oceans use carbon dioxide from the atmosphere as its source and can.
Why dump iron in the oceans? Lessons learned from ocean iron fertilization experiments Ken O. Buesseler Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.
USCG Polar Star overview & Particle export during SOFeX Ken O. Buesseler.
The biological response to in situ Southern Ocean iron fertilization. Richard T. Barber and SOFeX Team SOFeX: Southern Ocean Iron Experiments, An Overview.
Fe, Zn, and Cd stable isotopes from the eastern tropical South Pacific from GEOTRACES cruise GP16 – Methods and data Josh Helgoe, Emily Townsend, & Seth.
CO 2 and Climate Change. Lisiecki & Raymo,
1 Dynamics of nutrients in the Gdańsk Gulf; numerical simulations.
International Workshop for GODAR WESTPAC Global Ocean Data Archeology and Rescue: Scientific Needs from the Carbon Cycle Study in the Ocean Toshiro Saino.
Simulating the Southern Ocean Iron Experiment (SOFeX) using a marine ecosystem model Abstract The Southern Ocean Iron Experiment (SOFeX) was conducted.
Iron : Chemistry, sources and sinks..  Iron is the limiting factor in the surface water of S.O.  HNLC conditions « Iron hypothesis » (Martin et al.
Marine Ecosystem Simulations in the Community Climate System Model
Egg production rates of the larger copepods in the Gulf of Alaska: Calanus marshallae, Calanus pacificus, Eucalanus bungii and Neocalanus flemingeri Russell.
Interpreting the sedimentary record
Nutrients & Tracers Nutrients & Tracers
Biogeochemical Controls and Feedbacks on the Ocean Primary Production
OMSAP Public Meeting September 1999 Benthic Nutrient Cycling in Boston Harbor and Massachusetts Bay Anne Giblin, Charles Hopkinson & Jane Tucker The Ecosystems.
Isotopic insights into the benthic N cycle, and its impact on the global marine N cycle. Start with a review of stable isotope behavior in general. Wind.
Ocean Water.
Biology of mixed layer Primary production by Phytoplankton - small drifting organisms that photosynthesize Competition and limits on production Critical.
Food web and microbial loop Eutrophic vs. Oligotrophic food webs
Ocean Water.
Food web and microbial loop Eutrophic vs. Oligotrophic food webs
LU6: BEHAVIOUR OF METALS IN THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
Suggestions for getting an A
222Rn, oxygen, nutrients (nitrate, ammonia, phosphate)
Iron and Biogeochemical Cycles
~90 ppmv -Cooler oceans decrease CO2 by 22 ppmv -Saltier oceans increase CO2 by 11 ppmv.
Biology of mixed layer Primary production
Food web and microbial loop Eutrophic vs. Oligotrophic food webs
Examining the biogeochemistry behind the organic rich sediments of Guaymas Basin, Gulf of California Rebecca S. Robinson and Julie Fliegler, Graduate School.
Lesson 5: The Dead Zone Chemical Oceanography
Presentation transcript:

Changes in  15 N of nitrate and particulate nitrogen during a mesoscale iron fertilization experiment in the Southern Ocean David Timothy, Mark Altabet, Matt McIlvin and Peng Feng School for Marine Science and Technology U. Massachusetts Dartmouth 706 S. Rodney French Blvd. New Bedford, MA Acknowledgements: Rekha Singh and John Andrews provided technical assistance. Ken Buesseler provided in situ pump samples. Funding is from the DOE Carbon Sequestration Program and NSF. Contact: or NO 3 - concentration  15 NO 3 - Instantaneo us  15 N-PON Accumulat ed  15 N-PON u (fraction of NO 3 - utilized)  15 N Systematics NO 3 - (  ),  15 N Northern Patch High NO 3, Low Si Southern Patch High NO 3, High Si Background Deep-sea sedimentary  15 N has been used to estimate past changes in relative nutrient drawdown in Fe-limited HNLC regions. In a number of settings, corroboration between surface-water  15 N systematics (Fig 1) and modern sedimentary  15 N has been used to infer greater nutrient drawdown and hence less CO 2 degassing to the atmosphere during glacial periods. While the relationship between nutrient drawdown and  15 N of sinking particulates is robust with a fairly consistent fractionation factor for nitrate uptake, release from Fe-stress may produce modifications either through changes in species composition and/or phytoplankton physiological state. The Southern Ocean Fe Experiment (SOFeX; Fig 2) provided an opportunity to