Lecture 5: Arrow-Debreu Economy

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hal Varian Intermediate Microeconomics Chapter Thirteen
Advertisements

Lecture-1 Financial Decision Making and the Law of one Price
Efficient Diversification
Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets
State Preference Theory
L5: Dynamic Portfolio Management1 Lecture 5: Dynamic Portfolio Management The following topics will be covered: Will risks be washed out over time? Solve.
The securities market economy -- theory Abstracting again to the two- period analysis - - but to different states of payoff.
The Annuity Puzzle Richard MacMinnMacMinn Illinois State University Presentation at L5 The Fifth International Longevity Risk and Capital Market Solutions.
Rational Expectations and the Aggregation of Diverse Information in Laboratory Security Markets Charles R. Plott, Shyam Sunder.
Ch.7 The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Another View About Risk
Chapter 8 Risk and Return. Topics Covered  Markowitz Portfolio Theory  Risk and Return Relationship  Testing the CAPM  CAPM Alternatives.
P.V. VISWANATH FOR A FIRST COURSE IN INVESTMENTS.
Lecture 4 on Individual Optimization Risk Aversion
Lecture Presentation Software to accompany Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management Seventh Edition by Frank K. Reilly & Keith C. Brown.
Lecture Presentation Software to accompany Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management Seventh Edition by Frank K. Reilly & Keith C. Brown Chapter.
Ch.9 The Consumption Capital Asset Pricing Model 9.1 Introduction 9.2 The Representative Agent Hypothesis and Its Notion of Equilibrium 9.3 An Exchange.
L1: Risk and Risk Measurement1 Lecture 1: Risk and Risk Measurement We cover the following topics in this part –Risk –Risk Aversion Absolute risk aversion.
L11: Risk Sharing and Asset Pricing 1 Lecture 11: Risk Sharing and Asset Pricing The following topics will be covered: Pareto Efficient Risk Allocation.
THE CAPITAL ASSET PRICING MODEL (CAPM) There are two risky assets, Stock A and Stock B. Now suppose there exists a risk- free asset — an asset which gives.
Efficient Portfolios MGT 4850 Spring 2008 University of Lethbridge.
L9: Consumption, Saving, and Investments 1 Lecture 9: Consumption, Saving, and Investments The following topics will be covered: –Consumption and Saving.
L2: Static Portfolio Choice1 Lecture 2: Static Portfolio Choices We cover the following topics in this part –Choice I: Insurance Optimal insurance with.
Chapter 6 An Introduction to Portfolio Management.
1 Limits to Diversification Assume w i =1/N,  i 2 =  2 and  ij = C  p 2 =N(1/N) 2  2 + (1/N) 2 C(N 2 - N)  p 2 =(1/N)  2 + C - (1/N)C as N  
L6: CAPM & APT 1 Lecture 6: CAPM & APT The following topics are covered: –CAPM –CAPM extensions –Critiques –APT.
L9: Consumption, Saving, and Investments 1 Lecture 9: Consumption, Saving, and Investments The following topics will be covered: –Consumption and Saving.
Lecture 3: Arrow-Debreu Economy
Capital Asset Pricing Model Part 1: The Theory. Introduction Asset Pricing – how assets are priced? Equilibrium concept Portfolio Theory – ANY individual.
Equilibrium Pricing Roadmap… Review of different approaches to valuing securities The role of utility theory and it’s important results Generalizing utility.
This module identifies the general determinants of common share prices. It begins by describing the relationships between the current price of a security,
1 Finance School of Management Chapter 13: The Capital Asset Pricing Model Objective The Theory of the CAPM Use of CAPM in benchmarking Using CAPM to determine.
International Risk Sharing The Theory. Domestic Investment and Domestic Savings The theory suggest that benefits of International Risk Sharing ( IRS)
Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management
1 Risk and Return Calculation Learning Objectives 1.What is an investment ? 2.How do we measure the rate of return on an investment ? 3.How do investors.
BF 320: Investment & Portfolio Management M.Mukwena.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. Chapter.
An overview of the investment process. Why investors invest? By saving instead of spending, Individuals trade-off Present consumption For a larger future.
Version 1.2 Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. Requests for permission to make copies of any part of the work should be mailed to:
Portfolio Management-Learning Objective
Lecture Presentation Software to accompany Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management Seventh Edition by Frank K. Reilly & Keith C. Brown Chapter 7.
Some Background Assumptions Markowitz Portfolio Theory
Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management Chapter 7.
Investment. A Simple Example In a simple asset market, there are only two assets. One is riskfree asset offers interest rate of zero. The other is a risky.
Chapter 3 Discrete Time and State Models. Discount Functions.
Lecture #3 All Rights Reserved1 Managing Portfolios: Theory Chapter 3 Modern Portfolio Theory Capital Asset Pricing Model Arbitrage Pricing Theory.
Lecture 10 The Capital Asset Pricing Model Expectation, variance, standard error (deviation), covariance, and correlation of returns may be based on.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 7 Capital Allocation Between The Risky And The Risk-Free.
FIN 351: lecture 6 Introduction to Risk and Return Where does the discount rate come from?
L8: Consumption Based CAPM1 Lecture 8: Basics of Consumption-based Models The following topics will be covered: Overview of Consumption-based Models –Basic.
Capital Asset Pricing Model CAPM I: The Theory. Introduction Asset Pricing – how assets are priced? Equilibrium concept Portfolio Theory – ANY individual.
MEIE811D Advanced Topics in Finance Optimum Consumption and Portfolio Rules in a Continuous-Time Model Yuna Rhee Seyong Park Robert C. Merton (1971) [Journal.
Computational Finance 1/34 Panos Parpas Asset Pricing Models 381 Computational Finance Imperial College London.
Chp.5 Optimum Consumption and Portfolio Rules in a Continuous Time Model Hai Lin Department of Finance, Xiamen University.
Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management First Canadian Edition By Reilly, Brown, Hedges, Chang 6.
1 Complete Markets. 2 Definitions Event State of the world State Contingent Claim (State Claim)  Payoff Vector  Market is a payoff vector Exchange dollars.
Risk and Return: Portfolio Theory and Assets Pricing Models
Levy, Solomon and Levy's Microscopic Simulation of Financial Markets points us towards the future of financial economics." Harry M. Markowitz, Nobel Laureate.
Managing Portfolios: Theory
The Farm Portfolio Problem: Part I Lecture V. An Empirical Model of Mean- Variance Deriving the EV Frontier –Let us begin with the traditional portfolio.
Aggregate Stock Market 1. Introduction The standard framework for thinking about aggregate stock market behavior has been the consumption-based approach.
L6: Risk Sharing and Asset Pricing1 Lecture 6: Risk Sharing and Asset Pricing The following topics will be covered: Pareto Efficient Risk Allocation –Defining.
Security Markets V Miloslav S Vošvrda Theory of Capital Markets.
Portfolio Theory & Related Topics
Risk and Return.
Chapter 1 The Investment Setting
Theory of Capital Markets
Theory of Capital Markets
Saif Ullah Lecture Presentation Software to accompany Investment Analysis and.
Chapter 8 Risk and Required Return
Presentation transcript:

Lecture 5: Arrow-Debreu Economy The following topics are covered: Arrow-Debreu securities Pricing Arrow-Debreu securities Optimal portfolios of Arrow Debreu securities How Arrow-Debreu securities differ framework differs from the standard utility maximization? Implications in asset pricing Example L5: Arrow-Debreu Securities

L5: Arrow-Debreu Securities Arrow-Debreu Assets There are S possible states indexed by s=0, 1, …, S-1. A pure security (or say an Arrow-Debreu asset) stays in each state, paying $1 if a given state occurs and nothing if any other state occurs at the end of the period Let Пs denote the price of the Arrow-Debreu security associated with s, i.e., the price to be paid to obtain one monetary unit if state s occurs Agents don’t know which state will occur (in a future time) but they know state price given their expectations. State price Пs can be decomposed into the probability of the state, ps, and the price of an expected dollar contingent on state s occurring (or say the state price per unit of probability of associated contingent claims), πs. L5: Arrow-Debreu Securities

L3: Arrow-Debreu Securities Complete Market The market is considered to be complete when investors can structure any set of state-contingent claims by investing in the appropriate portfolio of Arrow-Debreu securities In other words, (1) there are enough independent assets to “span” the entire set of all possible risk exposures; (2) The market will be complete if there are at least as many assets who vectors of state-contingent payoffs are linearly independent as there are number of states Example: for the case of 3 states of nature, is the market complete with 3 assets: (1,1,1), (1,0,0), and (0,1,1)? How about adding an additional asset (0,1,3)? Given a complete security market, we could theoretically reduce the uncertainty about our future wealth to zero – page 78 CWS. L3: Arrow-Debreu Securities

Deriving Pure Security Prices Security state 1 state 2 security price i $10 $20 pj=$8 j $30 $10 pk=$9 Compute the prices for two pure securities. See page 80, CWS. L3: Arrow-Debreu Securities

