Department of Health and Human Services & Department of Probation October 28, 2014 Title IV-E California Well-Being Project.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Indiana IV-E Waiver Original Demonstration 1998 – 2002 Informal Extension 2002 – 2005 Current Extension
Advertisements

Lessons Learned in Washington State: Implementing and Sustaining Evidence- Based Juvenile Justice Programs Minnesota Juvenile Justice Forum June 19, 2008.
Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
Expedited Family Reunification Project
Feichter_DPG-SYKL03_Bild-01. Feichter_DPG-SYKL03_Bild-02.
Family Recovery Program A Multi-Systemic Recovery Approach to Families Transcultural Mental Health In A Changing World: Building A Global Response 2007.
© 2008 Pearson Addison Wesley. All rights reserved Chapter Seven Costs.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1 Computer Systems Organization & Architecture Chapters 8-12 John D. Carpinelli.
Chapter 1 The Study of Body Function Image PowerPoint
Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Appendix 01.
NCATS REDESIGN METHODOLOGY A Menu of Redesign Options Six Models for Course Redesign Five Principles of Successful Course Redesign Four Models for Assessing.
UNITED NATIONS Shipment Details Report – January 2006.
Copyright © 2012 California Department of Education, Child Development Division with WestEd Center for Child & Family Studies, Desired Results T&TA Project.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
Tennessee Higher Education Commission Higher Education Recommendations & Finance Overview November 15, 2012.
Targeted Assistance & Schoolwide Programs NCLB Technical Assistance Audio April 18, :30 PM April 19, :30 AM Alaska Department of Education.
Board of Early Education and Care Retreat June 30,
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Year 6 mental test 5 second questions
Year 6 mental test 10 second questions
Life After HPRP Barbara Poppe, Executive Director, USICH March 26, 2012.
REVIEW: Arthropod ID. 1. Name the subphylum. 2. Name the subphylum. 3. Name the order.
VOORBLAD.
15. Oktober Oktober Oktober 2012.
Maryland’s Proposed Title IV-E Waiver Demonstration Application A presentation by DHR to the Social Services Administration's Child and Family Advisory.
Factor P 16 8(8-5ab) 4(d² + 4) 3rs(2r – s) 15cd(1 + 2cd) 8(4a² + 3b²)
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge18/20/ Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge8/20/2014.
1..
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
District Advisory Council (DAC) 1 October 22, 2012 Westlawn Elementary School.
Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
Understanding Generalist Practice, 5e, Kirst-Ashman/Hull
1 Impact Assessment. 2 Demographics 3 Sex and Age.
SB 163 WRAPAROUND.
IV-E Waiver June 2006 Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services.
B RIAN K INKADE D EPARTMENT D EPUTY D IRECTOR photos ©JUPITERIMAGES 2009 M ARCH 25, 2011.
Title IV-E Abstract Report Worker Mentor Meeting February 21, 2012 Presenter: Mary Klinghagen.
25 seconds left…...
Januar MDMDFSSMDMDFSSS
Child Welfare Federal Finance Reform Christine Calpin Joan Smith JooYeun Chang.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
Intracellular Compartments and Transport
PSSA Preparation.
Essential Cell Biology
1 Definitions and Examples of Practices vs. Services in Child Welfare The Service Array Process The National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational.
1 Circuit 10 – Central Region CBC Performance and Quality Improvement Meeting Scheduled for Wednesday, August 20 th, 2014 at 10 a.m. Data for Week Ended.
Summary Slide Consumer Directed Option.
Data, Now What? Skills for Analyzing and Interpreting Data
Using Data to Plan Waiver Strategies and Drive Improvements: Key Indicators and Trends April 11, 2012.
Supervisor’s Core: Fiscal Essentials Version 2.0 July 2009.
Community Based Care in Florida and the IV-E Waiver.
National Innovations in CWS Funding: What’s Working? Michael Lawler Co-Director, Center for Public Policy Research and Director, The Center for Human Services.
Los Angeles County Proposed RBS Demonstration Project RBS Forum Sacramento, CA September 4/5, 2008.
Los Angeles County’s Department of Children and Family Services Title IV-E California Well-Being Project and Strategic Plan June 3, 2015.
1 DHS Board Meeting Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program Overview Mark Washington Division of Family and Children Services August 18, 2010.
California Well-Being Project
Using a Summary Score Approach to Analyze Performance Measures Over Time Charlie Ferguson, Ph.D. San Jose State University School of Social Work Demonstration.
California Well-Being Project
Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services
Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services
California Well-Being Project
Presentation transcript:

Department of Health and Human Services & Department of Probation October 28, 2014 Title IV-E California Well-Being Project

Objective To test child welfare interventions designed to decrease reliance on foster care and shorten the time children have open welfare cases. Goals Improve permanency and well-being outcomes Increase child safety without over reliance in out-of-home care Improve service array Engage families through individualized case work October 28, 2014 DHHS & Probation–Title IV-E Waiver 2 California Well-Being Project

Cohort 1 7/1/07 – 9/30/19 Alameda Los Angeles Cohort 2 10/1/14 – 9/30/19 ButteLake Sacramento San Diego San Francisco Santa Clara Sonoma October 28, 2014 DHHS & Probation–Title IV-E Waiver 3 Participating Counties

Flexible use of federal foster care funding Must include child welfare and probation – DHA in Sacramento County Capped funding allocation based on 5-year average ( ) Requires maintenance of base spending level October 28, 2014 DHHS & Probation–Title IV-E Waiver 4 How Does It Work?