study the relationship between nitrogen isotope biogeochemistry and nutrient drawdown during Fe-enhanced phytoplankton growth. SOFeX was a collaborative effort involving two Scripps vessels (the R/V Revelle and the R/V Melville) and a Coast Guard ice breaker, the Polar Star, to extend the monitoring of the biogeochemical response to meso-scale Fe addition. Iron was added to waters north and south of the Antarctic Polar Front. While both sites have HNLC conditions, [SiO 4 ] was low at the northerly site and high at the southern location (Fig 2). The most extensive coverage occurred at the southern site and is the focus of this presentation. Here, FeSO 4 was added four different times over a ~two week period (Fig 4). Fig. 2 Location of SOFeX sites (Jan - March 2002). This presentation focuses on the southern patch where high nitrate and high silicate concentrations occur. Figures courtesy of Ken Johnson. Fig. 1 Theoretical changes in  15 N with NO 3 - drawdown as prescribed by Rayleigh fractionation and assuming a constant fraction factor of 8‰. The model for ‘accumulated product’ assumes no loss of particulate nitrogen from the euphotic zone. The ‘instantaneous product’ model assumes efficient PN removal. Mass balance is satisfied as the accumulation of isotopically light PN balances the diminishing pool of isotopically heavy NO 3 -. Fig. 3 Vertical profiles of particulate nitrogen in and out of the southern patch. ~10L samples were collected with Niskin bottles and the particulates were collected on GF/F filters. There was a 2-3 fold increase in PN within the mixed layer. Fig. 5 Results from size-fractionated in situ large volume pump collections. Consistent with the bottle samples, “in” station samples were somewhat heavier than “out” (top and as Fig 4) and the >54 µm size fraction was typically ~0.5‰ lighter than particles 1-54 µm. This difference increased with PN concentration in the south patch (bottom). Samples are courtesy of Ken Buesseler. Fig. 4 Southern Patch time series of average [NO 3 - ] and PN in the mixed layer, and their  15 N. The accumulation of PN approximately balances NO 3 - drawdown. The difference between  15 NO 3 - and  15 N- PON showed little change over the study, suggesting a constant fractionation factor for NO 3 - near 5-6 ‰. Results In polar HNLC waters, plankton  15 N is primarily determined by the degree of NO 3 - drawdown and the fractionation factor for NO 3 - uptake by phytoplankton, assuming little influence from recycled N. An expectation was that Fe-stimulated drawdown of NO 3 - would cause an increase in  15 N in both NO 3 - and particles. An important question is whether the fractionation factor would significantly change in Fe-replete conditions. 1) Particulate nitrogen in the mixed layer increased by a factor of 2-3 in response to the Fe addition in the southern patch (Fig 3). 2) PN accumulation and NO 3 - drawdown were both 1-2 µM during the occupation of the bloom (Fig 4), suggesting retention of particulates within the mixed layer of the southern patch. 3)  15 N of PN and of NO 3 - increased by 1-2‰ as [NO 3 - ] decreased, and there is a clear contrast between in- and out-patch stations with respect to particulate  15 N (Fig 4). The isotopic fractionation factor for NO 3 - was near 5-6‰ and appears to have been unaffected by Fe fertilization, although further analyses of  15 NO 3 - on collected samples are needed. 4) The > 54 µm size fraction was typically lighter than the 1-54 µm size fraction by about 0.5 ‰. In the south patch, this difference increased as the bloom progressed, and with increasing PN concentration (Fig 5). This result may have been caused by several factors. Large chain-forming diatoms responded to the Fe addition and were likely isotopically lighter than smaller flagellates. Also, there was a surprising lack of zooplankton in the larger size fraction - their presence would have caused these samples to be isotopically more heavy. 5) The relationship between  15 N of the two size fractions in and out of the southern patch (Fig 5) is currently unexplained. Analysis of other size- fractionated samples collected in and out of the southern patch may clarify these results. SIZE-FRACTIONATED IN SITU LVP COLLECTIONS