1 CASL: The Consortium for Advanced Simulation of Light Water Reactors A DOE Energy Innovation Hub for Modeling and Simulation of Nuclear Reactors Jess.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Due Diligence of Technology Mission Critical: The Rocky Research scientist, engineers & mfg specialist are dedicated to assist potential investors in.
Advertisements

Recovery Boiler Modeling
1 NEST New and emerging science and technology EUROPEAN COMMISSION - 6th Framework programme : Anticipating Scientific and Technological Needs.
Nuclear Energy University Programs NEAMS Reactor IPSC: Nuclear Reactor Performance and Safety Analysis August 10, 2011 Dr. Thomas Fanning Argonne National.
Office of Nuclear Energy 1May 20, 2013 Property Management Workshop Office of Nuclear Energy Program Perspective Delivering Nuclear Solutions for America's.
Aug 9-10, 2011 Nuclear Energy University Programs Materials: NEAMS Perspective James Peltz, Program Manager, NEAMS Crosscutting Methods and Tools.
Crashworthiness and High Strain Rate Material Testing Test Development for Vehicle Crash Conditions Motivation: The current vehicle design approaches result.
Argonne National Laboratory 9700 S. Cass Avenue Argonne, IL  Original name for Argonne – the “Metallurgical Lab”, a code name for Enrico.
Presented by Suzy Tichenor Director, Industrial Partnerships Program Computing and Computational Sciences Directorate Oak Ridge National Laboratory DOE.
Nuclear Energy University Programs Small Modular Reactors August 10, 2011 Dan Ingersoll presented by Bob Hill.
Contractor Assurance Discussion Forrestal Building Washington, D.C. December 14, 2011.
Thermo-fluid Analysis of Helium cooling solutions for the HCCB TBM Presented By: Manmeet Narula Alice Ying, Manmeet Narula, Ryan Hunt and M. Abdou ITER.
Overview of Advanced Design White Paper Farrokh Najmabadi Virtual Laboratory for Technology Meeting June 23, 1998 OFES Headquarters, Germantown.
Systems Analysis and Design. Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Systems Analysis Systems Design Programming Testing Conversion On-going maintenance.
Nuclear Energy University Programs Nuclear Energy Enabling Technologies (NEET) Program Overview James Peltz Program Manager, NEAMS Crosscutting Methods.
Some Ideas For Metrology to Extend Capability and Attract Investors and Users from Methods Development Communities Art Ruggles, UTNE.
Enhanced Biomass-to-Liquids – Project Development and Modeling Tools Shrikar Chakravarti, Praxair Technology, Inc. Mathematical Models to Support Renewable.
Multi-physics coupling Application on TRIGA reactor Student Romain Henry Supervisors: Prof. Dr. IZTOK TISELJ Dr. LUKA SNOJ PhD Topic presentation 27/03/2012.
Chapter : Software Process
Power Extraction Research Using a Full Fusion Nuclear Environment G. L. Yoder, Jr. Y. K. M. Peng Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN Presentation.
Fuel Behavior in Long-term Management of Spent Light-Water Reactor Fuel International Conference on Management of Spent Fuel from Nuclear Power Reactors.
Office of Nuclear Energy U.S. Department of Energy
FY2010 PEMP Notable Outcomes October 15, FRA, LLC Board of Directors 10/15-16/2009 Office of Quality and Best Practices Performance Evaluation Management.
Software Development *Life-Cycle Phases* Compiled by: Dharya Dharya Daisy Daisy
Chapter 2 The process Process, Methods, and Tools
Work conducted by ANL for the GNEP Fast Reactor Simulation Andrew Siegel, ANL.
RIC 2009 Thermal Hydraulics & Severe Accident Code Development & Application Ghani Zigh USNRC 3/12/2009.
Nuclear Research Institute Řež plc 1 DEVELOPMENT OF RELAP5-3D MODEL FOR VVER-440 REACTOR 2010 RELAP5 International User’s Seminar West Yellowstone, Montana.
The Challenge of IT-Business Alignment
Reactor Dosimetry News and Prospects Mladen Mitev BgNS Conference 2014.
A Perspective on the NASA Space Power and Energy Storage Roadmap National Research Council Panel Power Workshop March 21, 2011 H. Sterling Bailey, Ph.
