Engaging in Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Charles Darwin University Institute for Teaching and Learning Keith Trigwell.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Is SoTL good for faculty professional development?
Advertisements

Key Stage 3 National Strategy
Classroom Factors PISA/PIRLS Task Force International Reading Association January 2005.
1 DPAS II Process and Procedures for Teachers Developed by: Delaware Department of Education.
0 - 0.
MULTIPLICATION EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 3. WHAT EVER YOU DO TO ONE SIDE YOU HAVE TO DO TO THE OTHER 2. DIVIDE BY THE NUMBER IN FRONT OF THE VARIABLE.
The Course experience questionnaire (P. Ramsden) Designed as a performance indicator 24 statements relating to 5 aspects 1 overall satisfaction statement.
1 Student Surveys and the Student Learning Experience Michael Prosser Higher Education Academy.
What is Pedagogic Research? Strategies and Approaches Dr Jennifer Hill Associate Professor of Teaching and Learning in Geography National Teaching Fellow.
Teaching for Higher Order Outcomes Peter Ling June 2012.
Correction, feedback and assessment: Their role in learning
Student Feedback on, and Evaluation of, their Learning Experience Michael Prosser Institute for Teaching and Learning The University of Sydney.
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson
A Process to Identify the Enduring Skills, Processes, & Concepts for your Content Area 1.
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
MYP planning: the unit planner
The case method in education Jonas Nordquist, Associate Editor, BMJ Learning
Seminar for Teacher Assistants
Introduction to Creating a Balanced Assessment System Presented by: Illinois State Board of Education.
Addition 1’s to 20.
Personal Inquiry project Trevor Collins Knowledge Media Institute The Open University, UK
Key Stage 3 National Strategy Standards and assessment: session 3.
Induction: Third Day.  How can we teach to promote learning goals? ◦ Approaches to Teaching  From teacher-focussed to student-centred ◦ Constructive.
National Curriculum Framework n Exploring and Developing ideas n Investigating and making art, craft & design n Evaluating and developing work n Knowledge.
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
1 © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training English K-6 Syllabus Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment.
Maths Counts Insights into Lesson Study
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
Learning Outcomes Participants will be able to analyze assessments
1 Literacy PERKS Standard 1: Aligned Curriculum. 2 PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1. Aligned Curriculum 2. Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction.
Student Growth Goals Sorting it out. Over- arching Goal 2.
Workshop: Translating graduate attributes into classroom learning A/Prof Simon Barrie Institute for Teaching and Learning Hong Kong Institute of Education.
Designing and Planning a Teaching Session This document is licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 UK: England & Wales license, available.
ORIC – Open Educational Resources for the Inclusive Curriculum 1 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike.
1 Angela Ho, EDC Chan Chi Hung, Learning to Learn Project.
Diversity and Difference? Focusing on Similarity through ‘Approaches to Learning’ Monica McLean and Keith Trigwell University of Oxford.
5E INQUIRY LEARNING CYCLE. EngageExplore ExplainElaborate Evaluate.
Thinking Actively in a Social Context T A S C.
To Lecture or not to lecture? That is the question Dr. Julian Hermida Algoma University Teaching Forum Academic Standards and Teaching & Learning Committee.
Biggs & Collis (1982) SOLO Taxonomy Overview and ideas for use Robin Trangmar Coleg Llandrillo.
1 Setting Appropriate Assessment and Grading Criteria.
1 The Theoretical Framework. A theoretical framework is similar to the frame of the house. Just as the foundation supports a house, a theoretical framework.
ZU students as critical thinkers Preferred learning styles –Surface learning –Structured learning –Rote learning –Memorizing.
I can generalise and develop a theory. I can change the prompt. I can comment on what I have noticed about the prompt, for example, I can identify a pattern.
Teaching and Learning Activities for Deep Learning Dr. Julian Hermida Algoma University Workshop on Teaching and Learning February 18, 2009.
Moodle Wiki Trial Design for Online Learning SEM
* Session 1 : Introduction and frameworks * Session 2 : Principles of alignment * Session 3 : Overview of assessment * Session 4 : Formative and summative,
SOLO Taxonomy SOLO Taxonomy. What level is your understanding of SOLO taxonomy.
Inquiry Primer Version 1.0 Part 4: Scientific Inquiry.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
SOLO Pam Hook and Julie Mills. Pre-structural Uni-structural Multi-structural Relational Extended Abstract.
Adapting the Biggs 3P model (1993) for Learning in Pharmacy Practice Boys,R; Kendrew,P; Miller, E. Reflection Advanced and Consultant Level Framework Appraisals.
Lessons in Achieving Evidence-based Teaching Practice
. Improving Learning and Teaching with Learning Analytics: What do teachers want? Professor Deborah West Director Learning and Teaching, Charles Darwin.
CoESP launch, Guelph University, 2016
Training for Master Trainers: Learning Engagement & Motivation
Inquiry-based learning and the discipline-based inquiry
Constructive alignment – the foundation for good assessment
Understanding Levels of Thinking using:
The TEAP Portfolio Award and the EAP Teacher Competencies
5E Inquiry learning cycle
Investigating science
Welcome to the overview session for the Iowa Core Curriculum
Pointless CPD? Capability, Competence & Reflection.
Gina Wisker University of Brighton
Planning a cross- curricular topic
PRINCIPLES OF GOOD PRACTICE IN SoTL
Presentation transcript:

Engaging in Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Charles Darwin University Institute for Teaching and Learning Keith Trigwell

Source 2 Presentation based on Chapter 15: Scholarship of teaching and learning 2012, ACER press

Purposes of SoTL 3 A way to raise the status of teaching A means through which teachers may come to teach more knowledgeably A means through which the quality of teaching may be assessed A way to enhance students’ experience of learning

Who is doing it? Scholarship of Teaching and Learning itemDisagreeAgree d/k I often ask other teachers to comment on my teaching ideas. I often investigate questions related to how students learn in my discipline. Improving my teaching is more effective if reviewed by my colleagues. I can explain what concepts, models or theories underpin my teaching in this subject. 4    

What is scholarship of teaching/learning? 5 Read Case 1 on your handout. Decide whether you think this is an example of SoTL or not. If you think it IS, hold up your handout, with YES facing me. If you think it is NOT, hold up NO facing me. What is the purpose of SoTL?

Boyer’s overlapping scholarships 6 Teaching Discovery Integration Application

What is Scholarship? 7 To be scholarly is to be engaged in personal, but rigorous intellectual inquiry/investigation and development involving values such as honesty, integrity, open-mindedness, scepticism and intellectual humility. To be engaged in scholarship is to take that process, for scrutiny, into the public arena. It is to make transparent the processes and outcomes of scholarly activities.

What is scholarship of teaching/learning 8 SoTL If teaching is about making learning possible … … then the scholarship of teaching is about making transparent how learning is being made possible. If teaching is about collaborative meaning-making … … then the scholarship of teaching is about making transparent how collaborative meaning-making is happening.

Levels of investigation: Level 3 9 Adapted LevelPurpose of investigation Evidence gathering processes will be Investigation results in 1 To inform oneself Verified by selfPersonal knowledge 2To inform a group within a shared context Verified by those within the same context Local knowledge 3To inform a wider audience Verified by those outside of that context Public knowledge

SoTL procedures 10 Six Steps (order of 1-3 may change) 1. Use a theory, model, framework or a substantial teaching tip to ground the initiative and provide the justification for action 2. Identify an intervention, or a current practice, or a collection of information that might lead to enhanced learning (preferably linked to the theory) 3. Formulate an investigative question related to teaching and/or student learning in the chosen context

11 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE STUDENT (previous experiences, current understanding, aptitudes and abilities, UAI, etc) COURSE AND DEPARTMENTAL LEARNING CONTEXT (course design, teaching methods, assessment, learning environment) STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF CONTEXT (quality of teaching, clarity of goals, appropriateness of assessment) STUDENTS’ APPROACHES TO LEARNING (how they learn; surface, deep) STUDENTS’ LEARNING OUTCOMES (what they learn: quality/quantity) PRESAGEPROCESSPRODUCT Adapted from Trigwell, K. & Prosser M. (1996). Towards an understanding of individual acts of teaching. HERD. 3P MODEL

12 Intended Learning Outcomes Teaching and Learning Activities Assessment Tasks CONSTRUCTIVE ALIGNMENT To perform an examination skill on a patient Observation of a doctor, then practise skill at the bedside with real-time feedback Perform skill on a role model in an observed assessment

Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes (SOLO) taxonomy 13 Biggs & Tang (2007) Not relevant Identify Do simple procedure Enumerate Describe List Combine Compare/ Contrast Explain causes Analyse Apply Theorise Generalise Hypothesise Reflect Prestructural Unistructural Multistructural Relational Extended abstract Levels of understanding

