Rockford Powertrain Training Workshop Process Capability and Cpk

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 6 - Statistical Process Control
Advertisements

Control Charts for Variables
1 COMM 301: Empirical Research in Communication Lecture 15 – Hypothesis Testing Kwan M Lee.
Chapter 9A Process Capability and Statistical Quality Control
Chapter 9A. Process Capability & Statistical Quality Control
VIII Measure - Capability and Measurement
HABEEB HATTAB HABEEB Office: BN-Block, Level-3, Room Ext. No.: 7292 H/P No.:
Global Business Management Group
Sampling Distributions
Chapter 10 Section 2 Hypothesis Tests for a Population Mean
13–1. 13–2 Chapter Thirteen Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Managing Quality Chapter 5.
S6 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S6 Statistical Process Control PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and Render.
8-1 Is Process Capable ? The Quality Improvement Model Use SPC to Maintain Current Process Collect & Interpret Data Select Measures Define Process Is Process.
CHAPTER 8TN Process Capability and Statistical Quality Control
1 The Basics of Regression Regression is a statistical technique that can ultimately be used for forecasting.
BCOR 1020 Business Statistics Lecture 21 – April 8, 2008.
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 6-1 Chapter 6 The Normal Distribution and Other Continuous Distributions.
Total Quality Management BUS 3 – 142 Statistics for Variables Week of Mar 14, 2011.
The one sample t-test November 14, From Z to t… In a Z test, you compare your sample to a known population, with a known mean and standard deviation.
1 1 Slide | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | UCL CL LCL Chapter 13 Statistical Methods for Quality Control n Statistical.
Discrete and Continuous Probability Distributions.
Chapter 6 – Part 4 Process Capability.
Statistical Process Control
Statistical Quality Control/Statistical Process Control
Statistical Applications in Quality and Productivity Management Sections 1 – 8. Skip 5.
Quality Control McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
CENTRE FOR INNOVATION, RESEARCH AND COMPETENCE IN THE LEARNING ECONOMY Session 2: Basic techniques for innovation data analysis. Part I: Statistical inferences.
1 © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2006 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Technical Note 8 Process Capability and Statistical Quality Control.
There are no two things in the world that are exactly the same… And if there was, we would say they’re different. - unknown.
Overview of Total Quality Tools
General Tolerance and Hole Fit
Lecture 12 Statistical Inference (Estimation) Point and Interval estimation By Aziza Munir.
Process Capability and Statistical Process Control.
Stat 1510: Statistical Thinking and Concepts 1 Density Curves and Normal Distribution.
1 Topic 7 - Hypothesis tests based on a single sample Sampling distribution of the sample mean Basics of hypothesis testing Hypothesis test for a population.
1 Estimation From Sample Data Chapter 08. Chapter 8 - Learning Objectives Explain the difference between a point and an interval estimate. Construct and.
ENGR 1181 College of Engineering Engineering Education Innovation Center Collecting Measured Data Pre-Class Reading.
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.S6 – 1 Operations Management Supplement 6 – Statistical Process Control © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. PowerPoint presentation to.
Brian Macpherson Ph.D, Professor of Statistics, University of Manitoba Tom Bingham Statistician, The Boeing Company.
Chapter 36 Quality Engineering (Part 2) EIN 3390 Manufacturing Processes Summer A, 2012.
6Sigma Chapter 3. Six Sigma Quality: DMAIC Cycle  Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control (DMAIC)  Developed by General Electric as a means of.
Chapter 7 Sampling Distributions Statistics for Business (Env) 1.
Lecture 16 Section 8.1 Objectives: Testing Statistical Hypotheses − Stating hypotheses statements − Type I and II errors − Conducting a hypothesis test.
1 Six Sigma : Statistical View Dedy Sugiarto. 2 What is Variation? Less Variation = Higher Quality.
Statistical Quality Control/Statistical Process Control
Statistical Quality Control
Operations Fall 2015 Bruce Duggan Providence University College.
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 17 Process Improvement Using Control Charts.
Chapter 36 Quality Engineering (Part 1) (Review) EIN 3390 Manufacturing Processes Fall, 2010.
Process Capability and Statistical Quality Control.
CHAPTER 11 Mean and Standard Deviation. BOX AND WHISKER PLOTS  Worksheet on Interpreting and making a box and whisker plot in the calculator.
Chap 5-1 Discrete and Continuous Probability Distributions.
Chapter 10 Confidence Intervals for Proportions © 2010 Pearson Education 1.
Overview Definition Measurements of process capability control
TQM Defined Total quality management is defined as managing the entire organization so that it excels on all dimensions of products and services that are.
Statistical Process Control
36.1 Introduction Objective of Quality Engineering:
McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved
STAT 206: Chapter 6 Normal Distribution.
What is the point of these sports?
Step M2 – Variable Process Capability
DSQR Training Process Capability & Performance
Process Capability.
Implementing Six Sigma Quality
Statistics for Business and Economics
13.0 PROCESS CAPABILITY SPECIAL TOPICS
Presentation transcript:

Rockford Powertrain Training Workshop Process Capability and Cpk

Training materials, reference documents, and functional SPC templates are available free on the Rockford Powertrain web site. Go to: www.rockfordpowertrain.com/supplier

Process Capability Enables successful manufacturing and sales Prevents scrap, sorting, rework Allows jobs to run well Has major impact on cost and schedule

“Process Capability” is the ability of a process to make a feature within its tolerance.

Everything Varies (and the variation can be seen if we measure precisely enough) Heights Weights Lengths Widths Diameters Wattage Horsepower Miles per Gallon Pressure Roughness Strength Conductivity Loudness Speed Torque Etc. etc. etc.

Eli Whitney in 1798 Won a U.S. Military contract to supply 10,000 guns Reduced variation and created interchangeable parts for assembly and service by: Installing powered factory machinery Using specialized fixtures, tools, jigs, templates, and end-stops Creating drawings, routings, operations & training

Manufacturing in the 21st Century International competition to provide defect-free products at competitive cost Reducing variation and providing interchangeable parts for assembly and service by: Using machine tools Using specialized fixtures, tools, jigs, templates, and end-stops Using drawings, routings, operations & training

Graphing the tolerance and a measurement .512 .513 .514 .515 . 516 .517 .518 .519 .520 .521 .522 .523 .524 .525 .526 .527 .528 It’s useful to see the tolerance and the part measurement on a graph. Suppose that:

Graphing the tolerance and a measurement Specification Limit MIN .512 .513 .514 .515 . 516 .517 .518 .519 .520 .521 .522 .523 .524 .525 .526 .527 .528 It’s useful to see the tolerance and the part measurement on a graph. Suppose that: --the tolerance is .515”

Graphing the tolerance and a measurement Specification Limit MIN Specification Limit MAX .512 .513 .514 .515 . 516 .517 .518 .519 .520 .521 .522 .523 .524 .525 .526 .527 .528 It’s useful to see the tolerance and the part measurement on a graph. Suppose that: --the tolerance is .515” to .525”

Graphing the tolerance and a measurement Specification Limit MIN X Specification Limit MAX .512 .513 .514 .515 . 516 .517 .518 .519 .520 .521 .522 .523 .524 .525 .526 .527 .528 It’s useful to see the tolerance and the part measurement on a graph. Suppose that: --the tolerance is .515” to .525” --and an individual part is measured at .520”.

Graphing the tolerance and measurements X X X Specification Limit MIN X Specification Limit MAX .512 .513 .514 .515 . 516 .517 .518 .519 .520 .521 .522 .523 .524 .525 .526 .527 .528 Suppose we made and measured several more units, and they were all EXACTLY the same! We wouldn’t have very many part problems!

Graphing the tolerance and measurements XX XXX XXXXX XXXXXXX Specification Limit MIN Specification Limit MAX .512 .513 .514 .515 . 516 .517 .518 .519 .520 .521 .522 .523 .524 .525 .526 .527 .528 In the real world, units are NOT EXACTLY the same. Everything VARIES. The question isn’t IF units vary. It’s how much, when, and why.

