Management of non naïve patients with hepatitis C "Non-Responders" 3rd Paris Hepatitis Conference, Paris, 19.01.2009 Christoph Sarrazin J. W. Goethe-University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HIV/HCV Coinfection News – HCV Protease Inhibitors
Advertisements

Hepatitis B & Hepatitis C in HIV
Overview: Treatment of HCV Infection Jürgen Rockstroh Department of Medicine I, University of Bonn, Germany ICVH Baltimore 20114/22/2011.
Durability of Response and Rate of Re-emergence of Wild Type at Boceprevir (BOC) Resistance-Associated Variant (RAV) Loci in Genotype 1a and 1b Patients:
Frequencies of Resistance-Associated Amino Acid Variants Following Combination Treatment with Boceprevir (BOC) Plus PEGINTRON (PegInterferon Alfa-2b) and.
HCV RESPOND-2 Final Results High Sustained Virologic Response Among Genotype 1 Previous Non-Responders and Relapsers to Peginterferon/Ribavirin when Re-
Adherence to HCV Therapy: Relation with Virologic Outcomes and Changes in Adherence Over Time Vincent Lo Re, MD, MSCE V. Teal, R. Localio, V. Amorosa,
Egyptian Guidelines For Management of Chronic Hepatitis B
Optimal therapy in genotype 1 patients 3 rd Paris Hepatitis Conference January 2009 Stefan Zeuzem, MD J.W. Goethe University Hospital Frankfurt,
Hepatitis C The next generation of Treatment for Hepatitis C.
Week 1.
How to Optimize Treatment of Genotype 4 Patients Rami MOUCARI MD, PhD Bellevue Medical Center – Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir Retreatment with HCV Genotype 1 NIAID Retreatment Phase 2a Treatment Experienced Osinusi.
Patrick MARCELLIN. THE CHALLENGE OF TREATING NON RESPONDERS Patrick Marcellin Service d’Hépatologie and INSERM CRB3 Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy University.
Jean-Michel PAWLOTSKY
Bruix J, et al. Presented at the 44 th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), April 24, 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark.04/28/09.
What’s new in HCV genotype 2? Alessandra Mangia S.Giovanni Rotondo,ITALY PARIS HEPATITIS CONFERENCE January 2012.
Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy
Management of Chronic Hepatitis C in 2013
Protease and Polymerase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Hepatitis C
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Simeprevir in Genotype 1 (Viral Relapsers) PROMISE Trial Phase 3 Treatment Experienced Forns X, et al. Gastroenterology.
TWH LIVER CENTRE UHN centre of excellence A case study: Hepatitis C treatment and severe anemia Colina Yim RN(EC), MN Nurse Practitioner CAHN 2013.
WHAT FUTURE FOR RIBAVIRIN? Mitchell L Shiffman, MD Chief, Hepatology Section Medical Director, Liver Transplant Program Virginia Commonwealth University.
Management of non naïve patients with hepatitis C Relapsers Alessandra Mangia Liver Unit & Division of Gastroenterology “CSS” San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
How to manage non responders Lawrence Serfaty Service d’Hépatologie, UMR S 893 Hôpital Saint-Antoine, UPMC, Paris Clinical case 1.
Liver Institute of Virginia Education, Research and Treatment for Patients with Liver Disease IVer Bon Secours Health System WHY CHOOSE TELAPREVIR Mitchell.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Peginterferon alfa-2b + Ribavirin in GT 1-6 (Flat versus Weight-Based Ribavirin Dosing) WINR Study Phase 3 Treatment.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Telaprevir in Treatment Experienced GT-1 REALIZE (Study 216) Phase 3 Treatment Experienced Zeuzem S, et al. N Engl.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Telaprevir in Treatment Naïve GT-1 ADVANCE (Study 108) Phase 3 Treatment Naïve Jacobson IM, et. al. N Engl J Med.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Simeprevir + PEG + RBV in Treatment-Naïve Genotype 1 QUEST-1 Trial Phase 3 Treatment Naïve Jacobson IM, et al.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study PEG alfa-2a + RBV versus PEG alfa-2a versus INF + RBV APRICOT STUDY Phase 3 Treatment Naïve, Chronic HCV and HIV.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Duration and Dose Finding Peginterferon alfa-2a + Ribavirin Phase 3 Treatment Naïve, Chronic HCV Randomized study.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Telaprevir in Treatment Naïve GT-1 ILLUMINATE (Study 111) Phase 3 Treatment Naïve Sherman KE, et. al. N Engl J.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Peginterferon alfa-2a + RBV versus Interferon alfa-2a + RBV ACTG 5071 Phase 2 Treatment Naïve, Chronic HCV and.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Peginterferon alfa-2b + Ribavirin for 12 or 24 Weeks in GT 2,3 Phase 3 Treatment Naïve, Chronic HCV Mangia A, et.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Sofosbuvir + Ribavirin to Prevent Post-Transplant HCV Recurrence Phase 2 Curry MP, et al. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:100-7.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study WINR Study Flat versus Weight-Based Ribavirin Dosing Phase 3 Treatment Naïve, Chronic HCV Jacobson IM, et. al.
