Southwest Rail Conference Joseph Black – Rail Director February 25, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transportation Funding Alternatives and Outreach
Advertisements

York Viva Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Concept image along Davis Drive.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation 1 Transportation Funding and Improving Roadway Services Delivery Transportation Advisory Commission.
Tysons Tysons Corner Circulator Study Board Transportation Committee June 12, 2012.
Back on track – or off the rails? A report by Stephen Glaister, Professor of Transport and Infrastructure, Imperial College London for Development Securities.
March 2012 Ports and Cities Conference Newcastle Dorte Ekelund, Executive Director Major Cities Unit Department of Infrastructure and Transport
Monterey Branch Line Association of Environmental Professionals and American Planning Association July 28, 2010.
Connecting Communities Planning Grant & Planning Tools Curtis Baker, Planning Administrator Krista Beniston, Planning Coordinator October 12,
Emerging California Passenger Rail Corridors A Comparative Look at the Future For Enhanced Passenger Rail in Coachella Valley/Banning Pass and the Delmarva.
City of North Liberty North Liberty Area Development Corporation University of Iowa Community Credit Union Economic Development Partnership Project October.
SCATTER workshop, Milan, 24 October 2003 Testing selected solutions to control urban sprawl The Brussels case city.
Mid Ohio Development Exchange (MODE) Presentation January 16, 2014.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Transport Division United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Transport Division ITU - Inland Transport.
John Barton, P.E. Assistant Executive Director for Engineering Operations Texas Department of Transportation Mid-States Highway-Rail Safety Conference.
Urban Transportation Council Green Guide for Roads Task Force TAC 2009 Annual Conference and Exhibition Vancouver.
1 March 14, 2013YMPO RTP Technical Advisory Committee Meeting.
Transportation Border Working Group
City of Schertz Presentation Joe Black – Lone Star Rail District Joe Lessard – Knudson, LP December 9, 2014.
California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
I-95 Corridor Coalition December 14, 2001 I-95 Corridor Coalition Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations Study — An Integrated Strategy to Eliminate Choke Points.
NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.
Passenger Rail Discussion Group April 17, 2012 Seattle, Washington Cross Border Passenger Rail: A Canadian Perspective.
1 Passenger Rail Solutions – Balanced Approach 2009 Ark-La-Tex Rail Summit May 9, 2009 – Marshall, TX Joe Adams, Vice President – Public Affairs.
City of Schertz Presentation Joe Black – Lone Star Rail District November 25, 2014.
Oceanside-Escondido Rail Line Final Project Presentation John R. VelascoMay 12 th, 2003.
TEMPO – Project Update Joseph Black — Rail Operations Manager February 12, 2011.
North Corridor Commuter Rail The Case For Tax Increment Financing Mecklenburg County May 2007.
Tools for Redevelopment Courtney Knight Managing Director, Redevelopment Revitalizing Atlanta 1.
Anaheim – Los Angeles Project EIR/EIS California High-Speed Rail Authority HIGH-SPEED TRAINS IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Orange County Business Council- Infrastructure.
1. 2 VIA Long Range Plan  Vision for High-Capacity Transit across VIA service area by 2035  From extensive public and stakeholder input  Prioritization.
Remote Rural Mobility Solutions and the Creation of a Rural Transit District Linda K. Cherrington.
Program Update Baltimore MPO November 25, Internal Draft AGENDA  Program Overview  Alternatives Development  Stakeholder and Public Outreach.
Alachua County Mobility Plan Transportation Improvement District Overview Jonathan B. Paul, AICP, MA 2 Jeffery L. Hays.
Rapid Transit Investment Plan David Armijo, CEO March 19, 2010.
The Looming Transportation Crisis May 2008 T he L ooming T ransportation C risis.
California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
“High Speed Rail Implementation - An Update on Passenger Rail Planning Activities in Minnesota.” presented by: Minnesota Department of Transportation March.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Trains are better for our environment than other modes of travel.
Freight Issues in the Report of the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission Transportation for Tomorrow.
Regional Transportation Investments: Alaskan Way Viaduct / Seawall Port of Seattle Commission Meeting March 28, 2006 Item No. xx Supp. Meeting.
December 12-13, 2007 Item 4.4 Tab 31 California State Rail Plan to
1 Presented to: Clean Air Trough Energy Efficiency CATEE Conference San Antonio December 18, 2013.
WELCOME! GREATER 288 PARTNERSHIP Promoting the Gateway to Texas GREATER 288 PARTNERSHIP Promoting the Gateway to Texas.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
California’s Strategic Growth Plan Ken De Crescenzo Federal Liaison California Department of Transportation.
Early Implementation of Coalition Initiatives ARK-LA-TEX Rail Summit May 9, Transportation Department North Central Texas.
1 Transportation Infrastructure Programs Past, Present & Future Transportation Association of Canada Fall Conference September 2011 Edmonton, Alberta.
1 Transportation Policy and Performance: The challenges and opportunities of performance-based programs Deputy Administrator Therese McMillan Federal Transit.
MARYLAND FREIGHT SUMMIT Freight in the Mid-Atlantic Region Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration September.
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
Metro’s Capital Improvement Needs Presented to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board By Tom Harrington, Director of Long Range Planning.
Wellington Transport Package, 27 January 2005 Wellington Transport Package 27 January 2005 Hon Dr Michael Cullen Minister of Finance.
Interstate 69 Update Briefing  Loyd Neal, Nueces County Judge Alliance for I-69 Texas Board Chair  Jeff Austin III, Transportation Commission Member.
Alachua County Mobility Plan Springhills Transportation Improvement District and Santa Fe Village Developer’s Agreement October 28, 2014.
The Regional Transport Strategy Transport for Regional Growth Conference Edinburgh 5 November 2015 John Saunders SEStran.
2015 Emerald Coast Transportation Symposium Stephanie Lane, Director CSX Industrial Development November 13, 2015.
Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce, Critical Issues Forum Charlie Zelle, Commissioner Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Moving Passengers and Products: The Ohio Hub Rail Study Ohio Rail Development Commission Lima – December 13, 2004 Provided Courtesy of the Good Governance.
Investing in Transportation Infrastructure Government Research Association Annual Policy Conference Janet Oakley, AASHTO July 28, 2009.
Overview Presentation Fall 2015 Gainesville-Haymarket Extension Study.
City of Joliet - Sustainability City of Joliet Sustainability Initiatives American Planning Association National Conference April 16, 2013.
AMPO October 22, South Florida Region.
Transit Technology Hampton Roads Transit. Hampton Roads Transit (HRT) provides public transportation for six cities in the South Hampton Roads region:
VA-NC Interstate High Speed Rail Compact Current Projects and Initiatives March 21, 2016 Paul C. Worley, Rail Director.
City of New Braunfels Regional Transportation Planning Garry Ford, P.E., PTOE City Engineer June 13, 2017.
Los Angeles – San Diego – San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor Update
Regional Roads Committee
Transportation Task Force Mission and Vision
VIRGINIA RAILWAY EXPRESS
Presentation transcript:

Southwest Rail Conference Joseph Black – Rail Director February 25, 2013

1 Public Safety Issues with trains of up to 2 miles in length running through the urban cores of cities up and down the Austin-San Antonio corridor Reduced Mobility as population growth and trade growth (two positive indicators for the region) result in increased congestion NAFTA Traffic is growing every year; many businesses in the corridor self-identify as NAFTA-related Economic Development is needed, supporting job creation and mitigating the effects of a negative world economy Lack of Transportation Choices in the corridor leaves people no alternatives to highway travel Decreasing Reliability as congestion increases, and both productive time for commuters and freight deliveries is negatively affected Air Quality is negatively affected by sole reliance on highway mode What are the Challenges?

2 Public Safety Issues with trains of up to 2 miles in length running through the urban cores of cities up and down the Austin-San Antonio corridor Reduced Mobility as population growth and trade growth (two positive indicators for the region) result in increased congestion NAFTA Traffic is growing every year; many businesses in the corridor self-identify as NAFTA-related Economic Development is needed, supporting job creation and mitigating the effects of a negative world economy Lack of Transportation Choices in the corridor leaves people no alternatives to highway travel Decreasing Reliability as congestion increases, and both productive time for commuters and freight deliveries is negatively affected Air Quality is negatively affected by sole reliance on highway mode What are the Challenges?