The “normal bell curve” XX XXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XX XXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX Widths, heights, depths, thicknesses, weights, speeds, strengths, and many other types of measurements, when charted as a histogram, often form the shape of a bell.* A “perfect bell,” like a “perfect circle,” doesn’t occur in nature, but many processes are close enough to make the bell curve useful. (*A number of common industrial measurements, such as flatness and straightness, do NOT tend to distribute in a bell shape; their proper statistical analysis is performed using models other than the bell curve.)

What is a “standard deviation”? XX XXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XX XXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX Typical distance from the center: -1 standard deviation Typical distance from the center: +1 standard deviation If we measure the DISTANCE from the CENTER of the bell to each individual measurement that makes up the bell curve, we can find a TYPICAL DISTANCE. The most commonly used statistic to estimate this distance is the Standard Deviation (also called “Sigma”). Because of the natural shape of the bell curve, the area of +1 to –1 standard deviations includes about 68% of the curve.

How much of the curve is included in how many standard deviations? -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 From –1 to +1 is about 68% of the bell curve. From –2 to +2 is about 95% From –3 to +3 is about 99.73% From –4 to +4 is about 99.99% (NOTE: We usually show the bell from –3 to +3 to make it easier to draw, but in concept, the “tails” of the bell get very thin and go on forever.)

A B What is Cpk? It is a measure of how well a process is within a specification. A Cpk = A divided by B B Specification Limit Specification Limit Cpk = A divided by B A = Distance from process mean to closest spec limit B = 3 Standard Deviations (also called “3 Sigma”) A bigger Cpk is better because fewer units will be beyond spec. (A bigger “A” and a smaller “B” are better.)

“Process Capability” is the ability of a process to fit its output within the tolerances. Cpk = A divided by B B Specification Limit Specification Limit …a LARGER “A” …and a SMALLER “B” …means BETTER “Process Capability”

A B An Analogy Cpk = A divided by B Analogy: Specification Limit Specification Limit Analogy: The bell curve is your automobile. The spec limits are the edges of your garage door. If A = B, you are hitting the frame of your garage door with your car.

A B How can we make Cpk (A divided by B) better? Cpk = A divided by B Specification Limit Specification Limit Design the product so a wider tolerance is functional (“robust design”) Choose equipment and methods for a good safety margin (“process capability”) Correctly adjust, but only when needed (“control”) Discover ways to narrow the natural variation (“improvement”)

What does a very good Cpk do for us? This Cpk is about 2. Very good! B Specification Limit Specification Limit Mean This process is producing good units with a good safety margin. Note that when Cpk = 2, our process mean is 6 standard deviations from the nearest spec, so we say it has “6 Sigma Capability.”

What does a problem Cpk look like? This Cpk is just slightly greater than 1. Not good! B Specification Limit Specification Limit This process is in danger of producing some defects. It is too close to the specification limits. (Remember: the bell curve tail goes further than B… …we only show the bell to 3-sigma to make it easier to draw.)

What does a very bad Cpk look like? This Cpk is less than 1. We desire a minimum of 1.33 and ultimately we want 2 or more. B Specification Limit Specification Limit A significant part of the “tail” is hanging out beyond the spec limits. This process is producing scrap, rework, and customer rejects. Notice that if distance “A” approaches zero… …the Cpk would approach zero, and… …the process would become 50% defective!

Free software is available to draw a histogram and calculate average, standard deviation, and Cpk. Located at: www.rockfordpowertrain.com/supplier

What “Six Sigma Philosophy” did Motorola teach its suppliers in the 1980’s? Specification Limit Specification Limit In the 1980’s, Motorola achieved dramatic quality improvements and won the USA’s Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award. Motorola began seminars teaching its “Six Sigma Philosophy” to its suppliers, and to other companies. The following few slides depict some original messages from that time.

