AAAML - XI International Congress Geographical Indications and Trademarks Parma 15-16 March 2013 oriGIn, the Global Alliance of GI Producers.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Latest Developments in Ukraines Intellectual Property Laws and Data Protection.
Advertisements

External Trade 1 5th Global Congress Combating Counterfeiting and Piracy Global and Regional IPR Enforcement Initiatives Luc-Pierre Devigne Head of Intellectual.
1 n European Commission 4th Global Congress: Combating Counterfeiting and Piracy Dubai – 3 February 2008 An Urgent Need to Better Respond to the Global.
An American Perspective: The Napa Valley Brand Geneva 27 May, 2004.
GIs in China. Institution of GI in China Publication of Labeling Standard for Food in 1994: GB mandatory mentions in Chinese - whats the name.
Better GI protection within the WTO framework Stefano Fanti – Managing Director Consorzio del Prosciutto di Parma Geneva, 27 May 2004.
EU system for geographical indications for agricultural products and foodstuffs Brussels, Michael ERHART European Commission DG Agriculture.
Sui generis system for the protection of non-agricultural geographical indications – the Hungarian example András Jókúti Legal and International Department.
Study on Geographical Indications protection for non-agricultural products in the internal market David Thual, Team Leader Public Hearing - 22 April 2013.
International Plant Protection Convention CPM 7, Rome March 2012
WIPO Roundtable on IP & Traditional Knowledge Geneva, November 1-2, 1999 Protection of Traditional Knowledge: A Global IP Issue Presenter: Richard Owens,
WIPO: South-South Cooperation Cairo, May 7, 2013 Trademarks and the Public Domain Prof. Dr. Martin Senftleben VU University Amsterdam Bird & Bird, The.
Geographical Indications (GIs): a tool to promote sustainable development Massimo Vittori Secretary General, oriGIn.
June 2007 © Copyright FNC 2007 Café de Colombia: protecting and promoting a well-known origin Luis Fernando Samper National Federation of Coffee Growers.
Geographical indications and their use to promote local products Damascus, May 2007 Octavio Espinosa WIPO.
INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION INTA GI TRIPS 23.4 Multilateral Register Proposal CLARK W. LACKERT, Chair, INTA GI Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
Yukiko Ko Binding Corporate Rules – Global Implications Conference on Cross Border Data Flows and Privacy October 16, 2007.
Geographical Indications Law: a new tool for Africa? All Africa House (UCT) Aug. 28, 2012 Seble Baraki Open A.I.R. Research Fellow.
Collective Marks and Certification Marks
Trademark enforcement in Belarus AIPPI Baltic, Vilnius, 2013 Darya Lando, Head of Legal Department LexPatent, Minsk, Belarus.
Worldwide Symposium on Geographical Indications Parma, June International Registration Burkhart Goebel Partner, Lovells, Madrid Chair of the INTA.
1 WTO and medicines: from Doha to Cancún Germán Velásquez Essential Drugs and Medicines Policy World Health Organization Geneva, October 2003.
By: James Minyard Danny Lourence And Miss Maruna.
What is the WTO?  The World Trade Organization (WTO) is the only global international organization dealing with the rules of trade between nations. 
How To Enter The Chinese Market
Doing business in Oman April April 2008Doing Business in OmanPage 2 Index of topics ► Business climate ► Legal system ► Business structures ►
Brussels Briefing n. 31 Geography of food: reconnecting with origin in the food system 15 th May Existing global and.
1 XI INT. CONGRESS AAAML A comparison of the three GI schemes in the EU A trade mark practioner’s perspective… Benjamin Fontaine Parma, March 2013.
Geographical Indications (GIs) in the Implementation of Public Policies: Best Practices and the Socio- Economic Dimension of GIs Presented at the Second.
By Prof. A. Damodaran Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore
WIPO Symposium on Geographical Indications
Trademark Issues in Current Negotiations Prof. Christine Haight Farley American University.
