Ioana Niculescu James Madison University August 15, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Factor each trinomial:
Advertisements

? Nuclear Reactions Categorization of Nuclear Reactions
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Multiplication X 1 1 x 1 = 1 2 x 1 = 2 3 x 1 = 3 4 x 1 = 4 5 x 1 = 5 6 x 1 = 6 7 x 1 = 7 8 x 1 = 8 9 x 1 = 9 10 x 1 = x 1 = x 1 = 12 X 2 1.
Division ÷ 1 1 ÷ 1 = 1 2 ÷ 1 = 2 3 ÷ 1 = 3 4 ÷ 1 = 4 5 ÷ 1 = 5 6 ÷ 1 = 6 7 ÷ 1 = 7 8 ÷ 1 = 8 9 ÷ 1 = 9 10 ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = 12 ÷ 2 2 ÷ 2 =
Fraction IX Least Common Multiple Least Common Denominator
Kerstin Sonnabend, IKP, TU Darmstadt S-DALINAC - Nuclear Astrophysics Nuclear Astrophysics at the Darmstadt superconducting electron linear accelerator.
E status report Alexandre Camsonne Hall A Jefferson Laboratory Hall A collaboration meeting December 13 th 2007.
High Luminosity Hall Mini-Review Review A/C spectrometer configurations MAD + HRS, SHMS + HMS, MAD + HMS, SHMS + HRS Four example experiments 1) Pion form.
Super BigBite concepts Bogdan Wojtsekhowski, JLab
Measuring the Neutron and 3 He Spin Structure at Low Q 2 Vincent Sulkosky College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA Experimental Overview The.
BigBite K.Egiyan Probabilities of SRC in Nuclei Measured with A(e,e / ) Reactions K. Egiyan (Yerevan Physics Institute, Yerevan, Armenia and Jefferson.
1 New target transverse spin dependent azimuthal asymmetries from COMPASS experiment Bakur Parsamyan INFN & University of Turin on behalf of the COMPASS.
Measuring the Neutron and 3 He Spin Structure at Low Q 2 Vincent Sulkosky for the JLab Hall A Collaboration College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA.
We need a common denominator to add these fractions.
CALENDAR.
Multiplication Facts Review. 6 x 4 = 24 5 x 5 = 25.
0 - 0.
1 1  1 =.
1  1 =.
2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt Time Money AdditionSubtraction.
2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt ShapesPatterns Counting Number.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Addition Facts
SEQUENCES Target: To find the next number in the sequence.
I can interpret intervals on partially numbered scales and record readings accurately ? 15 ? 45 ? 25 ? 37 ? 53 ? 64 Each little mark.
PR : Precision Measurements and Studies of a Possible Nuclear Dependence of R = L / T Simona Malace - contact (JLab) Eric Christy (Hampton U.),
Unit II Atomic Structure. Obj. 1…Daltons Atomic Theory Four postulates (1808)... Four postulates (1808) Atoms of the same element are identical...
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
Look at This PowerPoint for help on you times tables
Effects on UK of Eustatic sea Level rise GIS is used to evaluate flood risk. Insurance companies use GIS models to assess likely impact and consequently.
Area of triangles.
Fraction XI Adding Mixed Numbers With Unlike Denominators
Fraction IX Least Common Multiple Least Common Denominator
Adding Up In Chunks.
MaK_Full ahead loaded 1 Alarm Page Directory (F11)
Multiply Binomials (ax + b)(cx +d) (ax + by)(cx +dy)
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Let’s take a 15 minute break Please be back on time.
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Using Lowest Common Denominator to add and subtract fractions
April 06, 2005 JLab 12 GeV upgrade DOE Science Review 1 Fundamental Structure of Hadrons Zein-Eddine Meziani April 06, 2005 DOE Science Review for JLab.
Measurements of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T on Deuteron and Nuclei in the Nucleon Resonance Region Ya Li January 31, 2009 Jlab E02-109/E (Jan05)
SHMS Optics and Background Studies Tanja Horn Hall C Summer Meeting 5 August 2008.
Precision measurements of the F 2 structure function at large x in the resonance region and beyond S. Malace, PAC35 January 2010, Jefferson Lab Outline.
Rosen07 Two-Photon Exchange Status Update James Johnson Northwestern University & Argonne National Lab For the Rosen07 Collaboration.
How to reconcile G n M Hampton University and Jefferson Lab Virginia, USA Hall C User Meeting 2008, Jefferson Lab, August 4-5, 2008 Michael Kohl.
Measurement of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T in Nuclei at Low Q 2 Phase I Ya Li Hampton University January 18, 2008.
Proton Charge Form Factor Measurement E. Cisbani INFN Rome – Sanità Group and Italian National Institute of Health 113/Oct/2011E. Cisbani / Proton FF.
Hall-C Coincidence Commissioning Experiments E & E Krishna Adhikari Mississippi State University 1 Joint Hall-A & Hall-C Summer meeting.
Calorimetry for Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering in Hall A Alexandre Camsonne Hall A Jefferson Laboratory Workshop on General Purpose High Resolution.
Transverse Momentum Dependence of Semi-Inclusive Pion and Kaon Production E : Spokespersons Peter Bosted, Rolf Ent, Hamlet Mkrtchyan 25.5 days.
Inclusive Measurements of inelastic electron/positron scattering on unpolarized H and D targets at Lara De Nardo for the HERMES COLLABORATION.
Hall C - 12 GeV pCDR Max. Central Momentum 11 GeV/c 9 GeV/c Min. Scattering Angle 5.5 deg 10 deg Momentum Resolution.15% -.2% Solid Angle 2.1 msr 4.4 msr.
Ibrahim H. Albayrak, Hampton University Group Meeting Experiment Rosen07: Measurement of R =  L /  T on Deuterium in the Nucleon Resonance Region. 
Simultaneous photo-production measurement of the  and  mesons on the nucleons at the range 680 – 1500 MeV N.Rudnev, V.Nedorezov, A.Turinge for the GRAAL.
Vahe Mamyan, Hall-C collaboration meeting, January Data Analysis of F2 and R in Deuterium and Nuclei  Physics  Experiment Setup  HMS Detectors.
John Arrington Argonne National Lab
Kaons Propagation Through Nuclei
Nadia Fomin University of Virginia
Precision Measurement of η Radiative Decay Width via Primakoff Effect
presented by Werner Boeglin Florida International University Miami
Deep Inelastic Parity Robert Michaels, JLab Electroweak Physics
Special Considerations for SIDIS
Early running planning process
Overview: E (x>1) E (EMC)
Duality in Nuclei: The EMC Effect
E (“x>1”) PAC47 Jeopardy presentation John Arrington
Deuteron Electro-Disintegration at Very High Missing Momenta PR Hall C Collaboration Experiment Probe two nucleon dynamics at short space-time distances.
Presentation transcript:

Ioana Niculescu James Madison University August 15, 2013

 E The Search for Color Transparency at 12 GeV (CT)  E Precision measurements of the F 2 structure function at large x in the resonance region and beyond (F2)  E Deuteron Electro-Disintegration at Very High Missing Momentum (DED)  E Detailed studies of the nuclear dependence of F2 in light nuclei (EMC)

 A mix of short/partial experiments with moderate requirements that provide calibration/performance data for later experiments  Experiments that exercise full PID capabilities, high SHMS momentum, and unique Hall C capabilities (i.e. high luminosity, small systematic uncertainties, good PID at high rates)

 Beam energy: ◦ 11 GeV (most) ◦ 8.8 GeV (CT) ◦ 6.6 GeV (F2)  Beam current: 15 – 80 μA  Targets: ◦ Liquid (H and D) 10 cm (4 cm? 15cm?) ◦ Al (empty) ◦ Solid (Be-9, B-10, B-11, thick C-12, thin C-12, multi-foil)

 SHMS settings ◦ Used for electrons, positrons, and hadrons (CT) ◦ Momentum: 1.55 to 9.64 GeV/c ◦ Angle: 5.52 – 40 deg  HMS settings ◦ Used for electrons, positrons ◦ Momentum: 1.6 – 6.4 GeV/c ◦ Angle: 20 – 63.5 deg

 CT: 10 days (on 10 cm target)  F2: 9 days  DED: 2.6 days (62 hr)  EMC: 3 days  Total: 24.6 days (PAC days)

 Coincidence experiment : commission the SHMS and HMS  H(e,e'p) needed for commissioning spectrometer is part of the experiment  Smooth well known cross sections  Analysis framework (SIMC) already exists, online results can be used as diagnostics  Simultaneously commission the aerogel detector A(e,e’p) cross-section on 1 H and 12 C with 80 μA, of 8.8 & 11.0 GeV beam. 5 different Q 2 points (8,10, 12, 14 & 16.4 GeV 2 )

 Inclusive experiment  Extend proton and deuteron F2 structure function precision measurements to larger x and Q 2 by measuring H(e,e’) and D(e,e’) cross sections in the resonance region and beyond up to Q 2 ~ 17 GeV 2 and x ~ 0.99  17 deg setting in both HMS and SHMS  good overlap between momentum settings for each fixed-angle setting  substantial overlap between momentum settings at 17 and 30 deg  lowest central momentum needed with SHMS: 1.55 GeV Other measurements: R measurement: 10 h H 2 elastics: 5 h target length acceptance: 12 h configuration change: 45 h detector checks: 24 h

 3 kinematic settings  Centered at p m = 0.5, 0.65 and 0.8 GeV/c  Good overlap with existing data  Hydrogen normalizations not included

 Maximize the physics impact for the run period while minimizing additional beamtime and configuration changes Get results for new light nuclei of interest Extract “smeared” F 2n /F 2p ratio Expand examination of EMC-SRC correlation Take Q 2 scan for scaling studies  Targets: 1 H, 2 H, 9 Be, 10 B, 11 B, 12 C and Al C/D EMC ratios at 20, 25, 30 degrees (35, 40 if time) with SHMS to look at Q 2 dependence (deuterium parasitic with F2) Data on 9 Be, 10 B, 11 B, 12 C at 20 degrees with SHMS  Add extra EMC ratios for light nuclei with cluster structure  Extract “smeared” F2p, F2n (and ratios) from 12 C- 11 B, 10 B- 9 Be and 11 B- 10 B SRC target ratios at x>1 with HMS [parasitic with EMC]  Take EMC and SRC ratios together to examine EMC-SRC correlation High Q 2 C/D ratios (35, 40 degrees)  2 PAC days, run with E (F 2 on 1 H, 2 H): overlap in data/kinematics

11 EMC effect on light nuclei: 9 Be, 10 B, 11 B, 12 C and 27 Al Neutron or proton in-medium effects : 11 B- 10 B, 12 C- 11 B Extraction of n/p in-medium EMC: some of the results expected

12 SRC ratios on light nuclei: 9 Be, 10 B, 11 B, 12 C, 27 Al Improved Al ratios and new light nuclei ( 10,11 B) with cluster structure to better study SRC-EMC correlation, test different explanations.