3 Lone Star Rail – Partnering Milestones 33 SA-BC MPO and CAMPO 2004 – recommended dedicated revenue stream for LSRD at $5 million each per year for 10 years – STP-MM commitment of $20 million each for capital planning Raised additional $7.7 million federal funding $8.7 million state funding $4 million local funding Signed Union Pacific Memorandum of Understanding in late 2010 Launched environmental analysis of the passenger rail route, and starting (January) environmental analysis of the freight rail bypass route

4 Lone Star Rail – What’s New Continuing to Build Partnerships  Union Pacific  State of Texas  Regional  Local 4

5 Working with Union Pacific “…We believe that both Union Pacific and the District have made substantial progress…and anticipate that an eventual agreement will result in the ability of the District to provide passenger service and relocation of through freight in the Austin-San Antonio Corridor…” Jerry Wilmoth, General Manager – Network Infrastructure, Union Pacific Railroad, May letter to Travis County Judge Samuel Biscoe “…We believe that both Union Pacific and the District have made substantial progress…and anticipate that an eventual agreement will result in the ability of the District to provide passenger service and relocation of through freight in the Austin-San Antonio Corridor…” Jerry Wilmoth, General Manager – Network Infrastructure, Union Pacific Railroad, May letter to Travis County Judge Samuel Biscoe Freight Rail Bypass – joint planning LSTAR Passenger and Local Freight Operations – joint planning

6 First Step: Freight Rail Bypass miles of new freight rail line from Seguin to Taylor 40+ miles of improved freight rail line from San Antonio to Seguin 30+ through freight trains per day rerouted to Urban Freight Rail Bypass

7 Second Step: LSTAR Passenger Rail Service 118 miles of passenger rail from San Antonio north to Georgetown Up to 16 stations at full service 32 round trips a day at full service Express service of 75 minutes or less between downtown San Antonio and downtown Austin Local freight service maintained and improved 7

8 An “Education Corridor” 8

9 Regional Partnerships CAMPO LSTAR implementation of CAMPO 2035 Plan Project Connect initiative - regional system, funding and organization plan for high capacity transit in 5 county CAMPO area 9 SA-BC MPO LSTAR implementation of Mobility 2035 Plan and VIA Long Range Plan Engagement opportunity with VIA, Bexar County, and City of San Antonio on regional high capacity transit implementation

10 Local Growth and Investment Partnership Opportunity: Economic development opportunities Connectivity to regional economic centers Congestion-proof commuter service Anchors other downtown investments and tax base Mobility solution responsive to community growth demand Safety and air quality enhancement 10 O&M Investment: Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Station upgrades and in-kind service contributions Other revenue sources to be identified

11 How Partnerships Could Work 11 LSTAR, in combination with the downtown segments of the City of Austin’s Urban Rail system (another partnership), could bring the entire corridor from Georgetown to San Antonio right to the front door of the state capital complex and University of Texas at Austin

12 How Do We Pay For It? With a combination of local, state, and federal funds with an opportunity for public-private partnerships Local O&M funding commitment (TIFs, etc.) is critical to securing capital investment. 12

13 Lone Star Rail District will acquire the Union Pacific RR right of way from Taylor to San Antonio; proceeds will be used to construct the freight relocation line. Service Level Initial Base Full Psgr Improvements$ 700 mil$ 840 mil $ 1,400 mil ROW Purchase/Relo* $1,160-1,330 mil $1,160-1,330 mil $1,160-1,330 mil 13 Local revenue sources for annual O&M and lifecycle costs are the “gateway” to accessing the capital funding and financing sources * High end price includes UP costs for full double track Capital Funding Outline

Capital Funding Design Construction Commissioning Operations Local funding is the gateway to capital funding from public and private sources. 14 Local Funding Timing Capture value from land speculation, zoning and other entitlements New development influenced by rail opportunity Local funding necessary to secure capital funding Helps reduce through freight in community downtowns & neighborhoods Project Steps – The Way Forward

15 50 % participation of new property value increase/growth Federal ½ mile distance standard for most LSTAR station locations Exclude existing single family and duplex residential use properties Tax exempt parcels added when developed Pre-existing economic development agreements honored to expiration “Safe Investment” provisions included Local Funding: TIF Approach

Operating and maintenance (O&M) expense allocated 1/3 each to: Austin Region San Antonio Region Other Corridor communities 16 LSTAR Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Costs Service Level Initial Austin Region$10.1 mil San Antonio Region$10.1 mil Corridor communities$10.1 mil Total$30.3 mil

17 We appreciate the support that Lone Star Rail has received from the rail advocacy community Here’s how you can help now: Champion the project in your local community, if you are a resident of the Austin-San Antonio corridor Speak with your local jurisdictions about creating local funding sources (TIF, Sales tax TIF, etc.) Speak with your state legislators about funding the Texas Rail Relocation and Improvement Fund 17 Continuing the Partnerships