1 Randomized Block Design In chapter on paired t-tests, we learned to “match” subjects on variables that: – influence performance – but are not of interest.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The t Test for Two Independent Samples
Advertisements

Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1 Computer Systems Organization & Architecture Chapters 8-12 John D. Carpinelli.
Chapter 1 The Study of Body Function Image PowerPoint
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Appendix 01.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
CALENDAR.
Mean, Median, Mode & Range
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
Year 6 mental test 5 second questions
Year 6 mental test 10 second questions
Overview of Lecture Partitioning Evaluating the Null Hypothesis ANOVA
C82MST Statistical Methods 2 - Lecture 2 1 Overview of Lecture Variability and Averages The Normal Distribution Comparing Population Variances Experimental.
Overview of Lecture Factorial Designs Experimental Design Names
Lecture 2 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE: AN INTRODUCTION
1 Contact details Colin Gray Room S16 (occasionally) address: Telephone: (27) 2233 Dont hesitate to get in touch.
The 5S numbers game..
Biostatistics Unit 5 Samples Needs to be completed. 12/24/13.
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
The basics for simulations
Elementary Statistics
Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e © 2005 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 10-1 Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach 6 th Edition Chapter.
(This presentation may be used for instructional purposes)
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
ABC Technology Project
Chi-Square and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Hypothesis Tests: Two Independent Samples
Statistics Review – Part I
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
1..
Lecture Unit Multiple Regression.
Chapter 15 ANOVA.
Comparing Two Population Parameters
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
Before Between After.
Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Statistics for the Social Sciences
Week 1.
Statistical Inferences Based on Two Samples
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Chapter 10 Testing the Difference between Means and Variances.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
Chapter Thirteen The One-Way Analysis of Variance.
Ch 14 實習(2).
Clock will move after 1 minute
Intracellular Compartments and Transport
PSSA Preparation.
Chapter 11: The t Test for Two Related Samples
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved Chapter 11 Simple Linear Regression.
Experimental Design and Analysis of Variance
Essential Cell Biology
1 Chapter 20: Statistical Tests for Ordinal Data.
Lecture 11 One-way analysis of variance (Chapter 15.2)
Schutzvermerk nach DIN 34 beachten 05/04/15 Seite 1 Training EPAM and CANopen Basic Solution: Password * * Level 1 Level 2 * Level 3 Password2 IP-Adr.
1 One Way Analysis of Variance – Designed experiments usually involve comparisons among more than two means. – The use of Z or t tests with more than two.
1 Randomized Block Design 1.Randomized block design 2.Sums of squares in the RBD 3.Where does SS B come from? 4.Conceptual formulas 5.Summary table 6.Computational.
Chapter 17 Comparing Multiple Population Means: One-factor ANOVA.
Tests after a significant F
1 Lecture 15 One Way Analysis of Variance  Designed experiments usually involve comparisons among more than two means.  The use of Z or t tests with.
Randomized Block Design
Presentation transcript:

1 Randomized Block Design In chapter on paired t-tests, we learned to “match” subjects on variables that: – influence performance – but are not of interest. Matching gives a more sensitive test of H 0 because it removes sources of variance that inflate  2. Lecture 17

2 Randomized Block Design (RBD) In the analysis of variance, the matched subjects design is called the Randomized Block Design. – subjects are first put into blocks a block is a group matched on some variable – subjects in a block are then randomly assigned to treatments – for p treatments, you need p subjects per block Lecture 17

3 Sums of squares in the RBD We compute SS Treat as before. Compute SS B (SS for Blocks) analogously: – Compute deviations of block means from grand mean. – Square deviations, then add them up. SS Total is composed of SS Treat + SS E. Does SS B come from SS Treat or from SS E ? Lecture 17

4 Where does SS B come from? Lecture 17 SSTotal Residual SS E SS B SS E SS T

5 Conceptual Formulas SS T = Σb(X Ti – X G ) 2 p-1 SS B = Σp(X Bi – X G ) 2 b-1 SS Total = Σ(X i – X G ) 2 n-1 SS E = SS Total – SS T – SS B (b-1)(p-1) = n-b-p+1 MST = SST/(p-1) MSB = SSB/(b-1) MSE = SSE/(b-1)(p-1) = SSE/(n-b-p+1) Lecture 17

