“RACE TO THE TOP” UPDATE – TKES/LKES & THE G.O.L.D. ACADEMY SEPTEMBER 4, 2013 BOE STUDY SESSION Dan Ray, Ed.S. Director – “Race to the Top” Henry County.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines. The single most influential component of an effective school is the individual teachers within that school.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System
Discuss the charge of the Michigan Council for Educator Effectiveness (MCEE) Summarize the MCEE Interim Report Provide an Overview of the Pilot.
The SCPS Professional Growth System
In August, the historic CORE district waiver was approved allowing these districts to pursue a new robust and holistic accountability model for schools.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Katonah-Lewisboro School District Annual Professional Performance Review Update 5/23/
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making.
THREE HANDBOOKS TEACHER PROFESSIONAL EVALUATION SYSTEM EDUCATIONAL SPECIALISTS PROFESSIONAL EVALUATION SYSTEM SCHOOL ADMINISTRATOR PROFESSIONAL EVALUATION.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.
Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System 0 August 2012.
Preparing for Learning Objectives Review the TAPS component of the Cobb Keys for Teacher Effectiveness Explore the Teacher Performance Standards.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation August 20, 2014 Elizabeth M. Osga, Ph.D.
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Student Learning Objectives Overview. Defining SLOS A vital component of the Teacher Keys and Leader Keys Effectiveness System is Student Growth and Academic.
Education Committee Meeting Professional Development Plan November 3, 2014.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System
Stronge Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
OverviewOverview Virginia Principal Performance Evaluation System February 2013.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Implementing High Quality Student Learning Objectives: The Promise and the Challenge Maryland Association of Secondary School.
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Ensure All Students are Prepared for Success District and Schools’ SACS Accreditation Plans.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Title IIA Guidance Teacher and Leader Keys Effectiveness.
Georgia Association of School Personnel Administrators May 30,
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
“A New Chapter and a New Day” An Update on the School Improvement Grant Staff Meeting Friday, August 5, :30 a.m. LHS Commons.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Teacher Performance Evaluation System Data Sources.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
A Mission of Restoration
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Primary Purposes of the Evaluation System
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Stronge and Associates Educational Consulting, LLC  Uniform evaluation system for teachers, educational.
Why 21st Century Skills & STEM? Research indicates students across all grade-levels lack competencies in math and science. New demands have been placed.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
Southern Regional Education Board High Schools That Work Jo Kister, SREB Consultant Archived Information.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
Student Achievement Teacher & Leader Effectiveness Overview of Stronge & MyLearningPlan/OASYS Interim Report #1 January 27,
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Teacher Orientation Training for teachers FY15 July 28,
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Pre-Evaluation Conference Conducted August 18, 2015 STING Schedule.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Comprehensive Planning
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Georgia College & Career Academies
TKES and SLO assessments
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Presentation transcript:

“RACE TO THE TOP” UPDATE – TKES/LKES & THE G.O.L.D. ACADEMY SEPTEMBER 4, 2013 BOE STUDY SESSION Dan Ray, Ed.S. Director – “Race to the Top” Henry County Schools – McDonough, GA

Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Teacher Keys Evaluation System (Generates a Teacher Effectiveness Measure) Surveys of Instructional Practice (given in grades ) Teacher Assessment on Performance Standards (TAPS) (Data sources include observations and documentation) Student Growth and Academic Achievement Teachers of Tested Subjects - Student growth percentile/ - Student growth percentile/ value-added measure from value-added measure from CRCT/EOCT CRCT/EOCT Teachers of Non-Tested Subjects - DOE-approved Student Learning Objectives utilizing district-identified growth measure (SLOs) - DOE-approved Student Learning Objectives utilizing district-identified growth measure (SLOs) Teacher Keys Evaluation System Surveys inform Standards 3, 4, 7, 8

Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” 5 Domains 10 Standards TAPS Domains and Standards PLANNING 1. Professional Knowledge 2. Instructional Planning INSTRUCTIONAL DELIVERY 3. Instructional Strategies 4. Differentiated Instruction ASSESSMENT OF AND FOR LEARNING 5. Assessment Strategies 6. Assessment Uses LEARNING ENVIRONMENT 7. Positive Learning Environment 8. Academically Challenging Environment PROFESSIONALISM AND COMMUNICATION 9. Professionalism 10. Communication

Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” PLANNING Performance Standard 1: Professional Knowledge The teacher demonstrates an understanding of the curriculum, subject content, pedagogical knowledge, and the needs of students by providing relevant learning experiences. Sample Performance Indicators Examples may include, but are not limited to: The teacher: 1.1Addresses appropriate curriculum standards and integrates key content elements. 1.2Facilitates students’ use of higher-level thinking skills in instruction. 1.3Demonstrates ability to link present content with past and future learning experiences, other subject areas, and real-world experiences and applications. DOMAIN PERFORMANCE STANDARD PERFORMANCE INDICATORS TAPS Main Components Exemplary* In addition to meeting the requirements for Proficient… Proficient Proficient is the expected level of performance. Needs Development Ineffective The teacher continually demonstrates extensive content and pedagogical knowledge, regularly enriches the curriculum, and guides others in enriching the curriculum. The teacher consistently demonstrates an understanding of the curriculum, subject content, pedagogical knowledge, and the needs of students by providing relevant learning experiences The teacher inconsistently demonstrates understanding of curriculum, subject content, pedagogical knowledge, and student needs, or lacks fluidity in using the knowledge in practice. The teacher inadequately demonstrates understanding of curriculum, subject content, pedagogical knowledge and student needs, or does not use the knowledge in practice. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL RUBRIC

Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Teacher Keys Evaluation System (Generates a Teacher Effectiveness Measure) Surveys of Instructional Practice (will be given in grades ) Teacher Assessment on Performance Standards (Data sources include observations and documentation) Student Growth and Academic Achievement Teachers of Tested Subjects - Student growth percentile/ value-added measure from CRCT/EOCT Teachers of Non-Tested Subjects - DOE-approved Student Learning Objectives utilizing district-identified growth measure (SLOs) Teacher Keys Evaluation System Surveys inform Standards 3, 4, 7, 8

Surveys – another data point for teacher performance Teachers see the questions early in the school year Teachers do not administer the survey to their own students The survey covers TAPS Standards 3, 4, 7, 8 How we administered the surveys….flexibility was the key… An from a Luella High teacher about student surveys Question examples – next few slides…

GRADES 3 – 5 EXAMPLES My teacher explains things so I understand. My teacher makes class interesting and challenging. My teacher uses different ways to teach and help me learn. My teacher makes it okay for me to ask questions when I don’t understand something. My teacher shows respect to all students.

GRADES 6 – 8 EXAMPLES My teacher explains things so I understand. My teacher makes class interesting and challenging. My teacher uses different ways to teach and help me learn. My teacher gives me help when I need it.

GRADES EXAMPLES GRADES EXAMPLES My teacher uses a variety of activities and methods to engage me. My teacher makes class interesting and challenging. My teacher shares feedback about my learning progress with me and my parents. My teacher shows respect to all students. My teacher communicates and maintains classroom rules, routines, and procedures.

Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Teacher Keys Evaluation System (Generates a Teacher Effectiveness Measure) Surveys of Instructional Practice (Primary, Intermediate, Middle, and High School) Teacher Assessment on Performance Standards (Data sources include observations and documentation) Student Growth and Academic Achievement Teachers of Tested Subjects - Student growth percentile/ value-added measure from CRCT/EOCT Teachers of Non-Tested Subjects - DOE-approved Student Learning Objectives utilizing district-identified growth measure (SLOs) Teacher Keys Evaluation System Surveys inform Standards 3, 4, 7, 8

STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES ( SLO S ) A Student Learning Objective is comprised of a pre and post test which then includes setting a target for student growth for courses that do not have either the CRCT or EOCT:  Aligns with curriculum standards (Common Core in ELA and Math)  Contains measurable objectives  Contains expected gains or growth  Contains intervals of instructional time  Lets parent, student and teacher know “where the student” is Objectives

Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Leader Keys Evaluation System (Generates a Leader Effectiveness Measure) Governance and Leadership -Climate Survey -Student Attendance -Retention of Effective Teachers (tentatively in ) Leader Assessment on Performance Standards -Performance Goal Setting -Documentation of Practice Student Growth and Academic Achievement - Student growth percentile (CRCT/EOCT) - Achievement gap measure -DOE- approved Student Learning Objectives utilizing district-identified growth measure (SLOs) Surveys & Student Attendance inform their LAPS score

Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” LAPS Domains and Standards 4 Domains 8 Standards 8 Standards SCHOOL LEADERSHIP 1. Instructional Leadership 2. School Climate ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP 3. Planning and Assessment 4. Organizational Management HUMAN RESOURCES LEADERSHIP 5. Human Resources Management 6. Teacher/Staff Evaluation PROFESSIONALISM AND COMMUNICATION 7. Professionalism 8. Communication

Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” The leader fosters the success of all students by facilitating the development, communication, implementation, and evaluation of a shared vision of teaching and learning that leads to school improvement. Domain: School Leadership Performance Standard 1: Instructional Leadership The leader promotes the success of all students by developing, advocating, and sustaining an academically rigorous, positive, and safe school climate for all stakeholders. Performance Standard 2: School Climate

Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Leader Keys Evaluation System (Generates a Leader Effectiveness Measure) Governance and Leadership -Climate Survey -Student Attendance -Retention of Effective Teachers (tentatively in ) Leader Assessment on Performance Standards -Performance Goal Setting -Documentation of Practice Student Growth and Academic Achievement - Student growth percentile (CRCT/EOCT) - Achievement gap measure -DOE –approved Student Learning Objectives utilizing district-identified growth measure (SLOs) Surveys & Student Attendance inform their LAPS score

Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Survey Example My principal… Strongly Agree Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree 1. Is interested in a quality school which provides quality education. 2. Maintains open lines of communication with employees. 3. Visits my classroom or work space on a regular basis. 4. Makes helpful recommendations to me for improvement of performance.

Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Leader Keys Evaluation System (Generates a Leader Effectiveness Measure) Governance and Leadership -Climate Survey -Student Attendance -Retention of Effective Teachers (tentatively in ) (tentatively in ) Leader Assessment on Performance Standards -Performance Goal Setting -Documentation of Practice Student Growth and Academic Achievement - Student growth percentile (CRCT/EOCT) - Achievement gap measure - DOE-approved Student Learning Objectives utilizing district-identified growth measure (SLOs) Surveys & Student Attendance inform their LAPS score

First TEM & LEM scores… When: Summer of 2015 How they are calculated – TEM score - 50% is based on the TAPS score and 50% is based on Student Growth of that teacher’s students LEM score – 30% is based on the LAPS score, 50% based on School’s Student Growth, 20% is based on the Achievement Gap Reduction Merit Pay – One time award (stipend) to teachers and administrators that are in the top 10% of all teachers or administrators in Henry County based on their TEM or LEM score

FIVE STAR G.O.L.D. ACADEMY COMPONENTS  A.S.P.I.R.E.  L.E.A.D.  M.O.D.E.L.  D.R.I.V.E.  V.A.L.U.E.

STAKEHOLDER GROUPS INVOLVED… STAKEHOLDER GROUPS INVOLVED…  Senior Leadership – Superintendent, Assistant Superintendents, Executive Officers, Directors, and Coordinators  Principal Advisory Team  Assistant Principal Advisory Team  Henry County Board of Education members  Teacher Leader Advisory Team  Teachers of the Year  External Review Team – includes the following:  Educational Leadership staff members from UGA, Mercer Univ., Univ. of West GA, and Clark-Atlanta Univ.  Georgia Association of Educational Leaders (GAEL)  Georgia Department of Education – (GADOE)  Georgia Leadership Institute for School Improvement (GLISI)  Georgia Professional Standards Commission (GAPSC)  Georgia School Superintendents Association (GSSA)  Governor’s Office – Education Policy and the Office of Student Achievement  Southern Regional Education Board (SREB)  Georgia Partnership for Excellence in Education (GPEE)  Henry County Chamber of Commerce’s Education Committee

A.S.P.I.R.E. A.S.P.I.R.E.  Develop expertise for those who desire to remain in classrooms  Train teacher leaders who aspire to enter the field of administration  Cohort Model (not self-selected)  Four seminars will be a part of the cohort  Portfolio  Capstone projects  Anticipated start date (January 2015)

L.E.A.D. L.E.A.D.  Assistant principals and district-level leaders  Vital to succession planning  Cohort model (not self-selected)  NASSP Principal Simulations  Leadership seminars with special emphasis on instructional leadership  Capstone Project  Begins - July 2014

M.O.D.E.L. M.O.D.E.L.  Induction level leaders (1-3 years)  Coaching element conducted by a trained school district coach  Began – August 2013

D.R.I.V.E. D.R.I.V.E.  For Principals  Monthly leadership seminars  Level Alike meetings  Networking and idea sharing  Began May 2013

V.A.L.U.E. V.A.L.U.E.  Selected and trained leadership coaches (from our district)  Nurture/Support novice leaders (that are in M.O.D.E.L.) with job embedded sustainable processes  Begins October 2013

Any other comments and/or questions… “Everything rises and falls on Leadership” – John Maxwell John Maxwell