Lorain County K-12 Educational Microsurvey January 2014 Result Summary.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Classroom Walkthrough with Reflective Practice
Advertisements

Foundations of American Education, Fifth Edition

Classroom Factors PISA/PIRLS Task Force International Reading Association January 2005.
Nicholas Monterosso, CIRS Homeless Outreach Program Leader, On the Go! John Azoni, CIRS Homeless Outreach Associate, On the Go! On the.
Audience: Local school/PTA leaders (PTA president, school principal, school board members, PTA board) Presenter: State/district PTA leader.
National Representative 2012 – 2013 Using PTAs National Standards for Family School Engagement.
Building Our Future: One Community, One School, One Child at a Time Goals of the Special Administrative Board St. Louis Public Schools October 14, 2008.
Leadership for Learning Building the System to Help All Students Succeed Fourth Annual Policy and Practice Institute – Richard Laine Director of Education.
1 Mid-Term Review of The Illinois Commitment Assessment of Achievements, Challenges, and Stakeholder Opinions Illinois Board of Higher Education April.
1 Citrus County 21 st CCLC Progress Report Larry Parman External Evaluator.
Civics: Government and Economics in Action
SAC Needs Assessment. Background A goal of the Massachusetts State Advisory Council on Early Childhood Education and Care (SAC) Identify the needs of.
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
Core Pre-K Standards Review & Comment
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
1 An Introduction to the Role of the Schools (Funding) Forum.
School Leadership that Works:
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System
THIS WE BELIEVE. Our Vision We envision a school district that is a leader in student achievement where all students graduate and are totally prepared.
March 12, ALL third grade students, including those classified as students with disabilities and/or ELL (ESOL) MUST take the FCAT.
1 SESSION 5- RECORDING AND REPORTING IN GRADES R-12 Computer Applications Technology Information Technology.
Special Education Survey Barnstable Public Schools September 17 – October 2, 2012.
1 Discipline Without Delay What You Need to Know 2009 All Rights Reserved.
CA Latino Voters And Preschool HART RESEARCH ASSOTESCIA THETARRANCEGROUP Key findings from statewide survey Conducted July 2010 for.
GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay January 22-23,
The System of Education in Poland. Administrative control and extent of public-sector funded education In line with the Education System Act of 1991,
Problems, Skills and Training Needs in Nonprofit Human Service Organizations Dr. Rick Hoefer University of Texas at Arlington School of Social Work.
Transition IEP Using Your IEP to Plan for Your Life After High School
P-16 Council Overall Goals Regional change agents for “Closing the Gaps” Engaging community stakeholders Parents K-12 teachers K-12 administrators College.
SEED – CT’s System for Educator and Evaluation and Development April 2013 Wethersfield Public Schools CONNECTICUT ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION Overview of.
Read to Achieve Updates Newton Conover City Schools
Addition 1’s to 20.
1 Welcome to the Title I Annual Meeting for Parents
5 by 5: Growing Healthy Learners An early childhood system of care designed to prepare vulnerable children for success in school and in life. Sylvia Echols.
Parents as Partners in Education
Speaking and Listening Instruction: Identifying and Using Effective Approaches to Facilitating Classroom Discussions December 9, 2014 Katanna Conley Michelle.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
SoRo School Board Presentation Mary Waterman 5/20/14.
World’s Largest Educational Community
1 Maine’s Impact Study of Technology in Mathematics (MISTM) David L. Silvernail, Director Maine Education Policy Research Institute University of Southern.
SMART GOALS APS TEACHER EVALUATION. AGENDA Purpose Balancing Realism and Rigor Progress Based Goals Three Types of Goals Avoiding Averages Goal.
Title One Program Evaluation Report to the CCSD Board of Education June 17, 2013 Bill Poock, Title One Coordinator Leslie Titler, Title One Teacher.
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson 4c: Communicating with Families 1 6/12/201 3.
Reevaluation Exceptional Children Division 1. Reevaluation NC Policies , , and
1 A Call to Advocacy: Pennsylvania’s Early Childhood Initiatives Office of Child Development and Early Learning 2008.
1 Overview: What is “No Child Left Behind”?. 2 Reauthorization of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (“ESEA”) of ’65 Money to states for specific.
Instructional Hours Required Instructional Time / OAR
Student Learning Objectives Overview. Defining SLOS A vital component of the Teacher Keys and Leader Keys Effectiveness System is Student Growth and Academic.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
No Child Left Behind’s Impact on Career and Technical Education Julie Chadd, Ph.D., Eastern Illinois University Karen Drage, Ph.D., Eastern Illinois University.
700: Moving Through the Collaboration Continuum to Improve Permanency Outcomes Wednesday, March 20, 2013.
Key findings from a survey of 400 registered Washington voters conducted Sept , 2014.
LINC Advisory Committee September 10, Group Breakout Session 1.Reflecting on the presentation, what state or district policies from other states.
School Uniforms: An Investigation Status Report Harford County Public Schools December 17, 2007.
Parents and School Librarians: Partners in Student Learning The [school name] School Library A Presentation for the [name PTA or PTO] [Date] Your Name.
HEAD OF THE CLASS A Quality Teacher in Every Pennsylvania Classroom.
Service Learning Dr. Albrecht. Presenting Results 0 The following power point slides contain examples of how information from evaluation research can.
CHAPTER 16 COMMUNICATING SCHOOL FINANCE ISSUES. Vouchers to attend private schools will be a point of discussion and contention for years to come. This.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Community support for our local K- 12 Public Schools September 30, 2015.
STAKEHOLDER FORUMS NOVEMBER – DECEMBER 2013 Local Control Accountability Plan.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
2015 SAA Board Survey. Raw Board Survey ResultsStrongly Agree AgreeDisagreeStrongly Disagree Don't Know Total Points Responses minus DKs Average Score.
Selecting & Evaluating Quality Child Care Presented by.
IMPLEMENTING TITLE I IN BARROW COUNTY SCHOOLS ANNUAL PARENT MEETING
Socorro Independent School District Pre-Advanced and Advanced Placement Program
Pre-Advanced and Advanced Placement Program
Pre-Advanced and Advanced Placement Program
Summerour Middle Planning Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Lorain County K-12 Educational Microsurvey January 2014 Result Summary