Determinants of the Price of a Pure Security Time preferences for consumption and the productivity of capital (p82 CWS) Expectations as to the probability that a particular state will occur given homogeneous belief: Individuals’ attitudes towards risk (e.g., risk aversion), given the variability across states of aggregate end-of-period wealth Pure security prices must be adjusted to make the state 1 security relatively expensive and the state 3 security relatively cheap (page 83). Equation on page 84. L3: Arrow-Debreu Securities

An Example of Two States Two assets, (a) risk free bond: with r in both states; (b) risky asset initial price of the risky asset is 1 final value is Ps, s= 0, 1. P0<1+r<P1 We can Replicate the Arrow-Debreu security associated with state s=1 by purchasing alpha units of the risky asset and by borrowing B at the risk-free rate, in such a way that L3: Arrow-Debreu Securities

AD example w/ two states Which state would be more expensive? What decides the cost of the state contingent security? Try the sum of state prices 0 and 1. What do you get? Note Πs in slide 6 is same as ps in slide 5; ps refers to probability of state s in EGS. L5: Arrow-Debreu Securities

Option and AD Securities Assuming P0 < P1 – 1, then the AD asset associated with state s=1 is a call option with strike price P1 – 1 Premium of the call option is the price for pure security of state 1 In other words, buying a call option with an exercise price equal to P1 – 1 has the same payoff as an AD security Buying a call option with an exercise price equal to P1 – 1 has the same payoff as the mutual fund portfolio (long alpha share of stocks and borrow money – you can view this portfolio as a synthetic call option) Exercise 5.4 (b) L5: Arrow-Debreu Securities

Пs of Pure Security vs Security Price P Pure assets can be replicated by market security On the other hand, each market security may be considered as a specific set of payoff combination of AD assets (see slide 4). In other words, it represents a particular investment choice in AD assets. A particular example is the risk-free asset (this replicates the first point of slide 5) It has a payoff of 1 in each state of nature at the end of the period We have the following: L3: Arrow-Debreu Securities

Risk Neutral Probability and P Solving exercise 5.1 L3: Arrow-Debreu Securities

Optimal Portfolio of AD Assets Go through the example in CWS (page 84-88) Let cs denote the investment in AD asset with state s L3: Arrow-Debreu Securities

When πs stay constant across states If πs (state price per unit of of probability) stays the same across all states, then it is optimal for the agent to purchase the same quantity of these claims. It can be shown that Thus the above condition is equivalent to the case that a risk is actuarially priced, we need to purchase full insurance on it The asset is a risk free asset: cs=w(1+r) L3: Arrow-Debreu Securities

When πs differs across states When πs differs across states, then We have different level of consumption of each value of πs Note cs is what we want to solve for Figure 5.1 Exercise 5.2 Key: the consumption curve changes from 2 to 1 L3: Arrow-Debreu Securities

Graphic Illustration of the s=2 Case L3: Arrow-Debreu Securities

Analogy to Intertemporal Consumption Decisions The idea here is consistent with the choice between consumption and investment discussed in CW Chapter 1. It incorporates: Utility function Indifference curve Maximization under constraint – a decreasing return investment function only; i.e., consumption and investment without capital market Consumption is about the choice between consuming now and the future Investment is about choosing optimal investment return, which affects consumption pattern Here investment and consumption decisions are not separatable L3: Arrow-Debreu Securities

Then with the Capital Market Fisher separation theorem: Given perfect and complete capital markets, the production decision is governed solely by an objective market criterion (represented by maximizing attained wealth) without regard to individuals’ subjective preferences which enter into their consumption decisions Choose optimal production first, Choose optimal consumption pattern (C0, C1) based on each individual’s utility function (indifference curve) Less risk averse individual will consume more today Transaction costs break down the separation theorem L3: Arrow-Debreu Securities

Examples: Exercise 5.4(a) E5.4: Three assets: asset A (2, 5, 7); asset B (2, 4, 4); asset C (1, 0, 2) How to construct AD in state 1? How to construct a risk-free asset? L5: Arrow-Debreu Securities

Implications of Arrow Debreu Securities A means to model uncertainty About consumption in different states The same idea can be applied to the consumption over time Allocate wealth over time versus allocate wealth across states Easy to achieve any payoff, such as option payoffs L3: Arrow-Debreu Securities

L3: Arrow-Debreu Securities Exercises EGS, 5.2 CWS, 4.4 L3: Arrow-Debreu Securities