Josip Arlica, MD Altiora Training Program “Train to Gain”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Investigator Responsibilities in Clinical Research
Advertisements

The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Tips to a Successful Monitoring Visit
The Principal Investigator’s Roles and Responsibilities Chicken Soup for the Busy Coordinator (May 2010)
Safety Reporting IN Clinical Trials
GCP for Investigators Tina Lidén Mascher, Kvalitetsregister, forskning och industrisamarbeten.
Research Coordination Guidance The Committees on Human Research Serving University of Vermont & Fletcher Allen Health Care
UTHSC IRB Donna Hollaway, RN, CCRC 11/30/2011 Authority to Audit 45 CFR (e) An IRB shall conduct continuing review of research covered by this.
The Consent Process: It’s More Than Just a Form A “10 Minute Training” Brought to you by Cyndi Long, MS, RD, CCRC CU Sports Medicine.
Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), Informed Consent, and Responsibilities Requirement for IRBs -DHHS: 45 CFR Part 46 -FDA: 21 CFR 56 Requirement for and.
Good Clinical Practice in Research
IRB Determinations 1. AAHRPP Site Visit Results Site visitors observed a real commitment to human subject protections Investigator and research staff.
Obtaining Informed Consent: 1. Elements Of Informed Consent 2. Essential Information For Prospective Participants 3. Obligation for investigators.
GCP compliance for GenISIS  This presentation is intended for clinical staff involved in recruiting patients to the GenISIS (Genetics of Influenza Susceptibility.
Paul Below, CCRA GCP Trainer Medical Research Management, Inc.
John Naim, PhD Director Clinical Trials Research Unit
IS Audit Function Knowledge
Clinical Pharmacy’s Role in Research Trials Sheree Miller Pharm.D. Investigational Drug Service University of Washington Medical Center.
Tool Summary Sheet Note: This hidden slide will not show in a slide presentation. Remove before providing slide deck to sites. Tool: Sponsor Responsibilities.
Good Clinical Practice GCP
Jennifer McCormick MA, CRC Karla Lichter RN CCRC.
Overview of Good Clinical Practices (GCPs)
Accredited Member of the Association of Clinical Research Professionals, USA Tips on clinical trials Maha Al-Farhan B.Sc, M.Phil., M.B.A., D.I.C.
Monitoring and Special Considerations for Multi-Center Trials
Adverse Events, Unanticipated Problems, Protocol Deviations & other Safety Information Which Form 4 to Use?
Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines Quality of BE Data Dr. Henrike Potthast Training workshop: Assessment of Interchangeable.
Recapture of Day 1 Suchart Chongprasert, Ph.D. Food and Drug Administration “Practical Aspects in Performing Clinical and Bioanalytical Parts in BA/BE.
Good Clinical Practice (GCP)- An introduction Dr Noor Ibrahim Mohamed Sakian.
Regulatory Authority Governing Clinical Trials Anthony J. Minisi, MD Director, Cardiology Fellowship Program.
Janet Ellen Holwell, CCRC, CCRA President, NY Metropolitan Chapter of ACRP.
Elements of Clinical Trial Quality Assurance Regulatory Coordinator –SCTR SUCCESS Center QA Monitor – NIDA Clinical Trials Network Stephanie Gentilin,
RESPONSIBILITIES OF INVESTIGATOR
ORO Reviews: Frequent Findings Related to IRBs Bob Brooks Associate Director Research Compliance Education and Policy VHA Office of Research Oversight.
Investigational New Drug Application (IND)
RESCUE: ACRIN 4701 Protocol Development & Regulatory Compliance (PDRC) Josephine Schloesser, ACRIN Monitor Chris Steward, ACRIN QC Auditor.
Joint Research & Enterprise Office Training The team, the procedures, the monitor and the Sponsor Lucy H H Parker Clinical Research Governance Manager.
University of Miami Office of Research Compliance Assessment Lynn E. Smith, JD, CIM, CIP Johanna Stamates, RN, BA, CCRC With assistance from Elizabeth.
Good Clinical Practice A Review for OCRA US RAC Study Group September 2005 Ginger Clasby, MS Promedica International
CLINICAL TRIALS – PHASE III. What are phase III trials  Confirmatory phase (Therapeutic confirmatory trial)  Trials are done to obtain sufficient evidence.
GCP & ETHICS COMMITTEES Ravi Rengachari Vector Control Research Centre PONDICHERRY.
The Global Health Network Marijke Geldenhuys 19 September 2014 Adhering to the GCP Principles.. what does that even mean?
ANJALI JADHAV ANKITA SINGH ANUJA AHIRE ANURADHA PRASAD BEVIN D’SOUZA.
Quality of Bioequivalence Data Alfredo García - Arieta Training workshop: Training of BE assessors, Kiev, October 2009.
1 Denise K. Thwing, MAS, RN, CCRA March 31, 2010 Version: Final 31-Mar-2010.
UC DAVIS OFFICE OF RESEARCH Overview of Good Clinical Practices (GCP) Investigator and Study Team Responsibilities Miles McFann IRB Administration Training.
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigator Meeting Study POLO- AML-2 February 23, 2013/Toronto Behbood Sadrolhefazi Therapeutic Area Specialist/ Oncology.
Investigational Devices and Humanitarian Use Devices June 2007.
Thierry Le Chevalier, MD Good Clinical Practice Compliance.
Quality Assurance & Quality Control in Pharmaceuticals & Healthcare Industries By- Dr. Sushrut Varun Satpathy MBBS, MD Assistant Professor Department of.
Good Clinical Practice (GCP) UKTMN 6 th June 2006.
Lifespan GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE Record Management GCP May 2005.
 Good Clinical Practice is a set of guidelines for biomedical studies which encompasses the design, conduct, termination, audit, analysis, reporting.
ICH guidelines……….. INVESTIGATOR INVESTIGATOR Investigator's Qualifications and agreements The investigator(s) should be qualified by education, training,
Session 2 IRB Training  What is the Principal Investigator’s role in Human Subject Research?  What is the role of the Investigator’s staff in Human Subject.
GCP (GOOD CLINICAL PRACTISE)
Slide 1 Standard Operating Procedures. Slide 2 Goal To review the standard operating procedures Creating the informed consent document Obtaining informed.
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
Supervisory Responsibilities of Clinical Investigators
Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and Monitoring Practices
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
Enrolling in Clinical Trials
Administering Informed Consent Issues for Discussion
Good Clinical Practice
Pharmacovigilance in clinical trials
UK Legal Requirement for Notification of Serious Breaches of Good Clinical Practice or The Trial Protocol John Poland, PhD Senior Director, Regulatory.
Good Clinical Practice in Research
TRTO (Translational Research Trials Office)
Protocol Approval Criteria
Good clinical practice
Presentation transcript:

Josip Arlica, MD Altiora Training Program “Train to Gain” ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline for Good Clinical Practice Part I (Principles, IRB/IEC, Investigator, Sponsor) Josip Arlica, MD Altiora Training Program “Train to Gain”

Good Clinical Practice (GCP) International, ethical and scientific quality standard for designing, conducting, recording and reporting trials involving participation of human subjects The objective of GCP is to provide a unified standard for EU, Japan and USA to facilitate mutual acceptance of clinical data by the RA in these jurisdictions The GCP was developed with consideration of the current good clinical practices of EU, Japan and USA, as well as those of Australia, Canada, the Nordic countries and the WHO

The Principles of ICH GCP 1. Ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki (June 1964) 2. Foreseeable risks have to weighed against anticipated benefit 3. The rights, safety and well-being are the most important 4. The available clinical and non clinical data on IP should support the trial 5. Clinical trial has to be scientifically sound 6. A trial should be conducted in accordance with the protocol approved by EC 7. The medical care should be always the responsibility of a qualified physician 8. Each individual involved in conducting a trial should be qualified 9. Freely given consent should be obtained prior to clinical trial participation 10. All clinical trial data have to be recorded, handled and stored that allows accurate reporting, interpretation and verification 11. The confidentiality of records that could identify subjects should be protected 12. IP should be manufactured, handled and stored in accordance with GMP 13. System with procedures that assure the quality of every aspect of the trial

ICH GCP Summarizes a consensus between USA, Japan and Europe on the ethical and scientific standards required to carry out clinical research on human beings, defining precisely the responsibilities of: The Ethics Committee The Investigators The Sponsor

Institutional Review Board/Independent Ethics Committee (IRB/IEC) - responsibilities Should safeguard the rights, safety and well-being of all trial subjects Should review a proposed trial in a reasonable time frame and document its views in writing Should consider qualifications of the investigator Should conduct continuing review (at least one per year) Should review amount and method of payment to the patients Should ensure that amounts, methods and schedule of payment are set forth in the ICF

