1 PM NAAQS: Update on Coarse Particle Monitoring and Research Efforts Lydia Wegman, Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards, EPA Presentation at the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EPAs Proposed Revision of the SO 2 NAAQS & AQDs Subchapter 31 – Control of Emissions of Sulfur Presentation to the Air Quality Advisory Council January.
Advertisements

Our Vision – Healthy Kansans living in safe and sustainable environments.
Marion Wichmann-Fiebig II 5 Abteilungsleiterin „Luft“ 1 Review of the Gothenburg Protocol Link to potential PM control under CLRTAP: – Specifies control.
CLRTP PMEG Third meeting, 13 & 14 March 2006, Dessau.
PM NAAQS Review Update Joseph Paisie Air Quality Strategies & Standards Division, Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards, EPA WESTAR Fall Business.
Update on Regional Haze November 15, 2012 Michele Notarianni EPA Region 4 1.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter; Proposed Rule & 40 CFR Parts 53 and 58 Revisions to Ambient Air Monitoring Regulations;
Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards Review Process and Status Tom Moore WESTAR Council Meeting September 29, 2010 Portland, OR.
September 2006 Revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter Overview
NAAQS UPDATE SIP Steering Committee January 13, 2011.
1 Animal Feeding Operations: Air Quality Issues and Options William Schrock Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards, US EPA Presentation at the NACAA.
TCEQ/NUATRC Air Toxics Workshop: Session V – Human Health Effects Nathan Pechacek, M.S. Toxicology Section Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
EPA Update- Bob Judge Maine Air Quality Monitoring Committee April 18, ) NAAQS schedule 2) Budget 3) Technical Systems Audit.
NACAA FALL MEMBERSHIP MEETING - SEPTEMBER 21-23, Overview of NAAQS Monitoring Issues Lewis Weinstock NACAA Fall Meeting Boston, MA September 22,
June 12 &13, 2007 Mickey Leland National Urban Air Toxics Workshop II – Houston, Texas 1 Albuquerque, New Mexico Community Scale Ambient Air Monitoring.
Oil and Gas Workgroup Summary October 21-23, 2009 Denver.
Timely Policy-Related Monitoring Issues 2013 NACAA Spring Meeting May 6-8, 2013 Richard A. “Chet” Wayland Air Quality Assessment Division U.S. EPA OAQPS.
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
Overview What we’ll cover: Key questions Next steps
Proposed Revisions to Ambient Air Monitoring Regulations, and Proposed FY2007 Air Monitoring Guidance WESTAR Spring Business Meeting March 28, 2006.
The National Ambient Air Monitoring Strategy and Network Design Westar Spring 2007 Business Meeting April 4, 2007 Bruce Louks, Idaho Department of Environmental.
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
1 Overview of the National Monitoring Strategy with an Emphasis on NCore Mike Papp Ambient Air Monitoring Group EPA OAQPS Dec. 12, 2006 Las Vegas.
1 New NAAQS Review Process Briefing for EPA Staff Kevin Teichman, ORD and Lydia Wegman, OAQPS April 5, 2007.
The Use of Source Apportionment for Air Quality Management and Health Assessments Philip K. Hopke Clarkson University Center for Air Resources Engineering.
WRAP Update WESTAR Meeting San Francisco April 25, 2011.
Ambient Air Monitoring Networks 2010 CMAS Conference Chapel Hill, NC October 13, 2010 Rich Scheffe, Sharon Phillips, Wyatt Appel, Lew Weinstock, Tim Hanley,
ANPR: Transition to New or Revised PM NAAQS WESTAR Business Meeting March 2006.
Air Quality & Traffic August 25, 2015.
Urban Air Pollution GISAT 112. Learning Objectives Regions of the atmosphere Amount, composition of air we breathe Names of selected air pollutants Health.
Status of the Particulate Matter (PM) Air Quality Standards November 28, 2012.
