MEMO to EPU Public Land Transport Commission (SPAD) Feedback Forum 6 February 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
York Viva Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Concept image along Davis Drive.
Advertisements

Public Transportation at the State Level Planning and Design of Public Transport Infrastructure By Moaz Yusuf Ahmad.
Dynamic Improvements to Public Transportation in Malaysia
Tysons Tysons Corner Circulator Study Board Transportation Committee June 12, 2012.
Overview of a Timely Publication. Transportations importance has been recognized since colonial times National defense Economic vitality Quality of life.
Urban Transport Benchmarking Year Three Urban Transport Trends in Participant Cities Neil Taylor Transport & Travel Research Ltd Directorate-General for.
A34 Corridor Strategy Strategic Route Improvements 25 th November 2004 working together with.
Mass Transit OSullivan Chapter 11. Outline of the Chapter Analyze some empirical facts about public transit in the United States Analyze the commuters.
Transport for Canberra 07 November2013. Transport for NSW: Regional Transport Plan ACT, whilst not part of the region, is an important destination Transport.
Module 3 SMART PARKING. Module 3 Smart Parking Introduction This is one of seven Transit Oriented Development training modules developed by the Regional.
EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS IN MINNESOTA A JOINT PRESENTATION TO THE Transportation Funding Advisory Committee September 14, 2012.
MAXIMIZING THE AIR QUALITY BENEFITS OF BUS RAPID TRANSIT Walter Hook, BAQ Conference Agra, India, December, 2004 Funded by the US Agency for International.
Markham Centre TDM and Land Development Case Study ACT Canada – TDM Summit October 21, 2008.
Dr Lina Shbeeb Minister of Transport. Jordan
Active Transportation Towards Healthy Lifestyle Rajiv Rishyakaran, TRANSIT Malaysia.
1 Integration as a competitiveness instrument for Public Transport in rural areas Helder Cristóvão, José M Viegas Integration as a Competitiveness Instrument.
The Potential BRT in Asia
Externalities on highways Today: We apply externalities to a real-life example.
Urban Transportation 6. Introduction The major problem facing the transportation is congestion. The major problem facing the transportation is congestion.
RTA Legislation Crafted with Three Principles  Keep it simple  Provide maximum local flexibility  Utilize existing law whenever possible.
Presentation by: Permanent Secretary - PMORALG Mr. Jumanne Sagini 3 rd June 2014.
Urban Transport in the Developing World. Elements of Urban Transport Sector Urban public transport: Urban public transport: On-street systems (for buses,
1 Metrolinx delivers The Big Move Regional Transportation Plan: Transforming Transportation in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area November 5, 2012 Bruce.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Regulation & Finance Unit 7: Forecasting and Encouraging Ridership.
Rapid Transit Investment Plan David Armijo, CEO March 19, 2010.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Planning Process & Alternatives Analysis Unit 7: Forecasting and Encouraging Ridership.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
Competition Reforms in Bus transport sector In Zambia National Advocacy Plan (CREW Project) CREW NRG-IV Meeting, 22 nd April, Lusaka.
Sustainable travel for Limerick and Area By Professor Lewis Lesley.
1 TRANSPORT PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE 9 NOVEMBER 2005 Is the Gautrain the solution? Romano Del Mistro TRANSPORT PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE 9 NOVEMBER 2005.
Jeff’s slides. Transportation Kitchener Transportation Master Plan Define and prioritize a transportation network that is supportive of all modes of.
Presentation to the Sustainable Prosperity Conference
 City of Hamilton – Transportation Sustainable Mobility Summit – October 27, 2013.
Green Transport Dr Lina Shbeeb Minister of Transport. Jordan.
Metro Cities Transportation Policy Committee August 10, 2015 Overview of Minnesota Highway and Transit Finance.
Project Information Brief project description Cairo, Egypt Bus Rapid Transit System with potential capacity of 45,000 people per person per direction Phase.
Prague Integrated Transport (PID).  Prague - area 496 km 2 population 1.2 mil. distance of the city boundary from the centre is 10 km to the north, 18.
Cal y Mayor y Asociados, S.C. Atizapan – El Rosario Light Rail Transit Demand Study October th International EMME/2 UGM.
Public Transportation at the State Level Regulation and Coordination By Moaz Yusuf Ahmad.
Economics of Congestion Jagadish Guria Presentation to the the 8th Annual New Zealand Transport Summit 25 February 2008.
Putting Luas Cross City in context - Public Transport and Sustainable Measures in Dublin Dublin City Council 21 st March 2013 Gerry Murphy.
Enhancing Public Transport… 2 nd National Summit on Urban Public Transport 15 October 2009 Moaz Yusuf Ahmad for TRANSIT.
1. Variety of modes (types) of transport (public and private) 2. Density of transport networks more nodes and.
Revenue Administration Reform Project and Further Revenue Administration Reform Project and Further Restructuring for Higher Efficiency and Effectiveness.
7 May 2014 Sustainable transport vision for Greater Cairo.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference Implementing a BRT Project: The Preliminary Steps 8:30 – 9:50 a.m. Frank SpielbergBMI-SG Incoming Chair, TRB.
1/14 Next Steps for Participating Economies to Develop EE Urban Passenger Transportation 5 March, 2012 APERC Workshop, Kuala Lumpur Bing-Chwen Yang Team.
Enhancing Public Transport… …in the Kinta Valley Summit on Urban Public Transport 09 November, 2008.
Externalities on highways Today: We apply externalities to a real-life example.
Public Transportation Planning: Rapid transit solutions for adequate mass movement Mobility.
Corridors Matter but do not Neglect Connectivity in the System as a Whole ! Professor David A. Hensher FASSA Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies.
Enhancing Public Transport… …in the Klang Valley National Summit on Urban Public Transport 18 September, 2008.
Amal S. Kumarage 4 th November 2015.
1 West Midlands Transport Governance 30 March 2015 Adam Harrison West Midlands ITA Policy & Strategy Team.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
Athens, Conference Hall, Ministry of Infrastructure, Transport and Networks, 5&6 November 2015 ALTERNATIVE-COLLECTIVE PATTERNS OF OWNERSHIP AND USE OF.
Key Trends Shaping Transportation System Management Operations Timothy Papandreou CIO, Director Office of Innovation San Francisco Municipal Transportation.
Industry Briefing 25 May 2016.
Using Public-Private Partnerships to Move More People The Story of HOT Lanes in Northern Virginia January 30, 2017 Morteza Farajian, Ph.D.
Regional Roads Committee
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) ACEC Presentation May 25, 2017
VicRoads – Movement & Place
User Perspective on the State of Public Transportation
VicRoads – Movement & Place
Engaging Public Transport Users
Transportation Task Force Mission and Vision
SATC 2017 SOUTHERN AFRICAN SOLUTIONS TO PUBLIC TRANSPORT CHALLENGES
Innovation in Railways NTA Ireland
Presentation transcript:

MEMO to EPU Public Land Transport Commission (SPAD) Feedback Forum 6 February 2009

Presentation Structure Introductions – who we are Resolving Public Transport Issues in Malaysia Regulation has to change Organization has to change A New Model for Public Transport Making it happen Conclusion

So…who are you? The Association for the Improvement of Mass-Transit (TRANSIT), Klang Valley A diverse group of public transport users A united voice for the passenger Our Goal to ensure the voice of the passenger is heard in public transport planning, regulation, and operations To increase awareness about what public public transport can bring to our communities

Resolving Public Transport Issues in Malaysia FACT: Public transport provides 3 functions for society Mobility for those not using private transport Development tool to reduce infrastructure costs A business operation with potential for profits Investment in public transport is investment in critical communications infrastructure Far less money has been invested properly into public transport than in other infrastructure

Why dont choice users choose to use public transport? TRIP (Mass) transit journey is too tiring ROUTE Transit routes are very complicated PLATFORM Transit points are not accessible

To make people use public transport… TRIP (Mass) transit journey is too tiring ROUTE Transit routes are very complicated PLATFORM Transit points are not accessible MAKE TRIP FAST AND COMFORTABLE MAKE GETTING TO PLACES SIMPLE AND STRAIGHT FORWARD MAKE TRANSFERS CONVENIENT AND HASSLE FREE

The current system cannot work because: TRIP Collective movement of people ROUTE Servicing common corridor with greater efficiency PLATFORM Facilitated by pooled resources (stations, street signals, dedicated lanes etc) The single most important competitor to public transport is private transport Taxpayers money has not been used to fund common infrastructure to support public transport the way it is used to build and maintain roads for cars. Operators pitted against each other will take every cost savings they can get away with in absence of any reasonable standards, regulations and enforcement Mass transit vehicles SHARE travel space with private vehicles Operators maximize whatever they can squeeze from any loophole in public infrastructure (i.e. loitering of parked buses, unruly road hogging and speeding)

Regulation has to change Public transport is not coordinated Various disconnected services operated by various disconnected corporations Some important questions Why are government corporations competing with private corporations? Will the S.P.A.D. be just another agency? (#14) Does the government have a clear, realistic plan for public transport? Are government and operators listening to us?

So? To do this we must appreciate and understand all functions of public transport when we plan, regulate, and operate these services Is the service ensuring universal accessibility? Is the service enhancing development? Is the service planned and implemented to reduce other infrastructure costs? Have we maximized the benefits and minimized the costs? Are we planning ahead or planning too late?

