Www.straughanenvironmental.com creating a sustainable world The Chesapeake Bay TMDL A Policy Model for Nutrient Pollution Reductions James Noonan October.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dorchester County Government Officials Presentation Watershed Implementation Planning Phase II Status Mike Moulds, Local Team Coordinator October 4, 2011.
Advertisements

RTI International RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. Economic Study of Nutrient Credit Trading for the Chesapeake.
RTI International RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. Tradeoffs in Achieving TMDLs – Ecosystem Services and Cultural.
Howard County, MD Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan October 6, 2011 Howard Saltzman Howard County Department of Public Works.
Commonwealth of Virginia Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Russ Baxter, Chesapeake Bay Coordinator.
Title Text for Slide “ The region’s environmental and economic health will improve when we fully implement the Blueprint. The cleanup plan was designed.
Santa Ana Region Stormwater Permit TMDL Requirements and Costs
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
Chesapeake Bay and New York State Water Quality and the Potential for Future Regulations Presented by the Upper Susquehanna Coalition.
Mark Dubin Agricultural Technical Coordinator University of Maryland Extension-College Park Modeling Quarterly Review Meeting April 17, 2012.
Update on the District of Columbia’s Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) for the Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) November 18, 2010.
Point Source POLLUTION: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Katherine Antos Chesapeake Bay Program Office Jenny Molloy Water Protection Division DC Draft Phase II WIP.
Status Report: Chesapeake Bay TMDL Clean Up Plan Presented to P otomac Roundtable by Jack E. Frye April 9, 2010.
Progress Update: Evaluation of Federal Facilities in WIPs and Milestones CBPO Management Board March 6, Jim Edward, EPA Greg Allen, EPA.
1 “ Understanding the Local Role of Improving Water Quality” Virginia Association of Counties November 14, 2011 Virginia Association of Counties November.
DC Draft Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan Stakeholder Meeting March 1, 2012 Metropolitan Washington Council Of Governments Hamid Karimi Deputy Director.
Update on the Development of EPA’s Chesapeake Bay TMDL and Virginia’s Watershed Implementation Plan Russ Perkinson Potomac Roundtable October 8, 2010.
Virginia Assessment Scenario Tool VAST Developed by: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin.
1 Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board Meeting March 6, 2012 Discussion for the Final Evaluation of Milestones.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Jim Edward EPA Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office DDOE Meeting with Federal Partners February.
Urban BMP Incentive Study (HJR 107) And Other Interesting Legislative Items Delegate David Bulova August 10, 2007.
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
1 Questions Addressed What are the options for reducing pollutant inputs to Lake Tahoe? Pollutant Reduction Opportunities.
What is the Chesapeake Bay TMDL? Total Maximum Daily Load –Amount of pollutants that a water body can receive and still support designated uses Drinking,
Chesapeake Bay TMDL & Watershed Implementation Plans The Role of Local Governments Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA Presentation.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Suzanne Trevena EPA Water Protection Division Chair Milestone Workgroup December 4,
Status Report on Chesapeake Bay Clean Up Plan Wastewater Sector June 2, 2010.
Chesapeake Bay Policy in Virginia - TMDL, Milestones and the Watershed Agreement Russ Baxter Deputy Secretary of Natural Resources for the Chesapeake Bay.
2004 Tributary Strategies: Assessment of Implementation Options Steve Bieber Water Resources Program Presented at: COG Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee.
John Kennedy VA DEQ - Ches. Bay Program Mgr Tributary Strategies: Point Source Nutrient Controls Potomac Watershed.
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Basinwide BMP Verification Framework: Building Confidence in Delivering on Pollution Reductions to Local Waters Maryland.
KWWOA Annual Conference April 2014 Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Paulette Akers Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY.
VACo Environment and Agriculture Steering Committee VML Environmental Policy Committee June 2, 2010 Charlottesville, VA Chesapeake Bay Watershed Roanoke.
Preserving York County 2010 Municipal Educational Series January 28, 2010 Rick Keister, Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay Jake Romig, York County Circuit.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL and What It Means for You Katherine Antos, Coordinator Water Quality Team U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Virginia Municipal.
Maryland Association of Counties Conference August 12, 2009 Bob Koroncai USEPA Region III The Chesapeake Bay TMDL.
Is the Mid-Atlantic Region Water Rich? Presentation to 5 th Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable November 7, 2008 Joseph Hoffman, Executive Director.
Caroline County Pilot Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Katheleen Freeman, AICP, Director Caroline County Department of Planning & Codes Leslie Grunden,
Chesapeake Bay Watershed Implementation Plans: Why, What, and When Katherine Antos U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office MACo Winter Conference January.
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.
JULIE MAWHORTER MID-ATLANTIC URBAN & COMMUNITY FORESTRY COORDINATOR CHESAPEAKE TREE CANOPY STRATEGY & WORKPLAN UPDATE CITIZEN’S ADVISORY.
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SPRING MEETING MARCH 1—2, 2012 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA EPA’s Evaluation of Bay Jurisdictions’ Draft Phase II WIPs & Final
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Meeting March 17, 2011 Virginia Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Approach.
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Workgroup March 17, 2011.
Nutrients and the Next Generation of Conservation Presented by: Tom Porta, P.E. Deputy Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection President,
Williamsburg’s Local Strategies to meet the ChesBay TMDL March 2012 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Virginia Maryland Pennsylvania New York Delaware West Virginia.
1 Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan – Phase II James Davis-Martin, Chesapeake Bay TMDL Coordinator Citizens Advisory Committee to the Chesapeake.
The Chesapeake Bay: How is it Doing? An Overview of The Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Improving Local Water Quality in Pennsylvania and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay.
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
It’s The Final Countdown To The Mid-point Assessment:
WIP Regional Meetings Jason Keppler
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
Watershed Implementation Plan
River Flow into Chesapeake Bay
U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office June 1, 2012
Anne Arundel County Maryland
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
Maryland’s Phase III WIP Planning for 2025 and beyond
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
Maryland’s Draft Phase III WIP for the Chesapeake Bay
2018 BMP Verification Assessment
VIRGINIA’S Phase iii watershed implementation plan
Presentation transcript:

creating a sustainable world The Chesapeake Bay TMDL A Policy Model for Nutrient Pollution Reductions James Noonan October 15, 2012 MACO Administrators Meeting

creating a sustainable world MDEs Draft Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan Development Process Revised Waste Load Reductions allocated geographically and by source sector –waste water treatment plants (point sources), –agricultural sources, –stormwater and –septic systems The Phase II WIP Process

creating a sustainable world After 25 years of Voluntary Agreements –Anoxic Zone Continues to Enlarge –Living Resources Continue to Decline Statement of the Problem

creating a sustainable world Dissolved Oxygen

creating a sustainable world Watershed Nitrogen Sources Source:

creating a sustainable world Watershed Phosphorus Sources Source:

creating a sustainable world Source: / Watershed Sediment Sources

creating a sustainable world TMDL sets Bay watershed limits on an annual basis at –185.9 million pounds of nitrogen (25 percent reduction) –12.5 million pounds of phosphorus (24 percent reduction) and –6.45 billion pounds of sediment (20 percent reduction) Aggressive Milestones –60% Reduction by 2017 –100% Reduction by 2025 Chesapeake Bay TMDL

creating a sustainable world Pollution Reductions allocated –By Jurisdiction Maryland, Virginia, Delaware, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, New York, the District of Columbia –By Major River Basin Chesapeake Bay TMDL

creating a sustainable world Phase I Plans Developed by States in Fall of 2010 used to inform the final TMDL December 29, 2010 EPA established the Final TMDL Draft Phase I Watershed Implementation Plans

creating a sustainable world States demonstrate: –How the reductions will be achieved; i.e., which sectors; municipal and industrial wastewater treatment plants, septic systems, urban stormwater, and agricultural discharges will provide the nutrient and sediment load reductions necessary to achieve the waste load allocations of the Bay TMDL. –Address existing as well as any future nutrient and sediment sources associated with planned future development. Phase I Watershed Implementation Plans

