Learning Objectives To review key research for the working memory model To review knowledge and understanding of models of memory To apply knowledge to.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Psychologists were investigating the levels of processing model of memory. They presented participants with a list of words. After each word, there was.
Advertisements

Memory Mock test feedback.
Atkinson and Shiffrin – Multi store Model of Memory
 ALAN BADDELEY AND GRAHAM HITCH (1974)  Suggests that memory is an active, multi-component memory system.  Subsystems of working memory with temporarily.
Instructions Individually, choose a component of working memory. Write a short paragraph describing the main features of this working memory component.
Working Memory Model Baddeley and Hitch (1974) developed an alternative model of short-term memorywhich they called working memory.
Working Memory Dr. Claudia J. Stanny EXP 4507 Memory & Cognition Spring 2009.
The Architecture of Human Memory
Evidence for Multi-store model: 1.Primacy-Recency Effect - Atkinson (1970). When presented with lists to remember we recall first and last items best.
The Working Memory Model
Evaluate two models or theories of one cognitive process with reference to research studies.
The Working Memory Model. Baddeley & Hitch 1974  They felt that STM is not just one store but a number of different stores. Why?  1 store for visual.
Starter On a blank piece of paper, write down any key terms relating to the COGNITIVE approach These could be related to theories, research, evaluations,
Learning Objectives ALL will apply knowledge to past exam questions MOST will apply knowledge to past exam questions and analyse their performance to focus.
Memory Components, Forgetting, and Strategies
Information Processing. History In response to Behaviorism, a cognitive model of mind as computer was adopted (1960’s, 70’s) Humans process, store, encode,
© Banff and Buchan College 2004 The Working Memory Model (Baddeley and Hitch)
The Working Memory Model
Working Memory Model Baddeley and Hitch (1974)
Working Memory Baddeley and Hitch (1974)‏. Working Memory Baddeley and Hitch (1974)‏ –Believed that the STM store in the Multistore Model was too simplistic.
The Working Model of Memory
“e.g.” vs. “i.e.” When you mean “for example,” use e.g. It is an abbreviation for the Latin phrase exempli gratia. When you mean “that is,” use “i.e.”
Multi Store Model Calvin Laverick. Why have a model? A model is useful so we can test and investigate how memory works. – Without one, this would be very.
The Wonderful world of Memory Making Remembering Easier DoH!
The Working Memory Model Can I outline the working memory model of STM? Glossary: Central executive Phonological loop Visuo-spatial sketchpad Phonological.
The Working Memory Model Describe the main components in the working memory model.
The Working Memory Model was first proposed by Baddeley and Hitch in They Carried out an investigation to investigate whether there are different.
The Working Memory Model
Evaluate two models or theories of one cognitive process with reference to research studies. We will be focusing on two models of memory.
Past Examination Practise: From now until the exam! DO NOW: The ONLY essay question you have not completed, either in class or as a homework task is below.
The Working Memory Model LO: To describe the main components in the working memory model.
The Working Model of Memory L.O. Outline the WMM. L.O. Explain key studies. L.O. Evaluate its usefulness.
Evidence and Evaluation of WMM. Capacity of the ARTICULATORY LOOP Baddeley et al (1975) showed that people involved in a recall task could immediately.
Homework this week: revise for a test of all key terms so far on MONDAY 25 th FEBRUARY DO NOW: How do the pieces of research by Logie and Paulesu support.
Psychology Models of Memory. Outline the multi-store model The multi-store model, developed by Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968), is an information processing.
Cognitive Psychology The working Model of Memory By Baddeley and Hitch (1974)
Exam Questions & Mark Schemes
3.5 Evaluate two models of memory
The working memory model essay: top 3 mistakes which did you make? 1.Not saying what the studies show just what they found 2.Getting the details of the.
Try to remember as many nonsense syllables from the next slide as possible.
Topic 2 – Cognitive Psychology Lesson four – Working memory model 1.
Draw the WMM. Include as much detail as you can..
The Working Memory Model Baddeley & Hitch, The Working Memory Model The Diagram:
Working Memory Model Baddeley and Hitch (1974) developed an alternative model of short-term memory which they called working memory.
Cognitive Psychology Memory
Levels of Processing Memory Model (LoP)
The Working Memory Model cogmed
Feedback on Memory Mini-Mock
3.5 Evaluate two models of memory
WMM.
WMM Lesson 12.
Work this out in your heads in silence...
STM & LTM FEATURE SUPPORTING RESEARCH EVALUATIVE POINTS CAPACITY STM =
Memory: LTM Lesson 10.
Memory Models of Memory.
Baddely and Hitch (1974) theorised that STM must be made up of several components all of which are involved in processes other than simple storage.
MSM: evaluation Lesson 11.
PSYA1: Cognitive Psychology Memory
Evaluation of WMM.
Memory.
A2: Memory revision.
Working Memory Model Baddeley and Hitch (1974)
Evidence for the Working Memory Model.
To Do: Multistore model explained
P: there is real-life application for understanding different types of LTM. E: being able to identify different aspects of LTM allows psychologists to.
Start The working model was developed by
The Working Memory Model
Lesson 3: In pairs or 3’s, discuss what we have been talking about in the last two lessons What are the key terms? Main points? What did you learn that.
Learning Objectives To be able to answer short answer questions on ‘remembering and forgetting’ Well Done for giving up part of your holidays to come in.
Presentation transcript:

Learning Objectives To review key research for the working memory model To review knowledge and understanding of models of memory To apply knowledge to examination questions DO NOW: Complete the WMM template (on the whiteboard) with as much information as you can – what each component does, the research evidence – anything you can!

