Benchmarking of INTOSAI’s standard-setting PSC - INTOSAI Professional Standards Committee.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 A New Yorker Cartoon (In Reverse). 2 Introduction – the IAESB (International Accounting Education Standards Board) - Formally the IFAC Education Committee.

Advertisements

International Federation of Accountants Definition of Professional Accountant Bob Rutherford IESBA Meeting New York, USA October 2011.

SAI Performance Measurement Framework

1 Revision of ISSAI 30 – Code of Ethics Project proposal to the Steering Committee of the INTOSAI Professional Standards Committee Bahrain, May 2014.

The Institute of Internal Auditors Public Sector Updates Rob Newsome INTOSAI Professional Standards Committee Meeting May , Johannesburg,

INTOSAI Working Group on Public Debt Chairman’s Report Mr. Roberto Salcedo Aquino Representative of the WGPD’s Chair INTOSAI Working Group on Public Debt.

International Federation of Accountants International Education Standards for Professional Accountants Mark Allison, Executive Director Institute of Chartered.

Effective Internal Control, Establishing an Internal Audit Function, and Compliance Plans 2014 Governmental Accounting For Local Public Health September.

News from the Professional Standards Committee Bettina Jakobsen Chair of the PSC.

Due Process – ISSAIs and INTOSAI GOVs Roberto José Domínguez Moro Superior Audit Office of Mexico INTOSAI Working Group on Public Debt October, 2009.

INTOSAI and IFAC Robert F. Dacey Chief Accountant US Government Accountability Office.

The Institute of Internal Auditors: Serving the Global Internal Auditing Profession Gerry Cox, CMIIA, CIA, CRMA, Chief Executive, South.

PSC INTOSAI Professional Standards Committee News from the PSC Nanna Schnipper The PSC Secretariat.

Presentation to the INTOSAI PSC May 2014 Phil Tarling, CIA, CRMA, CMIIA Past Chairman of the IIA Board Developing The International Standards.

Revision of ISSAI 30 INTOSAI Code of Ethics

Development and Convergence of Auditing Standards and Methodology EUROSAI Seminar on Financial Audit Standards October 2008 Deputy Director General Kelly.

WGPD’s Administrative Matters Roberto José Domínguez Moro Superior Audit Office of Mexico INTOSAI Working Group on Public Debt.

Working Group on Public Debt Progress Report 6th Meeting of the Steering Committee of the INTOSAI Committee on the Knowledge Sharing and Knowledge Services.

Organically evolving CBC opportunities and areas of work INTOSAI Capacity Building Committee - Meeting in Lima, Peru 9-11 September 2014.

Michael Nugent. Sustainability Reporting An External Audit Perspective Michael Nugent IFAC.

INTOSAI Subcommittee on Internal Control Standards – achievements to date Subcommittee meeting, Vilnius, May 2014.

International Federation of Accountants International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board Status of Clarity Project and Other Activities INTOSAI PSC.

NASBA Role of State Regulators in Global Standards Setting Bob Bunting, Deputy President October 29, 2008.

PSC INTOSAI Professional Standards Committee Raising awareness of the ISSAIs and INTOSAI GOVs Presentation by (name and title) (venue and date) 1.

INTOSAI Task Force Global Financial Crisis - Challenges for SAIs and the WGPD Roberto José Domínguez Moro Superior Audit Office of Mexico INTOSAI Working.

The PSC in cooperation with CBC and KSC To adress technical standard-setting issues Proposal elaborated by the PSC – discussion in GB 2015 Consultation.

INTOSAI Professional Standards Committee Due process – why? Suggested by subcommittee chairs… To ensure… Transparency Accountability Consistency and high.

CBC Steering Committee Chaired by CBC Vice Chair Mr Magnus Lindell 1 INTOSAI CBC Steering Committee Meeting in Stockholm, Sweden.

2nd PEM-PAL plenary Zagreb January 28, 2011

Harmonization Project FAS Meeting Harmonization project and ISSAI 200 Purpose and scope of the project The purpose is to provide a conceptual basis.

Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices Working Group on Audit Manuals and Methods March 2006 Vilnius (Lithuania) Hungarian Experiences.

INTOSAI Capacity Building Committee Report to the KSC Steering Committee October 2015 Magnus Lindell CBC Vice Chair and Deputy Auditor General of Sweden.

EUROSAI Professional Standards – Goal Team 2 Brief introduction Cristina Breden Mária Kysucká Vilnius, September 2012.

WGPD’s Administrative Matters Roberto José Domínguez Moro Superior Audit Office of Mexico INTOSAI Working Group on Public Debt Mexico City, June 14-15,

INTOSAI's Capacity Building Committee Annual Meeting High-level Update on the ‎INTOSAI's Strategic Planning Process By: H.E Mr. Osama Faquih Stockholm.

Professionalization?.  The three levels of INTOSAI  Results from the survey to regions on professionalization  Information flow in INTOSAI  Function.

Due Process – ISSAIs and INTOSAI GOVs Roberto José Domínguez Moro Superior Audit Office of Mexico INTOSAI Working Group on Public Debt October, 2009.

Slide 1 ROAD TO EUROPE – PROGRAM OF ACCOUNTING REPORTING AND INSTITUTIONAL STRENGTHENING How can the European Federation of Accountants (FEE) Assist ?

37,000 returning visitors at INTOSAI’s professional standards = 78 ISSAIs and 10 INTOSAI GOVs.

Due Process – ISSAIs and INTOSAI GOVs Roberto José Domínguez Moro Superior Audit Office of Mexico INTOSAI Working Group on Public Debt June 14, 2010.