IRB/IEC responsibilities - continues Prior to the start of a clinical study the IEC must review and give written approval of the: Protocol Protocol amendment(s) Patient information and informed consent form Method of recruitment (advertisement/press articles) Investigator brochure and available safety information Investigator’s CV/qualifications Information regarding payments and compensation to subjects Provide continuing review of the study (at least once per year)

IRB/IEC composition At least five members At least one member whose primary area of interest is in non-scientific area At least one member who is independent of the institution/site A list of EC members and their qualifications should be maintained

IRB/IEC composition - continues Functions according to written operating procedures Maintains written records of activities and minutes of meetings Should comply with GCP and applicable regulatory requirements Makes decisions at least as quorum

IRB/IEC - continues Investigator should promptly report Deviations or changes of the protocol Changes increasing the risk to subjects All ADR that are both serious and unexpected New information that can affect the safety of subjects or the conduct of the trial

IRB/IEC records Retains all relevant records (written procedures, membership lists, submitted documents, minutes of meetings, correspondence) for at least 3 years after completion of the trial and make them available upon request from the regulatory authority

Investigator Investigators Qualifications Adequate Resources Medical Care of Subjects Communication with IRB/IEC Compliance with Protocol Investigational Product (IP) Randomization Informed Consent Records and Reports Progress Reports Safety Reporting Premature Termination of a Trial Final Report

Investigator Qualifications qualified by education, training and experience and provide evidence of such qualifications through up-to-date curriculum vitae thoroughly familiar with investigational product, protocol and IB comply with GCP and applicable regulatory requirements permit monitoring and auditing maintain the list of qualified persons to whom investigator has delegated trial-related duties

Investigator - Adequate Resources Potential for recruiting the required number of suitable subjects within the agreed recruitment period Sufficient time to properly conduct and complete the trial Available qualified staff and adequate facilities Staff thoroughly informed about the protocol and their trial-related duties and functions

Investigator - Medical Care of Subjects Investigator is responsible for trial-related medical decisions Adequate medical care should be provided to s subject for any AE (clinically significant lab. values included) Notification to primary physician about the subject’s participation in the trial Subject is not obliged to give the reason for withdrawing prematurely from trial, but investigator should make reasonable effort to ascertain the reason

Investigator - Communication with IRB/IEC Before initiating the trial the investigator should have written approval from IRB/IEC for protocol, informed consent form and any other written information provided to subject Should provide IEC with IB and updates

Investigator - Compliance with Protocol Conduct of the trial in compliance with protocol. Investigator and sponsor should sign the protocol Investigator should document and explain any deviation from the approved protocol Implemented deviation and, if appropriate, the proposed protocol amendment should be submitted to IRB/IEC, sponsor and regulatory authorities

Investigator - Investigational Product Responsibility for accountability at the trial site Maintain records of the product’s delivery to site, the inventory at site, the use by each subject and the return to the sponsor Records should include dates, quantities, batch/serial numbers, expiration dates and the unique code numbers assigned to the investigational products and subjects

Investigator - Investigational Product Stored as specified by the sponsor and in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements Is used only in accordance with the approved protocol Investigator should explain the correct use of investigational product to each subject

Investigator - Randomization Procedures and Unblinding Trial’s randomisation procedures must be followed Code is broken only in accordance with the protocol

Investigator - Informed Consent In obtaining and documenting informed consent, investigator should comply with applicable regulatory requirements, GCP and ethical principles that have origin in Declaration of Helsinki Prior to the beginning of the trial, the investigator should have IRB/IEC’s written approval of informed consent and any other written information provided to subjects Any revised informed consent form should receive IRB/IEC’s approval before use Neither investigator nor the trial staff should influence a subject to participate or to continue to participate in trial

Investigator - Informed Consent Written informed consent must be obtained for all study activities Consent to be taken prior to any study specific procedures Consent form signed and personally dated by all parties to the consent Copies of signed consent form and information sheet to be provided to the patient Consent process must be documented in the source documents

Investigator - Informed Consent Should not contain any language that causes the subject to waive any legal rights or that releases investigator, institution and sponsor from liability for negligence Investigator should fully inform the subject of all aspects of the trial The language used in written informed consent should be understandable to the subject Subject should be provided with ample time and opportunity to inquire about the details of the trial and decide whether to participate or not All questions should be answered to the satisfaction of the subject Informed consent form should be signed and dated by the subject

