Using Evidence in the Classroom for Professional Learning Ontario Education Research Symposium 17 - 19 February 2010 Helen Timperley University of Auckland.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leading Learning in the Social Sciences MARGARET LEAMY National Coordinator Social Sciences Te Tapuae o Rehua Consortium
Advertisements

The University of Waikato Private Bag 3105 Hamilton, New Zealand 0800 WAIKATO August 20081Jeanne Gilbert University of Waikato.
SCHOOL LEADERS: THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL INDUCTION
Continuous Improvement in the Classroom -Professional Learning Communities.
Enhancing our guiding philosophy of continuous improvement
School Based Assessment and Reporting Unit Curriculum Directorate
Creating the Map To Set the Direction. Educational Positioning System (EPS – a play on GPS)
Promoting Reflective Practice through open professional dialogue around data Dr Kathryn Glasswell Lindsey Judd ALL 2014.
School Leaders Shaping Professional and Student Learning AIS Executive Conference October 2011 Professor Helen Timperley The University of Auckland.
What role does assessment play in curriculum planning? © McLachlan, Edwards, Margrain & McLean 2013.
Statistics, teacher knowledge, and effective teaching Tim Burgess Massey University National Numeracy Conference Auckland 20 February 2008.
- a necessary condition to ensure equality of opportunity for all pupils Workshop 5: How to leave no one behind? Essential teaching competencies for inclusive.
 Leadership For Student Learning Sharon Friesen, Candace Saar, Jim Brandon.
Using Assessment Data for Improving Teaching Practice ACER Conference August 2009 Professor Helen Timperley Faculty of Education University of.
Schooling Improvement: What do we know?
The Leaders-Are-Teachers Revolution Geoff Petty 2015.
Leadership for Learning
Whole site approach to improvement Leading the Learning Workshop 3 - for leadership teams in secondary sites Quality, Improvement & Effectiveness Unit.
The contribution of research to teachers’ professional learning and development Philippa Cordingley Centre for the Use of Research and Evidence in Education.
Breakout Sessions Self review Preparing for ALL. Purpose To meet other schools in your ALLS cluster To critically inquire into the effectiveness of current.
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
Agenda Overview Problems of Practice – (same triads) – Break School Visits – Personal reflection – Partner share Research overview On PLCs and the connection.
Teachers have a significant role in developing and implementing the most effective teaching and learning strategies in their classroom and striving for.
Sharon Walpole University of Delaware Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia Literacy Coaches in Action: Strategies for Crafting Building- Level Support.
September 13, 2014 The Whole School Success Partnership Saturday, September 13th, 2014.
Synthesis of Ideas from MERGA Conference 2007 Participants in VP Development Session on National Curriculum Gaye Williams VP (Development) thanks all MERGA.
Network of School Planners in Ireland Mark Fennell 28 th April 2012 Implementing effective changes to improve student learning:
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
Conceptual Framework for the College of Education Created by: Dr. Joe P. Brasher.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
SEISMIC Whole School and PLC Planning Day Tuesday, August 13th, 2013.
Quality teaching and the implications for teaching and learning Based on the Quality Teaching for Diverse.
PARENT COORDINATOR INFORMATION SESSION PARENT ACCOUNTABILITY Wednesday, July 20, 2011 Madelene Chan, Supt. D24 Danielle DiMango, Supt. D25.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Inquiry-based Learning Linking Teaching with Learning.
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
LEAP Conference July 2015 Helen Timperley. Professional development to build capability is fundamental to whole school improvement processes BUT...
Support for mathematics and numeracy leaders How can mathematics departments implement the New Zealand Curriculum? A look at effective pedagogy, data analysis,
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Information & Communication Technologies (ICT) Professional Development Clusters 2010–2012.
Professional Learning and Development: Best Evidence Synthesis Helen Timperley, Aaron Wilson and Heather Barrar Learning Languages March 2008.
Teaching to the Standard in Science Education By: Jennifer Grzelak & Bonnie Middleton.
Guiding Principles We, the members of CPED, believe "The professional doctorate in education prepares educators for the application of appropriate and.
Revisiting Target Setting: A Complex Task Judy M. Parr University of Auckland EHSAS Seminars October 2008.
National Standards in Reading & Writing Sources : NZ Ministry of Education websites. G Thomas, J Turner.
1 WebCast # 1 October 17, Inquiry – A Starting Point Educators with an inquiry habit of mind do not presume an outcome; instead they allow for.
Supporting Practitioner Enquiry
Module 1 Peer Coaching on Paper Peer Coach Training.
A Learning System – we’re all in this together Kapiti Collective Lead Team Day September 2010.
Student Learning Update Strategic Partnerships Program – All Networks meeting Dianne Peck Acting General Manager, Student Learning Programs Office for.
Christchurch New Zealand October 2009 Integrating new technologies to empower learning and transform leadership.
CERI/OECD “Improving Learning through Formative Assessment” 4 February, 2005.
Peer Coaching for Effective Professional Learning.
Australian Council for Educational Research School Improvement Christian Schools National Policy Forum Canberra, 26 May 2014.
Copyright © May 2014, Montessori Centre International.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
Teacher Professional Learning and Development Presentation for PPTA Curriculum Workshops 2009.
Inquiry process To Focus our Professional Learning.
Policy, Assessment and Professional Learning
Data-Driven Instructional Leadership
Promoting Reflective Practice Local District 6 February 18, 2005
Consistency of Teacher Judgement
EDU 675 STUDY Lessons in Excellence-- edu675study.com.
EDU 675 STUDY Education for Service-- edu675study.com.
NJCU College of Education
Lecturette 2: Mining Classroom Data
CASL Meetings Collaborative Analysis of Student Learning
Standard for Teachers’ Professional Development July 2016
February 21-22, 2018.
Presentation transcript:

Using Evidence in the Classroom for Professional Learning Ontario Education Research Symposium February 2010 Helen Timperley University of Auckland

Required Conditions Relevant evidence Beliefs, knowledge and skills of teachers Beliefs, knowledge and skills of school leaders Relationships of respect and challenge

Relevant Evidence Evidence from own students (formal and informal) Evidence of own practice (link to evidence from students) Evidence from others’ research to inform practice

Beliefs, knowledge and skills of teachers Inquiry habit of mind –Evidence as a source of information for teaching and learning (not labels for students) Knowledge and skills –The meaning of the evidence for practice –Sufficient PCK from research to make relevant adjustments to practice

Beliefs, knowledge and skills of leaders Inquiry habit of mind –Evidence as a source of information for teaching, learning and leading Knowledge and skills –The meaning of the evidence for teaching and leadership practice –Sufficient PCK from research to make relevant adjustments to practice –Skills to engage in difficult conversations about the evidence with teachers

Relationships of Respect and Challenge Systems change using evidence requires learning together in relationships that : –Probe meanings, challenge interpretation of the evidence and underpinning reasoning –Respect the capacity of all to learn and improve

Relationships of Respect and Challenge Inquiry Habit of Mind Using Relevant Evidence Evidence-informed Conversations Evidence-Informed Conversations Earl and Timperley (2000)

How the Process Can Work: Two Sources of Evidence THE THEORY Professional Learning and Development Best Evidence Synthesis iteration (2008) THE PRACTICE Literacy Professional Development Project (LPDP) in New Zealand –300 schools –On average 2-3 times expected rate of progress –Bottom 20% 3-4 times expected rate of progress

What knowledge and skills do our students need? What knowledge and skills do we as teachers need? What has been the impact of our changed actions? Deepen professional knowledge and refine skills Engage students in new learning experiences Teacher inquiry and knowledge-building cycle to promote valued student outcomes

Evidence from Students What do the students already know? How adequate are the sources of evidence we have used? What do the students need to learn and do? How do we build on what they know?