Geographical Indications in the WTO and the Doha Negotiations Worldwide Symposium on Geographical Indications WIPO/Italian Foreign Affairs Ministry Parma,
Perspectives for Geographical Indications Teresa Mera June, 2009.
Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP Geographical Indications: A United States Perspective AIPPI Hyderabad October 14, 2011 Stanton J. Lovenworth Chair,
The U.S. Geographical Indications System: Building GI Brands
WIPO’s Strategies on Intellectual Property and Economic Development WIPO’s Strategies on Intellectual Property and Economic Development United Nations.
Enforcement measures of GIs through sui generis protection, unfair competition and consumer protection law GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND TRADEMARKS: A GLOBAL.
1 International Legal Framework for the Protection of Geographical Indications Warsaw, 26 April 2006 Denis Croze Acting Director Advisor Economic Development.
GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND APPELLATIONS OF ORIGIN: AN OVERVIEW
GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND COLLECTIVE MARKS
The need for recognition and protection of geographical indications in South Africa Prof Johann Kirsten Head of the Department of Agricultural Economics,
IPO-PAKISTAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION OF PAKISTAN 1 GIs as Economic Tool for SMEs Development: Current Status of Protection in Pakistan; Future.
Czech Presidency High Level Conference on the Future of Quality Policy of Agricultural Products and Foodstuff PDOs/PGIs: The point of view of GI producers.
EPA Negotiations: Intellectual Property and Sustainable Development for ECOWAS Countries By Catherine Grant Director: Trade Policy Business Unity South.
The Protection of Geographical Indications in Brazil Cristina Ninô Biscaia LL.M Munich Intellectual Property Law Center.
World Intellectual Property Organization International Protection of Geographical Indications Overview and Recent Developments Tbilisi, October 28, 2009.
History of the GI system How it all started. History of the GI system Foods have be named after their geographical origin since Antiquity: examples: 5th.
The Australian wine industry position on Geographical Indications TONY BATTAGLENE DIRECTOR, INTERNATIONAL & REGULATORY AFFAIRS.
WTO and the TRIPS Agreement Wolf R. MEIER-EWERT WTO Secretariat A Business-oriented overview of Intellectual Property for Law Students WIPO, Geneva 20.
Appellation of origin and peculiarities of its development in Russia (questions concerning development of appellation’s of origin institution in Russia.
1 THE NEGOTIATIONS ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AT THE WTO AND THEIR EFFECTS ON AGRICULTURE NEGOTIATIONS David Vivas Eugui UNCTAD, Commercial Diplomacy.
CZECH PRESIDENCY HIGH LEVEL CONFERENCE ON THE FUTURE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT QUALITY POLICY Prague, 13 March 2009 DRAFT CONCLUSIONS OF WORKSHOP B: EU.
Victor H. Bouganim WCL, American University
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1 Click to edit Master title style.
Lisbon System Built-in Flexibilities of the Lisbon System Forum on Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Lisbon, October 30 and 31, 2008.
The Napa Valley Experience in Protecting NAPA VALLEY
Recent Developments at the International Level
SELLO DE ORIGEN “Seal of origin” Adding value to
Registering your brand
Geographical Indications
Existing Approaches on the National and International Levels
Building a Producer Organization for American Origin Products Dr
Protecting Geographical Indications In Bangladesh
Session III: Case Studies of GIs
Community protection of geographical indications :
Practices related to geographical indication systems: the european union wipo sct geneva 28 march 2017 Francis FAY Head of Unit ‘Geographical Indications’
Geographical Indications Symposium Beijing, China June 26-28, 2007
Chapter 3: Trademarks in E-Commerce.
MINING LEGEND TO REALITY
Presentation transcript:

AAAML - XI International Congress Geographical Indications and Trademarks Parma March 2013 oriGIn, the Global Alliance of GI Producers

GIs: a global reality  EU: some GIs (not including non-agri GIs), 54 billion EUR worldwide  Several third-country GIs protected in the EU  Some GIs protected in China and 150 in India (growing phenomenon in Asia)  Dynamism in Central and South America more than 300 GIs !  Technical assistance projects in Africa : First 3 GIs registered at OAPI  Producers’ interest in “skeptical” countries (US, Argentina, Chili)

oriGIn: Unity is Strenght !  oriGIn: the organisation of GI producers’ groups  Established in 2003 as a non-for profit organisation  Some 350 members from 45 countries  Secretariat based in Geneva  Presidency: Mr. Ramón González Figueroa, Director General, Consejo Regulador del Tequila (CRT)  VPs in each continent

oriGIn goals  Strengthen the protection of GIs at the national, regional and international level  Promote GIs as a tool for sustainable development  Facilitate exchange of “best practices” among GI producers and specialists

How do the USA, China and Russia protect Geographical Indications?

The growing interest for GIs in the US

oriGIn’s campaign in the US  Promoted a debate on American origin products  oriGIn Handbook : AOP Potential & Shortfalls  Support to the establishment of the American Origin Products Association

How does the USA protect GIs?  Traditional commercial trademarks  Collective marks  Certification marks  American Viticultural Areas (AVAs) and Political Appellations for US wines with GIs

Certification marks (Lenham Act)  “Marks used by a person other than its owner… to certify regional or other origin, material, mode of manufacturing, quality…”  Exemption from the need of names to have acquired a secondary meaning  The owner cannot use the certification mark  Owner authorizes producers to use the certification mark and carries out controls

Shortfalls  No list of GIs (issue of transparency)  Preexisting marks?  Registration costs: 10,000 US$ in the US  “Non-participatory approach”: Kona Coffee registered as CM by the State of Hawaii (10% Kona Coffee requirement)  Monitoring the use of the certification mark (including license requirements): more 200,000 US$ per year spent by the Idaho Potato Commission (IPC)

Shortfalls  Protecting TMs from dilution and becoming generic as well as preventing the registration of confusingly similar marks (USPTO approach in dealing with TM requests containing CMs)  An opposition proceeding can excess 100,000 US$ (FNC spent over 500,000 US$ in oppositions only in 2007)  Litigation: more than 1,000,000 US$ spent by the IPC in enforcement cases in NY over the past 12 years

The GI wine sector: a sui generis system  Administered by the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB)  AVAs (a delimitated grape growing region distinguishable by geographical features, the boundaries of which have been recognized and defined by the TTB): some 200 exist today  Political Appellations (name of country, states and counties)  Criteria to use an appellation of origin in wine labels (75% of grapes grown in the area for political appellations and 85% for AVAs)

Sui generis v. TM systems Trademarks  Need of secondary meaning (except certification marks)  “First in time first in right” principle  Individual ownership (except collective and certification marks)  10-year protection + need to use  Name not shielded from “genericity”  Protection: likelihood of confusion approach  Registration costs + renewals  Private enforcement Sui Generis  No need of secondary meaning  Possible coexistence (good faith)  Collective ownership  Indefinite protection  Registered names never “generic”  Covers protection translation + with expressions like « style » + evocation  No registration costs / single fee  Private and Public enforcemen t

Emerging economies, an opportunity for GIs

GIs in the BRICs  Protecting GIs in the most important markets export is a priority  oriGIn’s practical manual for GI producers’ groups

Do you understand Chinese? Trademark System Sui generis system Ministry of Agriculture

Sui Generis (AQSIQ)  GI Protection - Decree N.78/2005 (Ministerial rules)  Special Origin Label to distinguish a “PGIP” product with GI  GI definition applies to any kind of goods, including handicrafts and traditional Chinese medicines, no services Trademark regime (SAIC)  GIs protected trough Certification Marks or Collective Marks according to the Trademark Law (2001) (Legislation)  Mesure for special sign for GIs under TM system 2007  All kind of goods and services Sui Generis Agri Products (MoA)  Mesures for GIs of Agri Products 2008 (Ministerial rules)  Primary products & products obtained in agricultural activities  GI= name of the geographical area + general name of the agri product GI Protection Systems in China

Protecting GIs in the Russian Federation  In 2008, IP Legislation Reform  Part IV of the Civil Code - Sui Generis System  GI definition applies to any kind of goods  Trademark System – Obligation to disclaim the geographical name in the application  Competent authority for GIs Registration: Rospatent

Protecting GIs in the Russian Federation  The principle of ‘joint titles’: sum of individual titles on the same GI  Each producer has to prove to meet requirements established by the law  Legal protection 10 years + renewal  Foreign GIs : ownership over the right in the country of origin  Single collective right-EU System /Certification marks

Some conclusions  GIs protected in China  EU-China project recently finalized  As of june 2009, 932 Chinese GIs (AQSIQ System )  Foreing GIs registered: Cognac, Scotch Whisky, Napa Valley  GIs protected in Russia  GI Register in Russia: some 149 entries  Foreign GIs protected: Prosciutto di Parma and Tequila  BRICs have established Sui Generis Systems to protect GIs  Foreign GIs can be protected under those systems

VI General Assembly of oriGIn and International Conference Bordeaux, France May 2013

Thank you! Ida Puzone, Project