October 6, 2006 Curriculum Leaders Assessment Update Scott E. Smith Assistant Director.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IDEA® English Language Proficiency Tests (IPT)
Advertisements

Targeted Assistance & Schoolwide Programs NCLB Technical Assistance Audio April 18, :30 PM April 19, :30 AM Alaska Department of Education.
New for Fall 2009 A proctor security checklist is incorporated in the TAD for classroom use. 1. Assist proctors with collecting tests each day. 2. Quick.
HSGQE Waivers and Procedures Department of Education & Early Development.
Alaska Department of Education & Early Development District Test Coordinator Training 2006 Alternative Assessment Program and Limited English Proficient.
Changes/Updates/Reminders Fall 2010 District Test Coordinator Training.
AYP Plan Performance Reporting Division Texas Education Agency TETN Accountability Update November 14, 2006.
AYP Update Performance Reporting Division Texas Education Agency ESC Title I Meeting September 18, 2006.
2006 Preliminary AYP Release. Overview 1. State Summary Results 2. Update of Preliminary AYP Data 3. Schedule for Appeals and Final Release 4. Overview.
Performance Reporting Division Texas Education Agency TI ESC Meeting September 18, AYP Update.
MA Department of Education Calculating Graduation Rates Massachusetts Department of Education November 2006 Bob Bickerton, Senior Associate Commissioner:
Curriculum Coordinators Meeting Kansas State Department of Education January 10, 2014.
An Update on Novi’s Journey Presentation for MAASE April 13, 2011.
COURSE REGISTRATION 101 Presented by Madison Advising Peers.
Kansas State Department of Education Summer Principals Academy Abilene, KS July 23, 2014.
Understanding the New Graduation Rate Sample Presentation 1.
Sophomore Class Meeting September Graduation Requirements Credits = 23.5 minimum 4 (each) Math/English/Social Studies 3 Science Driver Ed/Health/Phys.
There will be no KAMM. If a student currently takes the Kansas Assessment of Modified Measures (KAMM) in reading and math, then the student’s.
Lynda Lupp Richard Maraschiello Amy Morton Adam Schott John Weiss.
2015 Accountability Commissioner’s Final Decisions KIM GILSON SENIOR CONSULTANT, DATA AND ACCOUNTABILITY REGION 10 ESC
Nuts and Bolts Testing Windows Fall OTL Testing: Reading, Math, Science Fall OTL Testing: Reading, Math, Science –October 5 to January 15 –Equating.
Title III Notice of Proposed Interpretations & Implications for California’s Accountability System Robert Linquanti Cathy George Project Director & Sr.
Perkins 202 Dr. Michelle Crary – Staff Development and Accountability Coordinator Nori Cannell – Director – Guidance & Career and Technical Education.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
Staar Trek The Next Generation STAAR Trek: The Next Generation Performance Standards.
2014 SOAR Update AAEA Fall Conference presented by Ivy Pfeffer, Assistant Commissioner Arkansas Department of Education October 29, 2014.
Carolyn M. Wood - Assistant State Superintendent Division of Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems October 31,
Student Registration for School Year School Year
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS October 5, 2011.
10/29/071 Opportunity to Learn (OTL) Kansas State Department of Education October 29, 2007.
Dropout/Graduation Summary Report Jessica Noble, Education Program Consultant October
January 11, A few FAQS from districts regarding the 2013 pilot.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together.
Chapter 4 Changes Graduation Requirements and Keystone Exams Upper Merion Area School District Presentation by Jane Callaghan 3/15/2011.
Title III Notice of Proposed Interpretations Presentation for LEP SCASS/CCSSO May 7, 2008.
UMASD CURRICULUM/TECHNOLOGY/STUDENT SERVICES COMMITTEE December 17, 2012.
Adequate Yearly Progress Kansas State Department of Education 2007 Fall Assessment Conference Judi Miller,
Fall 2010 Mathematics Standards of Learning Assessment Update - 1 -
Heather Click-Cuellar KSDE Science Consultant Kansas Science Update KSDE Fall Assessment Conference.
BAIP Blending Assessment with Instruction Program Bill Biermann Assistant Executive Director SWPRSC
Proposed State Accountability System Brad Neuenswander, Interim Commissioner Kansas State Department of Education.
Proposed State Accountability System September 2014 Brad Neuenswander, Interim Commissioner Kansas State Department of Education.
Parent & Student Night Orientation 7 th Grade Registration 2013 – 2014 Grace Malek ~ 5 – 8 counselor Monday April 8 th, 5:00 – 6:00.
Keystone Exams and Graduation Requirements for Students Updated February
» Students who meet the passing standard on STAAR must still meet all promotion requirements outlined in the district policy. We will review.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
FLORIDA STATE EOC EXAMS. **Districts will select testing dates. REQUIRED TESTING Students enrolled in the Florida Public Schools are required to participate.
STUDENT ASSESSMENT DIVISION TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY Assessment Provisions for Qualifying ELL Asylees and Refugees Spring 2011 Administrations © 2010, Texas.
What is Concurrent Enrollment?
Information for Students and Families
Kansas Assessment Program
PSAT Exam
Information for Students and Families
Illinois’ Accountability Workbook: Approved Changes in 2005
Secondary Assessment Transition
PSAT Exam
PARCC Math Options Stephanie Boyd, PARCC Consultant
Information for Students and Families
Changes For Student October Pupil Enrollment Collection 2015
Federal Four-Year Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate
Parent & Students Orientation
Student October Collection
Information for Students and Families
Who Are Your Counselors?
Dropout Graduation Summary Report (DGSR)
READ Act Data Collection Spring 2015
Nuts and Bolts Rev
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
End of Course Tests (EOCT) “Test-Out” Guidance Letter Presentation
Registering for the ap exam
Presentation transcript:

October 6, 2006 Curriculum Leaders Assessment Update Scott E. Smith Assistant Director

Please hold your questions until the “end.”