The importance of planning: TRIP Collective movement of people ROUTE Servicing common corridors with greater efficiency PLATFORM Facilitated by pooled resources (stations, street signals, dedicated lanes etc)

Who does what in public transport TRIP Collective movement of people ROUTE Servicing common corridor with greater efficiency PLATFORM Facilitated by pooled resources (stations, street signals, dedicated lanes etc) This highly systemic and strategic task should be entrusted to a centralized authority with a high-level of legislative and enforcement powers This operational task is typically taken by private or quasi-government operators. Pooled resources refer to commonly shared infrastructures funded by taxpayers. Ownership by local and regional level authorities is a must.

The bottom line of public transport… KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS in: Accessibility Availability Reliability Safety Comfort The measurement of performance is the key, because…… If you cant measure it, you cant control it… If you cant control it, you cant manage it… If you cant manage it, you cant improve it. MAKE TRIP FAST AND COMFORTABLE MAKE GETTING TO PLACES SIMPLE AND STRAIGHT FORWARD MAKE TRANSFERS CONVENIENT AND HASSLE FREE

Change the regulation… Public Transport is a rakyat issue Public Transport Oversight and Regulation should be handled by a Select Parliamentary Committee A Centralized Authority (S.P.A.D.) will: Create national standards for public transport Integrate planning with National Physical Plan Determine funding needs and provide funds Invest in critical improvements to infrastructure

Change the regulation… Local / Regional Authorities are empowered to carry out the regulation of public transport Local / Regional Authorities would be integrated with economic growth regions Focus on local and regional planning as identified in the National Physical Plan Ownership of crucial public transport infrastructure Provision of investment capital and funding

A new model for public transport Authority provides & owns all vital infrastructure (incl. routes) Operators contracted to the Local or Regional Authority for a 3-5 year period Contract through open tender and KPI Operators are paid a contract fee for services provided with additional incentives for meeting/exceeding KPI Feedback from passengers becomes vital

A new organizational model KPIs in: Accessibility Availability Reliability Safety Comfort INPUTS Taxpayers Money Infrastructure Technology Resources Labor CONSUMED OUTPUTS Passenger/mile Passenger/energy unit Infra. KPIs Service KPIs PRODUCED OUTPUTS Journey covered/labor Operational cost/mile Vehicle seats/mile COST EFFECTIVENESS COST EFFICIENCY SERVICE EFFICIENCY OPERATORS SCOPE AUTHORITIES SCOPE Fair allocation of risks and responsibilities between operators and authorities

UNIFORM FEE COLLECTION (integrated ticketing system) A new financing model TRANSPORT AUTHORITIES COMMUTERS OPERATORS Contracted to: Private local GLC-funded local Private foreign PAYOUTS BASED ON DISTANCE TRAVELLED AND DRIVING MANHOURS PENALTY IF KPIs NOT MET EXTRA FEE FOR VALUE-ADDED SERVICE CIVIL DUTY LOCAL / STATE GOVT Quit rent rates depend on proximity to transit connections Congestion charges, summons FEDERAL GOVT Taxes, royalties, duties, levies FUNDING PENALTY IF KPIs NOT MET Non-discriminating distribution of tax revenue and fee income to cover entire population

The view from TRANSIT Indiscriminate LRT expansion not needed Go back to the RapidKL hub-and-spoke model used from This time, we make it work! Authority builds vital infrastructure (hubs, lanes) Authority directs local councils to identify bus routes All bus operators under contract to Authority Packaging of Areas will combine lucrative trunk routes with express and suburban routes

TRANSITs Klang Valley Network Our Strategic Plan - Start from the basics Make the bus service work well Enhance the bus services by introducing critical infrastructure (lanes, hubs) Introduce Quality Bus or Rapid Transit services to improve speed, frequency, reliability Then, we invest How many passengers per direction per hour? Choose the appropriate technology to meet our needs maximize benefits at the lowest cost! Ex. Kelana Jaya LRT to Lembah Subang

Moving 10,000 passengers/d/h

So what does that mean? The LRT solution is not the only one we should look at – the costs are higher and benefits lower Mass-Transit only when demand is proven For congested urban areas, monorail may be a more cost-effective solution than LRT Rapid Trams have the greatest combination of costs, capacity, and flexibility Rapid Transit on main roads (BRT, Trams) and expressways (ERT) is the best way to introduce rapid transit to our communities Uses the existing (and paid-for) road infrastructure Construction costs are lower so more km of routes Can be built faster and fine-tuned more easily

Conclusion Understand what makes public transport works best (utilizing all 3 functions) Public Transport is a rakyat issue Involve the rakyat & involve them S.P.A.D. plus Local / Regional Authority Govt management + Private operators Fair allocation: funding, resources & risks Maximize benefits, minimize costs! Keep it simple and make it work!

Thank you for your time Moaz Yusuf Ahmad On behalf of TRANSIT klangvalley_transit-