Starter Memory game!

Levels of Processing DIFFERENCE: MSM proposes that STM is a single unitary store, WMM proposes that it is made up of several distinct components with separate functions DIFFERENCE: A negative evaluation of the MSM is that we remember things we haven’t rehearsed. This is explained by the LoP explanation which states that (i) the type of information is important in remembering- semantic information is remembered best (ii) the idea of maintenance rehearsal leads to poorer recall than elaborative rehearsal DIFFERENCE: MSM proposes that STM is a passive store which can simply hold information temporarily, the WMM provides us with a more active model of human processing where information can be manipulated.

Introduction: the following are all key terms / pieces of information from yesterday’s lesson Dual tasks Word length effect Articulatory suppression Sub-system Think, Pair, Share: What is meant by each one of the key terms? Make a note of what each key term means!

Past Paper Questions: Memory Q1 According to the multi-store model, there are differences between short-term memory and long-term memory. Outline one way in which short-term memory and long-term memory differ. (2 marks) Q2 A researcher is investigating the levels of processing model of memory. He shows participants words printed on cards. Each card has a different word, for example ‘SACK’, ‘fake’ and ‘bread’. After each word, he asks one of the following three questions: oA: “Can you eat it?” oB: “Is it in capitals?” oC: “Does it rhyme with ‘lake’?” For each of the three questions (A, B and C), indicate which level of memory is most likely to be used when participants respond. Q3 Describe one study in which the working memory model was investigated. Indicate why the study was conducted, the method used, the results obtained and the conclusion drawn. (4 marks) Q4 Describe and evaluate the working memory model. Refer to empirical evidence in your answer. (10 marks) [AO1 = 5 AO2 = 5]

June 2009 PPQ 1 According to the multi-store model, there are differences between short-term memory and long-term memory. Outline one way in which short-term memory and long-term memory differ. (2 marks)

[AO1 = 2] AO1 One mark for identifying (by name or description) one difference and a further mark for relevant elaboration. Likely answers: Duration – lifelong in LTM/18/30 seconds STM; Capacity – 7+/- 2 in STM/ unlimited for LTM; Coding – mainly acoustic in STM/mainly semantic LTM; Types of forgetting.

June 2008 PPQ 2 A researcher is investigating the levels of processing model of memory. He shows participants words printed on cards. Each card has a different word, for example ‘SACK’, ‘fake’ and ‘bread’. After each word, he asks one of the following three questions: A: “Can you eat it?” B: “Is it in capitals?” C: “Does it rhyme with ‘lake’?” For each of the three questions (A, B and C), indicate which level of memory is most likely to be used when participants respond.

2 A researcher is investigating the levels of processing model of memory. He shows participants words printed on cards. Each card has a different word, for example ‘SACK’, ‘fake’ and ‘bread’. 1 AO1 mark each for identifying levels plus 1 AO2 mark each for correctly linking questions with levels as follows: “Can you eat it?” - Semantic/deep “Is it in capitals?” - Structural/shallow/visual/orthographic “Does it rhyme with ‘lake’?” - Phonetic/phonological/acoustic Note: if levels are correctly identified but not correctly linked, 1 mark for each level should be awarded.

June 2009 PPQ 3 Describe one study in which the working memory model was investigated. Indicate why the study was conducted, the method used, the results obtained and the conclusion drawn. (4 marks)

[AO1 = 4] AO1 Likely studies include: Paulescu et al (1993), Logie et al (1989), Robbins et al (1996), Hunt (1980), Brooks (1968), Baddeley, Thomson and Buchanan (1975), Hoosain and Salili (1988), Hulme, Thomson, Muir and Lawrence (1984), Levey, Aldaz, Watts and Coyle (1991), Baddeley et al (1998). 1 mark – why the study was conducted (must go beyond the stem) 1 mark – information about the method 1 mark – indication of results 1 mark – indication of a conclusion to be drawn

January Describe and evaluate the working memory model. Refer to empirical evidence in your answer. (10 marks) [AO1 = 5 AO2 = 5]

4. Describe and evaluate the working memory model. Refer to empirical evidence in your answer. (10 marks) AO1 Up to 5 marks for description with up to 3 marks for definition/description of features of the model: a central executive with series of subsystems which are named/described: articulatory loop/articulatory control system/‘inner voice’; primary acoustic/phonological store/‘inner ear’; visuo-spatial sketchpad/scratchpad/‘inner eye’; phonological loop; limited capacity; episodic buffer; limited/short duration/ short term memory. Description of how model works, eg the central executive allocates data to slave systems, or the idea that dual tasks are unimpaired if they rely on different subsystem/slave components. Credit description of relevant studies up to 2 marks. Likely studies include: Brooks (1968), Baddeley, Thomson and Buchanan (1975), Hoosain and Salili (1988), Hulme, Thomson, Muir and Lawrence (1984), Levey, Aldaz, Watts and Coyle (1991), Paulesu et al (1993), Baddeley et al (1998). AO2 Up to 5 marks. Application of knowledge of the model to examples, eg use of articulatory loop as temporary store for short sequences of words or digits, use of VSS for navigation. Analysis of the implication of studies. Evaluation of the model including support from studies and practical application/relevance and comparison with other models eg, the multistore model view of STM.

Plenary Peer review of the questions One achievement, one target