Bunch spacing, pile up and all that Frank Zimmermann HL-LHC/LIU brainstorming Jiva Hill, 24 June 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EcoTherm Plus WGB-K 20 E 4,5 – 20 kW.
Advertisements

Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
You have been given a mission and a code. Use the code to complete the mission and you will save the world from obliteration…
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Fill in missing numbers or operations
AP STUDY SESSION 2.
1
05/11/2006Prof. dr hab. Elżbieta Richter-Wąs Physics Program of the experiments at L arge H adron C ollider Lecture 4.
Worksheets.
Feichter_DPG-SYKL03_Bild-01. Feichter_DPG-SYKL03_Bild-02.
Sequential Logic Design
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Appendix 01.
Addition and Subtraction Equations
Chapter 1 Image Slides Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
David Burdett May 11, 2004 Package Binding for WS CDL.
Add Governors Discretionary (1G) Grants Chapter 6.
CALENDAR.
2.11.
Who Wants To Be A Millionaire? Decimal Edition Question 1.
Compression Scenarios for the European XFEL Charge and Bunch Length Scope Igor Zagorodnov 1st Meeting of the European XFEL Accelerator Consortium DESY,
1 A B C
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
This module: Telling the time
The basics for simulations
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
1 Prediction of electrical energy by photovoltaic devices in urban situations By. R.C. Ott July 2011.
15. Oktober Oktober Oktober 2012.
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
Progressive Aerobic Cardiovascular Endurance Run
1..
Adding Up In Chunks.
MaK_Full ahead loaded 1 Alarm Page Directory (F11)
TCCI Barometer September “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
LN-251 SimINERTIAL Performance
Before Between After.
Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP.
25 seconds left…...
Subtraction: Adding UP
: 3 00.
5 minutes.
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
Essential Cell Biology
Converting a Fraction to %
Resistência dos Materiais, 5ª ed.
Clock will move after 1 minute
PSSA Preparation.
Physics for Scientists & Engineers, 3rd Edition
Energy Generation in Mitochondria and Chlorplasts
Select a time to count down from the clock above
Murach’s OS/390 and z/OS JCLChapter 16, Slide 1 © 2002, Mike Murach & Associates, Inc.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Todd Satogata 1 Fri May RHIC FY03 Deuteron-Gold Performance n RHIC Deuteron-Gold Performance.
1 Dr. Scott Schaefer Least Squares Curves, Rational Representations, Splines and Continuity.
Schutzvermerk nach DIN 34 beachten 05/04/15 Seite 1 Training EPAM and CANopen Basic Solution: Password * * Level 1 Level 2 * Level 3 Password2 IP-Adr.
L1 Track Trigger for ATLAS at HL-LHC
Two Scenarios for the LHC Luminosity Upgrade Walter Scandale, Frank Zimmermann ACES workshop We acknowledge the support of the European Community-Research.
Name Event Date Name Event Date 1 LHC Upgrade We acknowledge the support of the European Community-Research Infrastructure Activity under the FP6 "Structuring.
Summary and outcome of the 1st LIU-HL-LHC brainstorming meeting (24 th June 2011) Mike Lamont This event is jointly organized by the HL-LHC and LIU projects.
HL-LHC/LIU Joint workshop Goal: Progressing towards an agreed set of 450 GeV beam parameters for High Luminosity operation in LHC after LS2 & LS3. Slides.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Frank Zimmermann, LHCb Upgrade Meeting Overview of LHC Machine Upgrade Plans from an LHCb Perspective - Frank Zimmermann LHCb Upgrade Meeting CERN, 5 August.
Operating IP8 at high luminosity in the HL-LHC era
fundamental equations of LHC performance
Frank Zimmermann & Walter Scandale
LS 1 start date 12th June Schedule Extension 2012 run Extension of 2012 run approved by the DG on 3rd July 2012.
Presentation transcript:

bunch spacing, pile up and all that Frank Zimmermann HL-LHC/LIU brainstorming Jiva Hill, 24 June 2011

no beam-beam limit limit on total beam current in LHC [& SPS] due to several systems (RF, dump, vacuum, collimator robustness, machine protection, RP, …) at ultimate value single bunches > 3e11 ppb with 2.5  m emittance have been accelerated in the SPS we can get a factor 2 higher peak luminosity with 50 ns spacing at the same current in addition we may get smaller emittance at 50 ns → additional gain in peak luminosity? pile up replaces beam-beam as HL-LHC constraint - do we understand it? - trade off between integrated luminosity & pile up? leveling works!

example HL-LHC parameters parametersymbolnom.nom.* 25 ns, crab, lrc50 ns, crab, lrc protons per bunchN b [10 11 ] bunch spacing  t [ns] beam currentI [A] rms bunch length  z [cm] 7.55 beta* at IP1&5  [m] full crossing angle  c [  rad] normalized mittance  [  m] Piwinski parameter  c  z /(2*  x *) tune shift  Q tot potential pk luminosityL [10 34 cm -2 s -1 ] actual (leveled) pk luminosityL lev [10 34 cm -2 s -1 ] (2.5) events per #ing (95) effective lifetime  eff [h] (26.6) level time / run timet level,run [h] / / 10.1 (16.4) e-c heat SEY=1.2P [W/m] SR+IC heat KP SR+IC [W/m] IBS  rise time (z, x)  IBS,z/x [h] 58, 10439, 70 71, 6036, 30 annual luminosity L int [fb -1 ] (204)

luminosity leveling at the HL-LHC w/o leveling leveling at 5x10 34 cm -2 s -1 k=2,  eff =15 h, T ta =5 h leveling at 2.5x10 34 cm -2 s -1 k=4,  eff =30 h, T ta =5 h virtual peak luminosity

50 ns pile up ns pile up ns pile up ns pile up ns pile up 285 trade off: integrated lumi ↔ pile up roughly for 2 times more integrated luminosity 4 times the pile up

25 ns or 50 ns? e-cloud is not the only argument 50 ns beam gives much higher peak luminosity and has larger reach for integrated luminosity pile up can be controlled by leveling what is the pile up limit (physics dependent?), and do we calculate the pile up correctly?

pile up Peak Stable Luminosity (ATLAS) 1.26x10 33 Fill /05/29, 06:41 Max. Peak Events / Bunch Crossing (ATLAS) 14.01Fill /04/23, 05:47 Max. Average Events / Bunch Crossing over the fill (ATLAS) 8.93Fill /03/22, 02:20 nominal Pile Up LHC Design Report = 19.0 at L=10 34 cm -2 s -1 with 2808 bunches scaling to actual conditions: present pile up should be < 19.0 (2808/1092) ~ 6 ?? from cosmic rays LHC  tot  100 mbarn ~ cm 2  inelastic  60 mbarn~ 6x cm 2

appendix

electron cloud build up at 3.5 TeV “scrubbing” ?! of low-energy e- now machine study in 2011 H. Maury

LHC Intensity Limits (7 TeV) Note: Some assumptions and conditions apply… Ideal scenario: no imperfections included! R. Assmann R. Chamonix 2010 Chamonix 2011