Robust Design – part of the original Six Sigma Known Existing Process New Product Specification Limit New Product Specification Limit The new design above has tolerances set “tight” to a known existing process, while the one below has tolerances that allow “six sigma capability”. Products have thousands of tolerances. They result from choices about shapes, thicknesses, grades of materials, and grades of components. “Robust design” is NOT about permitting “sloppiness.” It requires very smart engineering to allow ample tolerances AND achieve satisfactory function. Known Existing Process New Product Specification Limit New Product Specification Limit

Robust Design – part of the original Six Sigma Known Existing Process New Product Specification Limit New Product Specification Limit CAUTION: Suppliers must negotiate the widening of tolerances BEFORE competitive bids, quotations, and acceptance of orders. Competitive bids are commitments to meet all existing tolerances. Failure to meet customer tolerances means failure to meet contract requirements. Prevent breaches of contract. Known Existing Process New Product Specification Limit New Product Specification Limit

Robust Processes – part of the original Six Sigma New Process choice “X” New Product Specification Limit New Product Specification Limit The process above varies so much that it “fills” the design tolerance. The different process below has good repeatability for “six sigma capability”. It’s a false-economy to choose an allegedly lower-cost process that “uses up” all tolerance. The resulting scrap, rework, rejections, recalls, damage to reputation, crisis communications, and fire-fighting cancel out the alleged economy. “Robust Process” requires skillful insight to choose ways to make defect-free product at the lowest real cost. New Process choice “Y” New Product Specification Limit New Product Specification Limit

6 Sigma Philosophy – Not Just The Shop Floor Getting every person “capable” and in “self control” Achieving delivery and project deadlines Meeting budgets & financial goals Administrative tasks Design work Purchasing/sourcing Special projects Security and Safety Health and Environmental Legal compliance Anything that can be defined and measured

Getting every person “capable” and in “self control” Defined & Understood Requirements Ability to Measure Results Process Capability and Ability to Control The 3 Requisites Of Self-Control

Summary: To call a process “capable” typically requires at least a Cpk of 1.33 (+ and - 4 standard deviations within tolerance) Many customers desire a Cpk of 2.0 (+ and - 6 standard deviations within tolerance) Organizations need: Feasible designs Capable processes Process self-control

Conclusion: Yes: No: Yes: No: Yes: No: Process Capability: too wide potentially capable if re-centered Yes: No: potentially capable if re-centered

What is “Process Capability?” Review Question 1 What is “Process Capability?”

How is the “process average” calculated or estimated? Review Question 2 How is the “process average” calculated or estimated?

Review Question 3 What is a “Standard Deviation”? (also known as a “sigma”)

Review Question 4 What is Cpk used for?

Review Question 5 Suppose that a feature tolerance is .750”/.760”, and the process average is .759”, and the process standard deviation is .002” …is the process satisfactory and capable?

Review Question 6 Suppose that a torque tolerance is 25 foot pounds minimum, and the process average is 26 foot pounds, and the process standard deviation is 3 foot pounds… …is the process capable?

Review Question 7 Suppose that a diameter tolerance is 8.010” to 8.060”, and the process average is 8.041”, and the process standard deviation is .002”… …is the process capable?

Review Question 8 Fred is cutting an outside diameter on a lathe and the diameter is easily adjustable. The diameter tolerance is 5.050” to 5.090”, the process average is 5.090”, and the process standard deviation is .001”… What is the Cpk? What should Fred do with the process?

Review Question 9 Joe is boring an inside diameter on a lathe. The diameter tolerance is 1.980” to 2.020”. Joe has measured three random samples at 2.005”, 2.004”, and 2.006”. Estimate the process average. Estimate the standard deviation (best guess). Estimate whether the process can be capable.

Review Question 10 TechCorp is demonstrating a new “high-precision” grease dispenser machine. TechCorp claims that they can “dispense grease all day with an accuracy of plus or minus half an ounce.” During the demo, ten samples of grease in a row were dispensed (in ounces) as follows: 2.3, 2.0, 2.6, 3.0, 2.1, 2.7, 2.9, 2.5, 2.0, 2.4 Based on the sample data, evaluate TechCorp’s claim that they can “dispense grease all day with an accuracy of plus or minus half an ounce.”

