Achievement & Accountability Workgroup Meeting June 20, 2014 Krissy Johnson, MPA, Data Analyst Deb Came, PhD, Director of Student Information Damian Betebenner,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EQ: How can we summarize and compare data? MM1D3a Monday – 8/29/11 Math 1: Unit 1 – Day 5.
Advertisements

Common Core State Standards Implementation in Washington State May 31, 2012.
Gretchen Everhart School School Improvement Plan Public Hearing Public Hearing September 13, 2011.
Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress January 2008, Updated.
Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress February 2007, Updated.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress 2005 Status Report Research, Assessment & Accountability November 2, 2005 Oakland Unified School District.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
August 8, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon Housson, Director Overview of.
1 Overview of STAAR State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness Academic Achievement Distinction Designation Committee (AADDC) April 16, 2012.
Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
MUIR FUNDAMENTAL SCHOOL May 2012 CST Data Presentation.
Addition Facts
School Performance Framework Sponsored by The Colorado Department of Education Summer 2010 Version 1.3.
Understanding Median Student Growth Percentiles (mSGP) Or Surviving Pompeii.
The SCPS Professional Growth System
Changes in Student Assessment and School Accountability A-1.
Measuring growth in student performance on MCAS: The growth model
Update on Virginia’s growth measure Deborah L. Jonas, Ph.D. Executive Director for Research and Strategic Planning Virginia Department of Education April.
Take from Ten First Subtraction Strategy -9 Click on a number below to go directly to that type of subtraction problems
+ Yerington Intermediate School
All About State Testing May 24, 2012 Karen Weintraub, Assessment Manager/ District Assessment Coordinator
AYP: Making Adequate Yearly Progress in Washington State Spring 2012.
STATE TEST DATA SPRING 2012 Report to SSD School Board.
The Colorado Growth Model Module 1: What it is & What it means Sponsored by The Colorado Department of Education Summer 2009 Version 1.2.
California Common Core State Standards (CCSS) A Presentation for the Jurupa Unified School District English Learner Advisory Committees
Addition 1’s to 20.
Successful completion of the following requirements:  Language Arts– 3 middle school level or higher courses  Mathematics – 3 distinct middle school.
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Teacher Evaluation & APPR THE RUBRICS! A RTTT Conversation With the BTBOCES RTTT Team and local administrators July 20, 2011.
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
AYP to AMO – 2012 ESEA Update January 20, 2013 Thank you to Nancy Katims- Edmonds School District for much of the content of this presentation Ben Gauyan.
PRESENTATION FOR DIRECTORS OF SPECIAL EDUCATION (12/17/13) MICHAEL FLICEK, ED.D. EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY CONSULTANT Wyoming School Accountability.
Arkansas ESEA Flexibility Flexibility Amended in October, 2012 Louis Ferren, School Performance Public School Accountability.
Freedom Intermediate School
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation August 20, 2014 Elizabeth M. Osga, Ph.D.
Student Growth Measures Category “B” Teachers VENDOR (STAR)
KLFA Brad Neuenswander Deputy Commissioner, KSDE.
Simpson County Schools Accountability Results, Fall of 2013 Franklin-Simpson High School 97 th Percentile* DISTINGUISHED *percentile rank based on 2012.
MEDIAN STUDENT GROWTH ANALYSIS December 2014 Center for Educational Effectiveness: Greg Lobdell Office of Student and School Success, OSPI: Sue Cohn.
SMARTER BALANCED ASSESSMENT CONSORTIUM, GROWTH AND STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES WENDY ST. MICHELL ASSESSMENT DIRECTOR.
Student Growth Percentiles For Classroom Teachers and Contributing Professionals KDE:OAA:3/28/2014:kd:rls 1.
Nevada Transitioning from measuring status and reporting AYP, to measuring growth and reporting on School Performance.
Using the WV Growth Model to Measure Student Achievement Nate Hixson Assistant Director, Office of Research.
Student Growth Percentile (SGP) Model
99th Percentile 1st Percentile 50th Percentile What Do Percentiles Mean? Percentiles express the percentage of students that fall below a certain score.
Introduction to the Georgia Student Growth Model Student Growth Percentiles 1.
Including a detailed description of the Colorado Growth Model 1.
1 Measuring growth in student performance on MCAS: The growth model.
How Can Teacher Evaluation Be Connected to Student Achievement?
Update on Virginia’s Growth Measure Deborah L. Jonas, Ph.D. Executive Director for Research and Strategic Planning Virginia Department of Education July-August.
Using Student Growth Percentiles in Educator Evaluations
AWMLP Fall Meeting OSPI REPORT – OCTOBER 20 TH - MIKE HUBERT.
New York State Scores 2011—2012 School Year. Growth Ratings and Score Ranges Growth RatingDescriptionGrowth Score Range (2011–12) Highly EffectiveWell.
Grade/School Level WVEIS Based Reports School Level Growth Model Summary.
Student Achievement Dashboard Training. Objectives ●PWBAT understand the purpose for using the dashboard to analyze student achievement ●PWBAT understand.
Student Growth Percentiles Basics Fall Outcomes Share information on the role of Category 1 assessments in evaluations Outline steps for districts.
Understanding the Rhode Island Growth Model An Introductory Guide for Educators May 2012.
Star Rating Part 2 Growth, Graduation Rates and College and Career Readiness.
Accountability SY Divisions of Assessment, Accountability and School Improvement.
DISTRICT NAME HERE Using Student Growth Percentiles (Option A)
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COSA LAW CONFERENCE 2015 ODE Update on Educator Effectiveness.
STUDENT GROWTH GOALS PART 2- “HOW MUCH GROWTH”. LAST WEEK Who: 8.1- the 9 th grade team 6.1- the 9 th grade class 3.1 –the Special Eduction/ELL/LAP students.
Student Growth Percentiles For Classroom Teachers and Contributing Professionals 1 October 22, 2014.
Student Growth Percentiles (SGPs) MDE - AdvancED Michigan 2014 Fall School Improvement Conference November 18, 2014.
MCAS Progress and Performance Index Report 2013 Cohasset Public Schools.
REDMOND HIGH SCHOOL STATE TESTING INFORMATION SPRING 2016 May 31 st to June 3 rd.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Overview of the Georgia Student Growth Model 1.
How to Interpret Student Growth Plots
What is an Academic Peer
SGP What is it and where did it come from?.
Presentation transcript:

Achievement & Accountability Workgroup Meeting June 20, 2014 Krissy Johnson, MPA, Data Analyst Deb Came, PhD, Director of Student Information Damian Betebenner, PhD, Senior Associate, Center for Assessment ADEQUATE GROWTH PERCENTILES IN THE ACHIEVEMENT INDEX

Today’s Topics Review of Student Growth Percentiles What is adequate growth? Catching-Up/Keeping-Up & Moving-Up/Staying-Up Time horizon of adequate growth targets Transition to Smarter Balanced New standards, new destination

SGP Review: Anthony Anthony SGP: 75

Below Basic Proficient Advanced 385 Prior Score ~ 357 Anthony’s Peer Group 4 th Grade Score Distribution 75% of students in Anthony’s academic peers scored below him

SGP Key Concepts Academic peers are all students in Washington State in the same grade and assessment subject that scored similarly in previous years. Students can have high growth if they are score low, and high scoring students can have low growth. SGP calculations require at least two years of consecutive scores; use as many consecutive scores available, back to This model only controls for prior score history; no other characteristics, such as income or ethnicity, are considered. Washington’s state assessments are not vertically scaled. Therefore, we can’t subtract one year’s score from the next.

The Median Growth Percentile of this school is the middle student’s SGP Median Growth Percentiles

Why Growth?

Adequate Growth Percentiles Year 1Year 2Year 3 SGP = 56 L3: Proficient SGP = 75 Year 43 rd Grade AGP = 82 AGP = 43

Catch-Up/Keep-Up Categories Category Achievement Level in Previous Year Proficiency Goal Catching Up L1 or L2: Below Basic or Basic L3: Proficient Keeping Up L3 or L4: Proficient or Advanced L3: Proficient Moving Up L3: Proficient L4: Advanced Staying Up L4: Advanced L4: Advanced

School-Level Measures Median Adequate Growth Percentile % Catching-Up/Keeping-Up and/or % Moving- Up/Staying-Up Consider what the appropriate target should be for higher achieving students

Timeline Changes the Trajectory 3rd Grade4th Grade5th Grade6th Grade AGP = 45 AGP = 82 7th Grade AGP = 56 AGP = 90

Transition to Smarter Balanced

Availability of Data Adequate growth targets may not be available until or Smarter Balanced Field Testing affects the availability of SGPs

Entire state: MSP/HSPE/EOC Entire state: MSP/HSPE/EOC /3 of state: MSP/HSPE/EOC 1/3 of state: SBAC Field Test Entire state: SBAC fully operational SGP Student Growth Percentile (SGP) Transition to Smarter Balanced SGP

/3 of state: MSP/HSPE/EOC 1/3 of state: SBAC Field Test (no growth) Entire state: SBAC fully operational 1 st Year of SBAC SGPs 2nd Year of SBAC SGPs 1 st Year of SBAC Adequate Growth Targets 3 rd Year of SBAC SGPs 2 nd Year of Adequate Growth Targets Possible Availability of Adequate Growth Percentiles

THE TRANSITION TO SMARTER BALANCED How are other state’s handling the growth? A discussion with Damian

THANK YOU Krissy Johnson, Deb Came,

Extra Slides

Why Growth?

L4: Advanced L3: Proficient L2: Basic L1: Below Basic Grade Grade Scale Score Achievement Level Growth Percentile Growth Level Grade L1: Below Basic Grade L2: Basic 75 High 1 Year of Growth SGP = 75 3 Years of Growth AGP = 82 Reading Achievement Growth Adequate Growth Percentiles

L4: Advanced L3: Proficient L2: Basic L1: Below Basic Grade Grade Scale Score Achievement Level Growth Percentile Growth Level Grade L1: Below Basic Grade L2: Basic 75 High 1 Year of Growth SGP = 75 3 Years of Growth AGP = 82 Reading Achievement Growth Adequate Growth Percentiles