creating a sustainable world Sediment August 23, 2011

creating a sustainable world Sediment September 13, 2011, four days after Tropical Storm Lee

creating a sustainable world For point source, stormwater, and septic components of the plan MDE organized local teams that developed: –What can be implemented to achieve the targeted reductions –How the implementation actions will be achieved (new local ordinances and revenue sources) –Two-year milestones that reflect near-term implementation actions and steps to be taken between July 1, 2011 and June 30, 2013 Phase II WIP Process in Maryland

creating a sustainable world For Agriculture MDE formed agricultural work groups, organized for each soil conservation district Where local team strategies were not submitted, or fell short of the Final Target, the State supplemented the plans. Phase II WIP Process

creating a sustainable world To achieve the 2017 Interim Reductions –Point Source Sector - Major (>.5MGD) wastewater treatment plant upgrades to ENR –Agriculture Sector – Significant reduction from cropland, some reduction from AFOs, nurseries and pasture land –Stormwater Sector – Significant reduction from MS4 permittees retrofitting developed land with stormwater BMPs, also controlling fertilizer application and requiring forested stream buffers –Septic Sector - 60% in Critical Area upgrade or connection to an advanced waste water treatment plant. Phase II WIP Strategies

creating a sustainable world Private Industry has been working with Local Government providing environmental, civil, structural and mechanical engineering design services to implement ENR at major wastewater treatment plants. Strategies and Tools Point Sources Source: DC Water

creating a sustainable world Private Industry has been working with Local Government providing environmental planning, civil engineering design and construction services to: Strategies and Tools Stormwater MS4 –Conduct watershed assessments. –Use GIS to calculate treated and untreated impervious cover, identify where retrofit BMPs/ESD are needed and where they can be installed.

creating a sustainable world Private Industry has been working with Local Government providing environmental planning, civil engineering design and construction services to: Strategies and Tools Stormwater MS4 –Use software based models to calculate runoff volumes and estimate BMPs/ESD sizes. –Use software based models to evaluate treatment scenarios and perform cost benefit analysis

creating a sustainable world Private Industry has been working with Local Government providing environmental planning, civil engineering design and construction services to: Strategies and Tools Stormwater MS4 –Use software design tools to design BMPs/ ESD stormwater retrofits stream restoration –Construct BMPs/ESD stormwater retrofits and stream restoration –Monitor retrofit performance

creating a sustainable world Private Industry has been working with Local Government providing environmental planning, civil engineering design and construction services to: Strategies and Tools Stormwater MS4

creating a sustainable world Private Industry can support farmers providing environmental planning, civil engineering design and construction services for implementation of –Animal waste management systems –Runoff control –Riparian buffer design and implementation Strategies and Tools Agriculture

creating a sustainable world Private Industry has been working with Local Government providing environmental planning, civil engineering design and construction services to: Strategies and Tools Critical Area Septic Systems –Determine feasibility and cost of small flow, community based wastewater treatment –Design collection and treatment facilities –Install replacement septic systems that improve nitrogen removal

creating a sustainable world Chesapeake Bay Watershed one of several across the U.S. that have multiple impairments. The Great Lakes, Gulf of Mexico, San Francisco Bay, and many others. Watershed based approach, addressing all source sectors. Watershed Based Approach

creating a sustainable world Take a holistic approach to the issue –Understand all of the changes made to State law and regulations and incorporate the impacts of those programs into your reporting Changes to Septic system regulations Focused Growth –Use GIS tools to think about nutrient reductions from a watershed based perspective Locate opportunities for off site nutrient reductions Prioritize improvements to targeted watersheds How can Local Governments Meet WIP goals without breaking their budgets??

creating a sustainable world Make reduction strategies Standard Practice –Incorporate ESD and low impact strategies into all construction programs –Incorporate funding for those strategies into budgets for capital projects Examine the full range of strategies available to determine which mix of approaches maximize reductions more efficiently How can Local Governments Meet WIP goals without breaking their budgets??

creating a sustainable world Questions?