SoTL procedures 14 Steps (order of 1-3 may change) 1. Use a theory, model, framework or a substantial teaching tip to ground the initiative and provide the justification for action 2. Identify an intervention, or a current practice, or a collection of information that might lead to enhanced learning (preferably linked to the theory) 3. Formulate an investigative question related to teaching and/or student learning in the chosen context 4. Conduct an investigation (empirical, theoretical or literature-based) which addresses the question [with appropriate method] 5. Produce a result and some form of public artefact 6. Invite peer review on the clarity of each of the theory, practice, question, method and result steps of the procedure. Trigwell, 2012, p.255

What is scholarship of teaching/learning 15 Read Case 3 on your handout. Decide whether you think this is an example of SoTL or not. If you think it IS, hold up your handout, with YES facing me. If you think it is NOT, hold up NO facing me.

Who should be engaged with SoTL? 16 LevelPurposesVerified by Knowledge SoTL Who should do it? 0% 100% 1 Inform self Self No 2 Inform local Local peers LocalYes 3Inform the world Internat. peers Inter- national Yes (o/l) ?

Why level 2? Scholarship of Teaching and Learning itemDisagreeAgreeScale I often ask other teachers to comment on my teaching ideas. I often investigate questions related to how students learn in my discipline. Improving my teaching is more effective if reviewed by my colleagues. I can explain what concepts, models or theories underpin my teaching in this subject. 17  Public    Inquire Review Theory

Why level 2? 18 VariableTheoryPublicInquireReview CCSF ITTF Theory Public Inquire.30* -.27* -.42** *** -.43** ***.56*** -.43** -.36**.34*.23.36** Pearson Correlation co-efficients for Approaches to Teaching and Scholarship of Teaching N = 56, *p<.05; **p<.01; ***p<.001 CCSF = Conceptual Change/Student-focused approach to teaching ITTF = Information Transfer/Teacher-focused approach to teaching

Engaging in SoTL 19 Preparing the ground for SoTL might involve: ›find out who in your department is already engaged in SoTL ›contact your academic development unit (OLT) to see what they do ›establish or join a network of university teachers with whom you can share your thoughts on teaching ›become familiar with learning theories and teaching ideas and frameworks (see Chapters 1 and 2, of Hunt & Chalmers, 2012) ›attend research conferences that include teaching and learning in your discipline, and conferences about teaching and learning ›find out what sorts of SoTL investigations are acceptable.

Engaging in SoTL ›List the questions related to your teaching or your students’ learning that you would like to know more about ›Search the literature for answers to those questions. If not answered … A very useful starting resource is : ›A Tertiary Practitioner’s Guide to Collecting Evidence of Learner Benefit ›(Alkema 2011) – see references on handout for this web-link › practitioners-guide-to-collecting-evidence-of-learner-benefit.pdfhttp://akoaotearoa.ac.nz/download/ng/file/group-4/a-tertiary- practitioners-guide-to-collecting-evidence-of-learner-benefit.pdf ›Be clear about your purpose (level 2 or levels 2 and 3) 20 Getting started

Engaging in SoTL Evidence-based educational evaluation (General): (for example, Guba & Lincoln, 1985) Contextualised information can also be found in standard university teaching development texts: (for example Ramsden, 2003, Learning to Teach in Higher Education) Short, practical guides: (for example Knight, 2002, Small Scale Research: Pragmatic inquiry in social science and the caring professions) 21 Evaluation as SoTL

Level 3 SoTL 22 Scholarship of: Teaching Discovery Level 3 Investigation Levels 1 & 2 Investigation

Engaging in SoTL A practical approach to a successful outcome is to be a part of a team of investigators that includes someone familiar with social science research. They can provide : - guidance on methodology and analytical techniques, - interpretation of research texts, e.g. Cohen et al. (2007) and Tight (2003). 23 Level 3 engagement

Engaging in SoTL Align investigation background, question, & method Read related applications Complete a thorough search for what has already been researched Ensure that anticipated results are likely to be new knowledge Allow time to prepare the application/proposal Involve peers at all stages 24 Level 3 engagement: All good research practices apply

25 Engaging in SoTL is most likely to be a rewarding experience if it is seen as an integral part of teaching, and engaged in, with others, as questions about teaching arise during practice

The end 26