1 Kentucky Preschool Program Review (P2R) An Introduction.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Desired Results for Children and Families Program Self-Evaluation

Advertisements

Mano a Mano 3 Phase II Internet Course Week 5 - Topic III Early Childhood Program Structure Drs. Ellen Marshall and Cathy McAuliffe.

[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.

St. Louis Public Schools Curriculum Management Audit Speaker Dr. James Scott Lead Auditor for the St. Louis Public Schools Curriculum Management Audit.

Copyright © 2010 California Department of Education, Child Development Division with WestEd Center for Child and Family Studies, Desired Results T&TA Project.

Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results.

Gold Sneaker Initiative Introduction. Introductions Please state your 1.Name 2.Where you live and work 3.Which age group of children have the most energy?

Session Objectives Begin to understand the goals, purpose and rationale for Program Reviews Learn about the components of implementing Program Reviews.

Massachusetts Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) Overview of revised standards and initial pilot design.

1 Alignment of Inclusive Pre-School Learning Environments and Quality Rating Improvement System 391 Grant Funding Board Presentation April 10, 2012.

Introduction to the Environment Rating Scales

Center for Secondary Education for Students with Autism (CSESA)

MSCG Training for Project Officers and Consultants: Project Officer and Consultant Roles in Supporting Successful Onsite Technical Assistance Visits.

Overview of the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System KY Council of Administrators of Special Education Summer Conference July 9th, 2013.

October 2012 National Quality Framework Assessment & rating overview and authorised officer training Podcast Series: 4.

Visit Our Website at earlychildhoodohio.org Ohio’s Early Childhood Comprehensive Assessment System 1.

12/1/14 Child Count Collection Due December 15, /30/15 Exiting Collection Due July 15, 2015 Lucinda Morabito, Data and Reporting Coordinator Vermont.

North Carolina Educator Effectiveness System Training.

EXTENDED SCHOOL SERVICES (ESS)-Coordinator’s Meeting April Pieper Sharon Johnston

From QA to QI: The Kentucky Journey. In the beginning, we were alone and compliance reigned.

Teacher Evaluation Model

Stanislaus County CARES Plus Information Session.

1 Kentucky Preschool Program Review (P2R). Program Review: Compliance Review of the Preschool Program is required by the preschool regulations (704 KAR.

Bill Buchanan Ready Kids Conference Louisville June 2014 Count Down to New Eligibility Requirement for Kindergarten.

 Children Center’s mission statement  History of the Children’s Center  Strengths and Weaknesses  Funding for the Children’s Center  Nutrition, Food.

Proposed Childcare Licensing Regulations District of Columbia Office of the State Superintendent of Education Division of Early Learning September 2014.

WE’RE ACCREDITED….NOW WHAT? MAINTAINING ACCREDITATION AND SUSTAINING QUALITY Presented by: Julie Leslie & Kim St. Marie.

2012 Implementation It’s finally here! Goals Goal: to implement QUALITYstarsNY in high needs communities in NYS – State Education Department (SED) funding.

2012 Implementation: A QUALITYstarsNY Recruitment Session.

Environment Rating Scale Professional Development Seminars SACERS: School-Age Care Environment Rating Scale (Used with permission of the authors and the.

The Evaluation of Quality of NJ’s Preschool Classrooms 2014 NJ Division of Early Childhood Education.

First, a little background…  The FIT Program is the lead agency for early intervention services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.

Kentucky’s Common Kindergarten Entry Screen

1 QUALITYstarsNY Field Test Community Information Session 2010 WELCOME!

Public School-Operated UPK Information Session. Goals Increase your understanding of QUALITYstarsNY Answer your questions and concerns about participating.

CNA REGIONAL EDUCATIONAL LAB ~ APPALACHIA The Effects of Kentucky Virtual High School’s Hybrid Course in Algebra I on Teaching Practices, Classroom Quality,

Foundations of Environment Rating Scales Presented By: 1.

CDA Child Development Associate. What Is a CDA? Child Development Associate – Demonstrated the ability to meet the specific needs of children, work with.

Standards, Assessment and Accountability: Administration of Environmental Rating Scales by EEC Regional Staff Board of Early Education and Care December.

Early Reading First. The ultimate goal of Early Reading First is to close the achievement gap by preventing reading difficulties.

1 DRAFT Monitoring/Evaluation Overview September 20, 2010 Title III Director’s Fall Meeting.

Focused Monitoring November 10, 2010 Bureau of Special Education 1.

MATCHING SUPPORT TO PROMOTE POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG CHILDREN Jennifer Ross, M.Ed. ECE Training Solutions

EEC Board Preliminary Recommendations Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) Provisional Standards Study.

Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.

1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.

Understanding Quality in Early Childhood Education and Care Programs in Massachusetts Findings from the Preschool Program Quality Study and Highlights.

A District Coordinator’s Guide WHAT TO EXPECT DURING CONSOLIDATED MONITORING David Millanti Audit and Compliance Branch Manager Kentucky Department of.

On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.

Understanding the EHS Management System Development Process David Downs President EHS Management Partners,Inc.

Copyright © 2014 California Department of Education – All rights reserved Desired Results 1 Session V: Environment Rating Scales.