Investigator - Informed Consent If a subject is unable to read, an impartial witness should be present during the entire informed consent discussion. By signing the consent form, the witness attests that the information in the consent form was accurately explained to and understood by the subject and that consent was freely given by the subject

Investigator - Informed Consent Informed consent discussion and informed consent form should include explanations of the following: Trial involves research Purpose of the trial Trial treatments and probability of random assignment Trial procedures including all invasive procedures Subject’s responsibilities Aspects of the trial that are experimental Reasonably foreseeable risks or inconveniences to the subject and, if applicable, to an embryo, foetus or nursing infant Reasonably expected benefits Alternative treatments that may be available to the subject, and their important potential benefits and risks

Investigator - Informed Consent Compensation and/or treatment available to the subject in the event of trial related injury Anticipated prorated payment, if any, to the subject for participating in the trial Anticipated expenses, if any, to the subject for participating in the trial Subject’s participation in the trial is voluntary Subject may refuse to participate or withdraw from the trial at any time, without penalty or loss of benefits to which the subject is otherwise entitled Direct access to the original medical records for verification of trial procedures and data, without violating the confidentiality of the subject

Investigator - Informed Consent Records identifying the subject will be kept confidential. If the results of the trial are published, subject’s identity will remain confidential Subject will be informed in a timely manner if information becomes available that may be relevant to the subject’s willingness to continue participation in the trial Foreseeable circumstances and reasons under which the subject’s participation in the trial may be terminated Expected duration of the subject’s participation in the trial Approximate number of subject involved in the trial

Investigator - Informed Consent Subject should receive a copy of signed and dated informed consent form and any amendment When a trial includes subjects who can be enrolled with the consent of subject’s legally acceptable representative (e.g., minors, patients with severe dementia), the subject should be informed about the trial to the extent compatible with subject’s understanding and, if applicable, subject should sign and personally date consent form

Investigator - Informed Consent Non-therapeutic trials (trial in which there is no anticipated direct clinical benefit to the subject) may be conducted in subjects with consent of a legally acceptable representative provided the following conditions are fulfilled: Objectives of the trial can not be met by means of a trial in subjects who can give informed consent personally Foreseeable risks to the subjects are low Negative impact on subject’s well-being is minimized and low Trial is not prohibited by law Approval of IRB/IEC is expressly sought on the inclusion of such patients and the written approval covers this aspect

Investigator - Informed Consent In emergency situations, when prior consent is not possible to obtain, the consent of legally acceptable representative, if present should be requested. If not present it should be proceed as detailed in the protocol and /or elsewhere, with documented approval by the IRB/EC.

Investigator - Records and Reports Accuracy, completeness, legibility and timeliness of data reported to the sponsor in the CRFs and in all required reports Data derived from source documents should be consisted with them or the discrepancies should be explained Any change or correction to a CRF should be dated, initialled and explained and should not obscure the original entry (both written and electronic changes or corrections) Investigator should maintain the trial documents as specified by GCP and as required by applicable regulatory requirements Essential documents should be retained until at least 2 years after the last approval of a marketing application in an ICH region and until there are no pending or marketing applications or at least 2 years have elapsed since the formal discontinuation of clinical development Upon request of monitor, auditor, IRB/IEC or regulatory authority, the investigator should make available for direct access all requested trial-related records

Investigator - Safety Reporting All SAE must be reported immediately to the sponsor except those that the protocol or IB identifies as not needing immediate reporting Reports should be followed up Investigator should comply with applicable regulatory requirements related to reporting of unexpected serious adverse drug reactions to the regulatory authorities and EC AE and/or laboratory abnormalities identified in protocol as critical to safety evaluations should be reported to the sponsor For reported deaths, investigator should supply the sponsor and EC with additional requested information (autopsy r.)

Investigator - Premature Termination or Suspension of a Trial If the trial is prematurely terminated or suspended for any reason, the investigator should: promptly inform trial subjects assure appropriate therapy and follow-up inform regulatory authorities if required by applicable regulatory authorities

Investigator - Premature Termination or Suspension of a Trial If investigator terminates or suspends trial, he/she should inform institution, sponsor and EC and provide detailed written explanation If sponsor terminates or suspends trial, the investigator should promptly inform institution and EC and provide detailed written explanation If EC terminates or suspends trial, the investigator should promptly inform institution and sponsor and provide detailed written explanation

Final Report by Investigator Upon completion of trial, the investigator should inform institution and provide EC with summary of trial’s outcome and regulatory authorities with any reports required.

