Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk – 10.11.11.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

BEING AN ETHICAL INSTRUCTIONAL LEADER SHIRLEY JOHNSON & KEISHA D. SMITH BASED ON THE WORKSHOP FROM AEA 2012 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE.
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
Scaling-Up Early Childhood Intervention Literacy Learning Practices Maurice McInerney, Ph.D. American Institutes for Research Presentation prepared for.
How to commence the IT Modernization Process?
Twelve Cs for Team Building
Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
Purpose of Instruction
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
System Improvement PARCC Washington DC June, 2011 Ben Levin, OISE- University of Toronto.
Academic Alignment CROSBY TURNAROUND COMMITTEE
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
Sustaining Community Based Programs CYFAR Conference Boston, 2005.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Student Assessment Inventory for School Districts Inventory Planning Training.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
COLLEGE-READY LEARNER CRITICAL THINKER ADAPTABLE & PRODUCTIVE LEADERRESPONSIBLE DECISION MAKER SKILLED COMMUNICATOR HISD.
Continuing QIAT Conversations Planning For Success Joan Breslin Larson Third webinar in a series of three follow up webinars for.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Program Evaluation Tool Overview Library Media Leadership Council / Instructional Technology Leaders October 2, 2014.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person of the following resources found on any OIP Stage 0 Module.
Missouri Integrated Model Mid-Year Meeting – January 14, 2009 Topical Discussion: Teams and Teaming Dr. Doug HatridgeDonna Alexander School Resource SpecialistReading.
[TABLE OF CONTENTS] [COMBINED AGENDAS BY TOPIC] Planning for ChangeTABLE OF CONTENTSCOMBINED AGENDAS BY TOPIC Mark Kaufman The Regional Alliance for Math.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Measuring and Improving Practice and Results Practice and Results 2006 CSR Baseline Results Measuring and Improving Practice and Results Practice and Results.
Timberlane Regional School District
Coaching for Competence Margie McGlinchey SPDG Regional Mtg. October 1, 2009 Steve Goodman Margie McGlinchey Kathryn Schallmo Co-Directors.
The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Scaling-Up Within a Statewide Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) SPDG National Meeting miblsi.cenmi.org.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Lessons Learned about Going to Scale with Effective Professional Development Iris R. Weiss Horizon Research, Inc. February 2011.
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
FINAL PRESENTATION OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOUR AND ANALYSIS Prepared for : Dr. S. Kumar Group : Dollar 2 A. R. S. BANDARA - PGIA / 06 / 6317 B. A. G. K.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
A HANDBOOK FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES AT WORK CHAPTERS 1-3 Learning by Doing.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Min.cenmi.org Michigan Implementation Network Michigan Implementation Network 15 WAYS TO IMPROVE YOUR INNOVATION.
Prepared by the Justice Research and Statistics Association SUSTAINING EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICES.
Prepared by: Forging a Comprehensive Initiative to Improve Birth Outcomes and Reduce Infant Mortality in [State] Adapted from AMCHP Birth Outcomes Compendium.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Stage 3 Plan: Develop School Improvement Plan.
Office of Service Quality
Office of Service Quality
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
AVID Leading College & Career Readiness Districtwide - Transforming Student Outcomes AVID's mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
Phase-1: Prepare for the Change Why stepping back and preparing for the change is so important to successful adoption: Uniform and effective change adoption.
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
By Pam Rumage and Carmen Carr White Station Middle School
February 21-22, 2018.
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Presentation transcript:

Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk –

 How will we create the organizational vision and purpose to ensure that it is shared by all stakeholders?  How will we ensure a structured and collaborative process to identify and articulate the needs that, when addressed, will allow us to reach our vision and achieve our purpose?

 How will we communicate the need so all stakeholders clearly understand and own it?  How will we communicate the plan/solution so that everyone understands their role in implementing the solution? ◦ How will be ensure a consistent message? ◦ What context will amplify the message? ◦ What timing would amplify the message?