Quiz Question 1 True or False? “Process Capability” can be defined as the ability of a process to make a feature within its tolerance.

Quiz Question 2 True of False? We can estimate the process average by taking a set of sample measurements, adding them up, and dividing by the number of measurements.

Quiz Question 3 True or False? A “Standard Deviation” can be thought of as the “typical” distance of the measurements from the average; about 68% of the individuals will fall within + or – 1 standard deviation of a bell curve.

When using Cpk, the goal is to keep the Cpk value as low as possible. Quiz Question 4 True or False? When using Cpk, the goal is to keep the Cpk value as low as possible.

Quiz Question 5 True or False? If the feature tolerance is .350”/.360”, and the process average is .351”, and the process standard deviation is .004” …then the process should be called “capable.”

Quiz Question 6 True or False? If a pressure tolerance is 250 PSI minimum, and the process average is 260 PSI, and the process standard deviation is 4 PSI, …then the process is “capable.”

Quiz Question 7 True or False? If a height tolerance is 7.010” to 7.060”, and the process average is 7.042”, and the process standard deviation is .002”… …then the process is “capable.”

Quiz Question 8 True or False? If Larry is cutting an O.D. and the diameter is easily adjustable, the tolerance is 4.055” to 4.095”, the process average is 4.095”, and the standard deviation is .001”… …then Larry should be able to make the process fully “capable” by adjusting the process.

Quiz Question 9 True or False? If Jill is boring an I.D. with a tolerance of 1.475” to 1.525”, and has measured three samples at 1.501”, 1.500”, and 1.499”… …then the average of the samples is 1.501”, the standard deviation is probably larger than .010”, and the Cpk is probably zero.

Quiz Question 10 True or False? If HiTechCo is demonstrating a new “high-precision” surface coating machine, and claims that their machine “can coat all day with an accuracy of plus or minus .010 inches,” and during the demo the coating thickness readings (in inches) were as follows: .027, .028, .027, .029, .028, .029, .028, .029, .028, .027 …then the sample readings suggest that HiTechCo might be telling the truth about being able to hold plus or minus .010 inches.

Cpk and PPM (Parts Per Million Defective) Appendix Cpk and PPM (Parts Per Million Defective)

Cpk: Avoid confusion and pitfalls DOES IT VARY? Cpk varies when sampled, because it’s calculated from the average and the standard deviation, both of which are estimated from samples. CARROTS AND STICKS? Giving rewards or reprimands based on minor, short-term fluctuations of Cpk amounts to a lottery. Watch real trends. MAKE A “PLANT AVERAGE” CPK? It’s unhelpful to report a plant average Cpk of multiple characteristics and products, because: Cpk values depend on each chosen tolerance An “okay average Cpk” could come from 50% “good” and 50% “bad” numbers -- highly misleading!

What is PPM (defect Parts Per Million)? B The defect PPM is the area outside spec limits Specification Limit Specification Limit “PPM” is an estimate of the portion that is beyond the spec limit. If we know the Cpk… --we can look up the PPM “out of spec” in a statistics book table, or --we can use software, such as Microsoft Excel, to calculate the PPM. (REMEMBER that the “tail” of the bell goes out further than it is drawn.)

What is the “6-Sigma Philosophy” “1.5-Sigma Shift”? Unfavorable process shift of 1.5 standard deviations Specification Limit Specification Limit The “6 Sigma Philosophy” includes the premise that real-world processes move around to some extent, and produce more defects than a static process. As an arbitrary convention, this is represented as an “unfavorable shift” of 1.5 sigma in Parts Per Million tables for Six Sigma programs. The intention is to plan conservatively. (This means that the “PPM vs. Sigma” charts published for “6-Sigma Programs” show higher defect rates than the similar but traditional “Z-tables” in statistical textbooks.)

The following page is a table showing the relationships among the following: Cpk, “How Many Sigma Capability,” Parts Per Million according to traditional statistical tables Parts Per Million taking into account the “6-Sigma Philosophy” of an unfavorable shift in the mean of 1.5 Sigma