Sponsor Quality Assurance and Control CRO Medical Expertise Trial Design Trial Management, Data Handling, Record Keeping Investigator Selection Compensation to Investigator and Subjects Submission to RA Information on IP Manufacturing, packaging, Labelling and Coding of IP Supplying and Handling IP Record Access Safety Information ADR reporting Monitoring Audit

Quality Assurance and Control Responsible for implementing and maintaining QA and control systems with written SOPs For securing agreement from all involved parties to ensure direct access to all related sites, source documents and reports QA should be applied to each stage of the process Agreements have to be in writing as part of the protocol or a separate agreement

CRO Sponsor may transfer all or any trial-related duties to CRO, but remains ultimately responsible. CRO should implement QA as well Transferred duties have to specified in writing Any duties not specified are retained by the sponsor

Medical Expertise and Trial Design The sponsor should appoint qualified medical personnel to advise on trial related medical questions The sponsor have to utilise qualified individuals for trail design

Safety Information The sponsor is responsible for ongoing safety evaluation of IP The sponsor should promptly notify investigators/institutions and the RA of findings that could affect adversely safety of subjects The sponsor should expedite reporting to all concerned inv/inst IRB/IEC, where required and to RAs of al ADR that are both serious and unexpected

Monitoring - Purpose The purposes of trial monitoring are to verify that: (a) The rights and well-being of human subjects are protected. (b) The reported trial data are accurate, complete, and verifiable from source documents. (c) The conduct of the trial is in compliance with the currently approved protocol/amendment(s), with GCP, and with the applicable regulatory requirement(s).

Selection and Qualifications of Monitors (a) Monitors should be appointed by the sponsor. (b) Monitors should be appropriately trained, and should have the scientific and/or clinical knowledge needed to monitor the trial adequately. A monitor’s qualifications should be documented. (c) Monitors should be thoroughly familiar with the investigational product(s), the protocol, written informed consent form and any other written information to be provided to subjects, the sponsor’s SOPs, GCP, and the applicable regulatory requirement(s).

Extent and Nature of Monitoring The sponsor should ensure that the trials are adequately monitored. The sponsor should determine the appropriate extent and nature of monitoring. In general there is a need for on-site monitoring, before, during, and after the trial; however in exceptional circumstances the sponsor may determine that central monitoring in conjunction with procedures such as investigators’ training and meetings, and extensive written guidance can assure appropriate conduct of the trial in accordance with GCP. Statistically controlled sampling may be an acceptable method for selecting the data to be verified.

Monitor's Responsibilities The monitor should ensure that the trial is conducted and documented properly by: (a) Acting as the main line of communication between the sponsor and the investigator. (b) Verifying that the investigator has adequate qualifications and resources and remain adequate throughout the trial period, that facilities, including laboratories, equipment, and staff, are adequate to safely and properly conduct the trial and remain adequate throughout the trial period.

Monitor's Responsibilities – cont. (c) Verifying, for the investigational product(s): (i) That storage times and conditions are acceptable, and that supplies are sufficient throughout the trial. (ii) That the investigational product(s) are supplied only to subjects who are eligible to receive it and at the protocol specified dose(s). (iii) That subjects are provided with necessary instruction on properly using, handling, storing, and returning the IPs (iv) That the receipt, use, and return of the investigational product(s) at the trial sites are controlled and documented. (v) That the disposition of unused IP(s) at the trial sites complies with applicable regulatory requirement(s) and is in accordance with the sponsor. (d) Verifying that the investigator follows the approved protocol and all approved amendment(s), if any.

Monitor's Responsibilities – cont. (e) Verifying that written informed consent was obtained before each subject's participation in the trial. (f) Ensuring that the investigator receives the current Investigator's Brochure, all documents, and all trial supplies needed to conduct the trial properly and to comply with the applicable regulatory requirement(s). (g) Ensuring that the investigator and the investigator's trial staff are adequately informed about the trial.

Monitor's Responsibilities – cont. (h) Verifying that the investigator and the investigator's trial staff are performing the trial functions, in accordance with the protocol and any other written agreement between the sponsor and the investigator/institution, and have not delegated these functions to unauthorized individuals. (i) Verifying that the investigator is enroling only eligible subjects. (j) Reporting the subject recruitment rate. (k) Verifying that source documents and other trial records are accurate, complete, kept up-to-date and maintained. (l) Verifying that the investigator provides all the required reports, notifications, applications, and submissions, and that these documents are accurate, complete, timely, legible, dated, and identify the trial.