6 Summary table Sourcedf SSMS F Treatp-1 SS Treat SS T /(p-1) MS T /MS E Blocksb-1 SS B SS B /(b-1) MS B /MS E Error n-p-b+1 SS E SS E /(n-b-p+1) Totaln-1 SS Total Lecture 17

7 Computational Formulas CM = (ΣX) 2 SS Total = ΣX 2 – CM n SS Treat = ΣT 2 i – CMSS B = ΣB 2 i – CM b p SS E = SS Total – SS T – SS B p=# of samplesT i =Total for i th treatment b=# of blocksB i =Total for i th block Lecture 17

8 Randomized Block Design – Example 1a 1. Five Grade 10 high school students in an advanced math program are tested at the beginning of the term. Later in the term, they write a midterm and then a final exam. Each test/exam contains similar mathematics problems, and a comparison will be done to see whether significant differences exist between mean scores on the 3 exams. The students’ scores on the exams are: StudentFirst examMidtermFinal Grumpy Sneezy Dopey Goofy Sleepy Lecture 17

9 Randomized Block Design – Example 1a a. Is there an overall significant difference between mean scores on the 3 exams (  =.05). b. Although no specific predictions were made beforehand, after inspecting the data it could be seen that Sneezy consistently obtained higher exam scores than Goofy. Regardless of the results of your analysis in part (a), perform a post-hoc test to determine whether Sneezy and Goofy differ significantly on their overall average on the 3 exams (  =.05). Lecture 17

10 Randomized Block Design – Example 1a H 0 :  1 =  2 =  3 H A : At least two differ significantly Statistical test:F = MST MSE Rej. region:F obt > F (2, 8,.05) = 4.46 Lecture 17

11 Randomized Block Design – Example 1a CM = SS Total = ΣX 2 – CM = … – = – = Lecture 17

12 Randomized Block Design – Example 1a SS Treat = Σ(T i 2 ) – CM b = – = – = 98.8 Lecture 17

13 Randomized Block Design – Example 1a SS B = ΣB 2 i – CM p SS B = … – = – = Lecture 17

14 Randomized Block Design – Example 1a SS E = SS Total – SS Treat – SS B = – 98.8 – = Lecture 17

15 Randomized Block Design – Example 1a SourcedfSSMSF Treat Blocks Error Total Decision: Reject H O – average scores do differ across exams. Lecture 17

16 Randomized Block Design – Example 1b H 0 :  w =  A H A :  W ≠  A (Note: this is a post-hoc test. We’ll do N-K.) Statistical test:Q = X i – X j √MSE/n Lecture 17

17 Randomized Block Design – Example 1b Rank order sample means: SleepySneezyGrumpyDopeyGoofy Q crit = Q (4, 8,.05) = 4.53 Lecture 17 r = 4

18 Randomized Block Design – Example 1b Q obt : 86 – 79.67=6.33= 6.35 √(2.984)/ Reject H O. Sneezy & Goofy differ significantly on their overall average on the 3 exams. Lecture 17

19 RBD Example 2 2. People in a weight loss program are weighed at the beginning of the program, 3 weeks after starting, and 3 months after starting. The following are the weights (in pounds) of a random sample of 5 participants at each of these time periods. PersonStart3 Wks3 Months Mickey Minnie Hewey Dewey Louie Lecture 17

20 RBD Example 2 a. Are there significant differences between weights across the 3 time periods? (  =.05) b. Regardless of your answer in part a., perform the appropriate tests to determine at which time periods the participants’ mean weights differ significantly. Lecture 17

21 Randomized Block Design – Example 2a H 0 :  1 =  2 =  3 H A : At least two differ significantly Statistical test:F = MS T MS E Rej. region:F obt > F (2, 8,.05) = 4.46 Lecture 17

22 Randomized Block Design – Example 2a CM = = SS Total = ΣX 2 – CM = … – = – = Lecture 17

23 Randomized Block Design – Example 2a SS Treat = Σ(T i 2 ) – CM b = – = – = Lecture 17

24 Randomized Block Design – Example 2a SS B = ΣB 2 i – CM p SS B = … – = – = Lecture 17

25 Randomized Block Design – Example 2a SS E = SS Total – SS Treat – SS B = – – = Lecture 17

26 Randomized Block Design – Example 2a SourcedfSSMSF Treat Blocks Error Total Decision: Reject H O – weights do differ across the 3 time periods. Lecture 17