Hepatitis C Genotype 3 Paris 2012 Graham R Foster Professor of Hepatology Queen Marys School of Medicine Barts and The London.
3 rd Paris Hepatitis Conference January, 20th 2009 How to optimize the management of my HBeAg negative patients? Pietro Lampertico 1st Gastroenterology.
ALAN FRANCISCUS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, HEPATITIS C SUPPORT PROJECT EDITOR-IN-CHIEF, HCV ADVOCATE WEBSITE JOIN ME ON TWITTER & FACEBOOK – HCVADVOCATE BLOG:
Controversies: Lead in or no lead in ? PRO Controversies: Lead in or no lead in ? PRO Lawrence Serfaty Hôpital Saint-Antoine Paris 5th Paris Hepatitis.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Interferon alfa-2b +/- Ribavirin for 24 or 48 weeks Phase 3 Treatment Naïve, Chronic HCV McHutchison JG, et al.
Stefan ZEUZEM.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Peginterferon alfa-2a +/- Ribavirin for Chronic HCV Phase 3 Treatment Naïve, Chronic HCV Fried MW, et. al. N Engl.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Boceprevir in Treatment Experienced RESPOND-2 Phase 3 Treatment Experienced Bacon BR, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:
ALAN FRANCISCUS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, HEPATITIS C SUPPORT PROJECT EDITOR-IN-CHIEF, HCV ADVOCATE WEBSITE JOIN ME ON TWITTER & FACEBOOK – HCVADVOCATE BLOG:
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Telaprevir BID versus q8 in Treatment Naïve GT-1 OPTIMIZE (Study C211) Phase 3 Treatment Naïve Buti M, et al. Gastroenterology.
Terapia dell’Epatite cronica HCV correlata: Peg-IFN/ribavirina e che altro? L’infettivologia del terzo millennio: non solo AIDS Paestum maggio 2006.
Response Guided Therapy Fabien Zoulim Hepatology Department & INSERM Unit 1052, Lyon University Lyon, France.
Maria Buti Hospital General Universitario Vall Hebron Barcelona-. Spain Relapser or Non Responder? Chronic Hepatitis C.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Simeprevir with Peginterferon and Ribavirin in GT-4 RESTORE Phase 3 Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced Moreno.
How to manage G1 relapsers and non-responders George V. Papatheodoridis, MD Associate Professor in Medicine & Gastroenterology 2nd Department of Internal.
Hepatitis C Nonresponders
Triple Therapy Today Phase III Results in G1 Relapsers and Non Responders – Telaprevir 5 th Paris Hepatitis Conference Paris, 30. January 2012 Stefan Zeuzem.
36 year old HCV+ woman, Risk factor: occasional IVDU 15 years ago First treatment with PEG-IFN/RBV in 2002 –only qualitative PCR available : positive at.
‘Easy to treat’? Graham R Foster Professor of Hepatology Queen Marys University of London.
Date of download: 6/3/2016 From: Assessment of Hepatitis C Viremia Using Molecular Amplification Technologies: Correlations and Clinical Implications Ann.
Maria Buti,1 Yoav Lurie,2 Natalia G. Zakharova,3 Natalia P. Blokhina,4 Andrzej Horban,5 Gerlinde Teuber,6 Christoph Sarrazin,6 Ligita Balciuniene,7 Saya.
Classification of virologic responses based on outcomes during and after a 48-week course of pegylated interferon (PEG IFN) plus ribavirin antiviral therapy.
Classification of virologic responses based on outcomes during and after a 48-week course of pegylated interferon (PEG IFN) plus ribavirin antiviral therapy.
Chronic Hepatitis C Therapy: Changing the Rules of Duration
How to optimize the management of my HBeAg negative patients?
ASPIRE Study: SMV + PEG-IFN + RBV for genotype 1 experienced patients
Volume 130, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
New HCV therapies on the horizon
Chronic Hepatitis C Therapy: Changing the Rules of Duration
Meta-analysis Shows Extended Therapy Improves Response of Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 Infection  Harald Farnik, Christian M. Lange,
CONCERTO-4 Study: SMV + PEG-IFNa-2b + RBV for genotype 1
The Results of Phase III Clinical Trials With Telaprevir and Boceprevir Presented at the Liver Meeting 2010: A New Standard of Care for Hepatitis C Virus.
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages (September 2003)
Presentation transcript:

Management of non naïve patients with hepatitis C "Non-Responders" 3rd Paris Hepatitis Conference, Paris, Christoph Sarrazin J. W. Goethe-University Hospital, Frankfurt Medizinische Klinik I Germany

Definition of virologic non-response Currently used definitions of non-response Less than 2 log decline of HCV RNA concentration at week 12 of therapy Detectable HCV RNA at week 24 of therapy Problems: -PEG-IFN dose, ribavirin dose -Compliance, dose reductions, interruptions -Discont. due to and management of side effects -HCV assays - inter-assay variability - detection limits ( IU/ml)

Quantification of HCV RNA by diff. assays CobasTaqMan (CAP) / RealTimeHCV / Versant bDNA clinical samples (n=65) Differences between HCV RNA assays: may be up to 0,7 log steps (factor 3 - 4) Differences between HCV RNA assays: may be up to 0,7 log steps (factor 3 - 4) Vermehren et al., J Clin Microbiol 2008

Detection limits of old and new assays Stopping rule at week 24 for pts. with detectable HCV RNA with negative predictive values of % Based on assays with detection limits IU/ml Based on 48 weeks max. treatment duration Problems: -Currently used assays have detection limits of 5-10 IU/ml -Extension of treatment duration to 72 weeks -Negative predictive values for detectable HCV RNA at week 24 for pts treated for 72 wks only 90% Davis et al., Hepatology 2003, Berg et al., Gastroenterology 2007

Definition of virologic non-response Differentiation between partial non-response and null-response Partial non-response: - HCV RNA detectable at week 24 Null-response: - decline of less than 1 log at week 4 - decline of less than 2 log at week 12

Your approach for discontinuation What is your personal approach for treatment discontinuation? 1.Strict application to the 2 log decline and HCV RNA detectable at week 24 rules 2.Strict application to the 2 log decline rule but discontinuation at week 24 only in patients with HCV RNA >50 IU/ml 3.Continuation of therapy as long as HCV RNA declines and becomes undetectable at week 24 by a highly sensitive assay (<5-10 IU/ml) 4.Continuation of therapy as long as HCV RNA declines, is at least below 15 IU/ml at week 24 and becomes undetectable at week 30

Options for re-treatment 1.PEG-Interferon and Ribavirin 2.PEG-Interferon and Ribavirin and STAT-C

EPIC 3 Study design and baseline characteristics Patients with chronic hepatitis C and compensated liver disease (METAVIR- F2 - F4) Nonresponse or Relapse to - standard interferon plus ribavirin or - PEG-interferon plus ribavirin n=1336 Treatment duration 48 weeks if 2 log decline at week 12 80% genotype 1 77% IFN + riba versus 22% PEG-IFN + riba 42% F4 fibrosis (cirrhosis) Poynard et al., AASLD 2006

EPIC3 sustained virologic response rates IFN/RibavirinPegIFN/Ribavirin SVR (%) (n)95% CISVR (%) (n)95% CI All patients 24.7% (254/1030)21.2, % (48/299)10.6, 21.5 Previous tx. response Relapse 44.6% (95/213)35.8, % (40/112)24.1, 47.4 Nonresponse 17.2% (116/673)13.5, % (7/172)0.2, 8.0 Genotype % (138/825)13.4, % (28/243)6.3, /3 61.5% (102/166)51.7, % (17/39)23.1, % (10/32)10.1, % (3/15)--- METAVIR Fibrosis F2 31.8% (92/289)24.9, % (15/66)9.4, 36.0 F3 26.3% (85/323)20.0, % (16/92)7.2, 27.6 F4 18.5% (77/416)13.6, % (17/141)5.0, 19.1 Baseline viral load HVL (>600,000 IU/mL) 20.5% (116/566)16.1, % (18/169)4.5, 16.8 LVL (<600,000 IU/mL) 29.7% (138/464) 24.3, % (30/129) 13.7, 32.8 (Rel.+NR)