S URVEY M ETHOD 2 Telephone survey of 620 registered voters in Lorain County Fielded for 3 days between January 17-20th Purpose to gauge perceptions of educational achievement, new initiatives and statewide legislation Stratified by school district geography Not all results add to 100% due to rounding of decimals

R ESPONDENT B REAKDOWN 19% have a child in public school 76.5% do not have school aged children 2.9% have a child in private school 1.3% have a child in online or charter schools 0.3% home school their child(ren) 3

4 Most respondents (80%) believe their school district is doing an excellent or good job of preparing students for their futures. With most giving a “B” grade.

However, only 1/5 believe that education is improving and most believe it is getting worse. 5

6 Teachers are the most important indicators of a high quality education. Followed by students being prepared for their futures and schools offering a comprehensive curriculum.

Respondents do not place much stock in the state ratings. State ratings and extracurricular offerings were noted to be the least important when determining a high quality education. 7

Most do not trust state testing mechanisms or motives. But do support the third grade guarantee. 61% do not believe increased state testing has helped students. 67% disagree that policy decisions made at the state level are in the best interests of our students. 80% disagree that there should be more state government control over our local schools. 69% state that students scores from one test should not be used to evaluate teachers. 70% agree that students, teachers and schools should be rated on student grades, parental engagement and graduate success, along with test scores. Interestingly, 65% support retaining 3 rd graders that do not pass state reading tests. 8

9 There is overwhelming support for pre-school programs to help students perform better (76%)…

10 …but they were split on increased taxes to support pre-k programming.

61% disagree that locally approved tax dollars should support for profit and online charter schools. 70% agree that those that choose private schools should do so at their own expense. 32% identified finances as the most significant issue that school districts face. It rated 8 points higher than parental involvement or discipline and safety! This information, coupled with the findings regarding state testing, indicate that voters believe in local control and appropriate funding of their schools. 11 Respondents believe their local tax dollars should support public K-12 education, not “for profit” organizations.

C ONCLUSIONS 12 Our local schools are succeeding in providing high quality education with dedicated and skilled teachers. The state continues to change school criteria and mandates, without additional funding. It is important for all of us to support local K-12 education as we work to prepare students for their futures (and ours). Currently, local tax dollars for schools do support charter, for profit and parochial schools. Some schools in our region are suffering, reducing class offerings, letting students out early, providing only the minimums, etc. If something is not done soon, our schools will collectively reach a critical point.

N EXT S TEPS We will focus public attention on the need to support K-12 education by using the following methods in a planned, consistent format: Small group meetings with teachers and staff One-on-one meetings with elected officials, non profit heads and other civic leaders. Begin locally, then spread regionally. Individual meetings and phone calls with partners from other public educational institutions (JVS, LCCC, etc). Small group conversations with educational advocates (PTAs, PTOs, Boosters, Foundations, etc). Community forums, by school district, with residents. Communication must be two-way. We want your solutions and suggestions as we move forward 13

Discussion Is there anything in the survey that surprises you? Generally, does it reflect your view of education in Lorain County and/or our district? What is one big “takeaway” you got from the survey? If you were a district superintendent, how would you respond to what the community is telling us? Looking from a county-wide perspective, what should be our focus? Next steps? 14