Globaliia.org From Dubai to Beijing (How we use your GC input) Anton van Wyk, Chairman of the Board.

37,000 returning visitors at INTOSAI’s professional standards = 78 ISSAIs and 10 INTOSAI GOVs.

Decisions by the Governing Board ‘14 1.FAC to be extended with the chairs of goal 1, 2 and 3 (requires revision of INTOSAI Statutes) 2.To be considered.

Annual Report Constitution Public Audit Act Public Finance Management Act Other legislation Minister of Finance Establishment and operations National.

PSC INTOSAI Professional Standards Committee Due Process for INTOSAI Professional Standards Revision by 2016.

PSC INTOSAI Professional Standards Committee Due process Initial assessment Project Proposal Drafting by project group/ Subcommittee Exposure Draft Approval.

Introducing the ISSAIs and INTOSAI GOVs 1 PSC The Professional Standards Committee.

EVALUATION OF THE SEE SARMa Project. Content Project management structure Internal evaluation External evaluation Evaluation report.

February 2010 – Task Force finalized draft for discussion with IAASB and IAASB CAG in March 2010 IAASB expected to approve draft for public exposure in.

IAASB –February 2010 – Task Force finalized draft for discussion with IAASB and IAASB CAG in March 2010 –June approval of exposure draft IESBA –Closely.

1 International Education Standards for Professional Accountants Mark Allison, Executive Director Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland and Technical.

PSC INTOSAI Professional Standards Committee PSC’s mandate Evaluate and improve the standard-setting processes in close cooperation with the INTOSAI.

Agenda Item No. 25 INTOSAI Strategic Plan ( ) Strategic objectives and goals of KSC (Goal 3) SAI-India Comptroller and Auditor General of India1.

International Standards of Supreme Audit Institutions (ISSAIs) Jennifer Thomson Director OPSPF & Chief Financial Management Officer World Bank.

The International Professional Practices Framework

SSB Governance Matters James Gunn Managing Director, Professional Standards IAASB IAESB IESBA IPSASB.

Strategic Objectives for Goal 1 Draft Strategic Plan for INTOSAI 2017 – 2022 Provide a strong organizational framework to support INTOSAI’s standard- setting.

International Federation of Accountants

CAS Annual Meeting New Delhi 20th February 2017.

Jacek Gdański Accounting Department

Setting Actuarial Standards

Highlights of the new INTOSAI Strategic Plan

External Audit Core PFM Training Program Sanjay Vani

CBC Steering Committee Meeting

Agenda Item No. 25 KSC Work Plan

9th KSC Steering Committee Meeting

PSC survey Survey is one input out of several to the evaluation report

Standard Setting – Input to Benchmarking

Due Process for INTOSAI Professional Standards

Lyn Provost, IAASB Member and Task Force Chair IAASB Meeting

Presentation transcript:

Benchmarking of INTOSAI’s standard-setting PSC - INTOSAI Professional Standards Committee

Benchmarks so far INTOSAI IAASB (IFAC) IIA (IPPF) GAO (Yellow Book) Good practice according to INTOSAI GOV 9200 Others might follow in the future…

Elements of the benchmarking 1.Advisory body / stakeholder panel? 2.Governance / oversight body? 3.Who decides the content of the standards? 4.Who develops the standards? 5.Administrative support? 6.Financing? 7.Implementation? 8.Responsiveness? 9.Transparancy?

Overview ElementINTOSAIIAASBIIAGAOINTOSAI GOV 9200 StakeholdersVery limitedYes OversightFormally yes (GB)Yes (Yes)Yes DecidingFormal competencies in 3 SC (PSC, KSC, CBC) Board – IAASB 17 members and full-time chair Board – IIASB Min. 14 members GAO Input from Advisory Council and GAO audit standard team Independent selection procedure for emers of standard- setting body DevelopingProject groups and task forces Task Force with IAASB member as team leader. Secr assists drafting Project team w team leader. GAO audit standards team. Standards usually developed w input from a task force and experts Adm supportLimited (PSC secr.) No support to project groups or drafting. Yes Adequate resources should be available FinancingIn-kind No funding of expenses Yes (employees) Adequate resources should be available ImplementationIDI, subcom- mittees, PSC Secr Yes N/A ResponsivenessSome degree…YesSome degreeYes TransparancyYes

Key results I 1.Input from external stakeholders  Important to all. GAO, IAASB and the IIA has formalized their stakeholder input in permanent advisory bodies. Their role differ; review or comment on the content and assess compliance with due process 2.Oversight body  All include some form of oversight function. Some oversight functions include representatives of external stakeholders.

Key results II 3.Who decides the content of the standards?  For IAASB and IIA content is decided by a board with personal membership. In GAO content is ultimately decided by the Comptroller General. 4.Who develops the drafts?  Various forms of task forces or project teams consisting of qualified experts (auditing, methodology and/or standards).

Key results III 5.Administrative support?  All rely on administrative support. 6.Financing?  Financial models differ, but all benchmarks include some form of financing mostly in form of covering travel and accommodation costs. 7.Implementation support  Implementation systems and various implementation tools are in place.

Key results IV 8.Responsiveness?  Feedback systems differ; either based on questions and responses received or based on monitoring and providing inputs on needed revisions. 9.Transparency?  All have exposure periods of minimum 90 days and comments are made public.

Conclusions for inspiration…  Input from external stakeholders and wider recognition is important  Some form of oversight and coordination is necessary  Content of standards are decided by experts  Standard setters recieve administrative support.  Standard setting requires funding and adequate resources. Standards are developed by various forms of task forces etc.  Feedback from users is important  Standard setting must be transparent  Support for implementation is crucial