© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; www.timeandlearning.org The TIME Collaborative Data Cycles to Support Instruction Mankato West Middle School.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Guide to Compass Evaluations and
Directions As you view the photos from this teacher-built standards- based classroom, read the accompanying explanation regarding how each depicted artifact.
Maximizing SCHOOL Time. Conducting a School Time Analysis WHAT YOU NEED Schedules Calendar Information on activities that interfere with instructional.
A Guide to Implementation
o Nearly all 50 states have adopted the Common Core State Standards and Essential Standards. o State-led and developed Common Core Standards for K-12.
Elementary School Standards-Based Classroom.
Professional Development Plan PCS-PTCRN Presented by: Jocelyn Artinger.
1 LAUSD Mathematics Periodic Benchmark Assessments Using Data to Inform Instruction.
“PD in a PowerPoint” Standards Based Grading & Reporting (SBGR)
Learning Teams (LT): Building Capacity to Sustain High Quality, Site-Based, Professional Development.
Understanding Stanford 10 Results
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.
8 TH GRADE ALGEBRA SEMINAR FOR ENRICHMENT / PLACEMENT (ASEP) Shelburne Community School August 30, 2012.
Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
Math Content Network Update The Power of Mistakes Student Engagement Culture of Learning Growth Mindset Congruent Tasks.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
Implementing the CCSS Through Coaching Atomic Conference December 2, 2014.
Teacher Leadership Initiative Trainings
PLC’s who, what, when, how, why.
Read to Succeed Reading Coaches. “Reading coaches shall serve as job-embedded, stable resources for professional development throughout schools in order.
Examining Instruction, Part I Nov. 7, Plan for Today 4:10-4:15 Welcome and Overview 4:15-5:00 Tuning Protocol on Data Overviews 5:00-5:50 Observing.
Standards In Practice TM : Instructional Gap Analysis The PowerPoint presentation that follows was created by The Education Trust and can be found, together.
Redmond School District 2J School Improvement Presentation April 2010.
Elementary Report Card Revisions
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
What is Effective Professional Development? Dr. Robert Mayes Science and Mathematics Teaching Center University of Wyoming.
Math AP Meeting January 20, 2015 Presenter: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, CFN204.
YOUR LOGO January 13, 2014 ALL Site Coaching Session.
Buckeye Elementary School District’s Curriculum Mapping Initiative
Looking at Student Work Collaborative Teams Focus on Teaching and Learning School Leadership Team Meeting Waterfront Place Hotel October 22 – 24, 2012.
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
Math Liaison Meeting September 2014 Presenter: Simi Minhas, Math Achievement Coach Network 204.
Math Science Partnership Excellence In Mathematics Lanakila Elementary School Honolulu, HI.
STRATEGIC PLAN Tennessee Department of Education School Team Training Series Opening Session – Literacy June 2014.
PUTTING OUR FOOT DOWN TO ACCELERATE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT FROM WITHIN.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Timberlane Regional School District
Preparing to Teach a Module Session 2 August 2014 NTI.
Professional Learning Communities. Copyright © 2013 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved. Blackboard Collaborate Communication Tools 3.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
RtII Response to Instruction and Intervention. Organization.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Mid-Year Report Dibble Elementary Jackson Public Schools Pamela Perlos, Principal Math Focus.
Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014.
Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Overview 1.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
1 Hunters Lane High School An International Baccalaureate World School Susan Kessler, Ed.D., Executive Principal April Snodgrass, Assistant Principal Brad.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
Curriculum Evening Welcome 1.
Promoting Learning and Understanding for Students in Mathematics
Hopewell Middle School
Standards-based Grading and Reporting
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Intermediate Mathematics and the Learner-Centered Environment?
WASC FOCUS MTG #2 South East Senior High School Accreditation Process Year 2 of 6 WASC Focus Meeting #2 October 27, 2016.
By Pam Rumage and Carmen Carr White Station Middle School
Network Team Institute July 8-12, 2013
SIR Observation Preparation and Report Examples
Fulton County Schools Personalized Learning Instructional Model: Ocee Elementary January 2016.
Panorama Summer Session
Continuous Assessment Establishing Checkpoints
Presentation transcript:

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; The TIME Collaborative Data Cycles to Support Instruction Mankato West Middle School

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; Start and End Times 7:45 – 3:45 (M-Th) 7:45 – 1:45 (F) Student Days per Year 180 Background Information School Name City, State Grades Served One Interesting School Fact Mankato West Middle School Mankato, MA 6 – 8 We are a much better school than Mankato East

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; School-wide Student Achievement Targets Reading State Assessment % Proficiency Goal (13-14) Growth Percentile Goal (13-14) % Proficiency (12- 13) MCAS58%6546% Math State Assessment % Proficiency Goal (13-14) Growth Percentile Goal (13-14) % Proficiency (12- 13) MCAS65%6058% Science State Assessment % Proficiency Goal (13-14) Growth Percentile Goal (13-14) % Proficiency (12- 13) MCAS45%6039%

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; Additional Existing Goals [Optional] GoalMeasured by GoalMeasured by GoalMeasured by

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; Components of an Effective Data Cycle Assessments DailyYearQuarterWeek Analysis Which Data Data Protocols Which People Action Changes to Instruction Regrouping of Students Impact on Teacher Dev.

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; Data Cycle: Assessments What Assessments are We Using? AssessmentSubject(s)Grade(s)Frequency Exit Tickets, Homework Reading, Math, Science, Social Studies 6 – 8Every day QuizzesReading, Math, Science, Social Studies 6 – 8Every week to two weeks Unit TestsReading, Math, Science, Social Studies 6 – 8Every 4 to 6 weeks, after each unit NWEAReading, Math6 – 84x/year (Oct, Dec, Mar, and Jun) FinalsReading, Math, Science, Social Studies 6 – 82x/year, after each semester MCASReading, Math, Science6 – 8 (Science only in 8 th ) 1x/year

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; Data Cycle: Analysis When Do We Analyze Data? Length of Data Meeting Frequency (e.g. weekly) Assessment(s) Analyzed Participants (Grade and Subject Taught) 60 min1x/weekQuizzes, Unit Tests Reading teachers meet together; math teachers meet together; led by instr. Coach 90 minEvery other week, during early release Unit Tests, Finals Core content teachers meet in content and grade level teams 4 hours1x/yearMCASCore content teachers meet in content and grade level teams 6 hours4x/yearNWEACore content teachers meet in content and grade level teams

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; Data Cycle: Analysis (Continued) How Do We Ensure Time is Well Spent? Structure/ProtocolDescription AgendaInstructional Coach or grade level chair sets agenda for data meetings. Each agenda is structured in the same way, including assigning roles and repeating norms RolesAt each data meeting, there is a facilitator, timekeeper, note taker, and process observer. These roles rotate in each meeting NormsEach meeting has the following norms: Actively listen/participate Begin and end on time Collaborate and work towards consensus Always leave with next steps Data Analysis ToolsUse district’s data dashboard to print out student, class, grade, and school-wide results

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; Data Cycle: Action How are We Using Assessment Data? AssessmentFrequencyDecision(s) Driven by this Data Exit Tickets; Homework Every DayMonitor student progress in core content classes QuizzesEvery 1 to 2 Weeks Adjust core instruction, including identifying areas for re-teach Unit TestsEvery 4 to 6 Weeks Adjust unit planning; inform grouping of support classes NWEA4x/yearInform grouping of support classes; inform amount of support for each student ; ensure rigor in core classes Finals2x/yearInform grouping of support classes MCAS1x/yearInstructional focus; initial grouping of student support classes

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; Next Steps for Data Cycles Early Successes in Our Data Cycles So Far… Buy-in to norms Agenda and roles have improved the quality of data conversations Multiple opportunities for teachers to meet with grade and content level peers Early Challenges in Our Data Cycles So Far… Data dashboard does not drill down to student data as much as we’d like Ensuring consistency in assessing students daily across all classrooms Three Next Steps We’re Taking to Improve Our Data Cycles Dedicating an administrator to create additional data reports Looking for evidence of exit tickets in lesson plans and lesson observations Improving one-on-one coaching conversation protocols during data days

© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; Questions/Comments?