 What is the process to identify and articulate the need? ◦ Who will participate in the selection process? ◦ What data will be used to determine the need? ◦ How will we insure that the “right” people own the need? ◦ If there is turnover, how will we re-establish the need with new implementers?  What process will we use to select the solution/project/strategy? ◦ Who will participate in the selection process? ◦ What research will be used to identify the solution?

 How do we help people get ready to adopt the process? ◦ How will we build consensus? ◦ How will we build shared purpose? ◦ How will be build ownership?  How do we help people get ready to implement the process? ◦ How will we ensure that those implementing the process have the competencies needed to implement with fidelity? ◦ How will we ensure that leadership understands the process to the extent necessary to support it? ◦ How will we ensure that all systems are in place to support implementation?

 How will we ensure that stakeholders understand the critical features /non- negotiables (the “looks like, sounds like”) of implementation?  How will we ensure that stakeholders are prepared to implement the non-negotiables?

 How can we make implementation and outcomes understandable for all stakeholders, including their role in implementation?

 How will we first implement the strategy on a manageable level?  How will we scale the strategy to a larger audience? ◦ How will the initiative change due to expansion? ◦ How will you support a scaled version of the initiative? ◦ What roles and functions need to change to scale the initiative?

 How will we prepare for and manage/leverage the reactions to the change needed to implement the strategy? ◦ How will we understand the impact the change will have? ◦ What will we do to address the elements of change so that implementation will be successful? ◦ How will we respond when we don’t get the results we wanted? How will we analyze and identify the factors that may have contributed to the results?

 How will we build capacity to implement the strategy? ◦ How will we ensure sufficient planned professional learning for all stakeholders involved in implementation? ◦ How will we ensure that the professional learning is aligned with the professional learning standards? Has clear goals and outcomes? Aligns with the needs of the initiative? ◦ How will we implement a coaching process that is aligned with training outcomes and initiative standards? How will we provide opportunities for stakeholders to improve their performance? ◦ How will we embed “looks and sounds like” performance standards related to implementation fidelity within the staff evaluation system?

 How will we ensure that systems are in place to support the necessary changes in roles and functions? ◦ How will we understand the initiative sufficiently to anticipate the necessary role and function changes within the system? ◦ How will we align staff and their skills with the competencies needed for accuracy and fluency of implementation? ◦ How will we identify and align/develop/change systems to support the accuracy and fluency of the initiative? ◦ How will we build leadership that is committed to actively supporting the initiative?

 How will we measure adult implementation and student impact? ◦ What are the clearly-defined indicators of success? At what level are these indicators in place? ◦ What systems are in place to assure data-driven improvement? What systems are in place to collect and analyze data needed to ensure implementation fidelity? ◦ How are we ensuring staff competency in effectively using data to problem solve?

 What feedback and support loops are in place to address the following: ◦ Status/stage of initiative implementation? ◦ Competencies needed for implementation fidelity? ◦ Leadership support necessary for initiative sustainability? ◦ Systems necessary to support initiative implementation? ◦ Continuous improvement cycles to eliminate barriers and optimize systems to improve implementation

 What are the district and building needs and priorities?  How will we ensure that district and building initiatives are aligned with needs and priorities?  How will we ensure that the work of district and building leadership aligns with needs and priorities?  How will we build capacity and alignment across needs and priorities? How might initiatives address multiple needs and priorities?

 How will we build capacity and increase alignment between initiatives? ◦ How will we reduce competition between initiatives? ◦ How could common functions be leveraged to support the implementation fidelity of multiple initiatives? ◦ How will we ensure that innitiatives across grade levels support student capacity to ensure coherence of curriculum, instruction, and assessment? ◦ How can we ensure that school improvement efforts support the integration of initiatives?

 How will we develop, support, and activate the leadership characteristics necessary to support implementation in an environment of change? ◦ Technical leadership - Does the leadership have the skills to support and evaluate technical implementation of the chosen strategy/activity? ◦ Adaptive leadership – Does the leadership have skills such as conflict management, collaboration, and servant leadership to evaluate and address issues beyond technical implementation? (E.g. cultural issues) and to devise solutions beyond technical solutions?  How will we develop distributed and shared leadership?