REPEAT study design and baseline characteristics Randomization (105 centers, 2:1:1:2, n=950) R Study weeks Follow-up 360 µg plus RBV 1000/1200 mg Peg-IFN alfa-2a (40KD) 180 µg Follow-up 360 µg plus RBV 1000/1200 mg 180 µg Follow-up plus RBV 1000/1200 mg Follow-up plus RBV 1000/1200 mg A B D Peg-IFN alfa-2a (40KD) 180 µg Peg-IFN alfa-2a (40KD) 180 µg C R Jensen et al., AASLD 2007  Patients with non-response to PEG-2b + riba  91% genotype 1  25-30% F3-4 fibrosis

REPEAT sustained virologic response rates p=0.006, Odds ratio 2.0 (95% CI 1.21, 3.31) 7% 14% 9% 16% 0% 20% SVR 360/180 µg 72 weeks (A) 360/180 µg 48 weeks (B) 180 µg 72 weeks (C) 180 µg 48 weeks (D) 52/31711/15622/15627/313 10%

REPEAT Impact of cirrhosis in genotype 1 26/304 9% 3% 6/116 54/312 5% 17% 72 weeks (360/180 µg and 180 µg) (A+C) 48 weeks (360/180 µg and 180 µg) (B+D) CirrhoticNon-cirrhoticCirrhoticNon-cirrhotic 4/120 0% 20% 10% SVR SVR rates in GT-1 patients: - 11% (72 wks.) - 6% (48 wks.)

REPEAT Predictive value HCV RNA <50 IU/mL at week 12 All patients treated (n=942) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 57/10020/57 57% 35% 15/373 17/412 4% 72 weeks (360/180 µg and 180 µg) (A+C) 48 weeks (360/180 µg and 180 µg) (B+D) SVR <50 IU/mL at week 12: YES 17% (157 / 942) <50 IU/mL at week 12: NO 83% (785 / 942) SVR 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Boceprevir (SCH503034) Triple-Therapy for PEG/R NR, GT 1, 48 Wks., n=357 BocPEG2bRibaChange Wk 12-17EOTSVR 100 yesnoRiba + B 8006%2% 200 yesnoRiba + B 80016%12% 400 yesyesB 80020%14% 400yesnoRiba + B 80013%5% 800yesnoRiba21%4% PlacyesyesB 800 TW12 pos.32%7% Schiff et al., EASL SVR prediction: response at wk 8, >24-36 wks HCV RNA neg. - AE: anemia +1,5g/dl, nausea, fatigue, 8% discont. - Resistance in patients with break-through / withouth SVR

Results PROVE 3 Study (USA/EU) HCV Genotyp 1, Telaprevir, Nonresponder McHutchison et al. AASLD 2008 HCV RNA negative [%] 83 8% TVR+PEG2a+Riba →PEG2a+Riba ETR 65 Standard PEG2a+Riba 41 ? SVR12 ETR SVR TVR+PEG2a+Riba →PEG2a+Riba 73 ? 30% n=66 n=68 Relapser Non-Responder n=40 Wk 12 Non-Responder n=64 Wk 12 ETR SVR12 Wk 12 Wk36 SVR12 Wk 12 Relapser and Non-Responder ?

German HCV Guideline 2009 Recommendation for Non-responders  Non-response to (PEG)-interferon-alfa-monotherapie: re-treatment with PEG-interferon-alfa / ribavirin combination therapy [B].  Non-response to (PEG)-interferon-alfa/ ribavirin combination therapy: check initial treatment for improvement (dose of PEG-interferon, dose of ribavirin, dose reductions, tx interruptions, tx duration, HCV RNA kinetics, managment of side effects, compliance …) [C].  If HCV-RNA is detectable at week 12 [A] or at week 24 [C] in patients with slow response in the initial therapy, re-treatment should be discontinued.  In patients with virologic response treatment should be performed for 72 weeks [A].  No general recommendation for low-dose PEG-interferon monotherapy for prevention of fibrosis progression or complications of liver disease [A]. Consensus: 98% Sarrazin et al., German HCV Consensus Conference 2008

Your approach for selection of non- responders for re-treatment What is your personal approach for selection of non-responders for re-treatment? 1.Re-treatment of all non-responders who whish to receive a second course of therapy 2.Re-treatment only if a patient achieved at least a partial-response during the first course of therapy 3.Re-treatment only if dose of peg-interferon, and ribavirin as well as the management of side effects can be optimized 4.General recommendation to wait for future treatment options

Management of non naïve patients with hepatitis C "Non-Responders" 3rd Paris Hepatitis Conference, Paris, Christoph Sarrazin J. W. Goethe-University Hospital, Frankfurt Medizinische Klinik I Germany