Lesson #24 Multiple Comparisons. When doing ANOVA, suppose we reject H 0 :  1 =  2 =  3 = … =  k Next, we want to know which means differ. This does.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intro to ANOVA.
Advertisements

Dr. AJIT SAHAI Director – Professor Biometrics JIPMER, Pondicherry
Ch 14 實習(2).
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) ANOVA methods are widely used for comparing 2 or more population means from populations that are approximately normal in distribution.
Regression Part II One-factor ANOVA Another dummy variable coding scheme Contrasts Multiple comparisons Interactions.
Testing Differences Among Several Sample Means Multiple t Tests vs. Analysis of Variance.
POST HOC COMPARISONS A significant F in ANOVA tells you only that there is a difference among the groups, not which groups are different. Post hoc tests.
More on ANOVA. Overview ANOVA as Regression Comparison Methods.
Part I – MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS
ANOVA Determining Which Means Differ in Single Factor Models Determining Which Means Differ in Single Factor Models.
Comparing Means.
Lesson #23 Analysis of Variance. In Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), we have: H 0 :  1 =  2 =  3 = … =  k H 1 : at least one  i does not equal the others.
Intro to Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences PSYC 1900
Analysis of Variance Chapter 15 - continued Two-Factor Analysis of Variance - Example 15.3 –Suppose in Example 15.1, two factors are to be examined:
POST HOC COMPARISONS What is the Purpose?
PSY 1950 Post-hoc and Planned Comparisons October 6, 2008.
Lecture 9: One Way ANOVA Between Subjects
8. ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE 8.1 Elements of a Designed Experiment
Analyses of K-Group Designs : Omnibus F & Pairwise Comparisons ANOVA for multiple condition designs Pairwise comparisons and RH Testing Alpha inflation.
One-way Between Groups Analysis of Variance
Lecture 12 One-way Analysis of Variance (Chapter 15.2)
Post-hoc Tests for ANOVA Explaining significant differences in 1-way ANOVA.
K-group ANOVA & Pairwise Comparisons ANOVA for multiple condition designs Pairwise comparisons and RH Testing Alpha inflation & Correction LSD & HSD procedures.
Comparing Means.
Comparing Several Means: One-way ANOVA Lesson 14.
Statistical Methods in Computer Science Hypothesis Testing II: Single-Factor Experiments Ido Dagan.
Chapter 12: Analysis of Variance
Intermediate Applied Statistics STAT 460
Comparing Means. Anova F-test can be used to determine whether the expected responses at the t levels of an experimental factor differ from each other.
1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.
1 1 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Chapter 13 Experimental Design and Analysis of Variance nIntroduction to Experimental Design.
Multiple Comparisons.
Regression Part II One-factor ANOVA Another dummy variable coding scheme Contrasts Multiple comparisons Interactions.
Comparing Several Means: One-way ANOVA Lesson 15.
© Copyright McGraw-Hill CHAPTER 12 Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Introduction to Biostatistics, Harvard Extension School, Fall, 2005 © Scott Evans, Ph.D.1 Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Statistics 11 Confidence Interval Suppose you have a sample from a population You know the sample mean is an unbiased estimate of population mean Question:
Regression Part II One-factor ANOVA Another dummy variable coding scheme Contrasts Multiple comparisons Interactions.
STA MCP1 Multiple Comparisons: Example Study Objective: Test the effect of six varieties of wheat to a particular race of stem rust. Treatment:
Orthogonal Linear Contrasts This is a technique for partitioning ANOVA sum of squares into individual degrees of freedom.
Chapter 8 1-Way Analysis of Variance - Completely Randomized Design.
Psy 230 Jeopardy Related Samples t-test ANOVA shorthand ANOVA concepts Post hoc testsSurprise $100 $200$200 $300 $500 $400 $300 $400 $300 $400 $500 $400.
Quiz 11  Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)  post hoc tests.
Introduction to ANOVA Research Designs for ANOVAs Type I Error and Multiple Hypothesis Tests The Logic of ANOVA ANOVA vocabulary, notation, and formulas.
Topic 22: Inference. Outline Review One-way ANOVA Inference for means Differences in cell means Contrasts.
Simple ANOVA Comparing the Means of Three or More Groups Chapter 9.
Chapters Way Analysis of Variance - Completely Randomized Design.
Multiple comparisons 郭士逢 輔大生科系 2008 Advanced Biostatistics.
ANOVA: Why analyzing variance to compare means?.
1/54 Statistics Analysis of Variance. 2/54 Statistics in practice Introduction to Analysis of Variance Analysis of Variance: Testing for the Equality.
ANalysis Of VAriance (ANOVA) Used for continuous outcomes with a nominal exposure with three or more categories (groups) Result of test is F statistic.
Stats/Methods II JEOPARDY. Jeopardy Estimation ANOVA shorthand ANOVA concepts Post hoc testsSurprise $100 $200$200 $300 $500 $400 $300 $400 $300 $400.
Chapter 8 Analysis of METOC Variability. Contents 8.1. One-factor Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) 8.2. Partitioning of METOC Variability 8.3. Mathematical.
Posthoc Comparisons finding the differences. Statistical Significance What does a statistically significant F statistic, in a Oneway ANOVA, tell us? What.
Comparing Three or More Means
Statistics Analysis of Variance.
Multiple Comparisons Q560: Experimental Methods in Cognitive Science Lecture 10.
Post Hoc Tests on One-Way ANOVA
Statistics for Business and Economics (13e)
Post Hoc or Multiple Comparison Testing
Analysis of Treatment Means
After ANOVA If your F < F critical: Null not rejected, stop right now!! If your F > F critical: Null rejected, now figure out which of the multiple means.
Multiple Comparisons: Example
Do you know population SD? Use Z Test Are there only 2 groups to
1-Way Analysis of Variance - Completely Randomized Design
Experimental Statistics - Week 4 (Lab)
One Way ANOVAs One Way ANOVAs
Comparing Means.
Analysis of Treatment Means
1-Way Analysis of Variance - Completely Randomized Design
Presentation transcript:

Lesson #24 Multiple Comparisons

When doing ANOVA, suppose we reject H 0 :  1 =  2 =  3 = … =  k Next, we want to know which means differ. This does not protect the overall significance level, Do not perform a series of two-sample t-tests! which is the probability of making at least one Type I error in this series of comparisons.

A good multiple comparison procedure protects this overall significance level. It is not “inflated”, as it would be with a series of simple t-tests, each performed at  =.05. Many such procedures exist: - Scheffe’ (conservative) - Tukey (developed for pairwise comparisons) - Bonferroni (divide overall  by # tests) - Duncan (liberal)

Each procedure compares the difference of sample means to a “critical range”, or “minimum significant difference”, which depend on: We conclude that population means differ if their corresponding sample means differ by at least the minimum significant difference. - the procedure being used - the overall significance level,  - k (the number of “treatments”) - sample sizes - MS ERROR