Within the LPDP Project Students assessed using curriculum-based assessment Facilitated interpretation of how to score it and what the results mean with teachers and leaders - at the same time as…

What knowledge and skills do our students need? What knowledge and skills do we as teachers need? What has been the impact of our changed actions? Deepen professional knowledge and refine skills Engage students in new learning experiences Teacher inquiry and knowledge-building cycle to promote valued student outcomes

Evidence of Effectiveness of Own Knowledge and Practice How we have contributed to existing student outcomes? What do we already know that we can use to promote improved outcomes for students? What do we need to learn and do to promote these outcomes? What sources of evidence / knowledge can we utilise?

Within the LPDP Project With expert facilitators, the teachers: Relate student data to programme emphases; Respond to a scenario of (mostly ineffective) practice and discuss results; Discuss strengths and weaknesses of practice from classroom observations.

What knowledge and skills do our students need? What knowledge and skills do we as teachers need? What has been the impact of our changed actions? Deepen professional knowledge and refine skills Engage students in new learning experiences Teacher inquiry and knowledge-building cycle to promote valued student outcomes

Deepen Professional Knowledge and Refine Skills Important considerations: Consider research findings about different approaches –Integrate knowledge, skills and theory Curriculum, assessment, pedagogy –Focus on the teaching / learning links; Discuss existing ideas about students, assessment, curriculum and how to teach it

Three Fields of Knowledge (NCSL) What Is Known The knowledge from theory, research and best practice What We Know The knowledge of those involved. What practitioners know New Knowledge The new knowledge that we can create together through collaborative work

Within the LPDP Project Students are the “touchstone” throughout; Understand theory and practice – research on pedagogical content knowledge; Develop adaptive expertise; Engage teachers’ beliefs (theories of practice)

Promoting change in teachers’ beliefs and assumptions

What knowledge and skills do our students need? What knowledge and skills do we as teachers need? What has been the impact of our changed actions? Deepen professional knowledge and refine skills Engage students in new learning experiences Teacher inquiry and knowledge-building cycle to promote valued student outcomes

Judging Impact What evidence is there that any changes made promote our students’ learning and well-being? What reasons lie behind improvement or lack of it? –Means the ongoing use of evidence on a daily, weekly, term by term and annual basis Using a range of assessment tools

The use of evidence for professional learning CANNOT be a single event Pervades all aspects of the cycle –Identifying what students know and need to learn –Identifying what teachers know and need to learn –Deciding what might be most effective –Checking impact of changes to practice

Integration of Evidence Evidence from the classroom (students and teachers) PLUS Evidence of effective practice

Beliefs, knowledge and Skills of School Leaders Teachers cannot do it alone To lead effectively, leaders must know enough themselves to: –Use evidence to work through the inquiry and knowledge building cycles with teachers –Help teachers to use the range of evidence to improve practice

If Leaders are to Use Evidence to Lead Learning Must know their class of teachers using evidence to determine: –What the teachers already know and do well and what they need to learn –What the leaders need to learn and do to make a difference to teacher learning and student outcomes –How to engage the teachers to build on what they already know and can do –How to check impact

What knowledge and skills do our teachers need? What knowledge and skills do we as leaders need? What has been the impact of our changed actions? Deepen professional knowledge and refine skills Engage teachers in new learning experiences Leaders’ inquiry and knowledge-building cycle to promote valued teaching practices and student outcomes

Within the LPDP Effective leaders –Learned to interpret evidence of student learning and teaching practice And have the challenging conversations –Recognise their need to learn in order to teach others Less effective leaders –Focused on structures and processes to promote others’ learning

Conclusion Teachers can use evidence to improve teaching practice in ways that works for students Requires –Evidence from the classroom Student learning Teaching practice –Evidence from others’ research to inform change –Support from their leaders to: Develop the inquiry habit of mind, knowledge and skills needed to learn from evidence

References Earl, L. & Timperley, H. (2009). Professional Learning Conversations: Challenges in Using Evidence. Springer. Timperley, H. & Parr, J. (2009). Chain of Influence from Policy to Practice in the New Zealand Literacy Strategy. Research Papers in Education, 24(2), , Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H. & Fung, I. (2008) Teacher Professional Learning and Development: A Best Evidence Iteration.