Monitor's Responsibilities – cont. (m) Checking the accuracy and completeness of the CRF entries, SD and other trial-related records against each other. The monitor specifically should verify that: (i) The data required by the protocol are reported accurately on the CRFs and are consistent with the SD. (ii) Any dose and/or therapy modifications are well documented for each of the trial subjects. (iii) Adverse events, concomitant medications and intercurrent illnesses are reported in accordance with the protocol on the CRFs. (iv) Visits that the subjects fail to make, tests that are not conducted, and examinations that are not performed are clearly reported as such on the CRFs. (v) All withdrawals and dropouts of enrolled subjects from the trial are reported and explained on the CRFs.

Monitor's Responsibilities – cont. (n) Informing the investigator of any CRF entry error. The monitor should ensure that appropriate corrections or deletions are made, dated, explained and initialled by the investigator or authorised staff. This authorization should be documented. (o) Determining whether all AEs are appropriately reported within the time periods required by GCP, the protocol, the IRB/IEC, the sponsor, and the applicable regulatory requirement(s). (p) Determining whether the investigator is maintaining the essential documents. (q) Communicating deviations from the protocol, SOPs, GCP, and the applicable regulatory requirements to the investigator and taking appropriate action designed to prevent recurrence of the detected deviations.

Audit The purpose of a sponsor's audit, which is independent of and separate from routine monitoring or quality control functions, should be to evaluate trial conduct and compliance with the protocol, SOPs, GCP, and the applicable regulatory requirements.

Audit (a) The sponsor should appoint individuals, who are independent of the clinical trials/systems, to conduct audits. (b) The sponsor should ensure that the auditors are qualified by training and experience to conduct audits properly. An auditor’s qualifications should be documented.

Audit (a) The sponsor should ensure that the auditing of clinical trials/systems is conducted in accordance with the sponsor's written procedures on what to audit, how to audit, the frequency of audits, and the form and content of audit reports. (b) The sponsor's audit plan and procedures for a trial audit should be guided by the importance of the trial to submissions to regulatory authorities, the number of subjects in the trial, the type and complexity of the trial, the level of risks to the trial subjects, and any identified problem(s). (c) The observations and findings of the auditor(s) should be documented. (d) To preserve the independence and value of the audit function, the RA(ies) should not routinely request the audit reports. RA(ies) may seek access to an audit report on a case by case basis when evidence of serious GCP non-compliance exists, or in the course of legal proceedings. (e) When required by applicable law or regulation, the sponsor should provide an audit certificate.

Inspections/Audits FDA EMEA LOCAL INSPECTIONS AUDITS by the Sponsor

Focus Source of Patients: - Do subjects exist? - Were they available? - Did they come in? - Did they adequately sign an ICF? - Did they have the disease under study? - Did they meet the entrance criteria?

Focus Adverse Experiences: - Were they reported to the: Sponsor? IRB/IEC? Documentation: - How adequate is it: Consent forms? CRFs? SAE reports? IRB/IEC approvals and reports? Medical records? Medication: - Did the subject receive the right medication at the right dose?

Most common findings - Inadequate Patient Consent - Protocol Non-Adherence, Includjing Entrance Criteria Not Being Met - Records inadequate/Inaccurate - Accountability/Oversight not adequate - Drug Accountability issues - Failure to inform IRB/IEC - Records unavailable - Adverse Events not reported - Inappropriate Follow-up of AE - Inadequate training of site staff

NONCOMPLIANCE ISSUES to GCP Degrees of non-compliance to GCP: 1)Human Error 2)Poor Practices 3)Mismanagement/Negligence 4)Scientific Misconduct and Fraud

NONCOMPLIANCE ISSUES to GCP Lack of adherence to: Study-related requirements -Protocol violations -Incorrect randomisation of patients GCP/Regulatory requirements -Inappropriate adverse event reporting -Lack of IRB/IEC approval Ethical medical practices -Falsified or manipulated data -Falsified subjects

NONCOMPLIANCE ISSUES TO GCP Sponsors Concerns- Noncompliance leads to: - detection and rework costs: Time, resources, money - Delays: Data collection/processing Submissions - Questions: Reliability of data Effect on submission temelines Future credibility of sponsor with regulatory agencies