CONICAL ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES DIFFRACTION FROM SASTRUGI TYPE SURFACES OF LAYERED SNOW DUNES ON GREENLAND ICE SHEETS IN PASSIVE MICROWAVE REMOTE SENSING.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Scattering from Hydrometeors: Clouds, Snow, Rain
Advertisements

Future use of microwave observations in support of Cryosat Authors - C. Ruiz, E. Jeansou NOVELTIS, France - J.D. Flach, K. Partington VEXCEL UK, United.
Plane wave reflection and transmission
©DCNS all rights reserved / tous droits réservés Scattering of electromagnetic waves from rough surfaces at very low grazing angles. Ph. SPIGA,
UNIT 2: SOLVING EQUATIONS AND INEQUALITIES SOLVE EACH OF THE FOLLOWING EQUATIONS FOR y. # x + 5 y = x 5 y = 2 x y = 2 x y.
DETC ASME Computers and Information in Engineering Conference ONE AND TWO DIMENSIONAL DATA ANALYSIS USING BEZIER FUNCTIONS P.Venkataraman Rochester.
Optical Modeling of a-Si:H Thin Film Solar Cells with Rough Interfaces Speaker : Hsiao-Wei Liu 08/18/2010 Wed.
Simultaneously Stokes and anti-Stokes Raman amplification in silica fiber Victor G. Bespalov Russian Research Center "S. I. Vavilov State Optical Institute"
Radiative Transfer Dr. X-Pol Microwave Remote Sensing INEL 6669
Multiwave stimulated Raman scattering with quasi-phase matching Victor G. Bespalov Russian Research Center "S. I. Vavilov State Optical Institute" Nikolai.
University of Southampton Southampton, UK
Using a Radiative Transfer Model in Conjunction with UV-MFRSR Irradiance Data for Studying Aerosols in El Paso-Juarez Airshed by Richard Medina Calderón.
Specular reflectorquasi-specular reflector quasi-Lambert reflector Lambert reflector Limiting Forms of Reflection and Scatter from a Surface.
Electromagnetic Models In Active And Passive Microwave Remote Sensing of Terrestrial Snow Leung Tsang 1, Xiaolan Xu 2 and Simon Yueh 2 1 Department of.
A Study of Dense Medium Scattering and Its Applications in Sea Ice Research in Ross Island, Antarctica Y. J. Lee 1, W. K. Lim 2, H. T. Ewe 1 and H. T.
Scattering property of rough surface of silicon solar cells Bai Lu a, b, *,Wu Zhensen a, Tang Shuangqing a and Pan Yongqiang b a School of Science, Xidian.
The Improved 3D Matlab_based FDFD Model and Its Application Qiuzhao Dong(NU), Carey Rapapport(NU) (contact: This.
International Conference on Industrial and Applied Mathematics Zurich, Switzerland, July 2007 Shekhar Guha United States Air Force Research Laboratory.
The Maryland Optics Group IMPEDANCE METHODS FOR ANALYZING SURFACE PLASMONS Quirino Balzano, Igor Smolyaninov, and Christopher C. Davis Department of Electrical.
NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF WAVE EFFECTS IN HIGH-FREQUENCY CAPACITIVELY COUPLED PLASMAS* Yang Yang and Mark J. Kushner Department of Electrical and Computer.
Kirchhoff Approximation for multi-layer rough surface Noppasin Niamsuwan By ElectroScience Laboratory, Ohio State University.
July, 2003©2003 by H.L.Bertoni1 II. Plane Wave Propagation and Reflection in 3-D Propagation and interference in 3-D Reflection at plane surfaces Reflection.
Validated adjustment of remote sensing bias in complex terrain using CFD Michael Harris, Ian Locker, Neil Douglas, Romain Girault, Claude Abiven, Oisin.
May 25, 2007Bilkent University, Physics Department1 Optical Design of Waveguides for Operation in the Visible and Infrared Mustafa Yorulmaz Bilkent University,
ElectroScience Lab IGARSS 2011 Vancouver Jul 26th, 2011 Chun-Sik Chae and Joel T. Johnson ElectroScience Laboratory Department of Electrical and Computer.
Fig. 2: Radiometric angular response from deciduous Paulownia trees is plotted. The red, blue, black, and green curves trace the simulated values of four.
Modeling a Dipole Above Earth Saikat Bhadra Advisor : Dr. Xiao-Bang Xu Clemson SURE 2005.
Pat Arnott, ATMS 749 Atmospheric Radiation Transfer CH4: Reflection and Refraction in a Homogenous Medium.
IGARSS’11 Compact Polarimetry Potentials My-Linh Truong-Loï, Jet Propulsion Laboratory / California Institue of Technology Eric Pottier, IETR, UMR CNRS.
Scattering by particles
N. Pinel# 1/24RADAR'09 – Bordeaux (France), October 12-16, 2009 Dr. Nicolas Pinel*, Dr. Christophe Bourlier University of Nantes – IREENA Laboratory, Nantes,