” Particulates „ Characterisation of Exhaust Particulate Emissions from Road Vehicles Key Action KA2:Sustainable Mobility and Intermodality Task 2.2:Infrastructures.
Software Engineering Lecture # 17
Work Package 2 Giacomo Grasso ENEA UTFISSM-PRONOC LEADER Work Package 2 meeting Madrid, May 8, 2012 Current status and organization of the work.
Nuclear Fuels Storage & Transportation Planning Project Office of Fuel Cycle Technologies Nuclear Energy Criticality Safety Assessment for As-loaded Spent.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Stan Milora, ORNL Director Virtual Laboratory for Technology 20 th ANS Topical Meeting on the Technology.
CHECKPOINTS OF THE PROCESS Three sequences of project checkpoints are used to synchronize stakeholder expectations throughout the lifecycle: 1)Major milestones,
ESIP Federation Air Quality Cluster Partner Agencies.
CRESCENDO CRESCENDO Philippe HOMSI Paul WEBSTER
Fifth Lecture Hour 9:30 – 10:20 am, September 9, 2001 Framework for a Software Management Process – Life Cycle Phases (Part II, Chapter 5 of Royce’ book)
A System Analysis Code to Support Risk-Informed Safety Margin Characterization: Rationale, Computational Platform and Development Plan Nam Dinh, Vince.
Ted Fox Interim Associate Laboratory Director Energy and Engineering Sciences Oak Ridge, Tennessee March 21, 2006 Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
Cooperative Intersection Collision Avoidance Initiative ITS JPO Lead: Mike Schagrin Technical Lead: Morris Oliver, Office of Safety.
Presented by Adaptive Hybrid Mesh Refinement for Multiphysics Applications Ahmed Khamayseh and Valmor de Almeida Computer Science and Mathematics Division.
Institute of Safety Research Member Institution of the Scientific Association Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz DYN3D/ATHLET AND ANSYS CFX CALCULATIONS OF THE.
Software Engineering (CSI 321) Software Process: A Generic View 1.
1 Defense Programs Predictive Science and Program Credibility: “Beyond M over U” July 2008 Njema Frazier, PhD Acting Deputy Director, Office of Advanced.
Fuel Cycle Research Thrust Using A Full Fusion Nuclear Environment
Presented by LCF Climate Science Computational End Station James B. White III (Trey) Scientific Computing National Center for Computational Sciences Oak.
1 Modeling Complex Systems – How Much Detail is Appropriate? David W. Esh US Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2007 GoldSim User Conference, October 23-25,
Data Infrastructure Building Blocks (DIBBS) NSF Solicitation Webinar -- March 3, 2016 Amy Walton, Program Director Advanced Cyberinfrastructure.
1 Open Science Grid: Project Statement & Vision Transform compute and data intensive science through a cross- domain self-managed national distributed.
1 Schematic of Fluid-Thermal-Structural-Interactions (FTSI) Response Prediction of Compliant Structures in Hypersonic Flow Jack J. McNamara --- FA
Design and Planning Tools John Grosh Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory April 2016.
Algirdas Kaliatka, Audrius Grazevicius, Eugenijus Uspuras
Panel Discussion: Discussion on Trends in Multi-Physics Simulation
V&V Assessment for CASL/VERA
Numerical models of PWR reactor for Monte Carlo neutron transport and burnup simulations Mikołaj Oettingen, Ph.D. Department of Nuclear Energy, Faculty.
New Project 1: Development and Validation of models for DNB prediction
Validation of Advanced Modeling and Simulation: an Imperative
FRAPCON-3/FRAPTRAN APPLICATIONS Unit of Nuclear Safety Research
Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group
Jordan University of Science and Technology
PUMA : Purdue University Multi-Dimensional Integral Test Assembly Scientific Design of the Scaled Facility for GE SBWR Design SBWR : Simplified Boiling.
Integrated Modeling Approach and Plans
Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group
The Fuel Cycle Analysis Toolbox
TRL tables: power conversion and lifetime
Nuclear Energy University Programs
Presentation transcript:

1 CASL: The Consortium for Advanced Simulation of Light Water Reactors A DOE Energy Innovation Hub for Modeling and Simulation of Nuclear Reactors Jess Gehin Focus Area Lead Advanced Modeling Applications CASL Reactor Technology R&D Integration Lead Oak Ridge National Laboratory North American Workshop on Beta-delayed Neutron Emission JIHIR, ORNL May 2, 2013

2 A Different Approach –“Multi-disciplinary, highly collaborative teams ideally working under one roof to solve priority technology challenges” – Steven Chu –“Create a research atmosphere with a fierce sense of urgency to deliver solutions.” – Kristina Johnson –Characteristics Leadership – Outstanding, independent, scientific leadership Management – “Light” federal touch Focus – Deliver technologies that can change the U.S. “energy game ” First Introduced by Secretary Chu in the President’s FY2010 Budget Mission Provide leading edge modeling and simulation capabilities to improve the performance of currently operating Light Water Reactors Vision Predict, with confidence, the performance and assured safety of nuclear reactors, through comprehensive, science-based modeling and simulation technology that is deployed and applied broadly within the U.S. nuclear energy industry Goals 1.Develop and Effectively Apply Modern Virtual Reactor Technology 2.Provide More Understanding of Safety Margins While Addressing Operational and Design Challenges 3.Engage the Nuclear Energy Community Through Modeling and Simulation 4.Deploy New Partnership and Collaboration Paradigms` CASL A DOE Energy Innovation Hub in the Office of Nuclear Energy

CASL Scope: Develop and apply a “Virtual Reactor” to assess fuel design, operation, and safety criteria 3 Deliver improved predictive simulation of PWR core, internals, and vessel –Couple Virtual Reactor to evolving out-of-vessel simulation capability –Maintain applicability to other NPP types Execute work in six technical focus areas to: –Equip the Virtual Reactor with necessary physical models and multiphysics integrators –Build the Virtual Reactor with a comprehensive, usable, and extensible software system –Validate and assess the Virtual Reactor models with self-consistent quantified uncertainties Focus on Addressing Challenge Problems to Drive Development and Demonstration

4 CASL Challenge Problems Key safety-relevant reactor phenomena that limit performance CASL is committed to delivering simulation capabilities for  Advancing the understanding of key reactor phenomena  Improving performance in today’s commercial power reactors  Evaluating new fuel designs to further enhance safety margin CASL is committed to delivering simulation capabilities for  Advancing the understanding of key reactor phenomena  Improving performance in today’s commercial power reactors  Evaluating new fuel designs to further enhance safety margin

CASL: Challenge Problem (CP) Objectives CRUD (CRUD Induced Power Shift / CRUD Induced Localized Corrosion) –Inform PWR core CRUD risk assessment for margin management decisions; reduce uncertainty in CRUD thickness & boron uptake predictions GTRF / FAD (Grid-To-Rod Fretting / Fuel Assembly Distortion) –Inform fuel assembly structural features, materials, and geometry relationship to fuel system performance; identify core locations and geometric characteristics contributing to flow conditions impacting fuel structural stability PCI (Fuel Pellet Clad Interaction) –Predict cladding stress and strain, inform margins imposed, and inform fuel pellet-clad geometry relationship to performance during a power maneuver DNB (Departure from Nucleate Boiling) –Identify sources of conservatism and margin in current practices for typical reload DNB evaluations and on specific DNB correlation calibration experiments Cladding Integrity during a LOCA –Assess fuel performance s during a LOCA and identify sources of conservatism and margin Cladding Integrity during a RIA –Assess fuel performance during a RIA transient and identify sources of conservatism and margin Significant Progress on CRUD, GTRF, PCI CPs Increasing effort on DNB, Cladding Integrity CPs Significant Progress on CRUD, GTRF, PCI CPs Increasing effort on DNB, Cladding Integrity CPs 5

Stable yet evolving as required 6 CASL Organization

CASL Tackles the Multi-Scale Challenge of Predictively Simulating a Reactor Core From full core to fuel assembly to fuel subassembly to fuel pin/pellet 7