1 Monitoring/Evaluation Program Overview December 3, 2008 Title III Director’s Meeting.

Section 1. Introduction Orientation to Virginia’s QRIS.

CASE KDE UPDATE Division of Learning Services March 11, 2011.

Foundations of Environment Rating Scales Presented By: 1.

1 PACTS-Self Evaluation November 1, 2006 Video Conference Elaine Zabor Consultant Office of Federal Programs.

Accident Investigation SGRP CD Slide # Meeting 1 Northern Ontario Safety Group.

NYSED Policy Update Pat Geary Statewide RSE-TASC Meeting May 2013.

School Readiness Components of a Mixed- delivery System Blended Classrooms Braided Funds Community Partners.

Scoring the Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale -3 (ECERS-3)

Session V: Environment Rating Scales

Session V: Environment Rating Scales

2018 Safety Group 1 – 5 Year Program Timeline Guide

2017 Safety Group 1 – 5 Year Program Timeline Guide

2019 Safety Group 1 – 5 Year Program Timeline Guide

SECN – Transition Role Group Meeting

2016 Safety Group 1 – 5 Year Program Timeline Guide

2012 Safety Group 1 – 5 Year Program Timeline Guide

Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013

Session V: Environment Rating Scales

Presentation transcript:

1 Kentucky Preschool Program Review (P2R) An Introduction

Program Review: Compliance Review of the Preschool Program is required by the preschool regulations (704 KAR 3:410 Section 9) “A local school district preschool program shall be subject to evaluation by the Department of Education to determine the effectiveness of the statewide preschool program”

Preschool Program Review (P2R) Purpose  Regulation compliance  High quality classrooms Process  Online Preschool Program Review Report (P2R2); KDE onsite visit and/or desk audit  Classroom observations using ECERS-R

The Preschool Program Review (P2R) Document a glimpse

Preschool Program Review At A Glance Staff attends ECERS-R training District Raters achieve interrater reliability Conduct baseline observations (optional) Staff attends ECERS-R training District Raters achieve interrater reliability Conduct baseline observations (optional)

Preschool Program Review At A Glance District evaluates all classrooms using the ECERS- R (using interrater reliable ECERS-R observers)

Preschool Program Review At A Glance RTCs conduct ECERS-R on 30% of classrooms (random sample) during the cohort year with one observation per site District completes on-line Preschool Program Review Report (P2R) (self-assessment tool for the preschool regs on FileMaker Pro)

Preschool Program Review At A Glance KDE reviews Preschool Program Review (P2R) Report and other documents KDE assigns district site visits Note: Not all districts will receive onsite visit KDE reviews Preschool Program Review (P2R) Report and other documents KDE assigns district site visits Note: Not all districts will receive onsite visit

KDE provides district with commendations, recommendations and findings based on review District completes Action Plan addressing any findings. Note: Districts may write action plans as they complete the P2R doc. District completes Action Plan addressing any findings. Note: Districts may write action plans as they complete the P2R doc. Preschool Program Review At A Glance

3 3 Why is KDE using the ECERS-R It is an indicator of High Quality Programs “Provides a safe and nurturing environment that promotes the physical, social, emotional, aesthetic, intellectual, and language development of each child while being sensitive to the needs and preferences of families.” NAEYC (1996) Environment is more than furniture and materials – includes interactions and activities!

3 3 ECERS-R Process Quality Environment Activities Schedule Interactions Process Quality Environment Activities Schedule Interactions Needs of Children Health & safety Build relationships Stimulation & experiential learning Needs of Children Health & safety Build relationships Stimulation & experiential learning Comprehensive, observation-based instrument

3. Furnishings for relaxation and comfort Inadequate 12 Minimal 34 Good 56 Excellent No soft furnishings to children 3.1 Some soft furnishings accessible to children 5.1 Cozy areas accessible to children for a substantial portion of the day 7.1Soft furnishings in addition to cozy area accessible to children 1.2 No soft toys accessible to children 3.2 Some soft toys accessible to children 5.2 Cozy area is not used for active physical play 7.2Many clean, soft toys accessible to children 5.3 Most soft furnishings are clean and in good repair You EARN Yes’s

Key Things to Remember  Not a test  Picture of “real life” for children in your classroom  Can’t “fix” everything  ECERS-R is a tool to identify areas for improvement  KDE goal is “5”  Doesn’t mean you will start there  Some classrooms will get there, others won’t 8 8

Preschool Program Review (P2R) Process  The state goal is a 5.0 average on the ECERS-R. Remember this is a goal.

Cohort 1 ( ) # classes# sites# visits Ashland512 Boyd1334 Breathitt1144 Greenup544

P2R Timeline Apr-June Aug - Oct Jan-FebSpring Initial training District Inter-rater reliability by Oct 1 District conducts ECERS Observations (all classrooms) District completes Online P2R and gathers documents RTC conducts ECERS Observations (30% of classrooms at all sites)

P2R Timeline May Summer Aug - Nov Dec KDE Internal review of P2R Report. P2R Desk Reviews released to the districts Summer District completes Action Plan KDE Desk review of P2R districts Cohort III KDE Site Visits and Consolidated Monitoring site visits (Jan 15- May 15

Contact information: Annie Rooney French Or the preschool consultants with the Kentucky Department of Education Or your local Regional Training Center

Questions?