Princeton University Development of Improved Forward Models for Retrievals of Snow Properties Eric. F. Wood, Princeton University Dennis. P. Lettenmaier,
Problems and Future Directions in Remote Sensing of the Ocean and Troposphere Dahai Jeong AMP.
Pang-Wei Liu 1, Roger De Roo 2, Anthony England 2,3, Jasmeet Judge 1 1. Center for Remote Sensing, Agri. and Bio. Engineering, U. of Florida 2. Atmosphere,
- Microwave Remote Sensing Group IGARSS 2011, July 23-29, Vancouver, Canada 1 M. Brogioni 1, S. Pettinato 1, E. Santi 1, S. Paloscia 1, P. Pampaloni 1,
APPLICATIONS OF THE INTEGRAL EQUATION MODEL IN MICROWAVE REMOTE SENSING OF LAND SURFACE PARAMETERS In Honor of Prof. Adrian K. Fung Kun-Shan Chen National.
Roughness Model of Radar Backscattering From Bare Soil Surfaces Amimul Ehsan Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department, University of Kansas.
Active Microwave Physics and Basics 1 Simon Yueh JPL, Pasadena, CA August 14, 2014.
The Propagation of Electromagnetic Wave in Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Zhonghe Jiang XiWei Hu Shu Zhang Minghai Liu Huazhong University of Science & Technology.
HELICOIDAL VORTEX MODEL FOR WIND TURBINE AEROELASTIC SIMULATION Jean-Jacques Chattot University of California Davis OUTLINE Challenges in Wind Turbine.
ELECTROMAGNETICS AND APPLICATIONS Lecture 5 Normal Incidence at Media Interfaces Luca Daniel.
The propagation of a microwave in an atmospheric pressure plasma layer: 1 and 2 dimensional numerical solutions Conference on Computation Physics-2006.
DMRT-ML Studies on Remote Sensing of Ice Sheet Subsurface Temperatures Mustafa Aksoy and Joel T. Johnson 02/25/2014.
ElectroScience Lab A Study of Polarization Features in Bistatic Scattering from Rough Surfaces IGARSS 2011 Joel T. Johnson Department of Electrical and.
Doc.: IEEE /0431r0 Submission April 2009 Alexander Maltsev, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Polarization Model for 60 GHz Date: Authors:
1 Surface scattering Chris Allen Course website URL people.eecs.ku.edu/~callen/823/EECS823.htm.
1 The University of Mississippi Department of Electrical Engineering Center of Applied Electromagnetic Systems Research (CAESR) Atef Z. Elsherbeni
A review on different methodologies employed in current SWE products from spaceborne passive microwave observations Nastaran Saberi, Richard Kelly Interdisciplinary.
Retrieval of Soil Moisture and Vegetation Canopy Parameters With L-band Radar for a Range of Boreal Forests Alireza Tabatabaeenejad, Mariko Burgin, and.
Modeling Electromagnetic Fields in Strongly Inhomogeneous Media
SEA ICE CHARACTERISTICS IN THE SOUTHERN REGION OF OKHOTSK SEA OBSERVED BY X- AND L- BAND SAR Hiroyuki Wakabayashi (Nihon university) Shoji Sakai (Nihon.
Project Background My project goal was to accurately model a dipole in the presence of the lossy Earth. I used exact image theory developed previously.
Remcom Inc. 315 S. Allen St., Suite 416  State College, PA  USA Tel:  Fax:   ©
UCLA Vector Radiative Transfer Models for Application to Satellite Data Assimilation K. N. Liou, S. C. Ou, Y. Takano and Q. Yue Department of Atmospheric.
Scattering and Polarimatric Components in Community Radiative Transfer Model Quanhua (Mark) Liu The 4 rd JCSDA Science Workshop, May 31- June 1, 2006,
Evaluation of Tb response to snowpack by multiple microwave radiative transfer models Do Hyuk “DK” Kang NASA Goddard Space Flight Center NPP Program by.
UWBRAD meeting May 20, 2014 Leung Tsang, Shurun Tan, Tianlin Wang Coherent Wave Effects in Layering & Incoherent Model Inter-Comparison.
Cassini Huygens EECS 823 DIVYA CHALLA.
Surface scattering Chris Allen
UPB / ETTI O.DROSU Electrical Engineering 2
FDTD Modeling of FID Signal in Chirped-Pulse Millimeter Wave Spectroscopy Alexander Heifetz1, Sasan Bakhtiari1, Hual-Teh Chien1, Stephen Gray1, Kirill.
Polarization in spectral lines
Ground Penetrating Radar using Electromagnetic Models
ELEC 401 MICROWAVE ELECTRONICS Lecture 3
Roughness Correction for Aquarius (AQ) Sea Surface Salinity (SSS) Algorithm using MicroWave Radiometer (MWR) W. Linwood Jones, Yazan Hejazin Central FL.
ELEC 401 MICROWAVE ELECTRONICS Lecture 3
Reza Firoozabadi, Eric L. Miller, Carey M. Rappaport and Ann W
Surface scattering Chris Allen
CH4: Reflection and Refraction in a Homogenous Medium.
Why do satellite-based estimates of whitecap fraction depend on
Presentation transcript:

CONICAL ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES DIFFRACTION FROM SASTRUGI TYPE SURFACES OF LAYERED SNOW DUNES ON GREENLAND ICE SHEETS IN PASSIVE MICROWAVE REMOTE SENSING Wenmo Chang Leung Tsang Department of Electrical Engineering University of Washington

Outline Motivation – Observations in passive microwave remote sensing – Large 3 rd and 4 th Stokes parameters Scattering physics – Rough surfaces : Large slope and large height – Total internal reflection in layered media Electromagnetic methodology – Maxwell equations for rough surface – Radiative transfer theory for layered media Results and discussion

Greenland’s snow profile Wind induced – Sastrugi surface Large RMS height – 20 cm – GHz – GHz Large slope Photo courtesy of Quintin Lake

Four Stokes parameters in passive microwave remote sensing Microwave polarimetric signatures

Observations WindSat data over the Summit site Large 3 rd and 4 th Stokes parameters Up to 15 K for 10.7 GHz, 18.7 GHz and 37 GHz Li, L.; Gaiser, P.; Twarog, E.; Long, D.; Albert, M.;, "WindSat Polarimetric View of Greenland," Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IGARSS IEEE International Conference on, vol., no., pp , July Aug

Outline Motivations Scattering physics Electromagnetic methodology Results and discussion

Physical model Large height and large slope coupled with subsurface total internal reflection 1-D roughness: azimuthal asymmetry

Computer generation of Sastrugi surfaces Statistical data needed for Sastrugi profile Photo courtesy of Quintin Lake

Large angle transmission 20° 15° 60.2° Incident angle=55° Total internal reflection ε 1 =1.8, dense snow ε 2 =1.3, less dense snow ε 0 =1, air Critical angle=58.2° Large slope Phase shifts of v- and h-pol are different Non-zero U and V are generated

Scattering physics: results based on Maxwell equations Air to snow – Ɵ i =55 deg – ɸ i =30 deg – ε r snow =1.8 – ε r under =1.3 Two peaks in transmission Specular transmission angle in snow: 37.6 deg A secondary peak: around 60.4 deg Critical angle between snow and underlying layers: 58.2 deg The 60.4-deg transmission will have total internal reflection

Outline Motivations Scattering physics Electromagnetic methodology Results and discussion

Challenges in electromagnetic model Height of profile – Past: small to moderate height – New: large height up to 7 wavelengths Fluctuations of microwave signatures in simulations – Past coherent 3-D MoM (Tsang et al., 2008) Fluctuations due to roughness Fluctuations due to coherent multiple reflections of layering – Present model has less fluctuations

Present hybrid model Previous 3D MoM coherent model (Tsang et al., 2008) for comparisons (1) Maxwell equations for rough surface scattering to numerically derive rough surface’s bistatic coefficients (2) Radiative transfer theory for layered media Combine (1) and (2) : rough surface’s bistatic coefficients from Maxwell equations used as boundary conditions for radiative transfer

Rough surface’s boundary conditions Numerical methods to solve Maxwell equations (integral equations) – Conical diffraction – Field components obtained Four types of surface unknownsContinuity boundary conditions

Numerical solutions Numerical methods to solve Maxwell equations (integral equations) – Conical diffraction – Field components obtained

Numerical requirements Physical Parameters – RMS height: 20 cm GHz GHz Numerical parameters – Surface length: 4 m GHz GHz Number of surface unknowns: up to 20,000 Linear solver – Direct solver based on LU decomposition – In the future: multi-level UV

Bistatic coefficients Bistatic scattering and transmission coefficients

Boundary conditions for radiative transfer ‘Boundary condition’ for radiative transfer of layered media Multiple reflection – Iterative scheme Solid angle integral Matrices formed by the numerical bistatic coefficients At upper rough boundary At lower flat subsurface

Periodic profile Single realization Hybrid model compared with coherent 3-D MoM Geometry

Outline Motivations Scattering physics Electromagnetic methodology Results and discussion

Sastrugi surface at 10.7 GHz Averaging over 5 realizations Geometry 3 rd and 4 th Stokes parameters up to -15 K / +10 K

Sastrugi surface at 18.7 GHz Averaging over 5 realizations 3 rd and 4 th Stokes parameters up to -2 K / +10 K Geometry

Summary Hybrid model – 2-D MoM for rough surface – Radiative transfer for layer media – Combine rough surface boundary conditions with radiative transfer Numerical results of the model – Large 3 rd and 4 th Stokes parameters up to -15 K / 10 K – Less fluctuations – Both 10.7 GHz and 18.7 GHz show up to 15K

Thank You for Your Attention!