Some Findings from the AISL Program’s Online Project Monitoring System for Projects Funded Between FY 2006 and FY 2012 Gary Silverstein Westat August 21,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Study of State and Local Implementation and Impact The Study of State and Local Implementation and Impact of the Individuals with Disabilities Education.
Advertisements

Using Communications for Development 19 May 2006.
Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
Web Design Issues in a Business Establishment Panel Survey Third International Conference on Establishment Surveys (ICES-III) June 18-21, 2007 Montréal,
Designing and Building a Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation System: A Tool for Public Sector Management.
1 LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION Technology Initiative Grant Program Developing and Submitting TIG Project Evaluation Plans Bristow Hardin, LSC,
Nicholas Monterosso, CIRS Homeless Outreach Program Leader, On the Go! John Azoni, CIRS Homeless Outreach Associate, On the Go! On the.
HIV/AIDS Results Monitoring and Evaluation Systems Measuring the Multi-Sector Response.
Figure 1. There Are 13.3 Million Uninsured Young Adults Ages 19–29, 30 Percent of the Nonelderly Uninsured, 2005 Source: Analysis of the March 2006 Current.
Template: Making Effective Presentation about Your Evidence-based Health Promotion Program This template is intended for you to adapt to your own program.
1 National Collaborative on Workforce and Disability for Youth Competencies for Working with Youth: Identify, Assess, and Build Them!
February 16, 2014Ministry of Regional Development - 2 Mid-term assessment of information and publicity measures Commission Regulation (EC) No 1828/2006.
WHO training courses on family violence prevention | February 21, 2014 February 21, |1 | Strengthening capacity for the prevention of family violence.
Copyright © 2012 California Department of Education, Child Development Division with WestEd Center for Child & Family Studies, Desired Results T&TA Project.
National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies 1 Phase II: Educating the 2020 Engineer Phase II: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century...
Virginia - March 2014 (Content adapted from 2014 MSRRC Forum) Preparing for the State Systemic Improvement Plan.
Presented by the US Department of Education. More information at
PFY: A young adult lens (Improving young peoples lives through youth work)
Child Care Subsidy Data and Measurement Challenges 1 Study of the Effects of Enhanced Subsidy Eligibility Policies In Illinois Data Collection and Measurement.
23 RD NOVEMBER 2012 Audiences for opera in Ireland All data ROI TGI 2012 (c) Kantar Media Ltd.
Management Plans: A Roadmap to Successful Implementation
Arts Attendance in Ireland Key facts about audiences for the arts in Ireland.
2009 Strategic Planning playbook
Social inclusion initiatives: the effect of joined up approaches Justine McNamara and Alicia Payne Paper presented at the 11 th Australian Institute of.
Improving Practitioner Assessment Participation Decisions for English Language Learners with Disabilities Laurene Christensen, Ph.D. Linda Goldstone, M.S.
Promoting Rational Drug Use in the Community Monitoring and evaluation.
P-16 Council Overall Goals Regional change agents for “Closing the Gaps” Engaging community stakeholders Parents K-12 teachers K-12 administrators College.
LEARNING & SKILLS COUNCIL – CONTEXT AND PRIORITIES 6 December 2007 Presented to South London Learning Partnership Main Board Meeting By Vic Grimes, Area.
Settlement Program Logic Model
Barriers to Health Service Utilization by Immigrant Families Raising a Child with a Disability Unmet Needs and the Role of Discrimination.
Conflict Resolution Training for Youth. Virginia commonwealth university Department of educational leadership Program Evaluation APRIL 2013 RAM BHAGAT.
INTEGRATION & SUSTAINABILITY REVIEW BOARD PRESENTATION TO THE COMMUNITY 13 TH June 2011.