1 Mississippi Air Quality Update Mississippi Dept. of Environmental Quality Air Division August 5, 2011.
WESTAR National Air Monitoring Steering Committee Update Spring Business Meeting 2010 Denver, CO Bruce Louks, Idaho DEQ.
1 Exceptional Events Rulemaking Proposal General Overview March 1, 2006 US EPA.
EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop NCore Goals and Implementation Challenges Overview of NCore Aspects of the Monitoring Rule.
Health Effects of Air Pollution
Brad Miller Anna Kelley. National Ambient Air Quality Standard Update New Sulfur Dioxide Non-Attainment Area – Effective October 4, 2013 Ozone Secondary.
NAAQS and Criteria Pollutant Trends Update US EPA Region 10.
National Ambient Air Monitoring Networks Now and Later PM model evaluation workshop.
Network Assessment by Station Rankings: Description of Methodology Network Assessment Technical Support Group June 2001.
Bret A. Schichtel Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis (CAPITA) Washington University St. Louis, MO, Presented at EPA’s National Exposure.
Highlights of June 2008 NACAA Ambient Air Monitoring Steering Committee Meeting Westar Fall Business Meeting Seattle, WA October 2, 2008.
Opening Remarks -- Ozone and Particles: Policy and Science Recent Developments & Controversial Issues GERMAN-US WORKSHOP October 9, 2002 G. Foley *US EPA.
The Male’ Declaration Proposal for Phase III. Looking back to think ahead Policy Dialogue Background Materials Ministerial agreement Capacity building.
Update on the NADP Atmospheric Mercury Initiative Developing a new coordinated and collaborative approach to atmospheric mercury monitoring A Briefing.
(RWB / The Road to PM Understanding / November 2004) ExxonMobil Biomedical Sciences, Inc. 1 Adapted from Dan Greenbaum Health Effects Institute US EPA.
PM Methods Update and Network Design Presentation for WESTAR San Diego, CA September 2005 Peter Tsirigotis Director Emissions, Monitoring, and Analysis.
Fresno NCore Monitoring Deployment Status Presentation April 12, 2011 by: Joe Cruz Air Pollution Specialist, CARB.
1 RPO Data Analysis/Monitoring Grant Guidance Review Extracted from the EPA’s 3/5/02 RPO 4 th Year Policy, Organizational & Technical Guidance.
Strategic Plan Development Status Technical Analysis Forum meeting October 11, 2007.
OAQPS Update WESTAR April 3,  On March 12, 2008, EPA significantly strengthened the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ground-level.
Status Report on the Role of Ammonia in the San Joaquin Valley December 11, 2003 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency.
A Decision Framework for Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Programs Using Health Benefit Analysis Ying Li University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,
1 National Monitoring Committee Report Bruce Louks WESTAR Fall Meeting Portland, OR September 28, 2010.
Regional Air Grant Coordinators Meeting PM 2.5 Monitoring and Funding April 17, 2007.
Steve Page Office Director, OAQPS NACAA Spring Meeting 2010
National Monitoring Steering Committee Report
Proposed Ozone Monitoring Revisions Ozone Season and Methods
PMcoarse , Monitoring Budgets, and AQI
Exceptional Events Rulemaking Proposal
Proposal to Revise the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particle Pollution WESTAR Meeting March 2006.
EPA’s Current Air Toxics Activities
Implementing 8-Hour Ozone, PM2.5, and Regional Haze Standards
Exceptional and Natural Events Rulemaking
TCEQ AMBIENT Air Monitors in Corpus christi
Budget and Planning Update
CAIR Update WESTAR October 2, 2008.
U.S. Perspective on Particulate Matter and Ozone
Status of the PM NAAQS Review
EPA FY2008 Air Monitoring Budget Guidance
Presentation transcript:

1 PM NAAQS: Update on Coarse Particle Monitoring and Research Efforts Lydia Wegman, Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards, EPA Presentation at the WESTAR Spring Business Meeting April 3, 2007

2 PM NAAQS Review: Overview and Schedule EPA working to complete all NAAQS reviews within 5-year timeframe as required by Clean Air Act Final decision on PM standards signed September 2006; next PM NAAQS review begun October 2006 Estimated completion dates for key milestones in next review:  Kickoff Workshop: July 2007  Integrated Review Plan: December 2007  Science Assessment: September 2009  Risk/Exposure Assessment: April 2010  Policy Assessment: May 2010  Proposed Rule: December 2010  Final Rule: September 2011 Significant new research on PM completed or underway to help inform science assessment  Speciated monitoring program to help characterize PM components  Variety of new scientific studies focusing on PM health effects

3 NCore Multi-pollutant Network: Overview of Requirements for PM Between 60 and 75 stations must be operational by January 1, 2011  Most sites will be in urban areas, but approximately 20 will be in rural areas  NCore monitoring plans are due July 1, 2009  Many sites will be operational well before the 2011 deadline Proposed NCore sites are already partially operational in many States with ongoing equipment procurement and operator training Required coarse particle (PM ) measurements (all sites)  Total mass sampled on at least a 1-in-3 day frequency or using an approved continuous method when such a method is available  Mass speciation on at least 1-in-3 day frequency Speciation issues under consideration  Currently available dichotomous samplers are a logical choice. Other sampling configurations may be appropriate  Analysis options will likely share some characteristics with the PM 2.5 speciation network. Additional options include other source markers, endotoxins, and other “non-traditional” parameters  The PM speciation “piece” will likely be the last measurement to be implemented so we have time to work out these issues

4 NCore Multi-pollutant Network: Additional Information and Requirements Other required measurements include:  Fine particle mass and speciation (1-in-3 day frequency)  Continuous fine particle mass  Ozone  Trace level precursor gases (CO, SO 2, NO Y )  Basic meteorology We will be working with States to review the locations of candidate sites in advance of the plan due date Operator training is being provided on the new monitoring methods needed for NCore Candidate NCore Site Locations More information:

5 Research to Inform the Next Review: The EPA Air Research Program Majority of EPA-sponsored air research is focused on supporting the review of the primary (health-based) NAAQS for PM  Accomplished through a combination of in-house efforts and the EPA grants program One major goal of current research efforts is to inform decisions about coarse particles (PM ) in the next review Ongoing studies evaluate health effects of coarse particles in general while planned studies will also focus on the differences between urban and rural particles

6 Research to Inform the Next Review: Highlights of Ongoing Studies Panel study:  EPA scientists are studying a population of asthmatics to determine whether health-related endpoints change in response to fluctuations in ambient levels of coarse (PM 10 ) and/or fine PM  Volunteers are being evaluated for markers of a variety of cardiovascular endpoints Human clinical studies:  In two studies, EPA scientists are exposing either mild asthmatics or healthy individuals to coarse concentrated ambient particles (PM ) from Chapel Hill, North Carolina  Changes are being evaluated in a variety of cardiac and pulmonary endpoints A series of recent and ongoing animal/cell culture studies are also investigating the effects of coarse particles (PM ) on cardiopulmonary-related health endpoints

7 Research to Inform Next Review: Highlights of Planned Research on Urban vs. Rural Particles A series of projects will compare coarse particles from urban areas with coarse particles from rural areas  Health effects work evaluating cardiopulmonary-related endpoints will be conducted in humans, animals, and cultured cells and will attempt to link effects with specific sources  Exposure work will evaluate the spatial distribution and composition of coarse PM in urban versus rural areas This work will be conducted through a combination of in-house efforts and the EPA grants program  Includes an RFA that will fund multiple studies on coarse PM with an urban versus rural emphasis The current plan is that this work, to the extent possible, will be complete in time to inform the next review of the PM NAAQS (e.g., published by early 2009 at the latest)

8 Research to Inform Next Review: Highlights of Planned Research on Particle Size A series of projects will compare health effects and exposures across size fractions  Health effects work will evaluate the relative potency of coarse, fine, and ultrafine PM in human volunteers, animals, and cultured cells  Exposure work will characterize the relationship between ambient levels and human exposures for particles in different size fractions This work will be conducted through in-house efforts The current plan is that this work, to the extent possible, will be complete in time to inform the next review of the PM NAAQS (e.g., published by early 2009 at the latest)