Counties must implement prevention and family centered practices Requires reinvestment of savings into child welfare and probation Well-Being Project activities The evaluation component will include process, outcomes and costs Counties may opt out with fiscal repercussions October 28, 2014 DHHS & Probation–Title IV-E Waiver 5 How Does It Work? (continued)

Federal Funds $49.5 M Local Share $107.1 M $156.6 million October 28, 2014 DHHS & Probation – Title IV-E Waiver 6 Estimated Full Year Budget Comparison Federal Funds $66.3 M Local Share $107.1 M $173.4 million

Additional federal funds (waiver) Base amount (five-year average) Unchanged local spending Increased Investment in Better Outcomes October 28, 2014 DHHS & Probation – Title IV-E Waiver 7 How Are Savings Generated? Increased Investment in Better Outcomes Decreased number of children in out-of-home care Reduced entries and re-entries SAVINGS

$12.3 million in flexible federal funding for FY 14/15 Annualized $16.7 million through FY 18/19 (plus inflator) Increased federal funding Prevention Wrap-around Intensive family reunification Evidence-based programs Use of flexible dollars and reinvestment of future savings into programs… Increased reunification for CPS children More timely permanency for foster children Reduced re-entries into CPS Reduced recidivism for Probation children Reduced entry into systems due to effective prevention …for better outcomes October 28, 2014 DHHS & Probation – Title IV-E Waiver 8 Potential Benefits to Sacramento County

If total costs in a given year exceed the level of additional funding, the County will be required to absorb those excess costs with local funding DHHS & Probation – Title IV-E Waiver 9 October 28, 2014

Caseloads Placement Costs Operation/Admin Costs Realignment Growth October 28, 2014 DHHS & Probation – Title IV-E Waiver 10 Variables Affecting Level of County Risk

Length Of Stays Entries & Reentries Group Home Placements Out-of-County Placements Out-of-State Placements October 28, 2014 DHHS & Probation – Title IV-E Waiver 11 High Risk Scenarios

DHHS & Probation – Title IV-E Waiver 12 October 28, 2014 DepartmentPositions (FTEs) Full Year Staff Costs* Contracts*Total* DHHS24$2.6$7.5$10.1 Probation12$1.5$2.7$4.2 DHA2$0.3__$0.3 Subtotal38$4.4$10.2$14.6 Aid Payments$2.0 TOTAL38$4.4$10.2$16.6 *millions

Mitigating risk Funds set aside to cover unforeseen cost increases Early opt out costs County would have to pay back all waiver money spent on services that are not Title IV-E eligible under traditional funding structure Sustainability How would County fund waiver-related programs after the waiver period (FY19-20)? October 28, 2014 DHHS & Probation – Title IV-E Waiver 13 Other Considerations

October 28, 2014 DHHS & Probation – Title IV-E Waiver 14 QUESTIONS

Michelle Callejas Deputy Director Child Protective Services 15 October 28, 2014DHHS & Probation – Title IV-E Waiver

Achieving Better Outcomes Increased Safety Prevention of Abuse and Neglect More Timely and Successful Permanency DHHS & Probation – Title IV-E Waiver October 28,

DHHS & Probation – Title IV-E Waiver October 28, Safety Safety Organized Practice (SOP) Prevention Focus on children 6 and older Permanency Intensive Family Finding and Kinship Support

DHHS & Probation – Title IV-E Waiver October 28, Safety SOP is engagement model Similar to Signs of Safety Prevention Expanding services in Family Resource Centers Permanency Competitive process Letters of Interest (LOI) RFP

Contracting for permanency and prevention services $1.1 million for FY $36 million over 5 years Providers Partnering with providers to achieve outcomes Support local and state evaluation efforts Support policy development and training Ensure compliance with CWS/CMS requirements Staff DHHS & Probation – Title IV-E Waiver 19 October 28, 2014

DHHS & Probation – Title IV-E Waiver October 28, Continuous Quality Improvement PreventionPermanencySafety

If chosen interventions do not lead to expected outcome improvements then we will not continue investing in them DHHS & Probation – Title IV-E Waiver 21 October 28, 2014

Year 1- Stable Year 2 – 5% (ages 0-18) Year 3 – 4% (ages 0-18) Year 4 – 2% (ages 0-18) Year 5 – 2% (ages 0-18) DHHS & Probation – Title IV-E Waiver 22 October 28, 2014

$7 Million Over 5 years DHHS & Probation – Title IV-E Waiver 23 October 28, 2014

DHHS & Probation – Title IV-E Waiver 24 October 28, 2014

DHHS & Probation – Title IV-E Waiver 25 October 28, 2014

DHHS & Probation – Title IV-E Waiver 26 QUESTIONS

Brian Lee Division Chief Probation 27 October 28, 2014DHHS & Probation – Title IV-E Waiver

Achieving Better Outcomes Decreased Entries Reduced Recidivism Prevent Delinquency DHHS & Probation – Title IV-E Waiver October 28,

DHHS & Probation – Title IV-E Waiver October 28, Entries Wraparound Services (WRAP) Recidivism MultiSystemic Therapy (MST) Prevention Functional Family Therapy (FFT)

$11.7 million over five years Providers Assist with outcome, audit and service delivery Cross-over youth practice model and other cross-systems initiatives Case management and supervision Staff DHHS & Probation – Title IV-E Waiver 30 October 28, 2014

25% reduction Decreased time in out-of-home placement DHHS & Probation – Title IV-E Waiver 31 October 28, 2014

DHHS & Probation – Title IV-E Waiver 32 QUESTIONS