“Opportunity to Learn”: Grades /2007 and beyond

A Recent Federal Policy Change: On Tuesday, September 26 th, the USED advised us that because Kansas is implementing an OTL assessment schedule we have the flexibility of retesting “non-proficient” students. This policy has also been allowed in the past for states that have exit exams and end-of-course tests.

Defining the AYP Cohort in the Context of OTL: The USED has also eliminated the possibility of using as an AYP cohort those high school students (i.e., a combination of freshmen, sophomores, and juniors) who happen to take the assessments on a given year. The USED has said instead that AYP in the context of OTL must be calculated using enrollment of a particular class.

What follows, then, in this Power Point is a high school OTL plan incorporating two principal guidelines from the USED, namely (1) the opportunity to retest non-proficient students, and (2) the necessity of basing the high school AYP calculation on the enrollment of a particular class. The class enrollment suggested by KSDE is the junior class.

2006/2007: Making the Transition to AYP in the Context of OTL Remember: KSDE was forced to mandate testing of entire classes in 05/06 in order to ensure enough test scores to establish stable cut scores for the new state assessments.

11th grade students who were proficient in 10th grade: this would be the first group of students considered an 11 th grade cohort who happened to test early. Their scores actually count twice—once in 2006 and once in th grade students who were non-proficient as 10th graders and are tested for the second time in 2007: again, these students are part of the first 11 th grade cohort. These students have a second chance to become proficient. If these students are not retested, their non-proficient scores from 2006 are used in the 06/07 calculations. 11th graders who are tested for the first time. NT codes are used for all students not tested by 11th grade (see new document). Continued … Mathematics: Whose scores would be counted for AYP in 06/07 ?

What other students might be tested at the discretion of the district in 06/07 and beyond? Answer: Any 10th graders thought to be ready: their scores would be held or “banked” until these students reach the 11th grade. Any 9th graders thought to be ready: their scores would also be held or “banked” until these students reach the 11th graders.

Whose scores would count for participation in 06/07? Answer: All students enrolled as 11th grade students: some of these 11 th graders will be credited for participating in 06/07 whereas others will be granted participation credit for having participated as sophomores in 05/06. In other words, all 11 th grade students are counted in the participation calculations based on whether or not they were tested sometime during 9 th, 10 th, or 11 th grades. NOTE: NT Codes are used for all students not tested by 11th grade (see new document).

Mathematics: Who counts for AYP in and beyond? Banked scores from 11th grade students who were proficient when tested in 10th grade or 9th grade Scores for 11th grade students who were non- proficient in earlier situations and are tested for the second time as juniors.

What other students could be tested in and beyond at the discretion of the district if they meet established criteria? Answer: Any 10th graders thought to be ready; their scores are banked until they are 11th graders. Any 9th graders thought to be ready; their scores are banked until they are 11th graders.

Who counts for mathematics participation in 07/08 and beyond? Answer: All 11th grade students whether current or banked participation NT codes are used for all students not tested by 11th grade (see new document).

Reading: Whose scores count for AYP in 06-07? All 11th grade students being tested for the first time NT codes are used for all students not tested by 11th grade (see you documents).

What other students could be tested at the discretion of the district in 06/07? Any 10th graders thought to be ready; their scores are held or “banked” until these students become 11th graders. Any 9th graders thought to be ready; their scores are banked until they are 11th graders.

Reading: Who counts for participation in 06/07? Answer: -- All 11th graders (current participation) -- NT codes are used for all students not tested by 11th grade (see new document).

Other Assumptions … Only students who do not achieve “meets standard” may be retested. The tests must be given in separate semesters. Twelfth graders are not to be tested through OTL. The cohort group must consist of eleventh graders only.

Students who switch schools: When the student moves to another school after having been tested only once, the sending school is the AYP school and keeps the score of a student scoring proficient. If the student who has tested only once is non-proficient, the receiving school becomes the AYP school and an NT code is used to make the student ineligible because he wasn’t able to take advantage of his second testing opportunity in the sending school. In neither case does the banked score count for or against the receiving school. When the student moves to another school after having been tested twice, the score stays with the sending school and the receiving school notes in KIDS that the sending school is the AYP school.

Assumptions continued … Most special circumstances and exceptions can be found in the “Special Coding Circumstances for OTL” document.

Cautions/Next Steps … No OTL plan can be implemented until it has been approved by USED. KSDE intends to work very fast on an OTL plan for this year. The Feds may require that schools put in place some mechanism for remediation to justify the opportunity to test twice. Again, though, schools would presumably still have the option of testing only once during the 11th grade year and not making provisions for remediation.

Sample scenario … My district tested all sophomores in mathematics with P&P in 05/06. We want to continue with P&P tests indefinitely. What will we do in 06/07? Answer: A P&P district will have the option of testing (1) all juniors who didn’t score “meets standard” or above as sophomores, (2) any 9 th and 10th graders thought to be ready, and (3) any juniors who have never been tested.

KCA TEST BUILDER Manuals were ed to Superintendents & Test Coordinators on Monday, Oct. 1st. Additional Manuals can be found at Click KCA Test Builder and login Questions/Support

Kan-ed Test Builder 3.0 Empowered Desktop, Learning Station Questions/support: Phone:

KIDS Data Upload for Writing Answer Sheet Pre-slugging Answer sheet information will be pre-slugged for any students in the KIDS system as of 10/18/2006, so make sure your students at grades 5, 8 and 11 are in the KIDS system. You still must register the number of students for whom Writing Assessment materials are requested. Registration for materials needs to occur by 10/18/2006. Go to the CETE website to register.