8 Virtual Environment for Reactor Applications (VERA) CASL’s virtual reactor for in-vessel LWR phenomena Physics Coupling Infrastructure Subchannel Thermal- Hydraulics Isotopics Cross Sections Commercial CFD Reactor System Input / Output Baseline Advanced Thermal-Hydraulics Neutronics Nodal diffusion Chemistry Fuel performance Mechanics Research CFD Geometry / Mesh / Solution Transfer Structural mechanics Structural mechanics Subchannel Thermal- Hydraulics Neutron Transport Chemistry Corrosion CRUD Deposition

9 Enabling R&D Objectives 9 Materials Performance and Optimization (MPO) –Mature 3D fuel performance capability with full assessment against CRUD/PCI/GTRF problems. Validated fuel performance models inform assessments of safety margin (PCI) and best operational practices (CRUD, GTRF). Functional capability and partial assessment for RIA- and LOCA-based transient problems. Radiation Transport Methods (RTM) –Robust 3D pin-resolved transport and prototype hybrid Monte Carlo transport with modern cross section/shielding treatments and coupling to T-H, fuel, and corrosion chemistry capabilities Thermal Hydraulics Methods (THM) –Robust 3D steady-state/transient turbulent multi-phase capability with subcooled boiling models, an initial assessment of DNB, and complementary with a modern subchannel capability Validation and Uncertainty Quantification (VUQ) –Mathematical tools and methodologies integrated and accessible to enable quantifying sensitivities and uncertainties in full-scale multi physics PWR simulations

CASL Results to Date 10 Developed and released Virtual Environment for Reactor Applications (VERA) to CASL core partners through ORNL’s Radiation Safety Information Computational Center Established baseline industry capability and advanced R&D capability in VERA for neutronics, thermal hydraulics, and corrosion chemistry Applied selected aspects of VERA to operational PWR core scenarios with conditions relevant to corrosion buildup (“crud”), pellet-clad interaction, and grid-to-rod fretting Integrated within VERA a state-of-the-art sensitivity and optimization capability to support uncertainty analysis of reactor operational and safety scenarios Demonstrated that newly established multidimensional simulation capabilities exceed industry capabilities in physics modeling Scientific output 261 publications 30+ invited talks 247 milestone deliverables in CASL database

3D Fuel Performance Model: Peregrine Zr-4 clad He fill gas (2 MPa) Missing pellet surface Fuel Temperature Von Mises Effective Stress Defective (MPS) pellet placed midway between four intact pellets Simulation from fresh fuel state with a typical power history, followed by a late-life power ramp

Coolant Chemistry and CRUD Growth Thermal hydraulics + transport + fuel performance + chemistry + structural mechanics Large azimuthal variation in fluid/cladding temperature computed Spacer with mixing vanes Boron concentration within crud layer (colored contours) grown within MAMBA over 60 days of operation Variations in crud thickness and boron due to T variations on cladding surface Reduced crud and boron due to turbulence behind mixing vanes CFD computed cladding T for pin # 4 80 cm section of fuel rod

ILES DES Spalart-Allmaras Helicity isosurfaces All models capture some level of detail in the longitudinal vortical structures and swirl With Spalart-Allmaras, eddies appear more damped, rotation around rod is smeared End-view of fuel rod showing swirl in coherent structures Turbulent Flow in Grid-to-Rod-Fretting Scoping simulations with the Hydra-TH (LANL) code

Neutronics Modeling of Operational Reactors CASL is developing advanced neutronics modeling capabilities that provide far more detail than current industry practice CASL reference plant for this analysis is Watts Bar Unit 1 –TVA has provided substantial operational data –Westinghouse is providing industry-level analysis results for comparisons High fidelity neutronics simulations methods are under development within CASL –ORNL developing high-fidelity, high resolution transport using TITAN –University of Michigan developing capability that can be more readily deployable on industry computers Neutronics is being coupled with Thermal Hydraulics and Fuel Mechanics codes to provide a full multi-physics reactor simulation

Questions? or 15