Employment Ontario Program Updates EO Leadership Summit – May 13, 2013 Barb Simmons, MTCU.
Week 1.
WEB IEP FOLLOW-UP ECO GATHERED FOR BIRTH TO 5 INCLUDING INFANT, TODDLER, PK 1.
Charlottesville Tomorrow May 7, 2009Charlottesville Tomorrow : An Advocate For Our Future. Today.2 About Charlottesville Tomorrow.
1 Child Protective Services in Harris County Stakeholder Forum December 12, 2013.
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
“I can’t say who I am unless you agree I’m real.”
Engaging Patients and Other Stakeholders in Clinical Research
DATA TRACKING AND EVALUATION 1. Goal of the STEP program: To increase the number of STEM graduates within the five-year period of the grant. You have.
1 What is the Internet Archive We are a Digital Library Mission Statement: Universal access to human knowledge Founded in 1996 by Brewster Kahle in San.
Data, Now What? Skills for Analyzing and Interpreting Data
Be a Part of Building a Weather-Ready Nation
SRC Participation in Comprehensive Statewide Needs Assessment STATE REHABILITATION COUNCIL DISCUSSION POINTS JUNE 24,
Online Project Monitoring System (OPMS) ISE PI Meeting March 14, 2012 Sandra Toro Martell, NSF Gary Silverstein, Westat Hannah Putman, Westat Melissa Bryce,
Subcommittee on STEM Learning and STEM Learning Environments The Subcommittee on STEM Learning and STEM Learning Environments offers three overarching.
STEM Education Reorganization April 3, STEM Reorganization: Background  The President has placed a very high priority on using government resources.
S-STEM Program Evaluation S-STEM PI Meeting Arlington, VA October 2012.
1 Trends in Child Outcomes (C-3 / B-7) and Family Outcomes (C-4) Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance Reports Christina.
Noyce Program Evaluation Conference Thursday, December 6, 2007 Frances Lawrenz Michelle Fleming Pey-Yan Liou Christina Madsen Karen Hofstad-Parkhill 1.
An Overview of the NISE Network Presentation Overview NISE Network Network Community Educational Products Get More Involved.
 MISSION  HISTORY … to create a safe space … cultivate values of Respect, Diversity, Social Justice, and Youth Leadership … build a strong, youth led,
Evaluating NSF Programs
MMS EPO Mission Evaluation: An external evaluation was designed to support education and public outreach by establishing criteria for successful activities,
The Girls RISEnet 2010 Survey An Environmental Scan of Girl-Friendly Programs and Exhibits in U.S. Science Museums and Institutions NATIONAL INSTITUTE.
Museum and Community Partnerships.
An Overview of the NISE Network Presentation Overview NISE Network Network Community Educational Products Evaluation and Research.
Planning a Museum & Community Partnership Project Brown-Bag Workshop | Wednesday, September 30, Welcome (Kayla Berry) 2.Introduction (Rae Ostman)
W. K. Kellogg Foundation Grant: Racial and Ethnic Diversity in HSR June 6, 2004 AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting.
Evaluation of the Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program 2010 NSF Noyce Conference Abt Associates Inc. July 9, 2010.
Jaquanda Pugh Teacher assist II February 22, 2010.
GOALS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE 2005 HINTS Data Users Meeting Gary L. Kreps, GMU Brad Hesse, NCI Rick Moser, NCI.
Findings from the AISL Program’s Online Project Monitoring System for projects funded between FY 2006 and FY 2014 Gary Silverstein and Ashley Simpkins,
NSF INCLUDES Inclusion Across the Nation of Learners of Underrepresented Discoverers in Engineering and Science AISL PI Meeting, March 1, 2016 Sylvia M.
Minnesota’s Promise World-Class Schools, World-Class State.
Applied Research Consultants: Applied Research Consultants: Assessment Services and External Evaluation.
MSP Summary of First Year Annual Report FY 2004 Projects.
Designing Effective Evaluation Strategies for Outreach Programs
Innovative education and new skills to increase engagement in Science
Presentation transcript:

Some Findings from the AISL Program’s Online Project Monitoring System for Projects Funded Between FY 2006 and FY 2012 Gary Silverstein Westat August 21, 2014

AISL Online Project Monitoring System (OPMS) Online monitoring system completed by PIs Three surveys developed specifically for AISL  Baseline (anticipated activities and accomplishments)  Annual (project activities and reach for previous calendar year)  Closeout (project accomplishments over the entire grant) NSF uses OPMS data to  Examine project and program trends over time  Tell the story of how NSF funding effects the field and what effects those projects have  Respond quickly to questions from Congress and other stakeholders OPMS data are also being used by SRI as part of its evaluation of the AISL program

Putting the OPMS data collection in context More detailed information is available for projects funded since FY 2009 Findings in this presentation are only for the following project types:  Full-scale Development  Broad implementation  Connecting Researchers and Public Audiences  Research Baseline data about public audiences are reviewed here today  We have comparable information about professional audience deliverables In future years, we will also report data from the annual and closeout surveys

Major Questions I’m Going to Address Today What types of institutions are participating in the AISL program? What types of public audiences are AISL projects targeting? How are projects expecting to reach public audiences? What methods are projects using to examine their impact on the public?

What types of institutions are participating in the AISL program?

A wide range of institutions are collaborating on AISL projects Most projects include a combination of organization types  46 percent of projects are partnering with an informal science institution  34 percent plan are partnering with at a media design and production firm  34 percent are partnering with a college or university Most projects anticipate reaching their audiences through informal learning institutions  39 percent will use a science-technology center or museum  18 percent will use a 4-year college or university  17 percent will use a natural history museum

The projects funded between FY encompass a total of 1,311 lead and partner organizations Partner organization typeNumberPercent Informal learning institutions College or university Media design and production Education support services826.3 Educational institution322.4 Multi-category161.2 Other

Most of the places projects anticipate using for public learning experiences are informal learning institutions Public venueNumberPercent Science technology center/museum year college or university Public pre-K–12 district/school Natural history museum825.7 Zoo or aquarium684.7 Children’s museum654.5 Nature or interpretive center553.8 Library543.7

What types of public audiences are AISL projects targeting?

Youth, age are the most prominently targeted age group (n=241 projects) Age groupNumberPercent Youth, age Youth, age Adults, age Children, age Adults, age 55 and older Children, age

Projects expect to target a wide range of populations traditionally underrepresented in STEM (n=241 projects) Public audience typeNumberPercent Residents in an inner city Ethnic groups Low income individuals Women/girls Residents in a rural community Racial groups Persons with disabilities English language learners2912.0

How are projects expecting to reach public audiences?

Projects expect to use a wide range of approaches to reach public audiences (n=130 projects) Public audience deliverable typeNumberPercent Project website Programs, events, and activities Audio or video Exhibits Resource materials and information sharing Games/Information/communication technologies Infrastructure development64.6

Delivery methods example: How audio or video deliverable types will reach public audiences 14 Audio or video deliverable (e.g., movie, TV show, radio segment) DVD or CD-ROM Accessed at an exhibit AM/FM/HD/ satellite radio TV Theater at ISI Commercial theater Theater in non- ISI or commercial setting Fulldome Non-project website (e.g., YouTube) Project website

Websites and TV are the most common ways projects expect to deliver audio and video to public audiences *Non-project website = YouTube, FaceBook, etc.

Most projects are seeking to enhance their public audiences’ knowledge of and/or interest in a STEM topic 16

What methods are projects using to examine their impact on the public?

Projects are planning to use multiple approaches to assess their public audience impacts (n=196 projects) Study designNumberPercent Qualitative, no comparison group Quantitative, no comparison group Quasi-experimental Experimental Other None (impact not measured during grant award)1914.6

Two thirds of projects plan to collect participant data before and/or after an AISL deliverable/activity

Surveys and interviews are the most prominent methods that projects expect to use to examine participant outcomes

What are examples of other questions that can be addressed using OPMS data? How many people participate in ISE-funded science cafés in given year? Which ISE projects are reaching an international audience? How many ISE-funded museum projects are targeting youth—and what strategies are these projects using to engage this population? What are the most significant accomplishments of ISE projects focusing on biological sciences? What are the anticipated and actual impacts of ISE projects employing games and other information and communication strategies? What data collection activities are ISE projects using to assess the impact of their video products?

Gary Silverstein (301) Ashley Simpkins (240)